Case Studies
May 22, 2024

Measuring Urban Form and Its Effects on Urban Vitality in Seoul, South Korea: Urban Morphometric Approach

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 150, Issue 3

Abstract

Urban vitality is a core feature of sustainable cities and neighborhoods. Acknowledging the significant role of the spatial and physical attributes of built urban landscapes in influencing urban vitality, scholars and planners in the field of urban studies have meticulously examined the relationship between urban morphology and variations in urban vitality. While most previous studies have primarily focused on a narrow range of factors when analyzing urban form, often neglecting its multifaceted nature, this study utilizes urban morphometrics using Python's Momepy library to offer a comprehensive typology. It integrates diverse urban components from individual buildings and streets to entire neighborhoods into a unified, holistic framework, providing a more integrated understanding of urban form's influence on urban vitality. Our spatial econometric models identified higher building floor areas, taller and narrower streetside buildings, diversely aged buildings, and higher building coverings on lots as favorable urban form settings for urban vitality. Measuring urban morphology with advanced methods and identifying their relationship to urban vitality provides insightful implications for urban planners and designers for creating vibrant cities and neighborhoods.

Practical Applications

This study utilizes advanced methods to assess the design and layout of cities and neighborhoods and analyzes their effects on urban vitality. The Momepy Python package is used in this study to capture urban form in terms of size, density, layout, diversity, and connectedness. This study measures how diverse urban morphologies affect the variation of urban vitality captured by mobile phone data. This study introduces an integrated approach that identifies spatial relationships between buildings and street networks into a comprehensive framework. This holistic approach can suggest effective strategies for decision-making by urban planners and policymakers to create livable and sustainable cities and neighborhoods. Moreover, this study reveals how the effects of the urban morphology on urban vitality vary depending on the time of day and day of the week. The core findings suggest that urban planners and designers should consider spatial configurations of buildings and streets as well as residents’ behavior over time.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2022S1A5A2A01038246).

