Evaluation of the Performance of Micro–Nano Bubbles to Control the Simultaneous Inorganic and Colloidal Foulings in Reverse Osmosis
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 150, Issue 8
Abstract
The coexistence of different foulant compositions in the feed water of reverse osmosis (RO) systems causes serious complications in the fouling process of the membranes. Hence, in this technical research, the phenomenon of combined inorganic (gypsum)-colloidal (silica particles) fouling (inorganic-colloidal fouling) of brackish water RO (BWRO) process was studied in the lab-scale experiments. Moreover, the effect of the presence of air micro–nano bubbles (AMNBs) in the feed water; as a new practical method for control of membrane fouling, was investigated on this phenomenon. For this purpose, a suspension with the potential of inorganic scaling [calcium sulfate, Saturation index ] and colloidal fouling (colloidal silica, ) was used to form the inorganic and colloidal foulings (simultaneously) on the membrane surface during the inorganic-colloidal fouling process. All experiments were performed twice, once in the absence and once in the presence of AMNBs. Finally, the results of this research were compared with the results of the inorganic and colloidal fouling studies. Based on the results, the inorganic-colloidal fouling formed a dense and compact fouling layer on the membrane surface, which severely reduced the permeate flux (76.3%) and salt rejection (4%). The amount of decrease of these two parameters in inorganic-colloidal fouling was much higher than each of individual inorganic and colloidal foulings. In the presence of AMNBs, both types of inorganic and colloidal foulings greatly reduced and the major portion of inorganic-colloidal fouling was related to the colloidal fouling. Thus, a significant decline was observed in adverse effects of inorganic-colloidal fouling on the membrane performance and the permeate flux and salt rejection decreased by 18.5% and about 1%, respectively. The results of this study could introduce the micro–nano bubbles (MNBs) technology as an effective method to inhibit the inorganic-colloidal fouling in RO systems.
Practical Applications
Today, reverse osmosis processes are known as efficient technologies for supplying drinking water from brackish and sea water resources due to their high ability to remove various compounds. The separated compounds from the water accumulate near the membrane surface and consequently deposit on it and/or inside its pores. This phenomenon is called membrane fouling and has adverse effects on the performance of reverse osmosis processes. Water resources usually have different types of pollutants that simultaneous presence of them can intensify the membrane fouling process. Gypsum scaling and colloidal silica fouling are two major common types of reverse osmosis membrane fouling. Therefore, in this research, the effects of the inorganic-colloidal fouling were studied on the performance of a commercial brackish water reverse osmosis membrane, in presence and absence of air micro–nano bubbles. The results showed that the combined fouling formed a complex fouling layer on the membrane surface in absence of air micro–nano bubbles. In real-scale reverse osmosis process, this layer can severely reduce the membrane permeate flux and salt rejection which result to increase in the operational and maintenance costs. Alternatively, the presence of air micro–nano bubbles in the reverse osmosis feed flow could limit both inorganic and colloidal foulings and their synergetic effects on each other.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Ministry of Science, Research and Technology of Islamic Republic of Iran and Semnan Science and Technology Park (SSTP) (Javaneh project, Parsa Code: 16-99-02-000105).
References
Al Mamun, M. A., M. Sadrzadeh, R. Chatterjee, S. Bhattacharjee, and S. De. 2015. “Colloidal fouling of nanofiltration membranes: A novel transient electrokinetic model and experimental study.” Chem. Eng. Sci. 138 (Dec): 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2015.08.022.
AlSawaftah, N., W. Abuwatfa, N. Darwish, and G. Husseini. 2021. “A comprehensive review on membrane fouling: Mathematical modelling, prediction, diagnosis, and mitigation.” Water 13 (9): 1327. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091327.
AlSawaftah, N., W. Abuwatfa, N. Darwish, and G. A. Husseini. 2022. “A review on membrane biofouling: Prediction, characterization, and mitigation.” Membranes 12 (12): 1271. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12121271.
Alshami, A., T. Taylor, N. Ismail, C. Buelke, and L. Schultz. 2021. “RO system scaling with focus on the concentrate line: Current challenges and potential solutions.” Desalination 520 (Dec): 115370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.115370.
Babu, K. S., and J. K. Amamcharla. 2022. “Generation methods, stability, detection techniques, and applications of bulk nanobubbles in agro-food industries: A review and future perspective.” Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 63 (28): 9262–9281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2067119.
