Technical Papers
Apr 21, 2023

Spatial Structure Characterization of the Soil Surrounding Buried Water Transmission Mains by Using a Sensor-Enabled Geotextile

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 14, Issue 3

Abstract

Close examination of the parameters that characterize the spatial variability of the soil is necessary to understand how this variability can be used to study the structural behavior of buried large-diameter water transmission mains. In this research, a sensor-enabled geotextile was laid in a trench along a renewed water transmission pipeline segment to measure the ground strain during its installation and the first months of pipeline operation. A methodological approach was developed to identify, from experimental semivariograms built from ground strain measurement profiles, the scale of fluctuation that characterizes the horizontal spatial structure of the soil. Using both an experimental onsite test and a numerical model of the pipeline, the spatial variability was assumed to correspond to the soil modulus parameter in the model. The numerical results were well matched with the experimental test measurements. Both parameters, the scale of fluctuation and the soil modulus, were identified as important factors for understanding the spatial behavior of the soil–pipe system.

Practical Applications

Soil heterogeneity affects the structural response of a buried pipe with respect to force redistribution and structural displacement, and its influence appears mainly in the longitudinal direction. This heterogeneity results in the spatial variability of soil properties. Furthermore, the geomechanical behavior of buried pipes is subject to random uncertainties. In the framework of this study, the uncertain variables are treated by the theory of probabilities. Such an approach can be integrated into the context of asset management of a network of water transmission pipes. Thus, wishing optimized management of a network, the project manager needs a tool allowing him to evaluate the geomechanical performance of the pipes and to see if it is necessary to proceed to a follow-up in terms of inspection, maintenance, or renewal. This study showed that both soil modulus and the horizontal correlation length parameter of soil properties could characterize the spatial variability of a pipe site. By integrating these parameters into a numerical tool, a manager can incorporate spatial variability in a simple way while maintaining full control over their variability.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request (some ground strain measurements).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Syndicat des eaux d’Ile de France (SEDIF) and Veolia Eau d’Ile de France for their involvement in this project. Created in 1923, SEDIF is a public utility that is responsible for supplying drinking water to subscriber towns and municipalities in the Greater Paris area. SEDIF is the leading public drinking water utility in France and is one of the largest in Europe. Producing 765,000  m3 of water every day, SEDIF delivered 254 billion liters to users in 2019 through a network of pipes stretching 8,767 km.

