Case Studies
Apr 9, 2024

What Determines Infrastructure Investments: Critical Factors from Preliminary Feasibility Studies for Capital Projects in Korea

Publication: Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 40, Issue 4

Abstract

Infrastructure development is crucial for any country because it has significant effects on both social welfare and economic growth. Due to limited financial resources, the government prioritizes the infrastructure investment that maximizes impact and resource efficiency. However, many methods to support the decision-making undermine to derive insights from project experiences and ensure time- and cost-effectiveness. This study aims to identify the critical factors for the preliminary feasibility study (PFS) of large-scale infrastructure investment in South Korea by developing decision-tree classifiers based on the type of infrastructure (point, linear, and plane). The classifiers use data from 1,905 evaluations of 354 projects in Korea, classifying them as go, pending, or no-go with accuracies of 84.64%, 82.08%, and 87.88% by type of infrastructure, respectively. The critical factors affecting PFS are benefit-cost ratio, city-level development rank, regional development level, and total project cost among the 13 decision factors of PFS. Although multicriteria decision-making is supposed to comprehensive evaluation of various factors, some factors have governed the result, whereas others do not affect. The impact of these factors is discussed depending on the type of infrastructure. The results show the potential for this approach to improve efficiency in terms of time and cost by enabling early and reliable project screening. Although the study focuses mainly on South Korea, findings can provide valuable insights for more informed and efficient decisions to other countries.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the 2018 Yeungnam University Research Grant.