References

Annunziata, A., and C. Garau. 2021. “A literature review on the assessment of vitality and its theoretical framework. Emerging perspectives for geodesign in the urban context.” In Proc., 21st Int. Conf. on Computational Science and its Applications, edited by O. Gervasi et al., 305–322. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Anselin, L., and S. J. Rey. 2014. Modern spatial econometrics in practice: A guide to GeoDa, GeoDaSpace and PySAL. Chicago, IL: GeoDa Press LLC.
Araldi, A., and G. Fusco. 2019. “From the street to the metropolitan region: Pedestrian perspective in urban fabric analysis.” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 46 (7): 1243–1263. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319832612.
Argin, G., B. Pak, and H. Turkoglu. 2020. “Between post-flâneur and smartphone zombie: Smartphone users’ altering visual attention and walking behavior in public space.” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9 (12): 700. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9120700.
Boccalatte, A., M. Thebault, C. Ménézo, J. Ramousse, and M. Fossa. 2022. “Evaluating the impact of urban morphology on rooftop solar radiation: A new city-scale approach based on Geneva GIS data.” Energy Build. 260 (1): 111919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111919.
Brenner, N., and C. Schmid. 2015. “Planetary urbanization.” In Implosions/explosions, edited by B. Neil, 160–163. Berlin: JOVIS.
Caruso, G., M. Hilal, and I. Thomas. 2017. “Measuring urban forms from inter-building distances: Combining MST graphs with a Local Index of Spatial Association.” Landscape Urban Plann. 163: 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.003.
Chen, L., Y. Lu, Y. Ye, Y. Xiao, and L. Yang. 2022a. “Examining the association between the built environment and pedestrian volume using street view images.” Cities 127: 103734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103734.
Chen, Y., B. Yu, B. Shu, L. Yang, and R. Wang. 2023. “Exploring the spatiotemporal patterns and correlates of urban vitality: Temporal and spatial heterogeneity.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 91: 104440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104440.
Chen, Z., B. Dong, Q. Pei, and Z. Zhang. 2022b. “The impacts of urban vitality and urban density on innovation: Evidence from China’s Greater Bay Area.” Habitat Int. 119: 102490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102490.
Crowley, M., and K. Stainback. 2019. “Retail sector concentration, local economic structure, and community well-being.” Annu. Rev. Sociol. 45 (1): 321–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022449.
Delclòs-Alió, X., A. Gutiérrez, and C. Miralles-Guasch. 2019. “The urban vitality conditions of Jane Jacobs in Barcelona: Residential and smartphone-based tracking measurements of the built environment in a Mediterranean metropolis.” Cities 86: 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.09.021.
Delclòs-Alió, X., and C. Miralles-Guasch. 2018. “Looking at Barcelona through Jane Jacobs’s eyes: Mapping the basic conditions for urban vitality in a Mediterranean conurbation.” Land Use Policy 75: 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.026.
Fan, Z., J. Duan, M. Luo, H. Zhan, M. Liu, and W. Peng. 2021. “How did built environment affect urban vitality in urban waterfronts? A case study in Nanjing reach of Yangtze river.” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 10 (9): 611. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10090611.
Fang, C., S. He, and L. Wang. 2021. “Spatial characterization of urban vitality and the association with various street network metrics from the multi-scalar perspective.” Front. Public Health 579: 1–13.
Fleischmann, M. 2019. “Momepy: Urban morphology measuring toolkit.” J. Open Source Software 4 (43): 1807. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01807.
Fleischmann, M., A. Feliciotti, O. Romice, and S. Porta. 2020. “Morphological tessellation as a way of partitioning space: Improving consistency in urban morphology at the plot scale.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 80: 101441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101441.
Foltête, J.-C., and A. Piombini. 2007. “Urban layout, landscape features and pedestrian usage.” Landscape Urban Plann. 81 (3): 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.12.001.
Fuentes, L., C. Miralles-Guasch, R. Truffello, X. Delclòs-Alió, M. Flores, and S. Rodríguez. 2020. “Santiago de Chile through the eyes of Jane Jacobs. Analysis of the conditions for urban vitality in a Latin American metropolis.” Land 9 (12): 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9120498.
Gehl, J. 2011. Life between buildings. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Gómez-Varo, I., X. Delclòs-Alió, and C. Miralles-Guasch. 2022. “Jane Jacobs reloaded: A contemporary operationalization of urban vitality in a district in Barcelona.” Cities 123: 103565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103565.
Grekousis, G. 2020. Spatial analysis methods and practice: Describe—Explore—Explain through GIS. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Guan, C., and P. G. Rowe. 2021. “Beyond big versus small: Assessing spatial variation of urban neighborhood block structures in high-density cities.” Socio-Ecol. Pract. Res. 3 (1): 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-021-00074-7.
Han, Y., Y. Ye, and C. Qin. 2022. “Nonlinear relationship between the urban form and street vitality: A data-informed approach involving 12 Chinese cities.” In Proc., 28th Int. Annual Conf. Seminar on Urban Form and the Sustainable and Prosperous City, edited by A. Feliciotti and M. Fleischmann, 371–380. Glasgow, UK: Univ. of Strathclyde.
Hermosilla, T., L. A. Ruiz, J. A. Recio, and M. Cambra-López. 2012. “Assessing contextual descriptive features for plot-based classification of urban areas.” Landscape Urban Plann. 106 (1): 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.02.008.
Huang, J., Y. Cui, H. Chang, H. Obracht-Prondzyńska, D. Kamrowska-Zaluska, and L. Li. 2022. “A city is not a tree: A multi-city study on street network and urban life.” Landscape Urban Plann. 226: 104469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104469.
Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.
Jacobs-Crisioni, C., P. Rietveld, E. Koomen, and E. Tranos. 2014. “Evaluating the impact of land-use density and mix on spatiotemporal urban activity patterns: An exploratory study using mobile phone data.” Environ. Plann. A: Econ. Space 46 (11): 2769–2785. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130309p.
