Technical Papers
May 12, 2023

Discount Rate Selection for Investments in Climate Change Adaptation and Flood Risk Reduction Projects

Publication: Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 39, Issue 4

Abstract

The selection of an appropriate discount rate is a critical yet often neglected aspect of valuing flood protection and climate adaptation projects. We examine current discounting practices in flood risk management and climate adaptation literature and compare these practices with a proposed fair market value (FMV) discounting approach, in which we discount project cash flows based on their levels of systematic market risk, consistent with practice in the private sector. Using publicly available data, we demonstrate minimal correlation between flood risk–related cash flows and overall market returns, suggesting flooding-related cash flows are most appropriately discounted near the risk-free rate. We consider the example of a proposed storm surge barrier in Boston Harbor and compare prevailing public-sector discounting approaches with this FMV approach. Our results suggest prevailing discounting approaches systematically undervalue flood risk reduction benefits and climate adaptation investments relative to the private-sector valuation implied via the FMV approach.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Professor Deborah Lucas (MIT) for her constructive feedback and review of this manuscript. This study was funded by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) and the US Department of Defense (via the DoD SMART Scholarship-for-Service Program). The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent those of the MBTA or DoD.

References

Arrow, K., and R. Lind. 1970. “Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions.” Am. Econ. Rev. 60 (3): 364–378.
Bastidas-Arteaga, E., and M. G. Stewart. 2019. Climate adaptation engineering. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Bourdeau-Brien, M., and L. Kryzanowski. 2017. “The impact of natural disasters on the stock returns and volatilities of local firms.” Q. Rev. Econ. Finance 63 (Feb): 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.05.003.
Brealey, R. A., S. C. Myers, and F. Allen. 2011. Principles of corporate finance. 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Buchanan, M. K., R. E. Kopp, M. Oppenheimer, and C. Tebaldi. 2016. “Allowances for evolving coastal flood risk under uncertain local sea-level rise.” Clim. Change 137 (3–4): 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1664-7.
Chen, C., and J. R. Bartle. 2022. Innovative infrastructure finance: A guide for state and local governments. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91411-0.
Damodaran, A. 2021. “Betas by sector (US).” NYU Stern School of Business. Accessed August 20, 2021. http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/∼adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/Betas.html.
DHS (Department of Homeland Security). 2020. “Notice of funding opportunity (NOFO): FY 2020 building resilient infrastructure and communities.” Accessed February 8, 2021. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-08/fema_fy20-bric-notice-of-funding-opportunity_federal-register_August-2020.pdf.
Dietz, S., C. Gollier, and L. Kessler. 2018. “The climate beta.” J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 87 (Jan): 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.07.005.
Discount Rate Rule WRC. 2020. “18 C.F.R. § 704.39.” Accessed June 22, 2021. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2014-title18-vol2/pdf/CFR-2014-title18-vol2-sec704-39.
Dombrowski, T., D. Ratnadiwakara, and V. C. Slawson. 2020. “The FIMA NFIP’s redacted policies and redacted claims datasets.” J. Real Estate Lit. 28 (2): 190–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09277544.2021.1876435.
ECAWG (Economic of Climate Adaptation Working Group). 2009. “Shaping climate-resilient development: A framework for decision-making.” Climate Works Foundation. Accessed April 2, 2021. http://ccsl.iccip.net/climate_resilient.pdf.
FEMA. 2021. “Open FEMA dataset: FIMA NFIP redacted claims (as of May 23, 2021) [query enabled JSON array].” Accessed July 2, 2021. https://www.fema.gov/api/open/v1/FimaNfipClaims.
Fernandez, P., S. Bañuls, and P. Fernandez Acin. 2021. “Survey: Market risk premium and risk-free rate used for 88 countries in 2021.” SSRN Electron. J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3861152.
Froot, K. A., and S. Posner. 2002. “The pricing of event risks with parameter uncertainty.” Geneva Pap. Risk Insur. Theory 27 (2): 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021952927149.
Geltner, D., and R. De Neufville. 2018. Flexibility and real estate valuation under uncertainty: A practical guide for developers. New York: Wiley.
Gollier, C. 2014. “Discounting and growth.” Am. Econ. Rev. 104 (5): 534–537. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.534.
Gollier, C. 2021. “The welfare cost of ignoring the beta.” SSRN Electron. J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3802456.
