Technical Papers
Sep 20, 2023

Shake Table Testing and Modeling of New Zealand Light-Frame Wood Buildings

Publication: Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 12

Abstract

The 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence highlighted the vulnerability of New Zealand light-frame wood buildings that are the predominant typology in residential construction. While life-safety performance was excellent, many buildings experienced widespread cracking of internal wall linings that resulted in costly repairs and disruption. Despite the widespread use of light-frame wood construction in New Zealand, no known shake table tests have been documented for this construction typology. Additionally, New Zealand light-frame wood building performance cannot simply be inferred from international testing because New Zealand adopts a different design philosophy from those of the US and Canada by relying on gypsum sheathing as the primary lateral resisting element. To further investigate New Zealand light-frame wood building performance, this paper discusses shake table testing of a light-frame wood building specimen, constructed on the University of Canterbury unidirectional shake table using modern New Zealand design and construction approaches. The observed damages during the tests were consistent with those observed in similarly built structures that were investigated after the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence. This paper also presents a modeling approach using the state-of-the-art software Timber3D, which was verified by simulating the shake table specimen and comparing the observed and predicted dynamic response from the test specimen and model, respectively. The Timber3D modeling approach included analysis and parameterization of screw-slip data using the Evolutionary Parameter Hysteretic Model, formulation of two-dimensional wall component models, and nonlinear time history analysis of a three-dimensional model of the shake table specimen. The model was shown to reasonably predict the displacement response of the shake table specimen and the strength degradation from cracking damage through repeated earthquakes. The modeling approach described is intended to further the development of residential building models toward the performance-based seismic design of light-frame wood buildings in New Zealand.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The gypsum screw-slip testing data used during the study is proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions to maintain the anonymity of the gypsum manufacturers that facilitated the testing. Permission can be facilitated by contacting the corresponding author. The Timber3D models that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All other necessary data to reproduce the research results are available in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Pang for providing a copy of the Timber3D software, which proved to be an invaluable addition to the research. This project was partially supported by QuakeCoRE, which is funded by the New Zealand Tertiary Education Commission. This is QuakeCoRE Publication No. 0863.

