Technical Papers
Jan 18, 2023

Optimization of Aeration Diffuser System Design: A Simulation Study

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 4

Abstract

The influence of aeration diffuser system design on electricity usage, effluent water quality, and life-cycle cost in biological wastewater treatment was investigated. A plant-wide model was implemented, and simulations were carried out with different process configurations and aeration systems. Model-aided design of new aeration diffuser systems could significantly decrease electricity usage and life-cycle cost while at the same time avoiding negative effects on the treatment performance. The optimum distribution of diffuser systems in tanks in series was found to be influenced by process configuration, volumetric loading rate, temperature, and the internal recirculation flow rate. Compared with a conventional design approach, increasing the number of diffusers, up to a critical point, led to higher energy efficiency and lower life-cycle cost. This was despite an increasing limitation of the minimum airflow rate, leading to dissolved oxygen levels significantly exceeding control targets. Aeration systems optimized by simulations were found to, independently of process configuration, exhibit 20% lower electricity usage and 16%–18% lower life-cycle costs compared with systems designed based on a more conventional approach typically applied in practice.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The financial support from J. Gust. Richert Stiftelse (Application No. 2020-00636) is gratefully acknowledged. We are also grateful to the project group of “Effektiv Luftning på Svenska Avloppsreningsverk (ELSA)” (SVU 17-112) for many fruitful discussions, among others David Gustavsson, Dan Fujii, and Jenny Riit.

