Technical Papers
Dec 13, 2022

Examining the Effectiveness of Gender Equity Initiatives to Support Women in Engineering

Publication: Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 39, Issue 2

Abstract

Globally, women are a minority in the engineering profession. Various initiatives are adopted by employers to support women’s career progression and retention in the profession. This paper examines the effectiveness of the common initiatives. Focus groups were conducted with 25 New Zealand based female engineers to explore their experiences and perceptions of women in engineering initiatives. Women discussed the effectiveness, and unintended consequences, of the initiatives. Their responses were coded using the NVivo software to identify key themes, which were then categorized using the universal/selective/indicated model. The findings show that universal initiatives which encompass men and women are well supported with few unintended consequences. These initiatives (e.g., subconscious bias training) focus less on changing or supporting women and more on changing the environment. In contrast, selective initiatives (e.g., female leadership programs) which focus on women, had mixed support and more unintended consequences. Specifically, they emphasize societal stereotypes that men are a better fit for the role of engineer and that women need help to adapt to the male-dominated environment. This study concludes with recommendations for employers to implement that will increase the participation and advancement of women in engineering.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the open participation of the 25 female engineers in the focus groups. Sharing their experiences with such honesty provided the foundation to the study.

References

Baker, M., E. French, and M. Ali. 2021. “Insights into ineffectiveness of gender equality and diversity initiatives in project-based organizations.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (3): 04021013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000893.
Barreto, U., E. Pellicer, A. Carrion, and C. Torres-Machi. 2017. “Barriers to the professional development of qualified women in the Peruvian construction industry.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 143 (4): 05017002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000331.
Beasley, M. A., and M. J. Fischer. 2012. “Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors.” Social Psychol. Educ. 15 (4): 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9185-3.
Buse, K., D. Bilimoria, and S. Perelli. 2013. “Why they stay: Women persisting in US engineering careers.” Career Dev. Int. 18 (2): 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2012-0108.
Cech, E., B. Rubineau, S. Silbey, and C. Seron. 2011. “Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering.” Am. Sociological Rev. 76 (5): 641–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411420815.
CIPD (Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development). 2019. “Diversity management that works: An evidence-based view.” Accessed June 6, 2022. https://www.cipd.co.uk/Images/7926-diversity-and-inclusion-report-revised_tcm18-65334.pdf.
Conrad, M. O., A. R. Abdallah, and L. Ross. 2021. “Why is retaining women in STEM careers so challenging? A closer look at women’s insights and experiences in STEM fields.” Accessed February 12, 2022. https://peer.asee.org/why-is-retaining-women-in-stem-careers-so-challenging-a-closer-look-at-women-s-insights-and-experiences-in-stem-fields.
Dainty, A. R., B. M. Bagilhole, and R. H. Neale. 2000. “A grounded theory of women’s career under-achievement in large UK construction companies.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 18 (2): 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900370861.
Dainty, A. R., and H. Lingard. 2006. “Indirect discrimination in construction organizations and the impact on women’s careers.” J. Manage. Eng. 22 (3): 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2006)22:3(108).
Engineering NZ (Engineering New Zealand). 2020. “Remuneration for engineers full results.” Accessed February 21, 2022. https://members.engineeringnz.org/s/remuneration-for-engineers.
European Institute for Gender Equality. 2016. “EIGE glossary and thesaurus.” Accessed February 1, 2022. https://eige.europa.eu/thesaurus.
Evetts, J. 1997. “Women and careers in engineering: Management changes in the work organization.” Women Manage. Rev. 12 (6): 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649429710182440.
Faulkner, W. 2009a. “Doing gender in engineering workplace cultures. I. Observations from the field.” Eng. Stud. 1 (1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378620902721322.
Fouad, N. A., W.-H. Chang, M. Wan, and R. Singh. 2017. “Women’s reasons for leaving the engineering field.” Front. Psychol. 8 (Jun): 875. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00875.
Francis, V., and E. Michielsens. 2021. “Exclusion and inclusion in the Australian AEC industry and its significance for women and their organizations.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (5): 04021051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000929.
Gill, J., J. Mills, S. Franzway, and R. Sharp. 2008. “‘Oh you must be very clever!’ High achieving women, professional power and the ongoing negotiation of workplace identity.” Gender Educ. 20 (3): 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250801968990.
Guest, G., E. Namey, and K. McKenn. 2017. “How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence bas for nonprobability sample sizes.” Field Methods 29 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X16639015.
Hatmaker, D. M. 2013. “Engineering identity: Gender and professional identity negotiation among women engineers.” Gender Work Organ. 20 (4): 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2012.00589.x.
Hewlett, S. A., C. B. Luce, L. J. Servon, L. Sherbin, P. Shiller, E. Sosnovich, and K. Sumberg. 2008. “The Athena factor: Reversing the brain drain in science, engineering and technology.” Harvard Business Review, January 1, 2008.
Hickey, P. J., and Q. Cui. 2020. “Gender diversity in US construction industry leaders.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (2): 04020069. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000838.
