Evaluation of the Accuracy of Pavement ME Methodology in Calculating Equivalent Loading Frequency and Its Effect on Strain Response Predictions in Flexible Pavements
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Volume 150, Issue 1
Abstract
The prediction of strain responses under axle loadings is critical for flexible pavement design by the mechanistic-empirical approach. The mechanistic-empirical pavement design (pavement ME) method uses linear-elastic analysis to simulate the strain responses under axle loadings, and it relies on the concept of equivalent loading frequency to determine the elastic modulus of the asphalt concrete (AC) layer from the dynamic modulus master curve. The pavement ME method has a simplified procedure to calculate this frequency. The main goal of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of axle loading frequency calculated by the pavement ME method. This paper first introduces the concepts of predominant and equivalent frequencies, provides a brief explanation of the difference between them, and then proposes three predominant frequency methods for evaluation. The accuracy of the pavement ME method and the other methods of calculating the predominant frequency is evaluated in terms of frequency, modulus, and strain by comparing their results with those from dynamic viscoelastic analysis with moving loads. Results show that the time–frequency relationship for predominant frequency is closer to than , assuming that the pulse duration is accurate. Nevertheless, using with the approximate pulse duration as calculated by the pavement ME method gives reasonable predictions of the maximum tensile strain. On the other hand, while it gives reasonable predictions of vertical strains with increasing depth, the pavement ME method can underestimate them near the surface by up to 55%. Overall, even though the procedure for pavement ME frequency calculation is highly simplified, its general performance appears to be acceptable.
Practical Applications
The two most typical distresses of flexible pavement are rutting and fatigue cracking, and they are related to two critical strains: vertical strains throughout the layers and horizontal strains at the bottom of the asphalt concrete later of the pavement. The commonly used design approach, the pavement ME method, utilizes the concept of equivalent loading frequency to predict critical strains within the pavement by linear-elastic analysis rather than the full dynamic viscoelastic analysis. This reduces the computational cost significantly. This paper investigates the accuracy of the equivalent loading frequency calculated by the pavement ME method by comparing the frequency values with several other methods, and, finally, comparing the critical strains predicted by the pavement ME method and the results from dynamic viscoelastic analysis, which is considered to be the truth. The results showed that the pavement ME method underestimates vertical strains near the surface of the pavement, which may lead to underestimating rutting (before calibration). However, calibration may be able to remedy the problem. On the other hand, the horizontal strain predicted by the pavement ME method is reasonable, which means the fatigue cracking can be reasonably predicted.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request [vertical stresses, vertical strains, and horizontal strains (longitudinal and transverse) obtained by dynamic viscoelastic analysis using 3D-Move software for the 12 cases in Table 2; vertical strains and horizontal strains (longitudinal and transverse) obtained by linear-elastic analysis by methods of pavement ME, centroid of PSD, and the equivalent frequency for the 12 cases in Table 2].
References
AASHTO. 1993. AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Al-Qadi, I. L., M. A. Elseifi, P. J. Yoo, S. H. Dessouky, N. Gibson, T. Harman, J. D’Angelo, and K. Petros. 2008a. “Accuracy of current complex modulus selection procedure from vehicular load pulse: NCHRP Project 1-37A mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2087 (1): 81–90. https://doi.org/10.3141/2087-09.
Al-Qadi, I. L., W. Xie, and M. A. Elseifi. 2008b. “Frequency determination from vehicular loading time pulse to predict appropriate complex modulus in MEPDG.” Asphalt Paving Technol.-Proc. 77 (Apr): 739–771.
ARA (Applied Research Associates). 2001. “Appendix CC-3 of the guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures.” NCHRP 1-37A. Accessed July 1, 2016. https://me-design.com/medesign/Documents.html?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1.
Brown, S. F. 1973. “Determination of Young’s modulus for bituminous materials in pavement design.” Highway Res. Rec. 431 (Dec): 38–49.
Chen, P., K. Chatti, and B. Cetin. 2023. “Evaluation of the accuracy and validity of current MEPDG methodology for equivalent loading frequency calculation in flexible pavements.” In Advances in materials and pavement performance prediction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Ferry, J. D. 1980. Viscoelastic properties of polymers. New York: Wiley.
Ghanizadeh, A. R., and M. Fakhri. 2018. “Quasi-static analysis of flexible pavements based on predicted frequencies using fast Fourier transform and artificial neural network.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 11 (1): 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.09.002.
Kramer, S. L. 1996. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, NJ: Pearson Education India.
Lei, L. 2011. “Backcalculation of asphalt concrete complex modulus curve by layered viscoelastic solution.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State Univ.
Losa, M., and A. Di Natale. 2012. “Evaluation of representative loading frequency for linear elastic analysis of asphalt pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2305 (1): 150–161. https://doi.org/10.3141/2305-16.
Oshone, M., E. Dave, J. S. Daniel, and G. M. Rowe. 2017. “Prediction of phase angles from dynamic modulus data and implications for cracking performance evaluation.” Supplement, Road Mater. Pavement Des. 18 (S4): 491–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2017.1389086.
Rowe, G. 2009. “Phase angle determination and interrelationships within bituminous materials.” In Advanced testing and characterization of bituminous materials, two volume set, edited by A. Loizos, M. N. Partl, T. Scarpas, and I. L Al-Qadi, 59–68. London: Taylor & Francis.
Ullidtz, P. 2005. Frequency/loading time. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Ulloa, A., E. Y. Hajj, R. V. Siddharthan, and P. E. Sebaaly. 2013. “Equivalent loading frequencies for dynamic analysis of asphalt pavements.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25 (9): 1162–1170. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000662.
Underwood, B. S., and Y. R. Kim. 2009. “Determination of the appropriate representative elastic modulus for asphalt concrete.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 10 (2): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430701827668.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 26, 2023
Accepted: Oct 19, 2023
Published online: Dec 23, 2023
Published in print: Mar 1, 2024
Discussion open until: May 23, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Analysis (by type)
- Asphalt concrete
- Asphalt pavements
- Buckling
- Composite materials
- Continuum mechanics
- Critical loads
- Design (by type)
- Dynamic analysis
- Dynamic loads
- Dynamics (solid mechanics)
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering materials (by type)
- Engineering mechanics
- Fiber reinforced composites
- Highway and road design
- Infrastructure
- Material mechanics
- Materials engineering
- Pavement design
- Pavements
- Sight distances
- Solid mechanics
- Strain
- Structural dynamics
- Transportation engineering
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.