Jalaladdini, S., and D. Oktay. 2012. “Urban public spaces and vitality: A socio-spatial analysis in the streets of Cypriot towns.” Procedia—Social Behav. Sci. 35: 664–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.135.
Kang, C.-D. 2016. “Spatial access to pedestrians and retail sales in Seoul, Korea.” Habitat Int. 57: 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.07.006.
Kang, C.-D. 2018. “Valuing spatial access to types of retail and effects on the housing price in Seoul, Korea.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 144 (2): 05018007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000448.
Kang, C.-D. 2020. “Effects of the human and built environment on neighborhood vitality: Evidence from Seoul, Korea, using mobile phone data.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 146 (4): 05020024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000620.
Kim, S. 2020. “Urban vitality, urban form, and land use: Their relations within a geographical boundary for walkers.” Sustainability 12 (24): 10633. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410633.
Lang, W., E. C. M. Hui, T. Chen, and X. Li. 2020. “Understanding livable dense urban form for social activities in transit-oriented development through human-scale measurements.” Habitat Int. 104: 102238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102238.
Lee, K.-S., S. Y. You, J. K. Eom, J. Song, and J. H. Min. 2018. “Urban spatiotemporal analysis using mobile phone data: Case study of medium- and large-sized Korean cities.” Habitat Int. 73: 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.12.010.
Levinson, D. M., W. Marshall, and K. Axhausen. 2017. Elements of access: Transport planning for engineers: Transport engineering for planners. Middletown, DE: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Li, X., Y. Li, T. Jia, L. Zhou, and I. H. Hijazi. 2022. “The six dimensions of built environment on urban vitality: Fusion evidence from multi-source data.” Cities 121: 103482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103482.
Long, Y., and C. C. Huang. 2019. “Does block size matter? The impact of urban design on economic vitality for Chinese cities.” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 46 (3): 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317715640.
Lopes, M. N., and A. S. Camanho. 2013. “Public green space use and consequences on urban vitality: An assessment of European cities.” Social Indic. Res. 113 (3): 751–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0106-9.
Lu, S., Y. Huang, C. Shi, and X. Yang. 2019a. “Exploring the associations between urban form and neighborhood vibrancy: A case study of Chengdu, China.” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 8 (4): 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8040165.
Lu, S., C. Shi, and X. Yang. 2019b. “Impacts of built environment on urban vitality: Regression analyses of Beijing and Chengdu, China.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16 (23): 4592. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234592.
Lv, G., S. Zheng, and W. Hu. 2022. “Exploring the relationship between the built environment and block vitality based on multi-source big data: An analysis in Shenzhen, China.” Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk 13 (1): 1593–1613. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2091484.
Lynch, K. 1984. Good city form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Meng, Y., and H. Xing. 2019. “Exploring the relationship between landscape characteristics and urban vibrancy: A case study using morphology and review data.” Cities 95: 102389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102389.
Montgomery, J. 1998. “Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design.” J. Urban Des. 3 (1): 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418.
MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT). 2018. Wireless communication service statistics. Sejong, South Korea: MSIT.
Pivo, G., and J. D. Fisher. 2011. “The walkability premium in commercial real estate investments.” Real Estate Econ. 39 (2): 185–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6229.2010.00296.x.
Porta, S., A. Venerandi, A. Feliciotti, S. Raman, O. Romice, J. Wang, and M. Kuffer. 2022. “Urban MorphoMetrics + Earth Observation: An integrated approach to rich/extra-large-scale taxonomies of urban form.” Projections, 16. Measuring the City: The Power of Urban Metrics (MIT Press). Accessed September 5, 2023. https://projections.pubpub.org/pub/vfwe0fdj/release/1.
Pressey, A., D. Houghton, and D. Istanbulluoglu. 2024. “The problematic use of smartphones in public: The development and validation of a measure of smartphone ‘zombie’ behavior.” Inf. Technol. People 37 (1): 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-06-2022-0472.
Rodrigue, J., C. Comtois, and B. Slack. 2020. The geography of transport systems. London: Routledge.
Schirmer, P. M., and K. W. Axhausen. 2013. “A multiscale classification of urban morphology.” J. Transport Land Use 9 (1): 101–130. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.667.
Shi, J.-g., W. Miao, and H. Si. 2019. “Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domain of urban vitality research.” Sustainability 11 (4): 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040988.
Smeallie, P., and P. H. K. Smith. 1990. New construction for older buildings: A design sourcebook for architects and preservationists. New York: Wiley.
SMG (Seoul Metropolitan Government). 2020a. De facto population data. Seoul: SMG.
SMG (Seoul Metropolitan Government). 2020b. Seoul building registry data. Seoul: SMG.
SMG (Seoul Metropolitan Government). 2021. Seoul statistics. Seoul: SMG.
Song, Y., and G.-J. Knaap. 2004. “Measuring urban form: Is Portland winning the war on sprawl?” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 70 (2): 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976371.
Song, Y., B. Popkin, and P. Gordon-Larsen. 2013. “A national-level analysis of neighborhood form metrics.” Landscape Urban Plann. 116: 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.002.
Sousa, N., J. Monteiro, E. Natividade-Jesus, and J. Coutinho-Rodrigues. 2023. “The impact of geometric and land use elements on the perceived pleasantness of urban layouts.” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 50 (3): 740–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221129879.
Sung, H.-G., D.-H. Go, and C. G. Choi. 2013. “Evidence of Jacobs’s street life in the great Seoul city: Identifying the association of physical environment with walking activity on streets.” Cities 35: 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.07.010.
