Technical Papers
Jan 19, 2023

Correlation Analysis of the Experimental Data for In-Situ Chlorine Generation in Electrochlorination Process

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 4

Abstract

Even though chlorination is a widely used disinfection technique, it has several disadvantages, such as formation of chlorates during prolonged storage, requirement for skilled supervision during operations, risk of leakage, and related accidents during transport and storage. Electrochlorination (EC) is one of the novel technologies generating in-situ chlorine, thereby limiting most of the disadvantages of conventional chlorination treatment for water disinfection. The correlation between the various influencing parameters for EC, which is important for achieving the optimal conditions for in-situ chlorine generation, is still unclear. The major objective of the present study is to provide a detailed correlation analysis between the parameters influencing the EC process based on the extensive experimental data generated from the developed lab-scale setup for electrochlorination using graphite electrodes and titanium electrodes separately. The present study also examined the rate of loss of the electrode materials to check the longevity of electrodes. The experimental results generated were used for comparative analysis of the EC process for maximum in-situ chlorine generation. A detailed principal component analysis (PCA) was performed for the data generated during experimentation to understand the correlation between the influencing parameters for optimum in-situ chlorine generation. The optimum conditions for maximum in-situ chlorine generation obtained from the experiments were 10 V electric voltage, 60 min electrolysis time, 4 cm distance between electrodes, and 3.5  g/L electrolyte concentration, with maximum chlorine generation of 15.95  mg/L obtained for titanium electrodes using NaCl electrolytes for the developed lab setup. The results of PCA established the correlation between the influencing parameters and concluded that the most significant parameter influencing chlorine generation was electrolyte concentration and electrochlorination time, and electric potential was moderately influential, whereas distance between electrodes was least influential. The rate of material loss was 15.3  mg/min for titanium electrodes and 24  mg/min for graphite electrodes, indicating titanium electrodes are more durable than graphite electrodes during a prolonged EC process. The applicability of the generated chlorine stock solution was also examined for drinking water sample disinfection and found to be effective.