Khazanet, V. L. 1996. “Women in civil engineering and science: It’s time for recognition and promotion.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 122 (2): 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(1996)122:2(65).
Konrad, A. M., and F. Linnehan. 1995. “Race and sex differences in line managers’ reactions to equal employment opportunity and affirmative action interventions.” Group Organ. Manage. 20 (4): 409–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601195204003.
Kyriakidou, O. 2012. “Fitting into technical organizations? Exploring the role of gender in construction and engineering management in Greece.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 30 (10): 845–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2012.714870.
Leslie, L. 2020. “Greater good magazine.” Accessed February 24, 2022. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/what_makes_a_workplace_diversity_program_successful.
Leslie, L. M. 2019. “Diversity initiative effectiveness: A typological theory of unintended consequences.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 44 (3): 538–563. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0087.
Lu, S.-L., and M. Sexton. 2010. “Career journeys and turning points of senior female managers in small construction firms.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 28 (2): 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190903280450.
Mavriplis, C., R. Heller, C. Beil, K. Dam, N. Yassinskaya, M. Shaw, and C. Sorensen. 2010. “Mind the gap: Women in STEM career breaks.” J. Technol. Manage. Innovation 5 (1): 140–150. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242010000100011.
Morello, A., R. Issa, and B. Franz. 2018. “Exploratory study of recruitment and retention of women in the construction industry.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 144 (2): 04018001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000359.
Morgan, D. L. 1996. “Focus groups.” Annu. Rev. Sociol. 22 (1): 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129.
Naoum, S. G., J. Harris, J. Rizzuto, and C. Egbu. 2020. “Gender in the construction industry: Literature review and comparative survey of men’s and women’s perceptions in UK construction consultancies.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (2): 04019042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000731.
Patitsas, E., M. Craig, and S. Easterbrook. 2015. “Scaling up women in computing initiatives: What can we learn from a public policy perspective?” In Proc., ICER ’15: Proc. of the 11th Annual Int. Conf. on Int. Computing Education Research, 61–69. Nebraska, Omaha: International Computing Education Research.
Perrenoud, A. J., B. F. Bigelow, and E. M. Perkins. 2020. “Advancing women in construction: Gender differences in attraction and retention factors with managers in the electrical construction industry.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (5): 04020043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000808.
Powell, A., B. Bagilhole, and A. Dainty. 2009. “How women engineers do and undo gender: Consequences for gender equality.” Gender Work Organ. 16 (4): 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00406.x.
Smith, K. N., and J. G. Gayles. 2017. “‘Setting up for the next big thing’: Undergraduate women engineering students’ postbaccalaureate career decisions.” J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 58 (8): 1201–1217. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0094.
Smith, N. E., S. B. Costello, and S. Chowdhury. 2022. “Achieving gender balance in engineering: Examining the reasons for women's intent to leave the profession.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (4): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001057.
Smith, N. E., S. B. Costello, and S. Wilkinson. 2018. “Sticking it out: How influence and inclusion motivate women to stay in civil engineer.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Munic. Eng. 171 (3): 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmuen.17.00018.
Stats NZ (Statistics New Zealand). 2015. “Women at work: 1991-2013.” Accessed May 19, 2020. https://www.stats.govt.nz/reports/women-at-work-1991-2013.
Stats NZ Tatauranga Aotearoa (Statistics New Zealand Tatauranga Aotearoa). 2018. “2018 Census ethnic group summaries.” Accessed April 1, 2022. https://www.stats.govt.nz/tools/2018-census-ethnic-group-summaries.
Watts, J. H. 2009. “‘Allowed into a man’s world’ meanings of work-life balance: Perspectives of women civil engineers as ‘minority’ workers in construction.” Gender Work Organ. 16 (1): 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2007.00352.x.
WEF (World Economic Forum). 2021. “Global gender gap report.” Accessed February 21, 2022. https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2021/.
Wentling, R. M. 2004. “Factors that assist and barriers that hinder the success of diversity initiatives in multinational corporations.” Hum. Resour. Dev. Int. 7 (2): 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/1367886042000243781.
Wessel, J. L., N. Hagiwara, A. M. Ryan, and C. M. Kermond. 2015. “Should women applicants ‘man up’ for traditionally masculine fields? Effectiveness of two verbal identity management strategies.” Psychol. Women Q. 39 (2): 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314543265.
Xu, Y. 2015. “Focusing on women in STEM: A longitudinal examination of gender-based earning gap of college graduates.” J. Higher Educ. 86 (4): 489–523. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2015.0020.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 39Issue 2March 2023

History

Received: Apr 12, 2022
Accepted: Sep 26, 2022
Published online: Dec 13, 2022
Published in print: Mar 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 13, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Auckland, Auckland 2120, New Zealand (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6273-5403. Email: [email protected]
S. Chowdhury, Ph.D. [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]
S. B. Costello, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Cracking the Diversity Code: Analyzing Board Gender Diversity in the AEC Sector, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5772, 40, 3, (2024).
  • Influence of Work–Life Programs on Women’s Representation and Organizational Outcomes: Insights from Engineering and Construction, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5715, 40, 3, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share