References

Afnor. 1995a. “NF EN 639 Prescriptions communes pour tuyaux pression en béton y compris joints et pièces spéciales.” Accessed September 20, 2022. https://www.boutique.afnor.org/fr-fr/norme/nf-en-639/prescriptions-communes-pour-tuyaux-pression-en-beton-y-compris-joints-et-pi/fa025553/10803.
Afnor. 1995b. “NF EN 641 Tuyaux pression en béton armé à âme en tôle, joints et pièces spéciales compris.” Accessed September 20, 2022. https://www.boutique.afnor.org/fr-fr/norme/nf-en-641/tuyaux-pression-en-beton-arme-a-ame-en-tole-joints-et-pieces-speciales-comp/fa025555/10801.
Afnor. 2019. “NF EN 1295-1 Calcul de résistance mécanique des canalisations enterrées sous diverses conditions de charge—Partie 1: Prescriptions generals.” Accessed September 27, 2022. https://www.boutique.afnor.org/fr-fr/norme/nf-en-12951/calcul-de-resistance-mecanique-des-canalisations-enterrees-sous-diverses-co/fa189189/82755.
Afnor. 2020. “NF P98-331 Chaussées et dépendances—Tranchées: Ouverture, remblayage, refection.” Accessed September 27, 2022. https://www.boutique.afnor.org/fr-fr/norme/nf-p98331/chaussees-et-dependances-tranchees-ouverture-remblayage-refection/fa193146/85652.
Aslkhalili, A., H. Shiri, and S. Zendehboudi. 2021. “Probabilistic assessment of lateral pipeline–Backfill–Trench interaction.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 12 (3): 04021034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000564.
Becerril García, D., J. Cortés-Pérez, and I. D. Moore. 2020. “Modelling and parametric study of a gasketed bell and spigot joint in a buried high density polyethylene pipeline.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 98 (Apr): 103325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103325.
Bouayad, D. 2017. “Assessment of sandy soil variability based on CPT data.” Procedia Eng. 175 (Feb): 310–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.033.
Bowles, J. E. 2001. Foundation analysis and design. Norwich, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Breysse, D., C. La Borderie, S. M. Elachachi, and H. Niandou. 2007. “Spatial variations in soil properties and their influence on structural reliability.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 24 (2): 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286600601156673.
Buco, J. 2007. “Analyse et modélisation du comportement mécanique des conduites enterrées.” These de doctorat, LGCIE Equipe Géotechnique, INSA, Lyon.
Chilès, J.-P., and P. Delfiner. 2012. Geostatistics: Modeling spatial uncertainty. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Ching, J., T.-J. Wu, A. W. Stuedlein, and T. Bong. 2018. “Estimating horizontal scale of fluctuation with limited CPT soundings.” Geosci. Front. 9 (6): 1597–1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2017.11.008.
Cressie, N. 1993. Statistics for spatial data revised edition. New York: Wiley.
Darwich, G. 2019. “Modélisation du comportement géo-mécanique d’une conduite de transfert et évaluation de sa performance en contexte incertain.” Thèses en ligne, Dept. of GCE, Institute of Mechanical Engineering (I2M), Université de Bordeaux.
de Rocquigny, E., N. Devictor, and S. Tarantola. 2008. Uncertainty in industrial practice: A guide to quantitative uncertainty management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley–Blackwell.
Elachachi, S. M., D. Breysse, and A. Denis. 2012. “The effects of soil spatial variability on the reliability of rigid buried pipes.” Comput. Geotech. 43 (Jun): 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.02.008.
Elachachi, S. M., D. Breysse, and L. Houy. 2004. “Longitudinal variability of soils and structural response of sewer networks.” Comput. Geotech. 31 (8): 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.10.003.
Froio, D., and E. Rizzi. 2017. “Analytical solution for the elastic bending of beams lying on a linearly variable Winkler support.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 128–129 (Aug): 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.04.021.
Galindez-Jamioy, C. A., and J. M. López-Higuera. 2012. “Brillouin distributed fiber sensors: An overview and applications.” J. Sens. 2012 (Oct): 17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/204121.
Grynyshyna-Poliuga, O. 2019. “Characteristic of modelling spatial processes using geostatistical analysis.” Adv. Space Res. 64 (2): 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.04.020.
Higgins, M. S., A. Stroebele, and S. Zahidi. 2012. “Numbers don’t lie: PCCP performance and deterioration based on a statistical review of a decade of condition assessment data.” In Proc., Pipelines 2012 Conf., edited by R. J. Card, 298–306. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Iten, M., et al. 2015. “Benefits of global standards on the use of optical fiber sensing systems for the impact of construction of new utilities and tunnels on existing utilities.” In Pipelines 2015, 1655–1666. Baltimore: ASCE.
Jaksa, M., W. Kaggwa, and P. Brooker. 1999. “Experimental evaluation of the scale of fluctuation of a stiff clay.” In Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on the Application of Statistics and Probability, 415–422. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Joshi, S., A. Prashant, A. Deb, and S. K. Jain. 2011. “Analysis of buried pipelines subjected to reverse fault motion.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 31 (7): 930–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.02.003.
Kleiner, Y., and B. Rajani. 2001. “Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: Statistical models.” Urban Water 3 (3): 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00033-4.
Lagarias, J. C., J. A. Reeds, M. H. Wright, and P. E. Wright. 1998. “Convergence properties of the Nelder–Mead simplex method in low dimensions.” SIAM J. Optim. 9 (1): 112–147. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623496303470.
Liu, Z., Y. Kleiner, B. Rajani, L. Wang, and W. Condit. 2012. Condition assessment technologies for water transmission and distribution systems. Washington, DC: National Risk Management Research Laboratory, USEPA.
McGrath, T., R. Chambers, and P. Sharff. 1990. “Recent trends in installation standards for plastic pipe.” In Proc., Buried Plastic Pipe Technology STP1093-EB, edited by George S. Buczala and Michael. J. Cassady, 281–293. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP42126S.
