Case Studies
May 7, 2024

Incorporating Facility Diversity into Measuring Accessibility to Transit: A Case Study in Beijing

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 150, Issue 3

Abstract

Transit as an alternative means of travel allows travelers to access a wide range of activities and services. In addition to focusing on how many job opportunities and other basic urban services such as parks and healthcare can be accessed by transit, more attention should be paid to how many transit services can be obtained and how easy it is to access them. It should be noted that accessibility by transit and accessibility to transit are not the same thing, and most existing studies tend to focus on the former while ignoring the measurement of the latter. However, accessibility to transit is an important concept that can provide a framework for understanding and explaining the availability of transit services. In the literature, transit is more often used as a tool for accessing activities and opportunities to analyze the basic services such as healthcare resources and job opportunities that can be accessed, which not only ignores the transit service provided by the means of transit as a supplying facility, but also ignores the diversity of facilities in the integrated public transportation system. With this in mind, this paper introduces the entropy index into the adjusted Gaussian two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method to measure accessibility to transit to capture how the overall accessibility changes when considering different transit facilities. From the spatial distribution of accessibility, the areas with high accessibility score are distributed in the six core administrative districts of Beijing, accounting for 99.3% of the grids with high accessibility scores. When considering facility diversity, 46.7% of the grids within the core administrative districts experience an increase in their accessibility rank, and there is an increase in the number of grids with high accessibility. The research results indicate that considering facility diversity enhances the accessibility level of grids, elucidates the diversity differences in each area, and provides valuable information for the location selection of transit facilities and urban planning. The applicability of the proposed method to Beijing illustrates that it can provide valuable insights for the measurement of accessibility, which can help planners obtain more effective evaluation results.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support for this study provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 52272319).

