Technical Papers
Jun 20, 2022

Public Acceptance of and Confidence in Navigating Intersections with Alternative Designs: A Bivariate Ordered Probit Analysis

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148, Issue 9

Abstract

Public opposition to alternative intersection/interchange designs can be a large barrier to their implementation, even when they have safety and efficiency benefits. This study evaluated the factors influencing perceptions for four alternative designs: the roundabout, the restricted crossing U-turn, the displaced left turn, and the diverging diamond interchange. A survey was designed and distributed to 1,000 adults residing in the State of Indiana. The survey solicited participant acceptance of and driver confidence with alternative designs. Bivariate ordered probit models were estimated to evaluate the impact of socio-demographic and trip-making characteristics on public perception. The findings suggest that respondents who are younger, male, highly educated, who travel more often or for farther distances, and who rate their own driving ability highly, are more likely to accept and be confident using alternative designs. The results of this study can inform future outreach efforts by improving transportation agency understanding of public opinions and primary concerns regarding these designs and provide potential paths for improving public perception.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions. This study involved human subjects and data is subject to confidentiality terms for participant privacy as agreed upon with the Purdue University Institutional Review Board (IRB).

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Joint Transportation Research Program administered by the Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The authors would additionally like to thank the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT), the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), and the Fairfax County (VA) Department of Transportation (FCDOT) for allowing us to use public outreach materials they developed in the survey. The authors would lastly like to thank undergraduate research assistant Elizabeth Rosenzweig for her valuable assistance in conducting descriptive statistical analysis of the survey instrument.

