Technical Papers
Dec 6, 2022

Urban Governmental Environmental Attention Allocation: Evidence from China

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149, Issue 1

Abstract

Urban governmental environmental attention allocation (UGEAA) is an important issue for sustainable urban development. This study analyzes the spatial characteristics of the UGEAA and its driving factors across 255 Chinese cities from 2009 to 2018. The results show that (1) the UGEAA has spatial clustering and a spatial spillover effect, (2) factors such as governmental administrative distance, neighbors’ UGEAA, public attention to environmental pollution, and economic growth exert influences on the UGEAA, and (3) the driving forces of UGEAA exhibit differentiation for different regions. Text analysis is applied to measure the index of UGEAA. The analysis framework of the drivers of UGEAA is built. It contributes to the political geography theory by study of the spatial characteristics of UGEAA and fills the research gap in urban political geography study. It also contributes to the attention-based theory by expanding the research object to UGEAA. It unearths UGEAA’s driving factors, characteristics, and regional disparities, and proposes policy recommendations.

Practical Applications

Under the spatial interaction, the high-level UGEAA agglomeration area is conducive to the formation of a positive driving mechanism, which promotes the raising of the overall level of the UGEAA in the agglomeration area. Hence, the interaction of UGEAA should be maintained to provide a good policy environment and platform support for improving urban environmental quality. The low-level agglomeration areas of UGEAA should be the focus of management to implement effective external intervention and put in place the necessary leadership policies to reverse their negative dilatory mechanism. In addition, for that obvious spatial correlation exists in different UGEAA, policy-makers should consider setting up a joint action of environmental protection across departments and regions, as well as consider the mechanism of supervision, protection, and accountability with specific powers and responsibilities. UGEAA increases without necessarily resulting in policy formulation or governance action, but steady attention is at least a vital element of ecological environmental governance. Following that, the next focus should be on how to keep the governmental policy-makers’ attention steady and growing on this public issue. Different factors that drive UGEAA should be properly considered in government policies. First, governments should be encouraged to create more public participation platforms to enhance the effectiveness of the bottom-up supervision, especially for western China. Second, some local governments still face difficulties in resolving the dilemmas of “harmonious coexistence” of the economy and the environment in the region they govern. Therefore, it is meaningful to more deeply implement the strategy from extensive development to refined development. Third, governments should also note the adverse effect of GS in the eastern regions, perhaps limiting the GS without impairing its ability. It may be possible, for example, for the government to reduce redundant departments and personnel and increase availability of “internet +” services to increase their service efficiency. For the central regions, attention should also be paid to the significant impact of industrialization. The negative environmental effects caused by the industrial transfer from eastern regions to central regions have attracted the attention of governments. As a next step, the central government should assist the central region to perform well in the renewal of industrial equipment, and in the innovation and transformation of technological processes, in the upgrading of industry, and so on, to achieve a green transformation. Finally, the shortage of financial resources is still the main reason that governments cannot pay attention to the environment, due primarily to the economic development in the western regions. The central government has an urgent task of guiding the western regions out of the “poverty trap” and moving them from left to right along the environmental Kuznets curve.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71471047) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. HIT.HSS.202104).

