Case Studies
Oct 18, 2021

Integrated Travel Demand and Accessibility Model to Examine the Impact of New Infrastructures Using Travel Behavior Responses

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148, Issue 1

Abstract

The study aims to propose an integrated travel demand and accessibility model to examine the impact of new infrastructures on accessibility for households and employment. The cumulative opportunity measure and the spatial and temporal accessibility measure are used to describe region accessibility layout. And a zonal accessibility measure is proposed to measure attractiveness of the central business district (CBD). Further, accessibility measures are obtained by various transportation modes and times of day considering travel behavior and network traffic congestion. The complete methodology is demonstrated using a case study from the state of Maryland, US. Maryland Statewide Transportation Model is used to build an integrated travel demand and accessibility model. The investment in different projects for constrained long range plan (CLRP) (known as the vision for future growth) is compared to a case without transportation improvement but still has the same growth. Analysis results show that (1) due to lack of transit facilities, car accessibility is significantly higher than transit during peak hours; (2) because of traffic congestion, car accessibility is significantly lower during peak hours than off-peak hours, while transit is the opposite due to high frequency service during peak hours; (3) transit facility improvement can not only increase accessibility but also narrow the gap in accessibility between peak and off-peak hours; and (4) the affected region of accessibility is primarily concentrated in the metropolitan area. The study results demonstrate that it is necessary to fully assess the effect of planned transportation improvements on regional accessibility using the multimeasure accessibility analysis.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study were provided by the National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education. They are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions (e.g., anonymized data).

Acknowledgments

The research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71804127) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 22120210009). The model employed in the research was a task from a project titled “Maryland Statewide Transportation Model (MSTM)” supported by Maryland State Highway Administration (SHA) and Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT). The opinions and viewpoints expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors and does not relate to the aforementioned agencies. Thanks for the data provided by the National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education.