References

Beattie, G., R. H. Shelton, and G. C. Thomas. 2015. Structural performance of houses in the Canterbury earthquake series. Judgeford, New Zealand: Building Research Association of New Zealand.
Blaney, C., C. Cobeen, A. Filiatrault, D. P. Welch, M. Stoner, W. Pang, and T. Vincent. 2018. “Vulnerability based seismic assessment and retrofit of one-and two-family dwellings (ATC-110 project).” In Proc., 11th National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (11NCEE). Washington, DC: National Center on Education and the Economy.
Buchanan, A., D. Carradine, G. Beattie, and H. Morris. 2011. “Performance of houses during the Christchurch Earthquake of 22 February 2011.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 44 (4): 342–357. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.342-357.
Carradine, D. 2018. The effects of humidity on gypsum plasterboard used as lateral load bracing for buildings. Judgeford, New Zealand: BRANZ.
Casagrande, D., P. Grossi, and R. Tomasi. 2016. “Shake table tests on a full-scale timber-frame building with gypsum fibre boards.” Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 74 (3): 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-016-1013-6.
Christovasilis, I. P., A. Filiatrault, and A. Wanitkorkul. 2009. Seismic testing of a full-scale two-story light-frame wood building: NEESWood benchmark test. New York: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
Cooney, R. C., and M. J. Collins. 1982. A wall bracing test and evaluation procedure. Auckland, New Zealand: Building Research Association of New Zealand.
Ekiert, C., and A. Filiatrault. 2008. Fragility curves for wood light-frame structural systems for ATC-58. Buffalo, NY: Univ. at Buffalo.
Filiatrault, A., I. P. Christovasilis, A. Wanitkorkul, and J. W. van de Lindt. 2010. “Experimental seismic response of a full-scale light-frame wood building.” J. Struct. Eng. 136 (3): 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000112.
Filiatrault, A., D. Fischer, B. Folz, and C.-M. Uang. 2002. “Seismic testing of two-story woodframe house: Influence of wall finish materials.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (10): 1337–1345. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:10(1337).
Filiatrault, A., A. Wanitkorkul, and M. C. Constantinou. 2008. Development and appraisal of a numerical cyclic loading protocol for quantifying building system performance. Buffalo, NY: Univ. at Buffalo.
Folz, B., and A. Filiatrault. 2000. CASHEW: A computer program for cyclic analysis of shear walls. San Diego: Univ. of California.
Folz, B., and A. Filiatrault. 2001. “Cyclic analysis of wood shear walls.” J. Struct. Eng. 127 (4): 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:4(433).
Folz, B., and A. Filiatrault. 2004a. “Seismic analysis of woodframe structures. I: Model formulation.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (9): 1353–1360. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1353).
Folz, B., and A. Filiatrault. 2004b. “Seismic analysis of woodframe structures. II: Model implementation and verification.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (9): 1361–1370. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1361).
Horspool, N. A., A. B. King, S. L. Lin, and S. R. Uma. 2016. “Damage and losses to residential buildings during the Canterbury earthquake sequence.” In Proc., 2016 NZSEE Conf. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Earthquake Engineering Society.
Jampole, E. A., G. Deierlein, E. Miranda, B. Fell, S. Swensen, and C. Acevedo. 2016. “Full-scale dynamic testing of a sliding seismically isolated unibody house.” Earthquake Spectra 32 (4): 2245–2270. https://doi.org/10.1193/010616EQS003M.
Jennings, E. N., J. W. van de Lindt, X. Shao, W. Pang, and E. Ziaei. 2014. “Full-scale hybrid testing of a soft-story woodframe building seismically retrofitted using shape memory alloy devices in scissor-jack.” In Proc., 10th National Conf. in Earthquake Engineering. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Kim, J. H. 2004. Performance-based seismic design of light-frame shearwalls. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State Univ.
Krawinkler, H., F. Parisi, L. Ibarra, A. Ayoub, and R. Medina. 2001. Vol. 102 of Development of a testing protocol for woodframe structures. Richmond, CA: CUREE.
Li, M., F. Lam, R. O. Foschi, S. Nakajima, and T. Nakagawa. 2012a. “Seismic performance of post and beam timber buildings. I: Model development and verification.” J. Wood Sci. 58 (1): 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-011-1219-5.
Li, M., F. Lam, R. O. Foschi, S. Nakajima, and T. Nakagawa. 2012b. “Seismic performance of post-and-beam timber buildings. II: Reliability evaluations.” J. Wood Sci. 58 (2): 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-011-1232-8.
Liu, A., and D. Carradine. 2019. “Seismic bracing performance of plasterboard timber walls.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 52 (2): 56–66. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.52.2.56-66.
Liu, A., and M. Li. 2023. “Seismic effects of bracing irregularity of light timber-framed buildings.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 56 (1): 29–37. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.56.1.29-37.
Ma, Z., M. Li, A. Liu, J. Wang, L. Zhou, and W. Dong. 2022. “Seismic performance of single-storey light timber-framed buildings braced by gypsum plasterboards considering rigidity of ceiling diaphragms.” In Vol. 41 of Structures, 1207–1219. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Morris, H. W., S. Beskhyroun, T. Smith, M. Li, and D. Carradine. 2015. “In-situ lateral load test performance of Christchurch houses.” In Proc., 10th Pacific Conf. on Earthquake Engineering: Building an Earthquake-Resilient Pacific, 1–8. Christchurch, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