Gollier, C., and J. K. Hammitt. 2014. “The long-run discount rate controversy.” Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 6 (1): 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100913-012516.
Guthrie, W. F. 2020. NIST/SEMATECH e-handbook of statistical methods (NIST Handbook 151) [Data set]. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.18434/M32189.
Ha, S., H. Tatano, N. Mori, T. Fujimi, and X. Jiang. 2021. “Cost–benefit analysis of adaptation to storm surge due to climate change in Osaka Bay, Japan.” Clim. Change 169 (3–4): 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03282-y.
Hallegatte, S., C. Green, R. J. Nicholls, and J. Corfee-Morlot. 2013. “Future flood losses in major coastal cities.” Nat. Clim. Change 3 (9): 802–806. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1979.
In, S. Y., J. P. Weyant, and B. Manav. 2022. “Pricing climate-related risks of energy investments.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 154 (Feb): 111881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111881.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2022. “Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability.” In Contribution of Working Group II to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by H.-O. Pörtner, et al. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Joe, H. 2014. Dependence modeling with copulas. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Keenan, J. M. 2019. Climate adaptation finance and investment in California. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
Kirshen, P., et al. 2018. Feasibility of harbor-wide barrier systems—Preliminary analysis for Boston Harbor. Boston: Univ. of Massachusetts Boston.
Kirshen, P., et al. 2020. “Integrated assessment of storm surge barrier systems under present and future climates and comparison to alternatives: A case study of Boston, US.” Clim. Change 162 (2): 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02781-8.
Kousky, C., B. Fleming, and A. M. Berger, eds. 2021. A blueprint for coastal adaptation: Uniting design, economics, and policy. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Lee, J.-P., and M.-T. Yu. 2002. “Pricing default-risky CAT bonds with moral hazard and basis risk.” J. Risk Insur. 69 (1): 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6975.00003.
Lee, J. Y., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2015. “Ethical discounting for civil infrastructure decisions extending over multiple generations.” Struct. Saf. 57 (Aug): 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.06.001.
Li, J., M. Mullan, and J. Helgeson. 2014. “Improving the practice of economic analysis of climate change adaptation.” J. Benefit-Cost Anal. 5 (3): 445–467. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbca-2014-9004.
Lincke, D., and J. Hinkel. 2018. “Economically robust protection against 21st century sea-level rise.” Global Environ. Change 51 (Mar): 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.05.003.
Lowe, J. 2008. Intergenerational wealth transfers and social discounting: Supplementary green book guidance. London: HM Treasury.
Lucas, D. 2014a. “Evaluating the cost of government credit support: The OECD context.” Econ. Policy 29 (79): 553–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.12034.
Lucas, D. 2014b. “Rebutting Arrow and Lind: Why governments should use market rates for discounting.” J. Nat. Resour. Policy Res. 6 (1): 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19390459.2013.874106.
Lucas, D., and J. J. Montesinos. 2020. “A fair value approach to valuing public infrastructure projects and the risk transfer in public private partnerships.” In Economic analysis and infrastructure investment. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Ma, Z.-G., and C.-Q. Ma. 2013. “Pricing catastrophe risk bonds: A mixed approximation method.” Insur. Math. Econ. 52 (2): 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2012.12.007.
Mankiw, N. G., and M. D. Shapiro. 1986. “Risk and return: Consumption beta versus market beta.” Rev. Econ. Stat. 68 (3): 452. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926022.
Markanday, A., I. Galarraga, and A. Markandya. 2019. “A critical review of cost-benefit analysis for climate change adaptation in cities.” Clim. Change Econ. 10 (4): 1950014. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007819500143.
Martland, C. D. 2012. Toward more sustainable infrastructure: Project evaluation for planners and engineers. New York: Wiley.
Melo, C., I. Teotónio, C. M. Silva, and C. O. Cruz. 2020. “What’s the economic value of greening transport infrastructures? The case of the underground passages in Lisbon.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 56 May: 102083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102083.
Merton, R. C. 1976. “Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous.” J. Financ. Econ. 3 (1–2): 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90022-2.