References

Alam, B. M. 2009. “Transit accessibility to jobs and employment prospects of welfare recipients without cars.” J. Transp. Res. Board 2110 (1): 78–86. https://doi.org/10.3141/2110-10.
Bertolaccini, K., N. E. Lownes, and S. A. Mamun. 2018. “Measuring and mapping transit opportunity: An expansion and application of the transit opportunity index.” J. Transp. Geogr. 71 (1): 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.07.009.
Bureau of Public Roads. 1964. Traffic assignment manual. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
Chakraborty, A., and S. Mishra. 2013. “Land use and transit ridership connections: Implications for state-level planning agencies.” Land Use Policy 30 (1): 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.017.
Chow, L. F., F. Zhao, X. Liu, M. T. Li, and I. Ubaka. 2006. “Transit ridership model based on geographically weighted regression.” J. Transp. Res. Board 1972 (1): 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106197200113.
Christodoulou, A., L. Dijkstra, P. Christidis, P. Bolsi, and H. Poelman. 2020. “A fine resolution dataset of accessibility under different traffic conditions in European cities.”Sci Data 7 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00619-7.
Citilabs. 2018. “CUBE voyager: Predictive modeling and simulation of transportation.” Accessed July 17, 2018. https://www.bentley.com/en/products/product-line/mobility-simulation-and-analytics/cube-voyager.
CLRP (Constrained Long Range Plan). 1994. Financially constrained long-range transportation plan. Washington, DC: Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Costinett, P., M. Jain, R. Moeckel, E. Wardell, and T. Weidner. 2009. MSTM model user’s guide. Baltimore: Maryland DOT State Highway Administration.
Dalvi, M. Q., and K. Martin. 1976. “The measurement of accessibility: Some preliminary results.” Transportation 5 (1): 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00165245.
Delafontaine, M., T. Neutens, T. Schwanen, and N. V. Weghe. 2011. “The impact of opening hours on the equity of individual space-time accessibility.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 35 (4): 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.02.005.
Edelenbosch, O., D. van Vuuren, C. Bertram, S. Carrara, J. Emmerling, H. Daly, A. Kitous, D. McCollum, and N. S. Failali. 2017. “Transport fuel demand responses to fuel price and income projections: Comparison of integrated assessment models.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 55 (1): 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.005.
Geurs, K. T., and J. Ritsema van Eck. 2001. Accessibility measures: Review and applications. Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use transportation scenarios, and related social and economic impact. Utrecht, Netherlands: Universiteit Utrecht.
Götschi, T., A. de Nazelle, C. Brand, R. Gerike, and P. Consortium. 2017. “Towards a comprehensive conceptual framework of active travel behavior: A review and synthesis of published frameworks.” Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 4 (3): 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-017-0149-9.
Hansen, W. G. 1959. “How accessibility shapes land use.” J. Am. Inst. Planners 25 (2): 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307.
Koenig, J.-G. 1980. “Indicators of urban accessibility: Theory and application.” Transportation 9 (2): 145–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167128.
Levinson, D. M. 1998. “Accessibility and the journey to work.” J. Transp. Geogr. 6 (1): 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(97)00036-7.
Li, Q., T. Zhang, H. Wang, and Z. Zeng. 2011. “Dynamic accessibility mapping using floating car data: A network-constrained density estimation approach.” J. Transp. Geogr. 19 (3): 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.07.003.
Liu, S., and X. Zhu. 2004. “Accessibility analyst: An integrated GIS tool for accessibility analysis in urban transportation planning.” Plann. Des. 31 (1): 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1068/b305.
Loustau, P., C. Morency, M. Trépanier, and L. Gourvil. 2010. “Travel time reliability on a highway network: Estimations using floating car data.” Int. J. Transp. Res. 2 (1): 27–37. https://doi.org/10.3328/TL.2010.02.01.27-37.
Mavoa, S., K. Witten, T. McCreanor, and D. O’Sullivan. 2012. “GIS based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand.” J. Transp. Geogr. 20 (1): 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.001.
Morris, J. M., P. Dumble, and M. R. Wigan. 1979. “Accessibility indicators for transport planning.” Transp. Res. Part A Gen. 13 (2): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(79)90012-8.
MTA (Maryland Transit Administration). 2018a. “Baltimore red line.” Accessed August 30, 2019. https://www.baltimoreredline.com/map-facts/key-facts.
MTA (Maryland Transit Administration). 2018b. “Purple line.” Accessed August 30, 2019. http://www.purplelinemd.com.
Odoki, J. B., H. R. Kerali, and F. Santorini. 2001. “An integrated model for quantifying accessibility-benefits in developing countries.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 35 (7): 601–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00010-0.
Páez, A., D. M. Scott, and C. Morency. 2012. “Measuring accessibility: Positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators.” J. Transp. Geogr. 25 (1): 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016.
Rodrigue, J. P., C. Comtois, and B. Slack. 2016. The geography of transport systems. Oxfordshire, UK: Taylor & Francis.
Schrank, D., T. Lomax, and S. Turner. 2010. TTI’s 2010 urban mobility report. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Transportation Institute.
Shen, Q. 2006. “Job accessibility as an indicator of auto-oriented urban structure: A comparison of boston and los angeles with Tokyo.” Environ. Plann. B Plann. Des. 33 (1): 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1068/b31144.
Tang, J., S. Zhang, X. Chen, F. Liu, and Y. Zou. 2018. “Taxi trips distribution modeling based on entropy-maximizing theory: A case study in Harbin City—China.” Physica A 493 (1): 430–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.11.114.
Wang, Y., T. F. Welch, B. Wu, X. Ye, and F. W. Ducca. 2016. “Impact of transit-oriented development policy scenarios on travel demand measures of mode share, trip distance and highway usage in Maryland.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 20 (3): 1006–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0618-y.
Ye, X., K. Wang, Y. Zou, and D. Lord. 2018. “A semi-nonparametric poisson regression model for analyzing motor vehicle crash data.” PLoS One 13 (5): e0197338. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197338.
Zou, Y., J. E. Ash, B.-J. Park, D. Lord, and L. Wu. 2018. “Empirical bayes estimates of finite mixture of negative binomial regression models and its application to highway safety.” J. Appl. Stat. 45 (9): 1652–1669. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2017.1389863.
Zou, Y., H. Yang, Y. Zhang, J. Tang, and W. Zhang. 2017. “Mixture modeling of freeway speed and headway data using multivariate skew-t distributions.” Transp. Sci. 13 (7): 657–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2017.1318973.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
Volume 148Issue 1January 2022

History

Received: Apr 8, 2021
Accepted: Aug 30, 2021
Published online: Oct 18, 2021
Published in print: Jan 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Mar 18, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Senior Engineer, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., No. 4800 Cao’an Rd., Shanghai 201804, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0887-5875. Email: [email protected]
Master Degree Candidate, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., No. 4800 Cao’an Rd., Shanghai 201804, China. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7198-3548. Email: [email protected]
Bing Wu, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., No. 4800 Cao’an Rd., Shanghai 201804, China. Email: [email protected]
Yajie Zou, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., No. 4800 Cao’an Rd., Shanghai 201804, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Transport Accessibility of Urban Districts in Megapolis: Insights from Moscow, Urban Science, 10.3390/urbansci8020036, 8, 2, (36), (2024).
  • Evaluating relocation behavior of establishments: Evidence for the short-term effects of COVID-19, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 10.1177/23998083241230580, (2024).
  • The impacts of transport infrastructure development on travel route switch behavior in Bangladesh, Cogent Social Sciences, 10.1080/23311886.2022.2119688, 8, 1, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share