Responsiveness of the Bid and Responsibility of the Bidder in Public Construction Bids
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16, Issue 4
Abstract
Contractors bidding on public construction projects must observe applicable rules and regulations and comply with their terms and conditions. Failure to do so exposes the bidding contractor to the risk that its bid will be rejected as nonresponsive or irresponsible. This paper investigates the grounds for rejecting individual bids in the bidding regulations of state departments of transportation (DOTs). Each DOT adopts its own criteria for determining whether bids are responsive and bidders are responsible and, if not, the grounds for rejection. This paper evaluates sixteen factors that awarding authorities may consider in evaluating bid submissions, their responsiveness, and the reasons nonresponsive bids may be rejected. Our evaluation of an awarding authority’s grounds for rejecting unresponsive bids is followed by a discussion of several factors that may warrant reconsideration by public awarding authorities. Our analysis will provide valuable information to state DOTs and other awarding authorities of public construction projects worldwide, given the volume of projects awarded by state DOTs and their accumulated experience in managing competitive bidding for public projects. Both contractors and officials involved in public bidding should find this paper helpful. Contractors will have a better understanding of the potential grounds for bid rejection so they may stay clear of them when preparing proposals in response to future solicitations by public awarding authorities. Officials in charge of public bidding will be able to better assess issues and modify their procedures in light of those implemented by other public awarding authorities.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
No data, models, or code were generated or used during the study.
References
List of Statutes
Law No. (12) of 2020 Concerning Contracts and Warehouse Management in the Government of Dubai.
Works Cited
Alaska DOT&PF (Alaska DOT and Public Facilities). 2020. Standard specifications for highway construction. Juneau, AK: Alaska DOT&PF.
ALDOT (Alabama DOT). 2018. Standard specifications for highway construction. Montgomery, AL: ALDOT.
Alhyari, O., and K. Hyari. 2022. “Handling unbalanced pricing in bidding regulations for public construction projects.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 14 (3): 04522011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000547.
An, X., H. Li, J. Zuo, O. Ojuri, Z. Wang, and J. Ding. 2018. “Identification and prevention of unbalanced bids using the unascertained model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (11): 05018013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001563.
ARDOT (Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department). 2014. Standard specification for highway construction. Juneau, AR: ARDOT.
Baek, M., and B. Ashuri. 2018. “Statistical modeling of number of bidders in highway resurfacing and widening construction projects.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2018: Infrastructure and Facility Management. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P., M. Skitmore, R. Das, and M. Campo-Hitschfeld. 2015. “Quick abnormal-bid-detection method for construction contract auctions.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (7): 04015010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000978.
Caltrans. 2018. Standard specifications. Sacramento, CA: California State Transportation Agency.
Carr, P. 2005. “Investigation of bid price competition measured through prebid project estimates, actual bid prices, and number of bidders.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (11): 1165–1172. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:11(1165).
CDOT (Colorado DOT). 2021. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Denver: CDOT.
DELDOT (Delaware DOT). 2022. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Dover, DE: DELDOT.
FAR (Federal Acquisition Regulation). 2019. Federal acquisition regulation, issued fiscal year 2019 by the general services administration. Washington, DC: Dept. of Defense, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
FDOT (Florida DOT). 2023. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Tallahassee, FL: FDOT.
GDOT (Georgia DOT). 2013. Standard specifications: Construction of transportation systems. Atlanta: GDOT.
Hyari, K., Z. Tarawneh, and H. Katkhuda. 2016. “Detection model for unbalanced pricing in construction projects: A risk-based approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (12): 04016078. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001203.
IADOT (Iowa DOT). 2012. Standard specifications for highway and bridge construction. Ames, IA: IADOT.
Koc, K., O. Ekmekcioglu, and Z. Işık. 2023. “Developing a hybrid fuzzy decision-making model for sustainable circular contractor selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 149 (10): 04023095. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13305.
KYTC (Kentucky Transportation Cabinet). 2019. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Frankfort, KY: KYTC.
Li, M., M. Baek, and B. Ashuri. 2020. “Forecasting ratio of low bid to owner’s estimate for highway construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (1): 04020157. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001970.
MaineDOT (Maine DOT). 2020. State of Maine department of transportation standard specifications. Augusta, ME: MaineDOT.
MASSDOT (Massachusetts DOT). 2023. Standard specifications for highways and bridges. Boston: Commonwealth of MASSDOT.
MDOT (Michigan DOT). 2020. Standard specifications for construction. Lansing, MI: MDOT.
MoDOT. 2019. Missouri standard specifications for highway construction. Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission.
NCDOT (North Carolina DOT). 2018. Standard specifications for roads and structures. Raleigh, NC: NCDOT.
NJDOT (New Jersey DOT). 2019. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Ewing Township, NJ: NJDOT.
NMDOT (New Mexico DOT). 2019. Standard specifications for highway and bridge construction. Santa Fe, NM: NMDOT.
NVDOT (Nevada DOT). 2014. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Carson City, NV: State of NVDOT.
NYDOT (New York DOT). 2023. Vol. 1 of Standard specifications. Albany, NY: NYDOT.
ODOT (Ohio DOT). 2019. Construction and material specifications. Columbus, OH: ODOT.
ORDOT (Oregon DOT). 2021. Oregon standard specifications for construction. Salem, OR: ORDOT.
Rodriguez, M., V. Montequín, P. Ballesteros-Pérez, P. Love, and R. Signor. 2022. “Collusion detection in public procurement auctions with machine learning algorithms.” Autom. Constr. 133 (1): 104047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104047.
Safa, M., M. Yee, D. Rayside, and C. Haas. 2016. “Optimizing contractor selection for construction packages in capital projects.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 30 (5): 04016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000555.
SCDOT (South Carolina DOT). 2007. Standard specifications for highway construction. Columbia, SC: SCDOT.
Signor, R., P. Love, A. Belarmino, and O. Olatunji. 2019. “Detection of collusive tenders in infrastructure projects: Learning from operation car wash.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (1): 05019015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001737.
Singh, D., and R. Tiong. 2005. “A fuzzy decision framework for contractor selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (1): 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:1(62).
Somboonpisan, J., and C. Limsawasd. 2021. “Environmental weight for bid evaluation to promote sustainability in highway construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (4): 04021013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002005.
TXDOT (Texas DOT). 2014. Standard specifications for construction and maintenance of highways, streets, and bridges. Austin, TX: TXDOT.
UDOT (Utah DOT). 2023. Standard specifications for road and bridge construction. Salt Lake City, UT: UDOT.
Waara, F., and J. Brochner. 2006. “Price and nonprice criteria for contractor selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (8): 797–804. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:8(797).
World Bank. 2021. Standard bidding documents: Procurement of works. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
WSDOT (Washington State DOT). 2022. Standard specifications for road, bridge, and municipal construction. Olympia, WA: WSDOT.
Wu, X., and F. Xu. 2021. “Detection model for unbalanced bidding in railway construction projects: Considering the risk of quantity variation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (7): 04021055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002058.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 2, 2023
Accepted: Apr 16, 2024
Published online: Jul 13, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 13, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Architectural engineering
- Bids
- Buildings
- Business management
- Construction engineering
- Construction management
- Contracts and subcontracts
- Facilities (by type)
- Infrastructure
- Laws and regulations
- Legal affairs
- Practice and Profession
- Project management
- Public buildings
- Public information programs
- Structural engineering
- Structures (by type)
- Urban and regional development
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.