Pan, Y., C. E. Ventura, A. Bebamzadeh, and M. Motamedi. 2021. “Modeling of a shake-table tested retrofitted wood-frame building subjected to subduction ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 50 (9): 2510–2528. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3457.
Pan, Y., C. E. Ventura, and W. D. L. Finn. 2018. “Effects of ground motion duration on the seismic performance and collapse rate of light-frame wood houses.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (8): 04018112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000210.
Pan, Y., C. E. Ventura, W. D. L. Finn, and H. Xiong. 2019. “Effects of ground motion duration on the seismic damage to and collapse capacity of a mid-rise woodframe building.” Eng. Struct. 197 (Oct): 109451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109451.
Pan, Y., C. E. Ventura, and T. Tannert. 2020. “Damage index fragility assessment of low-rise light-frame wood buildings under long duration subduction earthquakes.” Struct. Saf. 84 (May): 101940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101940.
Pang, W., D. V. Rosowsky, S. Pei, and J. W. van de Lindt. 2007. “Evolutionary parameter hysteretic model for wood shear walls.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (8): 1118–1129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:8(1118).
Pang, W., and M. H. Shirazi. 2010. “Next generation numerical model for non-linear in-plane analysis of wood-frame shear walls.” In Proc., 11th World Conf. on Timber Engineering, 2255–2260. Trento, Italy: Trees and Timber Institute.
Pang, W., and S. M. H. Shirazi. 2013. “Corotational model for cyclic analysis of light-frame wood shear walls and diaphragms.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (8): 1303–1317. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000595.
Pang, W., E. Ziaei, and A. Filiatrault. 2012. “A 3D model for collapse analysis of soft-story light-frame wood buildings.” In Proc., World Conf. on Timber Engineering. Auckland, New Zealand: World Conference on Timber Engineering.
Pang, W., E. Ziaei, X. Shao, E. Jennings, J. van de Lindt, M. Gershfeld, and M. Symans. 2014. “A three-dimension model for slow hybrid testing of retrofits for soft-story wood-frame buildings.” In Proc., 10th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Pang, W. C., and D. V. Rosowsky. 2010. “Beam–spring model for timber diaphragm and shear walls.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Struct. Build. 163 (4): 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.2010.163.4.227.
Pei, S., J. W. van de Lindt, S. Pryor, H. Shimizu, H. Isoda, and D. Rammer. 2010. Seismic testing of a full-scale woodframe condominium: The NEESWood capstone test program. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
Phillips, R. 2015. “Investigation of shear capacity for light-frame wood walls constructed with insulated oriented strand board panels.” M.S. thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, Clemson Univ. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/2506.
Reserve Bank of New Zealand. 2016. Vol. 79 of Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin—The Canterbury rebuild five years on from the Christchurch Earthquake. Wellington, New Zealand: Reserve Bank of New Zealand.
Retamales, R., R. Davies, G. Mosqueda, and A. Filiatrault. 2013. “Experimental seismic fragility of cold-formed steel framed gypsum partition walls.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (8): 1285–1293. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000657.
Shelton, R. 2010. A wall bracing test and evaluation procedure. Judgeford, New Zealand: BRANZ.
Shelton, R. 2013. Engineering basis of NZS 3604. Judgeford, New Zealand: BRANZ.
Standards New Zealand. 1993. Timber structures standard. NZS 3603:1993. Wellington, New Zealand: Standards New Zealand.
Standards New Zealand. 2004. Earthquake actions—New Zealand. NZS 1170.5-Part 5. Wellington, New Zealand: Standards New Zealand.
Standards New Zealand. 2011. Timber-framed buildings. NZS 3604:2011. Wellington, New Zealand: Standards New Zealand.
Swensen, S., C. Acevedo, E. Jampole, E. Miranda, G. Deierlein, A. Hopkins, and B. Fell. 2014. “Toward damage free residential houses through unibody light-frame construction with seismic isolation.” In Proc., SEAOC 2014 83rd Annual Convention, 15. Sacramento, CA: Structural Engineers Association of California.
Thurston, S. J. 2003. Full-sized house cyclic racking test. Judgeford, New Zealand: BRANZ.
Thurston, S. J. 2012. The bracing performance of long plasterboard-lined walls. Judgeford, New Zealand: BRANZ.
van de Lindt, J. W., S. Pei, W. Pang, and S. M. H. Shirazi. 2012. “Collapse testing and analysis of a light-frame wood garage wall.” J. Struct. Eng. 138 (4): 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000472.
van de Lindt, J. W., S. Pei, and S. E. Pryor. 2011. “Construction and experimental seismic performance of a full-scale six-story light-frame wood building.” Procedia Eng. 14 (Jan): 1599–1605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.201.
van de Lindt, J. W., D. V. Rosowsky, A. Filiatrault, M. D. Symans, and R. A. Davidson. 2010. “The NEESWood project in review.” In Proc., 9th US National & 10th Canadian Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 291–300. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Structural Engineering
Journal of Structural Engineering
Volume 149Issue 12December 2023

History

Received: Jan 17, 2023
Accepted: Jul 6, 2023
Published online: Sep 20, 2023
Published in print: Dec 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 20, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7381-8717. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6997-5434
André Filiatrault, M.ASCE
Professor, Structural Engineering, Univ. School for Advanced Studies IUSS Pavia, Pavia 27100, Italy.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share