Neumann, J. E., P. Chinowsky, J. Helman, M. Black, C. Fant, K. Strzepek, and J. Martinich. 2021. “Climate effects on US infrastructure: The economics of adaptation for rail, roads, and coastal development.” Clim. Change 167 (3–4): 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03179-w.
NIBS (National Institute of Building Sciences). 2019. Natural hazard mitigation saves: 2019 report. Washington, DC: NIBS.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). 2021. “Mean sea level anomaly global ocean (Annual signals retained). [dataset].” Accessed July 14, 2021. https://www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/socd/lsa/SeaLevelRise/LSA_SLR_timeseries.php.
Nowak, P., and M. Romaniuk. 2013. “Pricing and simulations of catastrophe bonds.” Insur. Math. Econ. 52 (1): 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2012.10.006.
Oddo, P. C., B. S. Lee, G. G. Garner, V. Srikrishnan, P. M. Reed, C. E. Forest, and K. Keller. 2020. “Deep uncertainties in sea-level rise and storm surge projections: Implications for coastal flood risk management.” Risk Anal. 40 (1): 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12888.
OMB (Office of Management and Budget). 1992. “Circular A-94: Guidelines and discount rates for benefit-cost analysis of federal programs.” Accessed May 28, 2020. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/circulars/A94/a094.pdf.
OMB (Office of Management and Budget). 2003. “Circular A-4: Regulatory analysis.” Accessed June 2, 2021. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/circulars/A4/a-4.pdf.
Ramsey, F. P. 1928. “A mathematical theory of saving.” Econ. J. 38 (152): 543–559. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224098.
Rasmussen, D. J., M. K. Buchanan, R. E. Kopp, and M. Oppenheimer. 2020. “A flood damage allowance framework for coastal protection with deep uncertainty in sea level rise.” Earth Future 8 (3): e2019EF001340. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001340.
Rennert, K., et al. 2022. “Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2.” Nature 610 (7933): 687–692. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05224-9.
Shiller, R. J. 2022. US stock markets 1871-present and CAPE ratio. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ.
Smith, A. B., and R. W. Katz. 2013. “US billion-dollar weather and climate disasters: Data sources, trends, accuracy and biases.” Nat. Hazard. 67 (2): 387–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0566-5.
Stewart, M. G., and D. V. Rosowsky. 2022. “Extreme events for infrastructure: Uncertainty and risk.” In Engineering for extremes: Decision-making in an uncertain world, edited by M. G. Stewart and D. V. Rosowsky, 3–27. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85018-0_1.
Strauss, B. H., et al. 2021. “Economic damages from Hurricane Sandy attributable to sea level rise caused by anthropogenic climate change.” Nat. Commun. 12 (1): 2720. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22838-1.
USACE. 2019. “Planning guidance notebook: ER 1106-2-100.” In Appendix D–Economic, social, and regional considerations. Washington, DC: USACE.
USACE. 2021. Memorandum for planning community of practice: Economic guidance memorandum, 21-01, federal interest rates for corps of engineers projects for fiscal year 2021. Washington, DC: USACE.
US Treasury (United States Department of Treasury). 2022. Daily treasuries real long-term rates 2000-2022. Washington, DC: US Treasury.
Viscusi, K. W. 2022. “The social discount rate: Legal and philosophical underpinnings.” SSRN Electron. J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4083202.
Vousdoukas, M. I., L. Mentaschi, J. Hinkel, P. J. Ward, I. Mongelli, J.-C. Ciscar, and L. Feyen. 2020. “Economic motivation for raising coastal flood defenses in Europe.” Nat. Commun. 11 (1): 2119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15665-3.
Wang, L., and A. M. Kutan. 2013. “The impact of natural disasters on stock markets: Evidence from Japan and the US.” Comp. Econ. Stud. 55 (4): 672–686. https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2013.16.
Weber, V. 2015. “Estimation of the dependence parameter in bivariate Archimedean copula models under misspecification.” Ph. D. thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
WRDA (Water Resources Development Act). 1974. “Pub. L. No. 93–251.” Accessed June 22. 2021. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-88/pdf/STATUTE-88-Pg12.pdf.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 39Issue 4July 2023

History

Received: Dec 5, 2022
Accepted: Mar 17, 2023
Published online: May 12, 2023
Published in print: Jul 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 12, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6977-7657. Email: [email protected]
Edmund K. Turner Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5358-4140. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • What Determines Infrastructure Investments: Critical Factors from Preliminary Feasibility Studies for Capital Projects in Korea, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-6017, 40, 4, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share