Technical Papers
Oct 9, 2023

Using Perspectives of Private Vehicle Users to Identify Priority Areas for Improving Accessibility to Metro Stations

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149, Issue 4

Abstract

The present research investigates priority areas of interventions for improving accessibility to Metro stations in Delhi based on private vehicle users' perceptions. The focus is on identifying the avenues of infrastructure improvement in parking facilities near Metro stations. A tablet-based face-to-face questionnaire survey was adopted to collect 1,050 responses regarding perceived importance and satisfaction ratings of 17 service quality attributes under study on a 6-point Likert scale. The data were checked, cleaned, and analyzed using revised importance–performance analysis. A fuzzy c-means clustering technique was used to develop the factor structure and management scheme clusters. Finally, priority intervention areas were identified, and resources allocated by relating factor structures and management schemes. The findings indicated that the presence of designated parking facilities, provision of variable message signs (VMSs), parking guidance information, parking charges, and in-vehicle travel time were top priority attributes and warranted immediate improvement. Security, luggage space, extreme weather conditions, and universal design considerations were under low priority. Security at the Metro parking lots had optimum service levels and was expected to be maintained. Travel route information, safety, riding comfort, convenience, egress time, operational and maintenance cost, and illumination were attributes under “possible overkill,” indicating the need to transfer resources to improve other service attributes. The findings of the current work shall be useful to transport planners, traffic engineers, and officials in enhancing accessibility of private vehicle users to Metro stations by providing better Park-and-Ride facilities.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Education (MoE), Government of India for awarding the assistantship to Ms. Manaswinee Kar to conduct this study.