References

Bo, W. G., W. Xu, and J. F. Wang. 2018. “Local government competition and environmental regulation heterogeneity: Race to the bottom or race to the top?” [In Chinese.] China Soft Sci. 11: 76–93.
Chen, Q., and D. Taylor. 2020. “Economic development and pollution emissions in Singapore: Evidence in support of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis and its implications for regional sustainability.” J. Cleaner Prod. 243: 118637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118637.
Chen, X., X. Chen, and M. Song. 2021. “Polycentric agglomeration, market integration and green economic efficiency.” Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 59: 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.08.016.
Chen, Z., M. E. Kahn, Y. Liu, and Z. Wang. 2018. “The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China.” J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 88: 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.01.010.
Chen, Z., S. Chen, C. Liu, L. T. Nguyen, and A. Hasan. 2020. “The effects of circular economy on economic growth: A Quasi-natural experiment in China.” J. Cleaner Prod. 271: 122558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122558.
Chenery, H., S. Robinson, and M. Syrquin. 1986. Industrialization and growth: A comparative study. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
Cheng, Z., L. Li, and J. Liu. 2017. “Identifying the spatial effects and driving factors of urban PM2.5 pollution in China.” Ecol. Indic. 82: 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.043.
Cho, T. S., and D. C. Hambrick. 2006. “Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation.” Organ. Sci. 17 (4): 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0192.
Dar, A. A., and S. AmirKhalkhali. 2002. “Government size, factor accumulation, and economic growth: Evidence from OECD countries.” J. Policy Model. 24 (7): 679–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-8938(02)00163-1.
Davies, J. S., and D. Imbroscio. 2009. Theories of urban politics. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Deluca, K. M., E. Brunner, and Y. Sun. 2016. “Weibo, weChat, and the transformative events of environmental activism on China’s wild public screens.” Int. J. Commun. 10: 321–339.
Dong, F., B. Yu, Y. Pan, and Y. Hua. 2020. “What contributes to the regional inequality of haze pollution in China? Evidence from Quantile regression and Shapley value decomposition.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27 (22): 17093–17108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07929-8.
Dong, Y., M. Ishikawa, X. Liu, and S. Hamori. 2011. “The determinants of citizen complaints on environmental pollution: An empirical study from China.” J. Cleaner Prod. 19 (12): 1306–1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.015.
Elhorst, J. P. 2014. Spatial econometrics: From cross-sectional data to spatial panels. Berlin: Spring.
Feng, Y., X. Wang, W. Du, J. Liu, and Y. Li. 2019. “Spatiotemporal characteristics and driving forces of urban sprawl in China during 2003–2017.” J. Cleaner Prod. 241: 118061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118061.
Flavin, P., and W. W. Franko. 2017. “Government’s unequal attentiveness to citizens” political priorities.” Policy Stud. J. 45 (4): 659–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12184.
Flint, C., and P. J. Taylor. 2016. Political geography. Translated by Liu Yungang. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Folster, S., and M. Henrekson. 2006. “Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries: A reply.” Eur. Econ. Rev. 50 (1): 219–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.02.007.
Fu, J., G. Xiao, and C. Wu. 2020. “Urban green transformation in Northeast China: A comparative study with Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Guangdong provinces.” J. Cleaner Prod. 273: 122551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122551.
Getis, A., and J. K. Ord. 2010. “The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics.” Geog. Anal. 24 (3): 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x.
Hao, Y., Y. Deng, Z.-N. Lu, and H. Chen. 2018. “Is environmental regulation effective in China? Evidence from city-level panel data.” J. Cleaner Prod. 188: 966–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.003.
Hassid, J. 2015. “China’s responsiveness to internet opinion: A double-edged sword.” J. Curr. Chin. Aff. 44 (2): 39–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810261504400203.
Hou, X. L., and R. D. Yang. 2016. “The desire of government urban development and the spatial promotion of regional urbanization in China—A study based on the government work report.” [In Chinese.] Econ. Rev. 6: 9–22.
Hsieh, H.-F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. “Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.” Qual. Health Res. 15 (9): 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
Huang, D. Y. 2020. “Pressure transmission and change of policy implementation: A case study of the implementation of X industrial policy in a province.” [In Chinese.] CASS J. Polit. Sci. 06: 104–116+128.
Im, K. S., M. H. Pesaran, and Y. Shin. 2003. “Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels.” J. Econom. 115 (1): 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7.
Jin, H. H., Y. Y. Qian, and B. R. Weingast. 2004. “Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: Federalism, Chinese style.” J. Public Econ. 89 (9): 1719–1742.