Practical Applications

Sustainable Development Goal 6 discusses the need for the provision of pathogen-free drinking water to each and every region of countries. Remote and rural areas that are deprived of disinfected drinking water can benefit from low-cost and easy maintenance of electrochlorination system. An electrochlorination system limits the disadvantages of conventional chlorination. The chlorine generated through an electrochlorination system was found effective in water disinfection. For optimized working of a electrochlorination unit, the influencing parameters for in-situ chlorine generation and their interdependence should be understood. The present study discusses the correlation between these influencing parameters for optimum in-situ chlorine generation during the electrochlorination process. The study will be helpful in understanding the optimum conditions for chlorine generation using the electrochlorination process for various electrodes and electrolyte combinations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Anisah, S., W. Lun, and A. Wahab. 2021. “Electro-Fenton technology for wastewater treatment: A bibliometric analysis of current research trends, future perspectives and energy consumption analysis.” J. Water Process Eng. 40 (Dec): 101952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.101952.
APHA (American Public Health Association). 1998 Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. Washington, DC: APHA.
Boulay, N., and M. Edwards. 2001. “Role of temperature, chlorine, and organic matter in copper corrosion by-product release in soft water.” Water Res. 35 (3): 683–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00320-1.
Branz, A., M. Levine, L. Lehmann, A. Bastable, S. I. Ali, K. Kadir, T. Yates, D. Bloom, and D. Lantagne. 2017. “Chlorination of drinking water in emergencies: A review of knowledge to develop recommendations for implementation and research needed.” Waterlines 36 (1): 4–39. https://doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2017.002.
Brown, M. A., A. Goel, and Z. Abbas. 2016. “Effect of electrolyte concentration on the stern layer thickness at a charged interface.” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (11): 3790–3794. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201512025.
Choi, J., S. Shim, and J. Yoon. 2013. “Design and operating parameters affecting an electrochlorination system.” J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 19 (1): 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.08.004.
Eugene, D., and I. H. Suffet. 2002. “Electrochemical removal of bromide and reduction of THM formation potential in drinking water.” Water Res. 36 (19): 4902–4906. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00210-5.
Ghalwa, N. A., H. Tamos, M. ElAskalni, and A. R. El Agha. 2012. “Generation of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) from sodium chloride solution using C/PbO2 and Pb/PbO2 electrodes.” Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 19 (6): 561–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-012-0596-0.
Ghernaout, D., A. Alghamdi, and B. Ghernaout. 2019. “Microorganisms’ killing: Chemical disinfection vs. electrodisinfection.” Appl. Eng. 3 (1): 13–19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ae.20190301.12.
Ghernaout, D., and N. Elboughdiri. 2020. “An insight in electrocoagulation process through current density distribution (CDD).” Open Access Lib. J. 7 (2): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106142.
Jensen, W. B. 2012. “Faraday’s laws or Faraday’s law?” J. Chem. Educ. 89 (9): 1208–1209. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed101193q.
Jiang, Y., et al. 2021. “Electrochemistry communications anodic oxidation for the degradation of organic pollutants: Anode materials, operating conditions and mechanisms. A mini review.” Electrochem. Commun. 123 (Dec): 106912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2020.106912.
Jiménez-Moleón, M. C., and M. A. Gómez-Albores. 2011. “Waterborne diseases in the state of Mexico, Mexico (2000–2005).” J. Water Health 9 (1): 200–207. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2010.149.
Jung, Y. J., B. S. Oh, J. W. Kang, M. A. Page, M. J. Phillips, and B. J. Marin. 2007. “Control of disinfection and halogenated disinfection byproducts by the electrochemical process.” Water Sci. Technol. 55 (12): 213–219. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2007.409.
Khelifa, A., S. Moulay, F. Hannane, S. Benslimene, and M. Hecini. 2004. “Application of an experimental design method to study the performance of electrochlorination cells.” Desalination 160 (1): 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(04)90021-5.
Kraft, A. 2008. “Electrochemical water disinfection: A short review.” Platinum Met. Rev. 52 (3): 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1595/147106708X329273.
Kunz, S., U. Feistel, T. Grischek, L. G. Romero-Esquivel, J. Valverde-Cerdas, P. Otter, and J. Feller. 2018. “Treatment of arsenic-contaminated water using in-line electrolysis, co-precipitation and filtration in Costa Rica.” Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 18 (1): 40–48. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2017.089.
Mousazadeh, M., et al. 2021a. “Electrocoagulation as a promising defluoridation technology from water: A review of state of the art of removal mechanisms and performance trends.” Water 13 (5): 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13050656.
Mousazadeh, M., Z. Naghdali, Z. Al-Qodah, S. M. Alizadeh, E. K. Niaragh, S. Malekmohammadi, P. V. Nidheesh, E. P. Roberts, M. Sillanpää, and M. M. Emamjomeh. 2021b. “A systematic diagnosis of state of the art in the use of electrocoagulation as a sustainable technology for pollutant treatment: An updated review.” Sustainable Energy Technol. Assess. 47 (Sep): 101353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101353.
Otter, P., P. Malakar, B. B. Jana, T. Grischek, F. Benz, A. Goldmaier, U. Feistel, J. Jana, S. Lahiri, and J. A. Alvarez. 2017. “Arsenic removal from groundwater by solar driven inline-electrolytic induced co-precipitation and filtration—A long term field test conducted in West Bengal.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14 (10): 1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14101167.
Otter, P., P. Malakar, C. Sandhu, T. Grischek, S. K. Sharma, P. C. Kimothi, G. Nüske, M. Wagner, A. Goldmaier, and F. Benz. 2019. “Safe drinking water supply for river bound communities in India.” Water 11 (1): 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010122.
Saha, J., and S. K. Gupta. 2017a. “Endeavor toward competitive electrochlorination by comparing the performance of easily affordable carbon electrodes with platinum.” Chem. Eng. Commun. 204 (12): 1357–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2017.1365060.
Saha, J., and S. K. Gupta. 2017b. “A novel electro-chlorinator using low cost graphite electrode for drinking water disinfection.” Ionics 23 (7): 1903–1913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-017-2022-0.
Taylor, P., D. Ghernaout, and B. Ghernaout. 2012. Desalination and water treatment from chemical disinfection to electrodisinfection: The obligatory itinerary?, 37–41. Oxfordshire, UK: Taylor and Fransis. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2010.1085.
Wright, J. A., S. Gundry, J. Wright, and R. Conroy. 2004. “A systematic review of the health outcomes related to household water quality in developing countries household water quality in developing countries.” J. Water Health 2 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2004.0001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 149Issue 4April 2023

History

Received: Aug 8, 2022
Accepted: Oct 27, 2022
Published online: Jan 19, 2023
Published in print: Apr 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 19, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sapna R. Shinde [email protected]
Ph.D. Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed Univ.), Pune, Maharashtra 412115, India. Email: [email protected]
Sayali Apte, Aff.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed Univ.), Pune, Maharashtra 412115, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share