References

Anderson, E. W., and V. Mittal. 2000. “Strengthening the satisfaction-profit chain.” J. Serv. Res. 3 (2): 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050032001.
Ban, O. I., A. I. Ban, and D. A. Tuşe. 2016. “Importance–performance analysis by fuzzy C-means algorithm.” Expert Syst. Appl. 50: 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.12.023.
Bera, R., and B. Maitra. 2021. “Identification of priority areas of improvement for small passenger car segment in Indian market.” Vision 27 (2): 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629211004057.
Bergman, Å, J. Gliebe, and J. Strathman. 2011. “Modeling access mode choice for inter-suburban commuter rail.” J. Public Transp. 14 (4): 23–42. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.14.4.2.
Caber, M., T. Albayrak, and E. T. Loiacono. 2013. “The classification of extranet attributes in terms of their asymmetric influences on overall user satisfaction: An introduction to asymmetric impact-performance analysis.” J. Travel Res. 52 (1): 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287512451139.
Cao, J., and X. Cao. 2017. “Comparing importance-performance analysis and three-factor theory in assessing rider satisfaction with transit.” J. Transp. Land Use 10 (1): 65–68. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2017.907.
Chakour, V., and N. Eluru. 2014. “Analyzing commuter train user behavior: A decision framework for access mode and station choice.” Transportation 41 (1): 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-013-9509-y.
Chen, K. Y. 2014. “Improving importance-performance analysis: The role of the zone of tolerance and competitor performance. The case of Taiwan’s hot spring hotels.” Tourism Manage 40: 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.06.009.
Cheranchery, M. F., A. Noushad, A. Choyimadathil, J. T. Jose, K. Padu, and S. Nivedita. 2021. “Identifying areas of intervention for enhancing the attractiveness of inland waterway transport based on users’ perception: A case study of Kerala.” Case Stud. Transp. Policy 9 (3): 1006–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.05.001.
Choudhary, A., R. D. Garg, and S. S. Jain. 2022. “Examining the factors effecting severity of two-wheeler crashes at intersections.” Int. J. Crashworthiness 27 (6): 1697–1707. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2021.2008174.
Chowdhury, S., and A. A. Ceder. 2016. “Users’ willingness to ride an integrated public-transport service : A literature review.” Transp. Policy 48: 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.03.007.
Das, S., and D. Pandit. 2013. “Importance of user perception in evaluating level of service for bus transit for a developing country like India: A review.” Transp. Rev. 33 (4): 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.789571.
Debrezion, G., E. Pels, and P. Rietveld. 2009. “Modelling the joint access mode and railway station choice.” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 45 (1): 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2008.07.001.
Deng, J., and C. D. Pierskalla. 2018. “Linking importance-performance analysis, satisfaction, and loyalty: A study of Savannah, GA.” Sustainability 10 (3): 704. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030704.
Deng, W. 2007. “Using a revised importance-performance analysis approach: The case of Taiwanese hot springs tourism.” Tourism Manage 28 (5): 1274–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.07.010.
Deng, W. J., Y. F. Kuo, and W. C. Chen. 2008. “Revised importance-performance analysis: Three-factor theory and benchmarking.” Serv. Ind. J. 28 (1): 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060701725412.
de Oña, J. 2022. “Service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions towards public transport from the point of view of private vehicle users.” Transportation 49 (1): 237–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10175-7.
de Oña, J., E. Estévez, and R. de Oña. 2020. “Perception of public transport quality of service among regular private vehicle users in Madrid, Spain.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (2): 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120907095.
de Oña, J., E. Estévez, and R. de Oña. 2021a. “How does private vehicle users perceive the public transport service quality in large metropolitan areas? A European comparison.” Transp. Policy 112: 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.08.005.
de Oña, J., E. Estévez, and R. de Oña. 2021b. “Public transport users versus private vehicle users: Differences about quality of service, satisfaction and attitudes toward public transport in Madrid (Spain).” Travel Behav. Soc. 23 (December 2020): 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.11.003.
Directorate of Economics & Statistics Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. 2017. Delhi statistical hand book. New Delhi, India: Directorate of Economics & Statistics Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi.
DMRC (Delhi Metro Rail Corporation). 2020. DMRC annual report 2019–2020. New Delhi, India: DMRC.
Fernández-Heredia, Á, S. Jara-Díaz, and A. Monzón. 2016. “Modelling bicycle use intention: The role of perceptions.” Transportation 43 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9559-9.
Foote, P. J. 2000. “Chicago transit authority weekday park-and-ride users: Choice market with ridership growth potential.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1735 (1): 158–168. https://doi.org/10.3141/1735-19.
Givoni, M., and P. Rietveld. 2007. “The access journey to the railway station and its role in passengers’ satisfaction with rail travel.” Transp. Policy 14 (5): 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.004.
