Technical Papers
Apr 12, 2023

Assessment of Impact to Buried Pipelines due to Tunneling-Induced Settlement

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 14, Issue 3

Abstract

Tunneling in urban environments is challenging due to the number of pipelines to cross, which may adversely impact the pipelines due to tunneling-induced ground settlement. An adequate vertical separation distance between the bottom of the pipeline and tunnel crown is not always possible, and a minimum volume loss may be difficult to achieve due to subsurface conditions encountered and tunneling methods available. Therefore, the impact to the existing pipelines from tunneling needs to be assessed to mitigate the risk. Considering gap formation beneath the existing pipeline explicitly and a limiting overburden loading acting on the pipeline, this study proposes a design-oriented analytical approach to estimate the upper bound of the maximum bending moment of the pipeline induced by tunneling. A dimensionless quantity, namely, the overburden loading factor defined as the ratio of overburden loading and the minimum required loading to eliminate the gap, is introduced to evaluate the extent of gapping, by which gap formation can be predicted. The effect of pipe-soil interaction, which reduces the maximum bending moment in the pipeline, is considered by conducting nonlinear Winkler-based finite element analyses with varying stiffness factors. The design chart and table are presented to provide a more accurate estimation of the maximum bending moment, especially for greater stiffness factors. It is demonstrated for small overburden loading and stiffness factors, i.e., wider gaps, a perpendicular crossing may not always be the worst-case scenario. As illustrated by the partially supported beam model, the effect of the increase in the unsupported span is greater than the effect of the reduction of the curvature of the settlement trough for these cases. Design examples are provided to demonstrate the analytical procedure step-by-step, and a comparison with previous studies is made. It is demonstrated with reasonable conservatism for small to moderate stiffness factors, the proposed design-oriented analytical approach can straightforwardly predict the maximum bending moment in pipelines.

Practical Applications

It is common to cross beneath an existing buried pipeline in the proximity for any tunneling project in urban areas due to the restrictions of underground space, soil conditions, right-of-way, and construction costs, etc. Considering gap formation beneath and an ultimate overburden loading on the existing pipeline, this study can be used to estimate the maximum bending moment in the existing pipeline due to ground settlement induced by tunneling, especially in the preliminary stage when the soil information is unavailable. The analytical procedure can be easily implemented by hand calculation or a spreadsheet, and more accurate results can be found with the aid of a chart and table provided when the soil information is available. The results obtained can assist the tunnel practitioners to determine an adequate separation distance, intersection angle, and an appropriate tunneling method to minimize the impact to the existing pipeline. Three detailed design examples are provided in the Appendix to illustrate the procedure step-by-step.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

ASCE. 1984. Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems. New York: ASCE.
Attewell, P. B., J. Yeates, and A. R. Selby. 1986. Soil movements induced by tunnelling and their effects on pipelines and structures. London: Blackie and Son.
Folkman, S. 2018. Water main break rates in the USA and Canada: A comprehensive study. Logan, UT: Utah State Univ. Buried Structures Laboratory.
Fujita, K. 1994. “Soft ground tunnelling and buried structures.” In Proc., XIII Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Hetenyi, M. 1983. Beams on elastic foundation. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press.
Huang, M., X. Zhou, J. Yu, C. F. Leung, and W. Q. J. Tan. 2019. “Estimating the effects of tunnelling on existing jointed pipelines based on Winkler model.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 86 (Apr): 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.01.015.
Klar, A., I. Elkayam, and A. M. Marshall. 2016. “Design oriented linear-equivalent approach for evaluating the effect of tunneling on pipelines.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (1): 04015062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001376.
Klar, A., and A. M. Marshall. 2015. “Linear elastic tunnel pipeline interaction: The existence and consequence of volume loss equality.” Géotechnique 65 (9): 788–792. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.14.P.173.
Klar, A., A. M. Marshall, K. Soga, and R. J. Mair. 2008. “Tunneling effects on jointed pipelines.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (1): 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-068.
Klar, A., T. E. B. Vorster, K. Soga, and R. J. Mair. 2005. “Soil-pipe interaction due to tunnelling: Comparison between Winkler and elastic continuum solutions.” Géotechnique 55 (6): 461–466. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.6.461.
Klar, A., T. E. B. Vorster, K. Soga, and R. J. Mair. 2007. “Elastoplastic solution for soil-pipe-tunnel interaction.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (7): 782–792. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:7(782).
Lin, C., M. Huang, F. Nadim, and Z. Liu. 2020. “Tunnelling-induced response of buried pipelines and their effects on ground settlements.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 96 (Feb): 103193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103193.
Mair, R. J., R. N. Taylor, and A. Bracegirdle. 1993. “Subsurface settlement profiles above tunnels in clays.” Géotechnique 43 (2): 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.2.315.
Marshall, A. M., A. Klar, and R. J. Mair. 2010. “Tunneling beneath buried pipes: View of soil strain and its effect on pipeline behavior.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (12): 1664–1672. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000390.
Peck, R. B. 1969. “Deep excavation and tunneling in soft ground.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 225–290. Mexico: Sociedad Mexicana De Mechanica.
Shi, J., Y. Chen, H. Lu, S. Ma, and C. W. W. Ng. 2022. “Centrifuge modeling of the influence of joint stiffness on pipeline response to underneath tunnel excavation.” Can. Geotech. J. 59 (9): 1568–1586. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2020-0360.
Shi, J., Y. Wang, and C. W. W. Ng. 2016. “Three-dimensional centrifuge modeling of ground and pipeline response to tunnel excavation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (11): 04016054. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001529.
Trautmann, C. H., T. D. O’Rourke, and F. H. Kulhawy. 1985. “Uplift force-displacement response of buried pipe.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (9): 1061–1076. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:9(1061).
Vesic, A. B. 1961. “Bending of beams resting on isotropic elastic solid.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 87 (2): 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0000212.
Vorster, T. E., A. Klar, K. Soga, and R. J. Mair. 2005a. “Estimating the effects of tunneling on existing pipelines.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (11): 1399–1410. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:11(1399).
Vorster, T. E. B., R. J. Mair, K. Soga, and R. J. Mair. 2005b. “Centrifuge modelling of the effect of tunnelling on buried pipelines: Mechanisms observed.” In Proc., 5th Int. Symp. TC28, Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Wang, Y., J. Shi, and C. W. W. Ng. 2011. “Numerical modeling of tunneling effect on buried pipelines.” Can. Geotech. J. 48 (Jul): 1125–1137. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-024.
Yimsiri, S., K. Soga, K. Yoshizaki, G. R. Dasari, and T. D. O’Rourke. 2004. “Lateral and upward soil-pipeline interactions in sand for deep embedment conditions.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (8): 830–842. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(830).
Yu, J., C. Zhang, and M. Huang. 2013. “Soil–pipe interaction due to tunnelling: Assessment of Winkler modulus for underground pipelines.” Comput. Geotech. 50 (May): 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.12.005.
Zhang, Z., and M. Huang. 2012. “Boundary element model for analysis of the mechanical behavior of existing pipelines subjected to tunneling-induced deformations.” Comput. Geotech. 46 (Nov): 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.06.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 14Issue 3August 2023

History

Received: May 12, 2022
Accepted: Feb 16, 2023
Published online: Apr 12, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Sep 12, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Structural Lead, Aurora Technical Services, LLC, 2121 Sage Rd., Houston, TX 77056 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5801-1082. Email: [email protected]
Rafael Ortega, M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
President, Aurora Technical Services, LLC, 2121 Sage Rd., Houston, TX 77056. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share