References

Åmand, L., and B. Carlsson. 2013. “The optimal dissolved oxygen profile in a nitrifying activated sludge process—Comparisons with ammonium feedback control.” Water Sci. Technol. 68 (3): 641–649. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.287.
Åmand, L., G. Olsson, and B. Carlsson. 2013. “Aeration control—A review.” Water Sci. Technol. 67 (11): 2374–2398. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.139.
Amaral, A., et al. 2017. “Towards advanced aeration modelling: From blower to bubbles to bulk.” Water Sci. Technol. 75 (3): 507–517. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.365.
Andersson, S., P. Ek, M. Berg, J. Grundestam, and E. Lindblom. 2016. “Extension of two large wastewater treatment plants in Stockholm using membrane technology.” Water Pract. Technol. 11 (4): 744–753. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2016.034.
Arnell, M. 2016. “Performance assessment of wastewater treatment plants—Multi-objective analysis using plant-wide models.” Ph.D. thesis, Division of Industrial Electrical Engineering and Automation, Lund Univ.
Aymerich, I., L. Rieger, R. Sobhani, D. Rosso, and L. Corominas. 2015. “The difference between energy consumption and energy cost: Modelling energy tariff structures for water resource recovery facilities.” Water Res. 81 (Sep): 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.033.
Balku, S. 2007. “Comparison between alternating aerobic-anoxic and conventional activated sludge systems.” Water Res. 41 (10): 2220–2228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.046.
Baquero-Rodríguez, G. A., J. A. Lara-Borrero, D. Nolasco, and D. Rosso. 2018. “A critical review of the factors affecting modeling oxygen transfer by fine-pore diffusers in activated sludge.” Water Environ. Res. 90 (5): 431–441. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143017X15131012152988.
Dotro, G., B. Jefferson, M. Jones, P. Vale, E. Cartmell, and T. Stephenson. 2011. “A review of the impact and potential of intermittent aeration on continuous flow nitrifying activated sludge.” Environ. Technol. 32 (15): 1685–1697. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2011.597783.
Drewnowski, J., A. Remiszewska-Skwarek, S. Duda, and G. Lagod. 2019. “Aeration process in bioreactors as the main energy consumer in a wastewater treatment plant. Review of solutions and methods of process optimization.” Processes 7 (5): 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7050311.
Eurostat. 2021. “Electricity prices for non-household consumers—Bi-annual data (from 2007 onwards).” Accessed May 17, 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nrg_pc_205/default/table.
Garrido-Baserba, M., et al. 2016. “Linking biofilm growth to fouling and aeration performance of fine-pore diffuser in activated sludge.” Water Res. 90 (Mar): 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.12.011.
Gernaey, K. V., U. Jeppsson, P. A. Vanrolleghem, and J. B. Copp. 2014. Benchmarking of control strategies for wastewater treatment plants.. London: IWA Publishing.
Gillot, S., S. Capela, and A. Heduit. 2000. “Effect of horizontal flow on oxygen transfer in clean water and in clean water with surfactants.” Water Res. 34 (2): 678–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00167-0.
Gillot, S., and A. Heduit. 2008. “Prediction of alpha factor values for fine pore aeration systems.” Water Sci. Technol. 57 (8): 1265–1269. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.222.
Guo, J., X. Fu, G. Andres Baquero, R. Sobhani, D. A. Nolasco, and D. Rosso. 2016. “Trade-off between carbon emission and effluent quality of activated sludge processes under seasonal variations of wastewater temperature and mean cell retention time.” Sci. Total Environ. 547 (Mar): 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.102.
Hanhan, O., G. Insel, N. O. Yagci, N. Artan, and D. Orhon. 2011. “Mechanism and design of intermittent aeration activated sludge process for nitrogen removal.” J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 46 (1): 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2011.526073.
Henze, M., W. Gujer, T. Mino, and M. C. M. van Loosdrecht. 2000. Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3.. London: IWA Publishing.
Hung, C. H., and W. C. Boyle. 2001. “The effect of acid cleaning on a fine pore ceramic diffuser aeration system.” Water Sci. Technol. 44 (2–3): 211–218. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2001.0772.
Iranpour, R., A. Magallanes, M. Zermeno, O. Moghaddam, J. Wilson, and M. K. Stenstrom. 2000a. “Assessment of aeration system performance efficiency: Frequent sampling for damage detection.” Water Environ. Res. 72 (3): 363–376. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143000X137590.
Iranpour, R., A. Magallanes, M. Zermeno, V. Varsh, A. Abrishamchi, and M. K. Stenstrom. 2000b. “Assessment of aeration basin performance efficiency: Sampling methods and tank coverage.” Water Res. 34 (12): 3137–3152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00065-8.
Jenkins, T. E. 2014. Aeration control system design: A practical guide to energy and process optimization. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Jiang, L.-M., M. Garrido-Baserba, D. Nolasco, A. Al-Omari, H. DeClippeleir, S. Murthy, and D. Rosso. 2017. “Modelling oxygen transfer using dynamic alpha factors.” Water Res. 124 (Dec): 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.032.
Juan-Garcia, P., M. A. Kiser, O. Schraa, L. Rieger, and L. Corominas. 2018. “Dynamic air supply models add realism to the evaluation of control strategies in water resource recovery facilities.” Water Sci. Technol. 78 (5): 1104–1114. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.356.
Krampe, J. 2011. “Full scale evaluation of diffuser ageing with clean water oxygen transfer tests.” Water Sci. Technol. 64 (3): 700–707. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2011.694.
Leu, S.-Y., D. Rosso, L. E. Larson, and M. K. Stenstrom. 2009. “Real-time aeration efficiency monitoring in the activated sludge process and methods to reduce energy consumption and operating costs.” Water Environ. Res. 81 (12): 2471–2481. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143009X425906.
Li, D., M. Zou, and L. Jiang. 2022. “Dissolved oxygen control strategies for water treatment: A review.” Water Sci. Technol. 86 (6): 1444–1466. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2022.281.
Mueller, J. A., W. C. Boyle, and H. J. Pöpel. 2001. Aeration: Principles and practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Noble, P. A., H.-D. Park, B. H. Olson, P. Asvapathanagul, M. C. Hunter, M. Garrido-Baserba, S.-H. Lee, and D. Rosso. 2016. “A survey of biofilms on wastewater aeration diffusers suggests bacterial community composition and function vary by substrate type and time.” Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100 (14): 6361–6373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7604-7.
Odize, V. O., J. Novak, H. De Clippeleir, A. Al-Omari, J. D. Smeraldi, S. Murthy, and D. Rosso. 2017. “Reverse flexing as a physical/mechanical treatment to mitigate fouling of fine bubble diffusers.” Water Sci. Technol. 76 (7): 1595–1602. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.171.
Ostgaard, K., M. Christensson, E. Lie, K. Jonsson, and T. Welander. 1997. “Anoxic biological phosphorus removal in a full-scale UCT process.” Water Res. 31 (11): 2719–2726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00125-5.
Rieger, L., R. M. Jones, P. L. Dold, and C. B. Bott. 2014. “Ammonia-based feedforward and feedback aeration control in activated sludge processes.” Water Environ. Res. 86 (1): 63–73. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143013X13596524516987.
Rosso, D. 2018. Aeration, mixing, and energy: Bubbles & sparks. London: IWA Publishing.
Rosso, D., R. Iranpour, and M. K. Stenstrom. 2005. “Fifteen years of offgas transfer efficiency measurements on fine-pore aerators: Key role of sludge age and normalized air flux.” Water Environ. Res. 77 (3): 266–273. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143005X41843.
Rosso, D., L.-M. Jiang, D. M. Hayden, P. Pitt, C. S. Hocking, S. Murthy, and M. K. Stenstrom. 2012. “Towards more accurate design and specification of aeration systems using on-site column testing.” Water Sci. Technol. 66 (3): 627–634. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.187.
Rosso, D., L. E. Larson, and M. K. Stenstrom. 2008. “Aeration of large-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants: State of the art.” Water Sci. Technol. 57 (7): 973–978. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.218.
Schraa, O., L. Rieger, and J. Alex. 2017. “Development of a model for activated sludge aeration systems: Linking air supply, distribution, and demand.” Water Sci. Technol. 75 (3): 552–560. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.481.
Schraa, O., L. Rieger, J. Alex, and I. Miletic. 2019. “Ammonia-based aeration control with optimal SRT control: Improved performance and lower energy consumption.” Water Sci. Technol. 79 (1): 63–72. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.032.
Stenstrom, M. K., and R. G. Gilbert. 1981. “Effects of alpha, beta and theta factor upon the design, specification and operation of aeration systems.” Water Res. 15 (6): 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(81)90156-1.
Swedish Water. 2017. Investment needs and future costs for municipal water and wastewater. [In Swedish.] Bromma, Sweden: Swedish Water and Wastewater Association.
Tchobanoglous, G., H. D. Stensel, R. Tsuchihashi, and F. Burton. 2014. Wastewater engineering: Treatment and resource recovery. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
USEPA. 1989. Design manual—Fine pore aeration systems. Washington, DC: USEPA.
WEF (Water Environment Federation). 2010. Energy conservation in water and wastewater treatment facilities. Manual of Practice No. 32. New York: WEF.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 149Issue 4April 2023

History

Received: Jun 7, 2022
Accepted: Nov 7, 2022
Published online: Jan 18, 2023
Published in print: Apr 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 18, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Simon Bengtsson [email protected]
Researcher and Consultant, Promiko AB, Briggatan 16, Lomma 234 42, Sweden (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Researcher, Division of Industrial Electrical Engineering and Automation (IEA), Dept. of Biomedical Engineering (BME), Lund Univ., P.O. Box 118, Lund SE-221 00, Sweden; Urban Water Management, Research Institutes of Sweden, Gjuterigatan 1D, Linköping SE-582 73, Sweden. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1547-8413

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share