Jones, B. D. 1994. Reconceiving decision-making in democratic politics: Attention, choice, and public policy. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Khan, M. A., and I. Ozturk. 2020. “Examining foreign direct investment and environmental pollution linkage in Asia.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27 (7): 7244–7255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07387-x.
Kostka, G. 2014. “Barriers to the implementation of environmental policies at the local level in China.” Policy Res. Working Pap. 7016 (8): 1–51.
Kotera, G., K. Okada, and S. Samreth. 2012. “Government size, democracy, and corruption: An empirical investigation.” Econ. Modell. 29 (6): 2340–2348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.06.022.
Levin, A., C.-F. Lin, and C.-S. Chu. 2002. “Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties.” J. Econom. 108 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7.
Li, K., and B. Lin. 2015. “Impacts of urbanization and industrialization on energy consumption/CO2 emissions: Does the level of development matter?” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 52: 1107–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.185.
Li, W., and H. S. Chan. 2009. “Clean air in urban China: The case of inter-agency coordination in Chongqing’s blue sky program.” Public Administration Dev. 29 (1): 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.501.
Lieberthal, K. G., and D. M. Lampton. 2018. Bureaucracy, politics, and decision making in post-mao China. California: Univ. of California Press.
Liu, J. Q., and Y. H. Xie. 2015. “Unconventional tasks, attention of officials and governance mechanism of local discussion and coordination groups in China: A study based on a city in a province (2002-2012).” [In Chinese.] J. Polit. Sci. 4: 84–97.
Liu, X. H., and K. S. Jiang. 2016. “Study on the dynamic relationship between urbanization, industrial structure and haze in China—An empirical test based on inter-provincial panel data.” Ecol. Econ. 32 (6): 19–25.
Liu, Y., H. Xiao, Y. Lv, and N. Zhang. 2017. “The effect of new-type urbanization on energy consumption in China: A spatial econometric analysis.” J. Cleaner Prod. 163: S299–S305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.044.
Maddala, G. S., and S. Wu. 1999. “A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test.” Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat. 61: 631–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631.
Mcguirk, P. 2012. “Geographies of urban politics: Pathways, intersections, interventions.” Geog. Res. 50 (3): 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2011.00726.x.
Miao, X., Y. Tang, and C. W. Y. Wong. 2015. “Polluters migrate to China’s poor areas.” Nature 518 (7540): 483–483. https://doi.org/10.1038/518483d.
Miller, D. T., and M. Ross. 1975. “Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?” Psychol. Bull. 82: 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076486.
Nie, Y., D. Cheng, and K. Liu. 2020. “The effectiveness of environmental authoritarianism: Evidence from China’s administrative inquiry for environmental protection.” Energy Econ. 88: 104777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104777.
Oates, W. E. 2008. “On the evolution of fiscal federalism: Theory and institutions.” National Tax J. 61 (2): 313–334. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2008.2.08.
O’Brien, K. J., and L. Li. 1999. “Selective policy implementation in rural China.” Comp. Polit. 31 (2): 167–186. https://doi.org/10.2307/422143.
Ocasio, W. 1997. “Towards an attention-based view of the firm.” Strategic Manage. J. 18: 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+%3C187::AID-SMJ936%3E3.0.CO;2-K.
Pennebaker, J. W., M. R. Mehl, and K. G. Niederhoffer. 2003. “Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves.” Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54: 547–577. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041.
Porter, M. E., and C. V. D. Linde. 1995. “Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship.” J. Econ. Perspect. 9 (4): 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97.
Qiao, B. Y., J. Y. Fan, and X. Y. Feng. 2005. “Fiscal decentralization and compulsory primary education in China.” [In Chinese.] Social Sci. China 28 (6): 39–46.
Qiao, M., S. Ding, and Y. Liu. 2019. “Fiscal decentralization and government size: The role of democracy.” Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 59: 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.04.002.
Ran, R. 2017. “Understanding blame politics in China’s decentralized system of environmental governance: Actors, strategies and context.” China Q. 231: 634–661. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741017000911.
Rossi, U., and A. Vanolo. 2012. Urban political geographies: A global perspective. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Sadorsky, P. 2013. “Do urbanization and industrialization affect energy intensity in developing countries?” Energy Econ. 37: 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.01.009.
Seto, K. C., J. S. Golden, M. Albert, and B. L. Turner. 2017. “Sustainability in an urbanizing planet.” PNAS 114 (34): 8935–8938. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606037114.
Song, L. Y., W. L. Zhang, and Y. Liu. 2018. “The effect of fiscal autonomy on total factor productivity for resource—Based cities.” [In Chinese.] Finance Trade Res. 29 (03): 71–79.
Tan, X., L. Dong, D. Chen, B. Gu, and Y. Zeng. 2016. “China’s regional CO2 emissions reduction potential: A study of Chongqing city.” Appl. Energy 162: 1345–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.071.
