Technical Papers
Jun 20, 2022

Investigating Older Adults’ Propensity toward Ridesourcing Services

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148, Issue 9

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a study that explores the desired monthly cost savings that would motivate older adults to change their regular mobility choices to ridesourcing. Using data from a stated preference survey, various socioeconomic and demographic attributes and personal attitudinal factors were examined to investigate their impacts on older adults’ ridesourcing adoption decisions. Random parameter ordered logit models were developed for older adults (age 65 and older) and young adults (age 64 and younger) separately to investigate whether and how the contributing factors differ. The potential heterogeneity in the impacts of these variables was also examined. Model results showed significant differences between older and younger adults’ motivations for ridesourcing adoption. For older adults, those who were less educated or sensitive to travel costs required lower economic incentives, and were therefore easier to persuade to switch to ridesourcing. In contrast, older adults who had a positive view about private vehicle utilities, had trust issues with traveling with strangers, used private vehicles for regular trips, and shopped online regularly showed higher expectations of monthly cost savings to switching to ridesourcing. While these attitudes played a significant role in older adults’ decision-making, socioeconomic and demographic attributes, such as age and income, were more influential in young adults’ ridesourcing choices. The results provide a better understanding of the older adults’ motivations to switch to ridesourcing for monthly cost savings. The findings could be helpful for planners and policymakers to better plan for older adults to meet their mobility needs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Adler, G., and S. Rottunda. 2006. “Older adults’ perspectives on driving cessation.” J. Aging Stud. 20 (3): 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2005.09.003.
Alam, R., A. M. Sadri, and X. Jin. 2021. “Identifying public perceptions toward emerging transportation trends through social media-based interactions.” Future Transp. 1 (3): 794–813. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp1030044.
Alemi, F., G. Circella, S. Handy, and P. Mokhtarian. 2018a. “What influences travelers to use Uber? Exploring the factors affecting the adoption of on-demand ride services in California.” Travel Behav. Soc. 13 (Jul): 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2018.06.002.
Alemi, F., G. Circella, P. Mokhtarian, and S. Handy. 2018b. “Exploring the latent constructs behind the use of ridehailing in California.” J. Choice Modell. 29 (Aug): 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2018.08.003.
Alemi, F., G. Circella, P. Mokhtarian, and S. Handy. 2019. “What drives the use of ridehailing in California? Ordered probit models of the usage frequency of Uber and Lyft.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 102 (Dec): 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.12.016.
Asgari, H., and X. Jin. 2020. “Propensity toward ride-sourcing: Desired savings in travel time and mobility cost to switch from private mobility.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 121 (Apr): 102883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102883.
Asgari, H., X. Jin, and T. Corkery. 2018. “A stated preference survey approach to understanding mobility choices in light of shared mobility services and automated vehicle technologies in the U.S.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (47): 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118790124.
Azevedo, E. M., and E. G. Weyl. 2016. “Matching markets in the digital age.” Science 352 (6289): 1056–1057. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf7781.
Azimi, G., A. Rahimi, H. Asgari, and X. Jin. 2020a. “Role of attitudes in transit and auto users’ mode choice of ridesourcing.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (11): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120941841.
Azimi, G., A. Rahimi, H. Asgari, and X. Jin. 2020b. “Severity analysis for large truck rollover crashes using a random parameter ordered logit model.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 135 (Apr): 105355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105355.
Beirão, G., and J. S. Cabral. 2008. “Market segmentation analysis using attitudes toward transportation exploring the differences between men and women.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2067 (1): 56–64. https://doi.org/10.3141/2067-07.
Bialik, C., A. Flowers, R. Fischer-Baum, and D. Mehta. 2015. “Uber is serving New York’s outer boroughs more than taxis are.” Accessed August 10, 2015. https://fivethirtyeight.com.
Brown, A. 2019. “Redefining car access: Ride-hail travel and use in Los Angeles.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 85 (2): 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1603761.
Brown, A. E. 2018. Ridehail revolution: Ridehail travel and equity in Los Angeles. Los Angeles: Univ. of California.
Chihuri, S., T. J. Mielenz, C. J. Dimaggio, M. E. Betz, C. Diguiseppi, V. C. Jones, and G. Li. 2016. “Driving cessation and health outcomes in older adults.” J. Am. Geriatrics Soc. 64 (2): 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13931.
Cicchino, J. B., and A. T. McCartt. 2014. “Trends in older driver crash involvement rates and survivability in the United States: An update.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 72 (6): 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.011.
Circella, G., F. Alemi, K. Tiedeman, S. Handy, and P. Mokhtarian. 2018. “The adoption of shared mobility in California and its relationship with other components of travel behavior.” UC Davis: National Center for Sustainable Transportation. Accessed June 19, 2021. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1kq5d07p.
Clewlow, R. R., and G. S. Mishra. 2017. “Disruptive transportation: The adoption, utilization, and impacts of ride-hailing in the United States.” UC Davis: Institute of Transportation Studies. Accessed June 23, 2021. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/82w2z91j.
Cliff, N. 1988. “The Eigenvalues-greater-than-one rule and the reliability of components.” Psychol. Bull. 103 (2): 276–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.276.
Dawes, M. 2016. Perspectives on the ridesourcing revolution: Surveying individual attitudes toward Uber and Lyft to inform urban transportation policymaking. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Dias, F. F., P. S. Lavieri, V. M. Garikapati, S. Astroza, R. M. Pendyala, and C. R. Bhat. 2017. “A behavioral choice model of the use of car-sharing and ride-sourcing services.” Transportation 44 (6): 1307–1323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9797-8.
Dillahunt, T. R., V. Kameswaran, L. Li, and T. Rosenblat. 2017. “Uncovering the values and constraints of real-time ridesharing for low-resource populations.” In Proc., Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2757–2769. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Greene, W. H. 2012. Econometric analysis. 7th ed. London: Pearson.
Haboucha, C. J., R. Ishaq, and Y. Shiftan. 2017. “User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerging Technol. 78 (8): 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.010.
