Technical Papers
Dec 7, 2022

Selection of the Most Appropriate Sustainable Buildings Assessment Categories and Criteria for Developing Countries: Case of Ethiopia

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149, Issue 1

Abstract

Sustainable buildings can save 36% of total energy use, 65% of electricity consumption, 30% of greenhouse gas emissions, 30% of raw materials use, 30% of waste output, and 12% of potable water consumption. Several sustainable building assessment tools were used by both developed and developing countries. However, Ethiopia’s buildings were not critically assessed and evaluated from a sustainability point of view because there was no such type of study conducted so far. This paper aims to explore the most significant and widely used tools as well as the basis for other sustainable building assessment tools, such as Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Methodology (BREEAM), Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency (CASBEE), Sustainable Building Tool (SBTool), Comprehensive Environmental Performance Assessment Scheme (CEPAS), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen (DGNB), and Green Mark and Green Star. The methodology employed is the selection of the 10 most commonly and widely utilized sustainable building assessment tools (SBATs) from the 57 SBATs based on desk review and document analysis. The results of the study identified that all 10 SBATs have their own assessment categories and criteria based on many factors, such as climatic conditions and availability of resources, plus methods employing demographic dynamics and legal aspects of the sector for assessing the sustainable/green buildings. It distinguishes the most commonly and repeatedly used assessment categories and criteria and uses a consensus-based approach with experts in the building sectors, a four-quadrant model, and a circular and helical flow model, to develop a new sustainable building assessment tool suitable for Ethiopia.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The researcher extends the gratitude to the support of the key actors who contributed their parts in the study, and the comments of the senior experts for the realization of this paper.