Tang, S.-Y., and X. Zhan. 2008. “Civic environmental NGOs, civil society, and democratisation in China.” J. Dev. Stud. 44 (3): 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380701848541.
Tang, X., S. J. Zhou, X. R. Zhao, and Y. F. Wang. 2020. “Central-local relations and government responsive spillover: An empirical research of Chinese citizens” satisfaction with environmental governance.” [In Chinese.] Manage. World 36 (6): 120–134+249.
Tseng, C. C., S. C. Fang, and Y. T. H. Chiu. 2011. “Search activities for innovation: An attention-based view.” Int. J. Bus. 16 (1): 51–57.
Van Rooij, B., and C. W. Lo. 2010. “Fragile convergence: Understanding variation in the enforcement of China’s industrial pollution law.” Law Policy 32 (1): 14–37.
Verhoef, E. T., and P. Nijkamp. 2002. “Externalities in urban sustainability: Environmental versus localization-type agglomeration externalities in a general spatial equilibrium model of a single-sector monocentric industrial city.” Ecol. Econ. 40 (2): 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00253-1.
Wang, C. J., Z. Xu, and C. Y. Chen. 2018a. “Government’s attention on basic research in the process of Chin’s S&T system reform—Discourse analysis of the report on the work of the government (1985-2018).” [In Chinese.] Sci. Sci. Manage. S & T 39 (12): 54–66.
Wang, D. H., Z. J. Zhang, and C. E. Bai. 2007. “Size of government, rule of law, and the development of services sector.” [In Chinese.] J. Econ. Res. 6: 51–64.
Wang, R., F. Wijen, and P. P. M. A. R. Heugens. 2018b. “Government’s green grip: Multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China.” Strategic Manage. J. 39 (2): 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2714.
Wang, S., C. Li, and H. Zhou. 2019. “Impact of China’s economic growth and energy consumption structure on atmospheric pollutants: Based on a panel threshold model.” J. Cleaner Prod. 236: 117694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117694.
Wang, Z., F. Yin, Y. Zhang, and X. Zhang. 2012. “An empirical research on the influencing factors of regional CO2 emissions: Evidence from Beijing city, China.” Appl. Energy 100: 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.038.
Wen, H. 2014. “On the modernizing of China’s governance system and governance capability.” [In Chinese.] Jilin Univ. J. Social Sci. Ed. 54 (2): 20–26.
Wildasin, D. E. 1989. “Interjurisdictional capital mobility: Fiscal externality and a corrective subsidy.” J. Urban Econ. 25 (2): 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(89)90034-X.
Wong, C. W. Y., X. Miao, S. Cui, and Y. Tang. 2018. “Impact of corporate environmental responsibility on operating income: Moderating role of regional disparities in China.” J. Bus. Ethics 149 (2): 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3092-z.
Wu, F. 2003. “The (post-) socialist entrepreneurial city as a state project: Shanghai’s reglobalisation in question.” Urban Stud. 40 (9): 1673–1698. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000106555.
Wu, L., B. Li, H. Chao, and G. C. Li. 2020. “City, space and power: The discipline, path and trend of urban political geographies.” [In Chinese.] Urban Dev. Stud. 27 (4): 37–42.
Xu, C. 2011. “The fundamental institutions of China’s reforms and development.” J. Econ. Lit. 49 (4): 1076–1151. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.4.1076.
Yang, R., Y. Chen, Y. Liu, Y. Feng, J. Ji, C. W. Y. Wong, X. Miao, and Y. Tang. 2022. “Government-business relations, environmental information transparency and Hu-line related factors in China.” Environ. Dev. Sustainability 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02374-8.
Yang, Z. H. 2011. “An investigation on the nonlinear relationship between government size, expenditure growth and economic growth.” [In Chinese.] J. Quant. Tech. Econ. 28 (6): 77–92.
Yuan, F. C., and Y. W. Jiang. 2020. “Is the promotion tournament still work? Eco-evcironment governance AS a discussion area.” [In Chinese.] Public Administration Policy Rev. 9 (03): 62–73.
Zhao, L., C. Sun, and F. Liu. 2017. “Interprovincial two-stage water resource utilization efficiency under environmental constraint and spatial spillover effects in China.” J. Cleaner Prod. 164: 715–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.252.
Zheng, S., and M. E. Kahn. 2013. “Understanding China’s urban pollution dynamics.” J. Econ. Literature 51 (3): 731–772. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.3.731.
Zhong, S. Y., and K. Li. 2010. “The population dividend, the spatial spill-over and the provincial economic growth.” [In Chinese.] Manage. World 04: 14-23–186-187.
Zhou, X. G., and Y. Ai. 2010. “Multiple logics in institutional change: Toward an analytical framework.” Social Sci. China 4: 132–150.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 149Issue 1March 2023

History

Received: Dec 15, 2021
Accepted: Oct 7, 2022
Published online: Dec 6, 2022
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 6, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Shuangshuang Li [email protected]
School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China. Email: [email protected]
School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China. Email: [email protected]
School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China. Email: [email protected]
School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China. Email: [email protected]
Yanhong Tang [email protected]
School of Public Administration and Law, Northeast Agricultural Univ., Harbin 150030, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share