Henao, A. 2017. “Impacts of Ridesourcing-Lyft and Uber-on Transportation Including VMT.” In Mode replacement, parking, and travel behavior. Denver: Univ. of Colorado at Denver.
Hughes, R., and D. MacKenzie. 2016. “Transportation network company wait times in Greater Seattle, and relationship to socioeconomic indicators.” J. Transp. Geogr. 56 (3): 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.08.014.
Jones, B. O. 2017. “Consumer behaviour, disruptive innovation in the public transport, Uber and the taxi industry.” LSBM Working Pap. Ser. 2 (2–3): 63–76.
Kim, S., and G. F. Ulfarsson. 2004. “Travel mode choice of the elderly: Effects of personal, household, neighborhood, and trip characteristics.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1894 (1): 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3141/1894-13.
Kooti, F., M. Grbovic, L. M. Aiello, N. Djuric, V. Radosavljevic, and K. Lerman. 2017. “Analyzing Uber’s ride-sharing economy.” In Proc., 26th Int. Conf. on World Wide Web Companion, 574–582. Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.
Lang, B., A. Parkes, and K. Fernandez-Medina. 2013. “Driving choices for the older motorist: The role of self-assessment tools.” Accessed February 8, 2021. http://www.racfoundation.org/research/safety/driving-choices-for-the-older-motorist.
Lavieri, P. S., F. F. Dias, N. R. Juri, J. Kuhr, and C. R. Bhat. 2018. “A model of ridesourcing demand generation and distribution.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (46): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118756628.
Leistner, D. L., and R. L. Steiner. 2017. “Uber for seniors?: Exploring transportation options for the future.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2660 (1): 22–29. https://doi.org/10.3141/2660-04.
Mair, P. 2018. “Factor analysis.” In Modern psychometrics with R, 17–61. Berlin: Springer.
Mitra, S. K., Y. Bae, and S. G. Ritchie. 2019. “Use of ride-hailing services among older adults in the United States.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (3): 700–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119835511.
Norton, E. C., B. E. Dowd, and M. L. Maciejewski. 2018. “Odds ratios-current best practice and use.” J. Am. Med. Assoc. 320 (1): 84–85. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.6971.
Qi, Y., M. A. A. Sarker, M. Imran, and R. Pokhrel. 2020. Motor vehicle crashes among the older population. (No. FHWA-ICT-20-011). Rantoul, IL: Illinois Center for Transportation. https://doi.org/10.36501/0197-9191/20-017.
Qin, W., X. Xiang, and H. Taylor. 2020. “Driving cessation and social isolation in older adults.” J. Aging Health 32 (9): 962–971. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264319870400.
Ragland, D. R., K. E. MacLeod, T. McMillan, S. Doggett, and G. Felschundneff. 2019. Assessing and addressing the mobility needs of an aging population. UC Office of the President: Univ. of California Institute of Transportation Studies. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8p7283gg.
Ragland, D. R., W. A. Satariano, and K. E. MacLeod. 2005. “Driving cessation and increased depressive symptoms.” J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 60 (3): 399–403. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/60.3.399.
Rahimi, A., G. Azimi, and X. Jin. 2020. “Examining human attitudes toward shared mobility options and autonomous vehicles.” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 72 (5): 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.05.001.
Rayle, L., D. Dai, N. Chan, R. Cervero, and S. Shaheen. 2016. “Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco.” Transp. Policy 45 (Sep): 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.004.
Rayle, L., S. Shaheen, N. Chan, D. Dai, and R. Cervero. 2014. App-based, on-demand ride services: Comparing taxi and ridesourcing trips and user characteristics in San Francisco University of California transportation center (UCTC). Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Shirgaokar, M. 2017. “Which barriers prevent seniors from accessing transportation network company (TNC) services? Identifying ways forward for a gendered policy approach.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Walter E. Washington Convention Center.
Shirgaokar, M. 2020. “Expanding seniors’ mobility through phone apps: Potential responses from the private and public sectors.” J. Plann. Educ. Res. 40 (4): 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18769133.
Smith, A. 2016. “Shared, collaborative and on demand: The new digital economy.” Accessed June 23, 2021. http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/05/19/the-new-digital-economy/.
Taherdoost, H., S. Sahibuddin, and N. Jalaliyoon. 2014. “Exploratory factor analysis: Concepts and theory.” Adv. Appl. Pure Math. 27 (May): 375–382.
Tooley, M., J. Zmud, B. Ettelman, M. Moran, L. Higgins, A. Shortz, and E. Wheeler. 2019. “Older drivers and transportation network companies: Investigating opportunities for increased safety and improved mobility.” Accessed July 23, 2021. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/95179.
US Census Bureau. 2020. “65 and older population grows rapidly as baby boomers age.” Accessed February 8, 2021. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2020/65-older-population-grows.html.
Vespa, J., L. Medina, and D. Armstrong. 2020. “Demographic turning points for the United States: Population projections for 2020 to 2060.” Accessed February 7, 2021. https://census.gov/programs-surveys/popproj.html.
Vivoda, J. M., A. C. Harmon, G. M. Babulal, and B. J. Zikmund-Fisher. 2018. “E-hail (rideshare) knowledge, use, reliance, and future expectations among older adults.” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 55 (3): 426–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.03.020.
Wang, S., Z. Jiang, R. B. Noland, and A. S. Mondschein. 2020. “Attitudes towards privately-owned and shared autonomous vehicles.” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 72 (Sep): 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.05.014.
Washington, S. P., M. G. Karlaftis, and F. L. Mannering. 2011. Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
Xu, Y., X. Yan, X. Liu, and X. Zhao. 2021. “Identifying key factors associated with ridesplitting adoption rate and modeling their nonlinear relationships.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 144 (Jan): 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.12.005.
Yan, X., X. Liu, and X. Zhao. 2020. “Using machine learning for direct demand modeling of ridesourcing services in Chicago.” J. Transp. Geogr. 83 (Jan): 102661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102661.
Yang, L., G. Zheng, and X. Zhu. 2013. “Cross-nested logit model for the joint choice of residential location, travel mode, and departure time.” Habitat Int. 38 (23): 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.06.002.
Zheng, Z., Z. Liu, C. Liu, and N. Shiwakoti. 2014. “Understanding public response to a congestion charge: A random-effects ordered logit approach.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 70 (2014): 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.016.
Zou, Z., and C. Cirillo. 2021. “Does ridesourcing impact driving decisions: A survey weighted regression analysis.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 146 (Feb): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.02.006.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148Issue 9September 2022