References

Abrishami, M., and B. Chamberlain. 2023. “Comparing transportation metrics to measure accessibility to community amenities.” J. Digital Landscape Archit. 8: 342–350.
Chen, W., L. Cheng, X. Chen, J. Chen, and M. Cao. 2021. “Measuring accessibility to health care services for older bus passengers: A finer spatial resolution.” J. Transp. Geogr. 93: 103068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103068.
Cheng, J., and L. Bertolini. 2013. “Measuring urban job accessibility with distance decay, competition and diversity.” J. Transp. Geogr. 30: 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.03.005.
Currie, G. 2010. “Quantifying spatial gaps in public transport supply based on social needs.” J. Transp. Geogr. 18 (1): 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.12.002.
Dai, T., Z. Liu, C. Liao, and H. Cai. 2018. “Incorporating job diversity preference into measuring job accessibility.” Cities 78: 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.003.
Daniels, R., and C. Mulley. 2013. “Explaining walking distance to public transport: The dominance of public transport supply.” J. Transp. Land Use 6 (2): 5–20. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v6i2.308.
Delamater, P. L. 2013. “Spatial accessibility in suboptimally configured health care systems: A modified two-step floating catchment area (M2SFCA) metric.” Health Place 24: 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.07.012.
Delmelle, E. C., and I. Casas. 2012. “Evaluating the spatial equity of bus rapid transit-based accessibility patterns in a developing country: The case of Cali, Colombia.” Transp. Policy 20: 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.12.001.
Desjardins, E., C. D. Higgins, and A. Páez. 2022. “Examining equity in accessibility to bike share: A balanced floating catchment area approach.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 102: 103091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103091.
El-Geneidy, A., R. Buliung, E. Diab, D. Van Lierop, M. Langlois, and A. Legrain. 2015. “Non-stop equity: Assessing daily intersections between transit accessibility and social disparity across the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA).” Environ. Plann. B: Planning and Design 43 (3): 1350–1360.
El-Geneidy, A., M. Grimsrud, R. Wasfi, P. Tétreault, and J. Surprenant-Legault. 2014. “New evidence on walking distances to transit stops: Identifying redundancies and gaps using variable service areas.” Transportation 41 (1): 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9508-z.
El Murr, K., G. Boisjoly, and E. O. D. Waygood. 2023. “Measuring accessibility to parks: Analyzing the relationship between self-reported and calculated measures.” J. Transp. Geogr. 107: 103550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103550.
Farber, S., M. Z. Morang, and M. J. Widener. 2014. “Temporal variability in transit-based accessibility to supermarkets.” Appl. Geogr. 53: 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.012.
Foth, N., K. Manaugh, and A. M. El-Geneidy. 2013. “Towards equitable transit: Examining transit accessibility and social need in Toronto, Canada, 1996–2006.” J. Transp. Geogr. 29: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.12.008.
Frank, L. D., T. L. Schmid, J. F. Sallis, J. Chapman, and B. E. Saelens. 2005. “Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ.” Am. J. Preventive Med. 28 (2): 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001.
Fransen, K., T. Neutens, S. Farber, P. De Maeyer, G. Deruyter, and F. Witlox. 2015. “Identifying public transport gaps using time-dependent accessibility levels.” J. Transp. Geogr. 48: 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.09.008.
Geurs, K. T., and B. van Wee. 2004. “Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions.” J. Transp. Geogr. 12 (2): 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005.
Gu, Z., X. Luo, M. Tang, and X. Liu. 2023. “Does the edge effect impact the healthcare equity? An examination of the equity in hospitals accessibility in the edge city in multi-scale.” J. Transp. Geogr. 106: 103513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103513.
Guan, J., K. Zhang, Q. Shen, and Y. He. 2020. “Dynamic modal accessibility gap: Measurement and application using travel routes data.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 81: 102272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102272.
Handy, S. L., and D. A. Niemeier. 1997. “Measuring accessibility: An exploration of issues and alternatives.” Environ. Plann. A: Econ. Space 29 (7): 1175–1194. https://doi.org/10.1068/a291175.
Hansen, W. G. 1959. “How accessibility shapes land use.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 25 (2): 73–76.
Hussain, E., A. Bhaskar, and E. Chung. 2021. “A novel origin destination based transit supply index: Exploiting the opportunities with big transit data.” J. Transp. Geogr. 93: 103040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103040.
Langford, M., R. Fry, and G. Higgs. 2012. “Measuring transit system accessibility using a modified two-step floating catchment technique.” Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 26 (2): 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.574140.
Luo, W., and Y. Qi. 2009. “An enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method for measuring spatial accessibility to primary care physicians.” Health Place 15 (4): 1100–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.06.002.
Luo, W., and F. Wang. 2003. “Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: Synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Design 30 (6): 865–884. https://doi.org/10.1068/b29120.
Mavoa, S., S. Eagleson, H. M. Badland, L. Gunn, C. Boulange, J. Stewart, and B. Giles-Corti. 2018. “Identifying appropriate land-use mix measures for use in a national walkability index.” J. Transp. Land Use 11 (1): 681–700. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1132.
McGrail, M. R., and J. S. Humphreys. 2014. “Measuring spatial accessibility to primary health care services: Utilising dynamic catchment sizes.” Appl. Geogr. 54: 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.08.005.
Millward, H., J. Spinney, and D. Scott. 2013. “Active-transport walking behavior: Destinations, durations, distances.” J. Transp. Geogr. 28: 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.012.
O’Driscoll, C., F. Crowley, J. Doran, and N. McCarthy. 2023. “Land-use mixing in Irish cities: Implications for sustainable development.” Land Use Policy 128: 106615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106615.
Paez, A., C. D. Higgins, and S. F. Vivona. 2019. “Demand and level of service inflation in floating catchment area (FCA) methods.” PLoS One 14 (6): e0218773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218773.
Páez, A., D. M. Scott, and C. Morency. 2012. “Measuring accessibility: Positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators.” J. Transp. Geogr. 25: 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016.
Pereira, R. H., C. K. V. Braga, L. M. Servo, B. Serra, P. Amaral, N. Gouveia, and A. Paez. 2021. “Geographic access to COVID-19 healthcare in Brazil using a balanced float catchment area approach.” Social Sci. Med. 273 (1): 113773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113773.
Pereira, R. H. M. 2019. “Future accessibility impacts of transport policy scenarios: Equity and sensitivity to travel time thresholds for bus rapid transit expansion in Rio de Janeiro.” J. Transp. Geogr. 74: 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.12.005.
Pinto, D. G. L., C. F. G. Loureiro, F. F. L. de Matos Sousa, and B. Motte-Baumvol. 2023. “The effects of informality on socio-spatial inequalities in accessibility to job opportunities: Evidence from Fortaleza, Brazil.” J. Transp. Geogr. 108: 103577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103577.
Pirie, G. H. 1979. “Measuring accessibility: A review and proposal.” Environ. Plann. A: Econ. Space 11 (3): 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1068/a110299.
Saif, M. A., M. M. Zefreh, and A. Torok. 2019. “Public transport accessibility: A literature review.” Period. Polytech. Transp. Eng. 47 (1): 36–43. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.12072.
Stępniak, M., S. Goliszek, I. Ivan, A. Singleton, J. Horák, and T. Inspektor. 2017. Spatio-temporal variation of accessibility by public transport—The equity perspective, 241–261. Cham: Springer International.
Sun, C., J. Cheng, A. Lin, and M. Peng. 2018. “Gated university campus and its implications for socio-spatial inequality: Evidence from students’ accessibility to local public transport.” Habitat Int. 80: 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.08.008.
Tao, Z., J. Zhou, X. Lin, H. Chao, and G. Li. 2020. “Investigating the impacts of public transport on job accessibility in Shenzhen, China: A multi-modal approach.” Land Use Policy 99: 105025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105025.
Vale, D. S., M. Saraiva, and M. Pereira. 2015. “Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility.” J. Transp. Land Use 9 (1): 1–27.
van Soest, D., M. R. Tight, and C. D. F. Rogers. 2020. “Exploring the distances people walk to access public transport.” Transp. Rev. 40 (2): 160–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1575491.
van Wee, B., and T. de Jong. 2023. “Differences in levels of accessibility: The importance of spatial scale when measuring distributions of the accessibility of health and emergency services.” J. Transp. Geogr. 106: 103511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103511.
Venter, C. J. 2020. “Measuring the quality of the first/last mile connection to public transport.” Res. Transp. Econ. 83: 100949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100949.
Wan, N., B. Zou, and T. Sternberg. 2012. “A three-step floating catchment area method for analyzing spatial access to health services.” Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 26 (6): 1073–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.624987.
Wang, F. 2018. “Inverted two-step floating catchment area method for measuring facility crowdedness.” Prof. Geogr. 70 (2): 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2017.1365308.
Xiao, W., Y. D. Wei, and N. Wan. 2021. “Modeling job accessibility using online map data: An extended two-step floating catchment area method with multiple travel modes.” J. Transp. Geogr. 93: 103065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103065.
Xu, W., Y. Ding, J. Zhou, and Y. Li. 2015. “Transit accessibility measures incorporating the temporal dimension.” Cities 46: 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.002.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 150Issue 3September 2024

History

Received: Sep 5, 2023
Accepted: Mar 6, 2024
Published online: May 7, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 7, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, School of Transportation, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0170-0365. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Transportation, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Transportation, Southeast Univ., Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2346-1315. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share