Tolerance for Growing Errors of Observations as a Measure Describing Global Robustness of Estimation and Providing New Information on Other Methods
Publication: Journal of Surveying Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 4
Abstract
estimation is a modern estimation method that has found various applications in processing geodetic data. Its basic variants were not meant to be robust against outliers; however, the practical applications showed that the method could be used in such a context. Therefore, there is a need to describe the robustness of different estimation variants. The paper uses the global breakdown point in an extended interval (GBdP-) but also introduces the tolerance for growing errors of observations (TGE) to perform such an examination. It presents such measures obtained for the absolute estimation and robust estimation variants, which have not been shown before. The results prove that the absolute estimation predominates the squared estimation in such a context. Furthermore, the robust variants are much less sensitive to outliers than both basic variants mentioned. TGE not only describes how the method tolerates outliers but could also be applied to assume the most appropriate values of the steering parameters, which seems essential. The paper shows the theoretical relationship between basic estimation variants and respective -estimation methods. It is a basis for introducing and deriving GBdP- and also TGE for -estimation. The paper shows that both measures are equivalent in the case of -estimation. TGE could provide information about that estimation type’s sensitivity to growing errors of observations (also robustness to outliers) that is unavailable by applying other measures, including classical breakdown points, influence functions, rejection points, or mean success rate. TGE presents the robustness potential of the -estimation variants in a rather vivid and straightforward way, even for methods not classified as robust against outliers, e.g., the least-squares estimation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Baselga, S. 2007. “Global optimization solution of robust estimation.” J. Surv. Eng. 133 (3): 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2007)133:3(123).
Baselga, S., I. Klein, S. S. Suraci, L. C. de Oliveira, M. T. Matsuoka, and V. F. Rofatto. 2021. “Global optimization of redescending robust estimators.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2021 (Jul): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9929892.
Carrilho, A. C., M. Galo, and R. C. Santos. 2018. “Statistical outlier detection method for airborne LiDAR data.” ISPRS Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 42 (Sep): 87–92. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-87-2018.
Cellmer, S. 2015. “Least fourth powers: Optimisation method favouring outliers.” Surv. Rev. 47 (345): 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1179/1752270614Y.0000000142.
Duchnowski, R., and Z. Wiśniewski. 2017. “ and estimation. A wider range of robustness.” In Proc., 10th Int. Conf., Environmental Engineering, 1–6. Vilnius, Lithuania: Vilnius Gediminas Technical Univ. Technika.
Duchnowski, R., and Z. Wiśniewski. 2019. “Robustness of estimation: A theoretical approach.” Stud. Geophys. Geod. 63 (3): 390–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-018-0548-x.
Duchnowski, R., and Z. Wiśniewski. 2020. “Robustness of squared estimation: Empirical analyses.” Stud. Geophys. Geod. 64 (2): 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-019-0356-y.
Durdag, U. M., S. Hekimoglu, and B. Erdogan. 2022. “What is the relation between smearing effect of least squares estimation and its influence function?” Surv. Rev. 54 (385): 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2021.1939590.
Gui, Q., and J. Zhang. 1998. “Robust biased estimation and its applications in geodetic adjustments.” J. Geod. 72 (7): 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900050182.
Guo, Y., Z. Li, H. He, G. Zhang, Q. Feng, and H. Yang. 2020. “A squared similarity transformation method for stable points selection of deformation monitoring network.” Acta Geod. Cartographical Sin. 49 (11): 1419–1429. http://xb.chinasmp.com/EN/10.11947/j.AGCS.2020.20200023.
Hampel, F. R., E. M. Ronchetti, P. J. Rousseeuw, and W. A. Stahel. 1986. Robust statistics: The approach based on influence functions. New York: Wiley.
Huber, P. J. 1964. “Robust estimation of a location parameter.” Ann. Math. Stat. 35 (1): 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177703732.
Huber, P. J., and E. M. Ronchetti. 2009. Robust statistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Janicka, J., and J. Rapiński. 2013. “ transformation of coordinates.” Surv. Rev. 45 (331): 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1179/003962613X13726661625708.
Janicka, J., J. Rapiński, W. Błaszczak-Bąk, and C. Suchocki. 2020. “Application of the estimation method in the detection and dimensioning of the displacement of adjacent planes.” Remote Sens. 12 (19): 3203. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12193203.
Krarup, K., and K. Kubik. 1983. “The Danish method: Experience and philosophy.” In Deutsche Geodaetische Kommission Seminar on Math. Models of Geodetic photogrammetric point determination with regard to outliers and systematic errors, 131–134. Munich, Germany: Deutsche Geodaetische Kommission bei der Bayerischen Akademie Wissen.
Lehmann, R. 2013. “-rule for outlier detection from the viewpoint of geodetic adjustment.” J. Surv. Eng. 139 (4): 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000112.
Li, J., A. Wang, and W. Xinyuan. 2013. “Relationship between M-split estimation and LS and Its application in gross error detection.” Mine Surv. 2 (Jul): 57–59. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-358X.2013.02.20.
Nowel, K. 2019. “Squared S-transformation of control network deformations.” J. Geod. 93 (7): 1025–1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1221-4.
Prószyński, W. 1997. “Measuring the robustness potential of the least-squares estimation: Geodetic illustration.” J. Geod. 71 (10): 652–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001900050132.
Rousseeuw, P. J., and S. Verboven. 2002. “Robust estimation in very small samples.” Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 40 (4): 741–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00078-6.
Wiśniewski, Z. 2009. “Estimation of parameters in a split functional model of geodetic observations ( estimation).” J. Geod. 83 (2): 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0241-x.
Wiśniewski, Z. 2014. “M-estimation with probabilistic models of geodetic observations.” J. Geod. 88 (10): 941–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0735-7.
Wyszkowska, P., and R. Duchnowski. 2019. “ estimation based on norm condition.” J. Surv. Eng. 145 (3): 04019006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000286.
Wyszkowska, P., and R. Duchnowski. 2022. “Processing TLS heterogeneous data by applying robust estimation.” Measurement 197 (Apr): 111298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111298.
Yang, Y. 1994. “Robust estimation for dependent observations.” Manuscr. Geod. 19 (1): 10–17.
Yang, Y., L. Song, and T. Xu. 2002. “Robust estimator for correlated observations based on bifactor equivalent weights.” J. Geod. 76 (6): 353–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-002-0256-7.
Zienkiewicz, M. H., and R. Baryła. 2020. “Determination of an adequate number of competitive functional models in the square estimation with the use of a modified Baarda’s approach.” Surv. Rev. 52 (370): 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2018.1507361.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 24, 2023
Accepted: May 27, 2023
Published online: Jul 25, 2023
Published in print: Nov 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Dec 25, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Yeqing Tao, Xinchuan Li, Hao Chen, Juan Yang, Solution for the Robust Estimation of Heterogeneous Data Fusion Based on Classification Estimation, Journal of Surveying Engineering, 10.1061/JSUED2.SUENG-1492, 150, 3, (2024).