History

Received: Oct 2, 2021
Accepted: Apr 15, 2022
Published online: Jun 20, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Nov 20, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Md. Al Adib Sarker [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International Univ., 10555 W. Flagler St., EC 3725, Miami, FL 33174. Email: [email protected]
Alireza Rahimi, Ph.D. [email protected]
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International Univ., 10555 W. Flagler St., EC 3725, Miami, FL 33174. Email: [email protected]
Ghazaleh Azimi, Ph.D. [email protected]
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International Univ., 10555 W. Flagler St., EC 3725, Miami, FL 33174. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, American Institute of Certified Planners, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International Univ., 10555 W. Flagler St., EC 3603, Miami, FL 33174 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8660-3528. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Unraveling Heterogeneity in Online Shopping and Travel Behavior Through Latent Class Modeling, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 10.1177/03611981241234918, (2024).
  • Aging Population and Automated Mobility: Exploring the Impacts of Land Use Patterns and Attitudes, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 10.1177/03611981231160548, 2677, 10, (136-152), (2023).
  • Injury severity of single-vehicle large-truck crashes: accounting for heterogeneity, International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 10.1080/17457300.2023.2239212, 30, 4, (571-581), (2023).
  • Examining channel choice preferences for grocery shopping during the Covid-19 pandemic, International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 10.1016/j.ijtst.2023.03.006, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share