References

Adsit, S. E., T. Konstantinou, K. Gkritza, and J. D. Fricker. 2021. Public acceptance of INDOT’s traffic engineering treatments and services. West Lafayette, IN: Joint Transportation Research Program.
Carroll, D. H., and D. Lahusen. 2013. “Operational effects of continuous flow intersection geometrics: A deterministic model.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2348 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3141/2348-01.
Chilukuri, V., S. Siromaskul, M. Trueblood, and T. Ryan. 2011. Diverging diamond interchange performance evaluation (I-44 & Route 13). St. Louis: HDR Engineering.
Day, C., A. Hainen, and D. Bullock. 2013. Best practices for roundabouts on state highways. West Lafayette, IN: Joint Transportation Research Program.
Edara, P., S. Breslow, C. Sun, and B. R. Claros. 2015. “Empirical evaluation of J-turn intersection performance: Analysis of conflict measures and crashes.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2486 (1): 11–18. https://doi.org/10.3141/2486-02.
Fairfax County DOT. 2015. “Huntingdon area transportation study (HATS) project update.” County of Fairfax, Virginia. Accessed May 24, 2022. https://www.slideshare.net/fairfaxcounty/5-huntington-area-transportation-study.
Gbologah, F. E., A. Guin, and M. O. Rodgers. 2019. “Safety evaluation of roundabouts in Georgia.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (7): 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119843265.
Greene, W. H., and D. A. Hensher. 2010. Modeling ordered choices: A primer. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gwyther, H., and C. Holland. 2012. “The effect of age, gender and attitudes on self-regulation in driving.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 45: 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.11.022.
Hughes, W., R. Jagannathan, D. Sengupta, and J. E. Hummer. 2010. Alternative intersections/interchanges: Informational report (AIIR). Watertown, MA: Vanasse Hangen Brustlin.
Hummer, J. E., C. M. Cunningham, R. Srinivasan, S. Warchol, B. Claros, P. Edara, and C. Sun. 2016. “Safety evaluation of seven of the earliest diverging diamond interchanges installed in the United States.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2583 (1): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.3141/2583-04.
Hunter, M., A. Guin, J. Anderson, and S. J. Park. 2019. “Operating performance of diverging diamond interchanges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (11): 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119855341.
Indiana DOT. n.d.-a. “Median U-turns.” Accessed March 20, 2021. https://www.in.gov/indot/3392.htm.
Indiana DOT. n.d.-b. “Roundabouts.” Accessed March 20, 2021. https://www.in.gov/indot/3249.htm.
Inman, V. W., and R. P. Haas. 2012. Field evaluation of a restricted crossing U-turn intersection. Reston, VA: Science Applications International.
Jackson, K., C. Cunningham, C. Yeom, J. E. Hummer, and A. Kirk. 2014. “Public perception of double crossover diamond interchanges.” ITE J. 6 (1): 33–54.
Kostyniuk, L. P., and L. J. Molnar. 2008. “Self-regulatory driving practices among older adults: Health, age and sex effects.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 40 (4): 1576–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.04.005.
Lohr, S. L. 2021. Sampling: Design and analysis. 3rd ed. London: Chapman & Hall.
Losada-Rojas, L. L., C. Gkartzonikas, V. D. Pyrialakou, and K. Gkritza. 2019. “Exploring intercity passengers’ attitudes and loyalty to intercity passenger rail: Evidence from an on-board survey.” Transp. Policy 73 (Jan): 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.10.011.
Mehrara Molan, A., J. E. Hummer, and K. Ksaibati. 2019a. “Introducing the Super DDI as a promising alternative service interchange.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2673 (3): 586–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119833682.
Mehrara Molan, A., J. E. Hummer, and K. Ksaibati. 2019b. “Modeling safety performance of the new super DDI design in terms of vehicular traffic and pedestrian.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 127 (4): 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.03.008.
Molnar, L. J., et al. 2019. The role of driving comfort in self-regulation among a large cohort of older drivers: AAA LongROAD study. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2010. Roundabouts: An informational guide. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Alternative intersection design and selection. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. Diverging diamond interchange informational guide. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
North Carolina DOT. 2016. “Continuous flow intersection.” Accessed June 1, 2022. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Xjwpz3qCUm0.
Ott, S. E., R. L. Fiedler, J. E. Hummer, R. S. Foyle, and C. M. Cunningham. 2015. “Resident, commuter, and business perceptions of new superstreets.” J. Transp. Eng. 141 (7): 04015003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000754.
Savolainen, P. T., J. M. Kawa, and T. J. Gates. 2012. “Examining statewide public perceptions of roundabouts through a web-based survey.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2312 (1): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.3141/2312-03.
Schneider, H., S. Barnes, E. Pfetzer, and C. Hutchinson. 2019. Economic effect of restricted crossing U-turn intersections in Louisiana. Baton Rouge, LA: Highways Safety Research Group.
Shumaker, M. L., J. E. Hummer, and L. F. Huntsinger. 2013. “Barriers to implementation of unconventional intersection designs: A survey of transportation professionals.” Public Works Manage. Policy 18 (3): 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X12453927.
Steyn, H., Z. Bugg, B. Ray, A. Daleiden, P. Junior, and J. Knudsen. 2014. Displaced left turn intersection: Informational guide. Portland, OR: Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Tarko, A. P., M. Inerowicz, and B. Lang. 2008. Safety and operational impacts of alternative intersections. West Lafayette, IN: Joint Transportation Research Program.
Utah DOT. 2013. CFI guideline—A UDOT guide to continuous flow intersections. Salt Lake City: Utah DOT.
Veneziano, D., L. Ewan, and J. Stephens. 2013. Information/education synthesis on roundabouts. Bozeman, MT: Western Transportation Institute.
Virginia DOT. 2020. “Innovative intersections and interchanges.” Accessed March 20, 2021. http://www.virginiadot.org/innovativeintersections/.
Wang, X., and M. Abdel-Aty. 2008. “Analysis of left-turn crash injury severity by conflicting pattern using partial proportional odds models.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 40 (5): 1674–1682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.06.001.
Washington, S., M. G. Karlaftis, and F. L. Mannering. 2011. Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Wisconsin DOT. n.d. “Diverging diamond interchange (DDI).” Accessed March 20, 2021. https://wisconsindot.gov/Pages/safety/safety-eng/inter-design/ddi.aspx.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148Issue 9September 2022

History

Received: May 10, 2021
Accepted: Mar 10, 2022
Published online: Jun 20, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Nov 20, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Staff Engineer, McMahon Associates, Inc., 415 Fallowfield Rd., Suite 301, Camp Hill, PA 17011 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6513-8284. Email: [email protected]
Theodora Konstantinou, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ., 550 Stadium Mall Dr., West Lafayette, IN 47907. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Lyles School of Civil Engineering & Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue Univ., 550 Stadium Mall Dr., West Lafayette, IN 47907. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6598-4771. Email: [email protected]
Jon D. Fricker, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ., 550 Stadium Mall Dr., West Lafayette, IN 47907. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share