Babu, K. S., and J. K. Amamcharla. 2023. “Effect of bulk nanobubbles on ultrafiltration membrane performance: Physiochemical, rheological, and microstructural properties of the resulting skim milk concentrate dispersions.” J. Food Eng. 337 (Jan): 111238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111238.
Badruzzaman, M., N. Voutchkov, L. Weinrich, and J. G. Jacangelo. 2019. “Selection of pretreatment technologies for seawater reverse osmosis plants: A review.” Desalination 449 (Jan): 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.10.006.
Bretsznajder, S. 1971. Prediction of transport and other physical properties of fluids. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Chang, Y.-R., Y. -J. Lee, and D. -J. Lee. 2019. “Membrane fouling during water or wastewater treatments: Current research updated.” J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 94 (Jan): 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2017.12.019.
Chen, Z., J. Luo, X. Hang, and Y. Wan. 2018. “Physicochemical characterization of tight nanofiltration membranes for dairy wastewater treatment.” J. Membr. Sci. 547 (Feb): 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.10.037.
Dayarathne, H. N. P., J. Choi, and A. Jang. 2017. “Enhancement of cleaning-in-place (CIP) of a reverse osmosis desalination process with air micro-nano bubbles.” Desalination 422 (Nov): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.08.002.
Dayarathne, H. N. P., S. Jeong, and A. Jang. 2019. “Chemical-free scale inhibition method for seawater reverse osmosis membrane process: Air micro-nano bubbles.” Desalination 461 (Jul): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.03.008.
Ehsani, M., H. Doan, and A. Lohi. 2021. “A comprehensive review of membrane fouling and cleaning methods with emphasis on ultrasound-assisted fouling control processes.” Korean J. Chem. Eng. 38 (8): 1531–1555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-021-0832-2.
Goh, P. S., W. J. Lau, M. H. D. Othman, and A. F. Ismail. 2018. “Membrane fouling in desalination and its mitigation strategies.” Desalination 425 (Jan): 130–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.018.
Hoek, E. M. V., and M. Elimelech. 2003. “Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: A new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 (24): 5581–5588. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0262636.
Ishizaki, T., Y. Matsuda, T. Morita, Y. Nishiuchi, K. Tada, J. Nagahara, and T. Hata. 2018. “Cleaning effect by fine bubbles generated with gas–liquid share method.” J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 51 (2): 170–174. https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.17we039.
Jin, X., A. Jawor, S. Kim, and E. M. V. Hoek. 2009. “Effects of feed water temperature on separation performance and organic fouling of brackish water RO membranes.” Desalination 239 (1–3): 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.026.
Jun, B. -M., J. Cho, A. Jang, K. Chon, P. Westerhoff, Y. Yoon, and H. Rho. 2020. “Charge characteristics (surface charge vs. zeta potential) of membrane surfaces to assess the salt rejection behavior of nanofiltration membranes.” Sep. Purif. Technol. 247 (Sep): 117026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117026.
Kalka, H. 2021. “Aqion: Manual (selected topics).” Accessed May 25, 2023. https://www.aqion.de/site/98.
Lee, S., J. Cho, and M. Elimelech. 2004. “Influence of colloidal fouling and feed water recovery on salt rejection of RO and NF membranes.” Desalination 160 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(04)90013-6.
Li, X.-X., et al. 2022. “Enhanced permeate flux by air micro-nano bubbles via reducing apparent viscosity during ultrafiltration process.” Chemosphere 302 (Sep): 134782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134782.
Liu, J., Z. Wang, C. Y. Tang, and J. O. Leckie. 2018. “Modeling dynamics of colloidal fouling of RO/NF membranes with A novel collision-attachment approach.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 52 (3): 1471–1478. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05598.
Mulder, M. 1996. “Basic principles of membrane technology.” In Polarization phenomena and membrane fouling. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
O’connor, C. T., E. W. Randall, and C. M. Goodall. 1990. “Measurement of the effects of physical and chemical variables on bubble size.” Int. J. Miner. Process. 28 (1–2): 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-7516(90)90032-T.
Okamoto, Y., and J. H. Lienhard. 2019. “How RO membrane permeability and other performance factors affect process cost and energy use: A review.” Desalination 470 (Nov): 114064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.07.004.
Powell, C. 2021. “Evaluating source water quality, pretreatment, and particulate mass transport in a nanofiltration membrane process.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida.