Molugaram, K., G. S. Rao, A. Shah, and N. Davergave. 2017. Statistical techniques for transportation engineering. Cambridge, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Nie, X., J. Zhang, H. Huang, Z. Liu, and S. Lacasse. 2015. “Scale of fluctuation for geotechnical probabilistic analysis.” In Proc., 5th Int. Symp. on Geotechnical Safety and Risk, 834–840. Rotterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Onyejekwe, S., X. Kang, and L. Ge. 2016. “Evaluation of the scale of fluctuation of geotechnical parameters by autocorrelation function and semivariogram function.” Eng. Geol. 214 (Nov): 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.09.014.
Oswell, J. M., J. Hart, and N. Zulfiqar. 2019. “Effect of geotechnical parameter variability on soil-pipeline interaction.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 10 (4): 04019028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000402.
Phoon, K.-K. 2014. Reliability-based design in geotechnical engineering: Computations and applications. London: CRC Press.
Potts, D., K. Axelsson, L. Grande, H. Schweiger, and M. Long. 2002. Guidelines for the use of advanced numerical analysis. Wolverhampton, UK: Thomas Telford.
Rajani, B., and Y. Kleiner. 2001. “Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: Physically based models.” Urban Water 3 (3): 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00032-2.
Rajeev, P., J. Kodikara, D. Robert, P. Zeman, and B. Rajani. 2014. “Factors contributing to large diameter water pipe failure.” Water Asset Manage. Int. 10 (3): 9–14.
Romer, A. E., G. E. C. Bell, and R. D. Ellison. 2007. “Failure of prestressed concrete cylinder pipe.” In Proc., Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects, edited by M. Najafi and L. Osborn, 1–17. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Rubio, N., D. Roehl, and C. Romanel. 2007. “A three dimensional contact model for soil-pipe interaction.” J. Mech. Mater. Struct. 2 (8): 1501–1513. https://doi.org/10.2140/jomms.2007.2.1501.
Sahraoui, Y., M. Benamira, M. Nahal, F. Nouadria, and A. Chateauneuf. 2020. “The effect of welded joint repair on a corroded pipeline reliability subjected to the hardness spatial variability and soil aggressiveness.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 118 (Dec): 104854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104854.
Shynk, J. J. 2012. Probability, random variables, and random processes theory and signal processing applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Soize, C. 2017. Uncertainty quantification: An accelerated course with advanced applications in computational engineering. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Uzielli, M., S. Lacasse, F. Nadim, and K.-K. Phoon. 2007. “Soil variability analysis for geotechnical practice.” In Vol. 3–4 of Proc., 2nd Int. Workshop Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, 1653–1752. Singapore: National Univ. of Singapore.
Vanmarcke, E. H. 1977. “Probabilistic modeling of soil profiles.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 103 (11): 1227–1246. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000517.
Wang, W., Y. Wang, B. Zhang, W. Shi, and C.-Q. Li. 2021. “Failure prediction of buried pipe network with multiple failure modes and spatial randomness of corrosion.” Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 191 (Jun): 104367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.104367.
Xu, M., and D. Shen. 2020. “The influence of erosion voids on the longitudinal behaviour of a jointed large-diameter reinforced concrete pipeline.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 103 (Sep): 103494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103494.
Yanez-Godoy, H., G. Darwich, S. M. Elachachi, O. Chesneau, and C. Feliers. 2018. “Suivi du comportement mécanique d’une conduite d’eau potable enterrée et instrumentée: Analyse des premières mesures.” Acad. J. Civ. Eng. 36 (1): 629–632. https://doi.org/10.26168/ajce.36.1.136.
Yáñez-Godoy, H., S. M. Elachachi, and G. Darwich. 2017a. “Geomechanical behaviour of large diameter pressure water pipelines in unidimensional heterogeneous soils.” Proc., Safety, Reliability, Risk, Resilience and Sustainability of Structures and Infrastructure, 12th Int. Conf. Structural Safety and Reliability, edited by C. Bucher, B. R. Ellingwood, and D. M. Frangopol, 386–395. Baltimore: International Association for Structural Safety and Reliability.
Yáñez-Godoy, H., S.-M. Elachachi, O. Chesneau, and C. Feliers. 2019. “Identification of key determinants of geo-mechanical behavior of an instrumented buried pipe.” In Proc., 13th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP13), 1297–1304. Seoul: Korean Institute of Bridge and Structural Engineers.
Yáñez-Godoy, H., A. Mokeddem, and S. M. Elachachi. 2017b. “Influence of spatial variability of soil friction angle on sheet pile walls’ structural behavior.” Georisk Assess. Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohazards 11 (4): 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2017.1297465.
Yang, J.-N. 1972. “Simulation of random envelope processes.” J. Sound Vib. 21 (1): 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(72)90207-6.
Zheng, Q., L. Graf-Alexiou, Y. Li, N. Yoosef-Ghodsi, M. Fowler, M. Kainat, and S. Adeeb. 2021. “Strain demand of elastic pipes subjected to permanent ground displacements using the finite difference method.” J. Pipeline Sci. Eng. 1 (2): 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2021.06.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 14Issue 3August 2023

History

Received: Jul 11, 2022
Accepted: Feb 10, 2023
Published online: Apr 21, 2023
Published in print: Aug 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Sep 21, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Univ. of Bordeaux, Institute of Mechanical Engineering (I2M), UMR 5295, Bât. A11, 351 Cours de la Libération, 33405 Talence Cedex, France (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9918-3457. Email: [email protected]
Sidi Mohammed Elachachi [email protected]
Professor, Univ. of Bordeaux, Institute of Mechanical Engineering (I2M), UMR 5295, Bât. A11, 351 Cours de la Libération, 33405 Talence Cedex, France. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share