References

Al-Qawasmi, J., M. Asif, A. A. El Fattah, and M. O. Babsail. 2019. “Water efficiency and management in sustainable building rating systems: Examining variation in criteria usage.” Sustainability 11 (8): 2416. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082416.
Ammar, M. G. 2012. “Evaluation of the green Egyptian pyramid.” Alexandria Eng. J. 51 (4): 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2012.09.002.
Attia, S. 2017. “Green buildings certification in MENA–issues and challenges.” Accessed September 15, 2020. https://www.ecomena.org/green-buildings-mena/.
Behnam, N. 2017. “A review on sustainable building.” Int. J. Eng. Sci. 6 (1): 451–459. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2968885.
Bernardi, E., S. Carlucci, C. Cornaro, and R. Andre. 2017. “An analysis of the most adopted rating systems for assessing the environmental impacts of buildings.” Sustainability 9 (7): 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071226.
BREEAM-NOR. 2019. “New construction: Technical manual.” BREEAMR®NOR. Accessed February 27, 2021. www.breeam.com, and www.byggalliansen.no.
Buente, S. 2015. “Top 10 countries for LEED National Profile: India.” Accessed May 14, 2021. http://www.usgbc.org/articles/top-10-countries-leed-national-profile-india.
CEPAS. 2021. “Comprehensive Environmental Performance Assessment Scheme for Buildings.” Accessed May 18, 2021. https://www.bd.gov.hk/en/resources/codes-and-references/notices-and-reports/index_CEPAS.html.
Cheng, C.-L., J. Peng, Jr., M.-C. Ho, W.-J. Liao, and S.-J. Chern. 2016. “Evaluation of water efficiency in green building in Taiwan.” Water 8 (6): 236–248. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8060236.
Cole, R. J. 2007. “Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions and roles.” Build. Res. Inf. 33 (5): 455–467.
Darianes, S. V. A. S., M. Jackson F. H. Alexander, M. B. C. Cláudia, and T. P. Máriam. 2022. A Sustentabilidade Na Construção Civil E O Papel Do Arquiteto: Uma Revisão Narrativa Sustentability In Civil Construction And The Role Of The Architect: Narrative Review: Revista Mundi Sociais E Humanidades. Paranaguá 7 (2): 1–17.
DGNB. 2013. Accessed July 2013. http://www.dgnb-system.de.
Elena, B., C. Salvatore, C. Cristina, and B. Rolf André 2017. “An Analysis of the Most Adopted Rating Systems for Assessing the Environmental Impact of Buildings.” Sustainability 9 (7): 1226. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071226.
Endo, J., S. Murakami, and T. Ikaga. 2004. “Application of a building environmental assessment, CASBEE, and its influence on the building market.” Accessed March 14, 2020. https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB8054.pdf.
Geng, Y., H. Dong, B. Xue, and J. Fu. 2012. “An overview of Chinese green building standards.” Sustainable Dev. 20: 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1537.
GOBAS-Group. 2003. Green Olympic Building Assessment System. Beijing: Architecture and Building Press.
GBC (Green Building Council). 2022. GREENSL® rating system for new constructions. Version 2.1. Colombo, Sri Lanka: GBC.
Green Building Index. 2011. “GBI assessment Criteria for Non-Residential Existing Building (NREB).” Accessed August 8, 2021. www.greenbuildingindex.org | [email protected].
Green Building Index. 2015. “Executive summary.” Accessed August 8, 2021. http://www.greenbuildingindex.org/organisation-certifiedbuildings-Summary.html.
Haapio, A., and P. Viitaniemi. 2008. “A critical review of building environmental assessment tools.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 28 (7): 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.01.002.
Hazem, N., M. Abdelraouf, I. S. Fahim, and S. El-Omari. 2020. “A novel green rating system for existing buildings.” Sustainability 12 (17): 7143.
He, Y., T. Kvan, M. Liu, and B. Li. 2018. “How green building rating systems affect designing green.” Build Environ. 133: 19–31.
Hikmat, H. A., and S. F. Al Nsairat. 2009. “Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries – Case of Jordan.” Build. Environ. 44 (5): 1053–1064.
Hind, A. K. O. 2018. “Sustainable- eco- buildings assessment method for the evaluation of residential buildings in hot dry climate.” In Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on New Horizons in Green Civil Engineering. Victoria, BC: The University of Victoria.
HQE™. 2015. “Haute Qualitè Environnementale.” Accessed May 24, 2021. http://www.beHQE™.com.
Hu, X. L., L. Y. Chen, and H. P. Lei. 2009. China’s low carbon development pathways by 2050-Scenario analysis of energy demand and carbon emissions. Beijing: Science Press.
Ismaeel, W. S. E., A. Rashed, and E. Toulibah. 2018. The National Green Pyramid Rating System. Cairo, Egypt: Elain Publishing House.
James, S. 1997. Sustainable architecture, principles, paradigms, and case studies. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
Keung, J. 2011. “Small nation but big vision for the built environment.” In Proc., 2011 Int. Green Building Conf. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Kibert, C. J. 2012. Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design). 2015. “LEED® for existing buildings: Operation and maintenance.” Accessed October 10, 2021. http://www.docdatabase.net/more-leed-for-existing-buildings-operations-and-maintenance-1302099.html.
Li, B., and R. Yao. 2009. “Urbanization and its impact on building energy consumption and efficiency in China.” Build. Environ. 34 (9): 1994–1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.02.015.
Loftness, V., and D. Haase. 2013. Sustainable built environments. New York: Springer.
Markelj, J., M. K. Kuzman, and M. Zbašnik-Senegačnik. 2013. “A review of building sustainability assessment methods.” Archit. Res. 14: 22–31.
MEP (Ministry of Environmental Protection). 2007. National industrial standard for environment protection of the People’s Republic of China: Technical requirement for environmental labeling products eco-housing. Beijing: Environmental Science Press.
MOHURD and GAQSIQ (Ministry of Housing and Urban–Rural Department and General Administration of Quality Supervisor Inspection and Quarantine). 2006. Evaluation standard for green buildings. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.
Nils, L. 2015. “Overview.” International Initiative for a Sustainable Built Environment. Accessed December 23, 2021. http://www.iisbe.org/system/files/SBTool%20Overview%2018Jul15.pdf.
Ojo-Fafore, E., C. Aigbavboa, and P. Remaru. 2018. “Benefits of green buildings.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Bandung, Indonesia: IEOM Society.
Prior, J. M. Holden, and C. Ward. 2019. Vol. 1 of The digest of BREEAM new construction and refurbishment statistics 2013 to 2017. London: Bre Global Ltd.
Reddy, S., P. Anand Raj, and P. Rathish Kumar. 2019. “Developing a Sustainable Building Assessment Tool (SBAT) for developing countries—Case of India.” In Urbanization challenges in emerging economies: Resilience and sustainability of infrastructure, edited by U. P. Singh and G. L. S. Babu, 137–148. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Reed, R. 2011. A comparison of international sustainable building tools. Melbourne, Australia: Deakin Univ.
Saleh, H., and R. Yacine. 2012. “Sustainable building assessment tool development approach.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 5: 52–62.
Sanadi, N. A., and S. S. Makandar. 2019. “Limitations of green building rating systems – A case of LEED and GRIHA.” Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 6 (5): 6798–6803.
Suchith, A., P. Ananda, and P. Rathish. 2018. “Developing a sustainable building assessment tool (SBAT) for developing countries – Case of India.” Urbanization Challenges in Emerging Economies 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482032.015.
UK BREEAM. 2019. “UK BREEAM assessment system.” Accessed January 15, 2019. https://www.breeam.com.
WGBC (World Green Building Council). 2016. “Green Building Councils and rating tools.” Accessed September 22, 2020. https://www.worldgbc.org/rating-tools.
Yasutoshi, S., D. Satoshi, and T. Kanako. 2013. “CO2 emission factor for rainwater and reclaimed water used in buildings in Japan.” Water 5 (2): 394–404.
Yudelson, J. 2008. In the Green Building Revolution. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Zuo, J., and Z. Zhao. 2014. “A review on green building research-current status and future agenda.” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 30: 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.021.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149Issue 1March 2023

History

Received: Jun 10, 2022
Accepted: Oct 18, 2022
Published online: Dec 7, 2022
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 7, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Mekonnen Abebe Anshebo [email protected]
Dept. of Architecture, College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Addis Ababa Science and Technology Univ., Addis Ababa 161417, Ethiopia (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Wubishet Jekale Mengesha, Dr.Eng. [email protected]
Addis Ababa Univ., Addis Ababa 518, Ethiopia. Email: [email protected]
Daniel Lirebo Sokido, Ph.D. [email protected]
Ethiopian Civil Service Univ., Addis Ababa 5648, Ethiopia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share