Gliem, J. A., and R. R. Gliem. 2003. “Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales.” In Midwest Research-to-Practice Conf. in Adult, Continuing and Community Education, 82–88. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois Univ.
Goel, R., and G. Tiwari. 2014. Promoting low carbon transport in India: Case study of metro rails in Indian cities. New Delhi, India: UN Environment Programme.
Goel, R., and G. Tiwari. 2016. “Access-egress and other travel characteristics of metro users in Delhi and its satellite cities.” IATSS Res. 39 (2): 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2015.10.001.
Guharoy, A., B. Majumdar, P. Sahu, and A. Maji. 2019. “Identification and evaluation of key determinants of two-wheeler ownership model in the context of developing countries: A case study of Pune City, India.” J. Eastern Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 13: 120–131. https://doi.org/10.11175/easts.13.120.
Hu, M. L. M., T. K. Chen, and T. L. Ou. 2009. “An importance–performance model of restaurant dining experience.” In Vol. 5 of Advances in hospitality and leisure, edited by J. S. Chen, 207–222, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1745-3542(2009)0000005015.
Jain, S., P. Aggarwal, P. Kumar, S. Singhal, and P. Sharma. 2014. “Identifying public preferences using multi-criteria decision making for assessing the shift of urban commuters from private to public transport: A case study of Delhi.” Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav. 24: 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.03.007.
Kang, A. S., K. Jayaraman, K. L. Soh, and W. P. Wong. 2019. “Convenience, flexible service, and commute impedance as the predictors of drivers’ intention to switch and behavioral readiness to use public transport.” Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav. 62: 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.005.
Kano, N., N. Seraku, and F. Takahashi. 1984. “Attractive quality and must-be quality.” Jpn Soc. Qual. Control 14: 39–48.
Kar, M., S. Sadhukhan, and M. Parida. 2022. “Measuring heterogeneity in perceived satisfaction of private vehicle users towards attributes affecting access to metro stations: A case study of Delhi.” Case Stud. Transp. Policy. 10 (3): 1790–1803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.07.009.
Karamychev, V., and P. van Reeven. 2011. “Park-and-ride: Good for the city, good for the region?” Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 41 (5): 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2011.03.002.
Keumi, C., and H. Murakami. 2012. “The role of schedule delays on passengers’ choice of access modes: A case study of Japan’s international hub airports.” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 48 (5): 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2012.03.005.
Kimpton, A., D. Pojani, N. Sipe, and J. Corcoran. 2020. “Parking behavior: Park “n” ride (PnR) to encourage multimodalism in Brisbane.” Land Use Policy 91 (October 2019): 104304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104304.
Krejcie, R. V., and D. W. Morgan. 1970. “Determining sample size for research activities.” Educ. Psychol. Meas. 30 (3): 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308.
Kuo, Y. F., J. Y. Chen, and W. J. Deng. 2012. “IPA-Kano model: A new tool for categorising and diagnosing service quality attributes.” Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 23 (7–8): 731–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2011.637811.
Lai, I. K. W., and M. Hitchcock. 2015. “Importance-performance analysis in tourism: A framework for researchers.” Tourism Manage. 48: 242–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.11.008.
Lai, I. K. W., and M. Hitchcock. 2016. “A comparison of service quality attributes for stand-alone and resort-based luxury hotels in Macau: 3-dimensional importance-performance analysis.” Tourism Manage 55: 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.01.007.
Li, L., M. Cao, Y. Bai, and Z. Song. 2019. “Analysis of public transportation competitiveness based on potential passenger travel intentions: Case study in Shanghai, China.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (4): 823–832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119825648.
Liu, C., E. Bardaka, R. Palakurthy, and L. W. Tung. 2020. “Analysis of travel characteristics and access mode choice of elderly urban rail riders in Denver, Colorado.” Travel Behav. Soc. 19 (May 2019): 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.11.004.
Loader, C., and J. Stanley. 2009. “Growing bus patronage and addressing transport disadvantage-The Melbourne experience.” Transp. Policy 16 (3): 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.02.001.
Lubis, H. A.-R., B. Hasibuan, and M. Farda. 2019. “Users’ perception of private park and ride facilities in Cawang Area, Jakarta, Indonesia.” J. Tek. Sipil. 26 (3): 205–212. https://doi.org/10.5614/jts.2019.26.3.3.
Majumdar, B. B., P. K. Sahu, M. Patil, and N. Vendotti. 2021. “Pedestrian satisfaction-based methodology for prioritization of critical sidewalk and crosswalk attributes influencing walkability.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 147 (3): 04021032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000718.
Martilla, J. A., and J. C. James. 1977. “Importance-Performance analysis.” J. Mark. 41 (1): 77. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250495.
Matzler, K., and E. Sauerwein. 2002. “The factor structure of customer satisfaction: An empirical test of the importance grid and the penalty-reward-contrast analysis.” Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manage. 13 (4): 314–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230210445078.
Matzler, K., E. Sauerwein, and K. A. Heischmidt. 2003. “Importance-performance analysis revisited: The role of the factor structure of customer satisfaction.” Serv. Ind. J. 23 (2): 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060412331300912.