Qrenawi, L. I., and A. Abuhabib. 2020. “A review on sources, types, mechanisms, characteristics, impacts and control strategies of fouling in RO membrane systems.” Desalin. Water Treat. 208 (Dec): 43–69. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2020.26448.
Rezvani Mahmouee, A., S. F. Saghravani, and B. Dahrazma. 2022. “Application of micro–nano bubbles to improve the performance of reverse-osmosis membrane against the gypsum scaling.” J. Environ. Eng. 148 (1): 04021073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001935.
Rezvani Mahmouee, A., S. F. Saghravani, and B. Dahrazma. 2023. “Evaluation of the anti-fouling effects of micro-nano bubbles on the performance of reverse osmosis membrane.” J. Environ. Eng. 149 (4): 04023005. https://doi.org/10.1061/JOEEDU.EEENG-7072.
Ruiz-García, A., N. Melián-Martel, and I. Nuez. 2017. “Short review on predicting fouling in RO desalination.” Membranes 7 (4): 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes7040062.
Shahonya, I., F. Nangolo, M. Erinosho, and E. Angula. 2021. “Scaling and fouling of reverse osmosis (RO) membrane: Technical review.” In Advances materials science engineering lecture notes in mechanical engineering, edited by M. Awang and S. S. Emamian, 41–47. Berlin: Springer.
Shang, C., D. Pranantyo, and S. Zhang. 2020. “Understanding the roughness–Fouling relationship in reverse osmosis: Mechanism and implications.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 54 (8): 5288–5296. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00535.
Shirazi, S., C. -J. Lin, and D. Chen. 2010. “Inorganic fouling of pressure-driven membrane processes—A critical review.” Desalination 250 (1): 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.056.
Shmulevsky, M., X. Li, H. Shemer, D. Hasson, and R. Semiat. 2017. “Analysis of the onset of calcium sulfate scaling on RO membranes.” J. Membr. Sci. 524 (Dec): 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.055.
Souri, Z., K. Khanna, N. Karimi, and P. Ahmad. 2021. “Silicon and plants: Current knowledge and future prospects.” J. Plant Growth Regul. 40 (Jun): 906–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-020-10172-7.
Su, X., W. Li, A. Palazzolo, and S. Ahmed. 2019. “Permeate flux increase by colloidal fouling control in a vibration enhanced reverse osmosis membrane desalination system.” Desalination 453 (Mar): 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.12.003.
Terán Hilares, R., I. Singh, K. Tejada Meza, G. J. Colina Andrade, and D. A. Pacheco Tanaka. 2022. “Alternative methods for cleaning membranes in water and wastewater treatment.” Water Environ. Res. 94 (4): e10708. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.10708.
Uppu, A., A. Chaudhuri, and S. P. Das. 2019. “Numerical modeling of particulate fouling and cake-enhanced concentration polarization in roto-dynamic reverse osmosis filtration systems.” Desalination 468 (Oct): 114053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.06.019.
Yang, Y., X. Yao, S. Wu, X. Wang, L. Feng, X. Feng, and Y. Ma. 2023. “Enhanced treatment of AZO dyes in wastewater using heat-activated persulfate with micro-nano bubble aeration.” Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 197 (Sep): 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2023.07.013.
Yin, Z., Y. Ma, B. Tanis-Kanbur, and J. W. Chew. 2020. “Fouling behavior of colloidal particles in organic solvent ultrafiltration.” J. Membr. Sci. 599 (Apr): 117836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.117836.
Zhang, Y., H. Duan, E. Chen, M. Li, and S. Liu. 2023. “Physicochemical characteristics and the scale inhibition effect of air nanobubbles (A-NBs) in a circulating cooling water system.” Langmuir 39 (4): 1629–1639. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c03075.
Zhou, Z., B. Ling, I. Battiato, S. M. Husson, and D. A. Ladner. 2021. “Concentration polarization over reverse osmosis membranes with engineered surface features.” J. Membr. Sci. 617 (Jan): 118199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118199.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 30, 2023
Accepted: Jan 31, 2024
Published online: May 17, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 17, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- [Inorganic compounds]
- Biological processes
- Chemical compounds
- Chemical processes
- Chemicals
- Chemistry
- Colloids
- Environmental engineering
- Fouling
- Geomechanics
- Geotechnical engineering
- Gypsum
- Membranes
- Minerals
- Organic compounds
- Osmosis
- Salts
- Silica
- Soil mechanics
- Soil properties
- Structural engineering
- Structural members
- Structural systems
- Waste management
- Waste treatment
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.