Technical Papers
Mar 25, 2023

Discovering Water- and Fuel-System Maintenance Requirements Using Historic Work Order Cost Data: Data and Text-Mining Approach

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 37, Issue 3

Abstract

Ensuring reliable facility services with aging infrastructure and growing deferred maintenance backlogs in water and fuel systems requires properly managing the maintenance of these critical systems. Dormitories safeguard the comfort and health of their occupants, but they rely on proactive management of and response to infrastructure failures. This study employed a data and text-mining approach to analyze 43,704 water and fuel work orders queried from a military maintenance database to identify the most common and costly failure types and the components that most frequently fail in dormitories. Statistical and correlation analysis indicated that leaks, clogs, and temperature regulation are problems that cost the most and occur most frequently, and toilets, sinks, and showers are the components that most often need repair. This study provides an intellectual framework for analyzing past maintenance work orders to reveal trends in failure types and components. The study contributes to the practice of infrastructure management by revealing that design and maintenance management should focus on preventing and repairing these common and costly failures.

Practical Applications

This study provides infrastructure maintenance managers with an objective understanding of the most common failure types and associated costs for water, sewer, and fuel supply infrastructure in dormitories to better inform resourcing decisions. By using readily available data from a work order database and incorporating data and text-mining techniques, this research highlights for maintenance managers the components that fail most often, the type of failure they experience, and costs associated with the repair of these failures. This research found that leaks, clogs, and problems with temperature regulation are the most common problems, and they occur most frequently in toilets, sinks, and showers in priority order. This research found that 74% of costs are associated with these common failure modes. Understanding common failure modes allows maintenance managers to efficiently determine parts on-hand levels, the composition of repair crews, and expected costs over a budget cycle. These findings allow maintenance managers to make better-informed budget and resourcing decisions using objectively identified maintenance trends so that they do not have to rely on experience or gut feelings.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models and code generated or used during the study appear in the published paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge their families for their love and support.

References

Abdallah, M., L. Muddana, and C. Clevenger. 2020. “Upgrading large existing buildings to maximize their sustainability.” J. Archit. Eng. 26 (1): 04019029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000376.
Bortolini, R., and N. Forcada. 2020. “Analysis of building maintenance requests using a text mining approach: Building services evaluation.” Build. Res. Inf. 48 (2): 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2019.1609291.
Chen, T. Y.-J., J. A. Beekman, S. D. Guikema, and S. Shashaani. 2019. “Statistical modeling in absence of system specific data: Exploratory empirical analysis for prediction of water main breaks.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 25 (2): 04019009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000482.
Daher, S., T. Zayed, and A. Hawari. 2020. “Defect-based condition assessment model for sewer pipelines using fuzzy hierarchical evidential reasoning.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 35 (1): 04020142. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001554.
Daniels, J. I. 2017. Analyzing performance in air force facility maintenance and repair. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Air Force Institute of Technology.
Das, S., and M. Y. L. Chew. 2011. “Generic method of grading building defects using FMECA to improve maintainability decisions.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 25 (6): 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000206.
de Oliveira, D. P., D. B. Neill, J. H. Garrett Jr., and L. Soibelman. 2011. “Detection of patterns in water distribution pipe breakage using spatial scan statistics for point events in a physical network.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 25 (1): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000079.
DoD (US Department of Defense). 2019. Operation and maintenance overview fiscal year 2020 budget estimates. Washington, DC: US Department of Defense.
Elshaboury, N., T. Attia, and M. Marzouk. 2020. “Application of evolutionary optimization algorithms for rehabilitation of water distribution networks.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (7): 04020069. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001856.
Grussing, M. N. 2014. “Life cycle asset management methodologies for buildings.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 20 (1): 04013007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000157.
Gunay, H. B., W. Shen, and G. Newsham. 2019a. “Data analytics to improve building performance: A critical review.” Autom. Constr. 97 (Jan): 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.020.
Gunay, H. B., W. Shen, and C. Yang. 2019b. “Text-mining building maintenance work orders for component fault frequency.” Build. Res. Inf. 47 (5): 518–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2018.1459004.
Hassanain, M. A., F. Fatayer, and A.-M. Al-Hammad. 2015. “Design phase maintenance checklist for water supply and drainage systems.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (3): 04014082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000613.
Hassanain, M. A., A. Sedky, Z. A. Adamu, and A.-W. Saif. 2010. “A framework for quality evaluation of university housing facilities.” J. Build. Appraisal 5 (3): 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1057/jba.2009.15.
Islam, R., T. H. Nazifa, and S. F. Mohamed. 2019. “Factors influencing facilities management cost performance in building projects.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 33 (3): 04019036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001284.
Kanniyapan, G., L. J. Nesan, I. S. Mohammad, S. K. Tan, and V. Ponniah. 2019. “Selection criteria of building material for optimising maintainability.” Constr. Build. Mater. 221 (Oct): 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.108.
Ma, Z., Y. Ren, X. Xiang, and Z. Turk. 2020. “Data-driven decision-making for equipment maintenance.” Autom. Constr. 112 (Apr): 103103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103103.
Mo, Y., D. Zhao, J. Du, M. Syal, A. Aziz, and H. Li. 2020. “Automated staff assignment for building maintenance using natural language processing.” Autom. Constr. 113 (May): 103150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103150.
Mo, Y., D. Zhao, M. Syal, and A. Aziz. 2017. “Construction work plan prediction for facility management using text mining.” In Computing in civil engineering, 92–100. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Nojedehi, P., H. B. Gunay, and W. O’Brien. 2021. “A text-mining framework to provide insights into the maintenance performance of buildings.” ASHRAE Trans. 127 (1): 12–20.
O’Connor, J. T., and B. D. Mock. 2019. “Construction, commissioning, and startup execution: Problematic activities on capital projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (4): 04019009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001621.
Róka-Madarász, L., L. Mályusz, and P. Tuczai. 2016. “Benchmarking facilities operation and maintenance management using CAFM database: Data analysis and new results.” J. Build. Eng. 6 (Jun): 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.03.007.
Silge, J., and D. Robinson. 2017. “Text mining with R: A tidy approach.” In O’Reilly media. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
Simpeh, F., and W. Shakantu. 2019. “On-campus university student housing facility services prioritisation framework.” Facilities 38 (1–2): 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-10-2018-0129.
Toomey, D. 2014. R for data science. Birmingham, UK: Packt.
Weeks, D. J., and F. Leite. 2021a. “Facility defect and cost reduction by incorporating maintainability knowledge transfer using maintenance management system data.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 35 (2): 04021004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001569.
Weeks, D. J., and F. Leite. 2021b. “Minimizing facility corrective maintenance: Benchmarking preventative-to-corrective maintenance ratios using maintenance data and building age in dormitories.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (1): 04021086. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000996.
Yoon, S., T. Weidner, and M. Hastak. 2021. “Total-package-prioritization mitigation strategy for deferred maintenance of a campus-sized institution.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (3): 04020185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001956.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 37Issue 3June 2023

History

Received: Aug 27, 2022
Accepted: Feb 1, 2023
Published online: Mar 25, 2023
Published in print: Jun 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Aug 25, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Construction Engineering and Project Management, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 301E Dean Keeton St., Stop C1752, Austin, TX 78712 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5108-3614. Email: [email protected]
Samuel Parker, M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student, Transportation Engineering, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 301E Dean Keeton St., Austin, TX 78712. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • NLP for Automated Discovery and Assessment of Dominant Construction and Maintenance Work Order Activities in MEP Projects, Construction Research Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485262.018, (168-178), (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share