Tang, S., and N. Ta. 2022. “How the built environment affects the spatiotemporal pattern of urban vitality: A comparison among different urban functional areas.” Comput. Urban Sci. 2 (1): 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-022-00069-4.
Vanderhaegen, S., and F. Canters. 2017. “Mapping urban form and function at city block level using spatial metrics.” Landscape Urban Plann. 167: 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.023.
Venerandi, A., A. Feliciotti, M. Fleischmann, K. Kourtit, and S. Porta. 2023. “Urban form character and Airbnb in Amsterdam (NL): A morphometric approach.” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 50 (2): 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221115196.
Venerandi, A., M. Zanella, O. Romice, J. Dibble, and S. Porta. 2017. “Form and urban change—An urban morphometric study of five gentrified neighbourhoods in London.” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 44 (6): 1056–1076. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516658031.
Wang, F. 2015. Quantitative methods and socio-economic applications in GIS. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Wang, L., W. Zheng, S. He, and S. Wei. 2022. “Assessing urban vitality and its determinants in high-speed rail station areas in the Yangtze River Delta, China.” J. Transport Land Use 15 (1): 333–354. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2022.2010.
Wu, C., M. Zhao, and Y. Ye. 2023. “Measuring urban nighttime vitality and its relationship with urban spatial structure: A data-driven approach.” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 50 (1): 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083221108191.
Wu, J., N. Ta, Y. Song, J. Lin, and Y. Chai. 2018. “Urban form breeds neighborhood vibrancy: A case study using a GPS-based activity survey in suburban Beijing.” Cities 74: 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.008.
Wu, W., Z. Ma, J. Guo, X. Niu, and K. Zhao. 2022. “Evaluating the effects of built environment on street vitality at the city level: An empirical research based on spatial panel Durbin model.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19 (3): 1664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031664.
Wu, W., and X. Niu. 2019. “Influence of built environment on urban vitality: Case study of Shanghai using mobile phone location data.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 145 (3): 04019007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000513.
Xia, C., A. Zhang, and A. G. O. Yeh. 2022. “The varying relationships between multidimensional urban form and urban vitality in Chinese megacities: Insights from a comparative analysis.” Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 112 (1): 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2021.1919502.
Xu, X., X. Xu, P. Guan, Y. Ren, W. Wang, and N. Xu. 2018. “The cause and evolution of urban street vitality under the time dimension: Nine cases of streets in Nanjing City, China.” Sustainability 10 (8): 2797. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082797.
Yang, J., G. C. Jin, X. Huang, K. Chen, and H. Meng. 2018. “How to measure urban land use intensity? A perspective of multi-objective decision in Wuhan urban agglomeration, China.” Sustainability 10: 3874. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113874.
Yu, L., and Y. Cai. 2021. “Do rising housing prices restrict urban innovation vitality? Evidence from 288 cities in China.” Econ. Anal. Policy 72: 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.08.012.
Yue, H., and X. Zhu. 2019. “Exploring the relationship between urban vitality and street centrality based on social network review data in Wuhan, China.” Sustainability 11 (16): 4356. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164356.
Yue, W., Y. Chen, Q. Zhang, and Y. Liu. 2019. “Spatial explicit assessment of urban vitality using multi-source data: A case of Shanghai, China.” Sustainability 11 (3): 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030638.
Zarghami, E., M. Karimimoshaver, A. Ghanbaran, and P. SaadatiVaghar. 2019. “Assessing the oppressive impact of the form of tall buildings on citizens: Height, width, and height-to-width ratio.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 79: 106287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106287.
Zarin, S. Z., M. Niroomand, and A. A. Heidari. 2015. “Physical and social aspects of vitality case study: Traditional street and modern street in Tehran.” Procedia Social Behav. Sci. 170: 659–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.068.
Zeng, C., Y. Song, Q. He, and F. Shen. 2018. “Spatially explicit assessment on urban vitality: Case studies in Chicago and Wuhan.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 40: 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.04.021.
Zhang, A., W. Li, J. Wu, J. Lin, J. Chu, and C. Xia. 2021. “How can the urban landscape affect urban vitality at the street block level? A case study of 15 metropolises in China.” Environ. Plann. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 48 (5): 1245–1262. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320924425.
Zhang, E., H. Xie, and Y. Long. 2023. “Decoding the association between urban streetscape skeletons and urban activities: Experiments in Beijing using Dazhong Dianping data.” Trans. Urban Data, Sci., Technol. 2 (1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/27541231221143608.
Zhang, L., Y. Ye, W. Zeng, and A. Chiaradia. 2019. “A systematic measurement of street quality through multi-sourced urban data: A human-oriented analysis.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16 (10): 1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101782.
Zhang, Z., Y. Zhang, T. He, and R. Xiao. 2022. “Urban vitality and its influencing factors: Comparative analysis based on taxi trajectory data.” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 15: 5102–5114. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3183176.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 150Issue 3September 2024

History

Received: May 22, 2023
Accepted: Mar 21, 2024
Published online: May 22, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 22, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Chang-Deok Kang [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Urban Planning and Real Estate, Chung-Ang Univ., 84 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 06974, South Korea. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share