References

Adaku, E. 2016. “Rethinking urban infrastructure cost management in developing countries.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 142 (1): 05014032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000269.
Ahn, S., et al. 2008. General guidelines for preliminary feasibility studies. Sejong-si, Republic of Korea: Public and Private Infrastructure Investment Management Center, Korean Development Institute.
Alshboul, O., A. Shehadeh, and O. Hamedat. 2022. “Governmental investment impacts on the construction sector considering the liquidity trap.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (2): 04021099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001003.
Andres, L., D. Biller, and M. H. Dappe. 2016. “A methodological framework for prioritising infrastructure investment.” J. Infrastruct. Dev. 8 (2): 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974930616667886.
Atkinson, G. 2015. “Cost-benefit analysis: A tool that is both useful and influential?” In The tools of policy formulation, 142–160. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Choi, J., D. P. de Oliveira, and F. Leite. 2022. “A novel approach to capture similarity in capital project benchmarking: An application to healthcare projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (3): 05022007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001039.
Dehnhardt, A., T. Grothmann, and J. Wagner. 2022. “Cost-benefit analysis: What limits its use in policy making and how to make it more usable? A case study on climate change adaptation in Germany.” Environ. Sci. Policy 137 (Nov): 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.08.005.
Elmousalami, H. H. 2020. “Artificial intelligence and parametric construction cost estimate modeling: State-of-the-art review.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (1): 03119008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001678.
Giang, D. T. H., and L. S. Pheng. 2015. “Critical factors affecting the efficient use of public investments in infrastructure in Vietnam.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 21 (3): 05014007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000243.
Girardet, X., J. C. Foltête, and C. Clauzel. 2013. “Designing a graph-based approach to landscape ecological assessment of linear infrastructures.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 42 (Sep): 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.03.004.
Gondia, A., A. Siam, W. El-Dakhakhni, and A. H. Nassar. 2020. “Machine learning algorithms for construction projects delay risk prediction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (1): 04019085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001736.
Hansen, S., E. Too, and T. Le. 2022. “An epistemic context-based decision-making framework for an infrastructure project investment decision in Indonesia.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (4): 05022008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001049.
Iniestra, J. G., and J. G. Gutiérrez. 2009. “Multicriteria decisions on interdependent infrastructure transportation projects using an evolutionary-based framework.” Appl. Soft Comput. J. 9 (2): 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2008.07.006.
Jo, H., H. Lee, Y. Suh, J. Kim, and Y. Park. 2015. “A dynamic feasibility analysis of public investment projects: An integrated approach using system dynamics and agent-based modeling.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (8): 1863–1876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.07.002.
Khalifa, R. I., and T. U. Daim. 2021. “Project assessment tools evaluation and selection using the hierarchical decision modeling: Case of state departments of transportation in the United States.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (1): 05020015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000858.
Lambert, J. H., et al. 2012. “Prioritizing infrastructure investments in Afghanistan with multiagency stakeholders and deep uncertainty of emergent conditions.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 18 (2): 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000078.
Liu, J., P. E. D. Love, B. Carey, J. Smith, and M. Regan. 2015. “Ex-ante evaluation of public-private partnerships: Macroeconomic analysis.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 21 (2): 04014038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000228.
Mantas, C. J., and J. Abellán. 2014. “Credal-C4.5: Decision tree based on imprecise probabilities to classify noisy data.” Expert Syst. Appl. 41 (10): 4625–4637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.01.017.
Martello, M. V., and A. J. Whittle. 2023. “Discount rate selection for investments in climate change adaptation and flood risk reduction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 39 (4): 04023024. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5401.
McLeod, S. 2021. “Feasibility studies for novel and complex projects: Principles synthesised through an integrative review.” Project Leadersh. Soc. 2 (Dec): 100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2021.100022.
Özkir, V., and T. Demirel. 2012. “A fuzzy assessment framework to select among transportation investment projects in Turkey.” Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (1): 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.051.
Pamucar, D., D. Macura, M. Tavana, D. Božanić, and N. Knežević. 2022. “An integrated rough group multicriteria decision-making model for the ex-ante prioritization of infrastructure projects: The Serbian Railways case.” Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 79 (Feb): 101098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101098.
Panayiotou, A., and F. Medda. 2016. “Portfolio of infrastructure investments: Analysis of European infrastructure.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 22 (3): 04016011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000300.
Pardo-Bosch, F., and A. Aguado. 2016. “Sustainability as the key to prioritize investments in public infrastructures.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 60 (Sep): 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.03.007.
Pardo-Bosch, F., A. Aguado, and M. Pino. 2019. “Holistic model to analyze and prioritize urban sustainable buildings for public services.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 44 (Sep): 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.028.
Priemus, H., B. Flyvbjerg, and B. van Wee. 2014. “Decision-making on mega-projects.” In International handbook on mega-projects, 9–10. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rajaram, A., T. M. Le, N. Biletska, and J. Brumby. 2010. A diagnostic framework for assessing public investment management. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Salvado, F., N. Marques de Almeida, and Á. Vale e Azevedo. 2020. “Future-proofing and monitoring capital investments needs throughout the life cycle of building projects.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 59 (Aug): 102159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102159.
Shen, L., S. Jiang, and H. Yuan. 2012. “Critical indicators for assessing the contribution of infrastructure projects to coordinated urban-rural development in China.” Habitat Int. 36 (2): 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.10.003.
Thacker, S., D. Adshead, M. Fay, S. Hallegatte, M. Harvey, H. Meller, N. O’Regan, J. Rozenberg, G. Watkins, and J. W. Hall. 2019. “Infrastructure for sustainable development.” Nat. Sustainability 2 (4): 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0256-8.
Vaughan-Morris, G. 2012. Strategic infrastructure: Steps to prioritize and deliver infrastructure effectively and efficiently. Cologny: World Economic Forum.
Wang, Y., H. W. Lee, W. Tang, J. Whittington, and M. Qiang. 2021. “Structural equation modeling for the determinants of international infrastructure investment: Evidence from Chinese contractors.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (4): 04021033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000933.
Wei, H.-H., M. Liu, M. J. Skibniewski, and V. Balali. 2016. “Prioritizing sustainable transport projects through multicriteria group decision making: Case study of Tianjin Binhai new area, China.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (5): 04016010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000449.
Yun, S., and C. H. Caldas. 2009. “Analysing decision variables that influence preliminary feasibility studies using data mining techniques.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 27 (1): 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802596246.
Zhang, L., Y. Zhang, H. X. Li, and Z. Lei. 2021. “Estimating long-term impacts of tunnel infrastructure development on urban sustainability using granular computing.” Appl. Soft Comput. 113 (Dec): 107932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107932.
Zhang, X., Y. Wu, M. Skitmore, and S. Jiang. 2015. “Sustainable infrastructure projects in balancing urban-rural development: Towards the goal of efficiency and equity.” J. Clean Prod. 107 (Nov): 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.068.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 40Issue 4July 2024

History

Received: Oct 31, 2023
Accepted: Jan 23, 2024
Published online: Apr 9, 2024
Published in print: Jul 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Sep 9, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Researcher, Dept. of Construction Science, Texas A&M Univ., 3137 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4409-8391. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Yeungnam Univ., 280 Daehak-ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 38541, Republic of Korea (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7396-5917. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share