Meek, S., S. Ison, and M. Enoch. 2008. “Role of bus-based park and ride in the UK: A temporal and evaluative review.” Transp. Rev. 28 (6): 781–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640802059152.
MHA (Ministry of Home Affairs). 2011. Census of India. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Home Affairs.
Mikulić, J. 2007. “The Kano model–A review of its application in marketing research from 1984 to 2006.” In Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Marketing Theory Challenges in Transitional Societies, 87–96. Zagreb, Croatia: University of Zagreb.
Mingardo, G. 2013. “Transport and environmental effects of rail-based Park and Ride: Evidence from the Netherlands.” J. Transp. Geogr. 30: 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.02.004.
MoHUA (Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs Government of India). 2021. Harmonised guidelines & standards for universal accessibility in India 2021. New Delhi, India: MoHUA.
MoUD (Ministry of Urban Development). 2014. National urban transport policy. New Delhi, India: MoUD.
MoUD (Ministry of Urban Development). 2016. Delhi national urban transport helpline operations document. New Delhi, India: MoUD.
Prasad, P., and B. Maitra. 2019. “Identifying areas of interventions for improvement of shared modes for school trips.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 121 (September 2018): 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.01.009.
Redman, L., M. Friman, T. Gärling, and T. Hartig. 2013. “Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review.” Transp. Policy 25: 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.005.
RodrÍGuez, D. A., and F. Targa. 2004. “Value of accessibility to bogotá’s bus rapid transit system.” Transp. Rev. 24 (5): 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144164042000195081.
Roy, S., and D. Basu. 2020. “Selection of intervention areas for improving travel condition of walk-accessed bus users with a focus on their accessibility: An experience in Bhubaneswar.” Transp. Policy 96 (August 2019): 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.06.004.
Sadhukhan, S., U. K. Banerjee, and B. Maitra. 2018. “Preference heterogeneity towards the importance of transfer facility attributes at metro stations in Kolkata.” Travel Behav. Soc. 12: 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2017.05.001.
Saiyad, G., M. Srivastava, and D. Rathwa. 2022. “Assessment of transit accessibility through feeder modes and its influence on feeder mode choice behavior.” Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 47 (4): 4483–4497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06082-9.
Sampson, S. E., and M. J. Showalter. 1999. “The performance-importance response function: Observations and implications.” Serv. Ind. J. 19 (3): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069900000027.
Sukor, N. S., N. Jarani, and S. F. M. Fisal. 2017. “Analysis of passengers’ access and egress characteristics to the train station.” Eng. Heritage J. 1 (2): 01–04. https://doi.org/10.26480/gwk.02.2017.01.04.
Sun, S., D. Fang, and J. Cao. 2020. “Exploring the asymmetric influences of stop attributes on rider satisfaction with bus stops.” Travel Behav. Soc. 19 (October 2019): 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.01.004.
van der Waerden, P., and J. van der Waerden. 2018. “The relation between train access mode attributes and travelers’ transport mode-choice decisions in the context of medium- and long-distance trips in the Netherlands.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (8): 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118801346.
Wen, C. H., W. C. Wang, and C. Fu. 2012. “Latent class nested logit model for analyzing high-speed rail access mode choice.” Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 48 (2): 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.09.002.
Wu, H., Y. Tang, and J. Shyu. 2010. “An integrated approach of Kano’s model and importance-performance analysis in identifying key success factors.” Afr. J. Bus. Manage. 4 (15): 3238–3250.
Wu, X., J. Cao, and J. Huting. 2018. “Using three-factor theory to identify improvement priorities for express and local bus services : An application of regression with dummy variables in the Twin Cities.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 113 (September 2017): 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.003.
Yang, M., J. Zhao, W. Wang, Z. Liu, and Z. Li. 2015. “Metro commuters’ satisfaction in multi-type access and egress transferring groups.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 34: 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.11.004.
Zhang, C., Y. Tang, L. Luo, and W. Xu. 2009. “Outlier identification and visualization for Pb concentrations in urban soils and its implications for identification of potential contaminated land.” Environ. Pollut. 157 (11): 3083–3090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.05.044.
Zheng, Y., H. Kong, G. Petzhold, M. M. Barcelos, C. P. Zegras, and J. Zhao. 2021. “User satisfaction and service quality improvement priority of bus rapid transit in Belo Horizonte, Brazil.” Case Stud. Transp. Policy 9 (4): 1900–1911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.10.011.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149Issue 4December 2023

History

Received: Sep 10, 2022
Accepted: Aug 16, 2023
Published online: Oct 9, 2023
Published in print: Dec 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 9, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9660-2422. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Architecture & Planning, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5245-3480. Email: [email protected]
Manoranjan Parida, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share