Case Studies
May 31, 2024

Coupled Data Analytics–SWAT Approach for Flow Generation and Analysis in Ungauged Tropical Watershed

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 4

Abstract

At a regional scale, decision-making in water resources management is based on the analysis of long-term, continuous observations of hydrometeorological variables including streamflow. Quite often, constraints such as paucity of observed flow data hinder scientific planning in ungauged watersheds of developing countries. In this context, we present an improved framework for predicting streamflow data in an ungauged tropical watershed (Jambhira) in eastern India utilizing coupled data analytics and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) for flow regionalization. In this study, the choice of different dimensionality reduction methods such as principal components analysis (PCA) and Isomap during the clustering stage, as well as the choice of inverse distance weighting (IDW) and physical similarity (PS) approaches for regionalization of SWAT model parameters for the ungauged watershed, are investigated. As a novel aspect, in this case study, we included certain seasonal climate characteristics and changed land-use composition of the study watersheds as pertinent features for clustering of homogeneous watersheds. The proposed framework is then evaluated for its possible limitations, namely, whether the integrated approaches yield the best estimates of hydrological model parameters for ungauged watersheds, and if they guarantee good performance across different flow regimes. The regionalization results for the pseudoungauged watershed (Govindpur, India) indicate that coupled PS-SWAT approach is the most efficient with R2 and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 and from 0.74 to 0.77, respectively. The hydrological model of the ungauged watershed (Jambhira) is developed using the regionalization framework, and using the simulated flows, flow duration curve (FDC) analysis is also performed. Analysis of regime-based flow characteristics reveals a declining trend in the magnitude of low and high flows by 4% and 22.2%, respectively, in Jambhira.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The gridded rainfall and temperature data used in the study can be freely accessed from the Indian Meteorological Department website (http://dsp.imdpune.gov.in/). Streamflow data at gauging stations in the region are freely available in the India-Water Resources Information System (WRIS) web portal (https://indiawris.gov.in/wris/#/RiverMonitoring). The other data sets generated or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Natural Resources Census Project of National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC), Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO), Hyderabad, India, for providing the Land Use/Land Cover information utilized in this research work.
Author contributions: Ankita Manekar: methodology, data curation, formal analysis, software, investigation, visualization, interpretation, and writing–original draft. Meenu Ramadas: conceptualization, visualization, interpretation, and writing–reviewing and editing.

References

Abbaspour, K. C. 2011. SWATCUP2: SWAT calibration and uncertainty programs manual version 2. Duebendorf, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology.
Abbaspour, K. C., E. Rouholahnejad, S. Vaghefi, R. Srinivasan, H. Yang, and B. Klove. 2015. “A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model.” J. Hydrol. 524 (May): 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.027.
Abbaspour, K. C., M. T. Van Genuchten, R. Schulin, and E. Schlappi. 1997. “A sequential uncertainty domain inverse procedure for estimating subsurface flow and transport parameters.” Water Resour. Res. 33 (8): 1879–1892. https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR01230.
Althoff, D., R. B. Ribeiro, and L. Neiva Rodrigues. 2021. “Gauging the ungauged: Regionalization of flow indices at grid level.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 26 (4): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002067.
Arnold, J. G., D. N. Moriasi, P. W. Gassman, and M. J. White. 2012. “SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation.” Biosyst. Eng. 55 (4): 1491–1508. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.42256.
Arnold, J. G., R. Srinivasan, R. S. Muttiah, and J. R. Williams. 1998. “Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 34 (1): 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x.
Barbhuiya, S., A. S. Raghuvanshi, and H. L. Tiwari. 2023. “Assessment of streamflow in ungauged basin by using physical similarity approach.” Arab. J. Geosci. 16 (12): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11786-3.
Burn, D. H., and D. B. Boorman. 1993. “Estimation of hydrological parameters at ungauged catchments.” J. Hydrol. 143 (3–4): 429–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(93)90203-L.
Chiang, S. M., T.-K. Tsay, and S. J. Nix. 2002. “Hydrologic regionalization of watersheds. I: Methodology development.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 128 (1): 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2002)128:1(3).
Cigizoglu, H. K., and M. Bayazit. 2000. “A generalized seasonal model for flow duration curve.” Hydrol. Processes 14 (6): 1053–1067. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(20000430)14:6%3C1053::AID-HYP996%3E3.0.CO;2-B.
Coffey, M. E., S. R. Workman, J. L. Taraba, and A. W. Fogle. 2004. “Statistical procedures for evaluating daily and monthly hydrologic model predictions.” Trans. ASABE 47 (1): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.15870.
Daneshvar, F., J. R. Frankenberger, L. C. Bowling, K. A. Cherkauer, and A. G. D. L. Moraes. 2021. “Development of strategy for SWAT hydrologic modeling in data-scarce regions of Peru.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 26 (7): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002086.
de Oliveira, V. A., C. R. de Mello, S. Beskow, M. R. Viola, and R. Srinivasan. 2019. “Modeling the effects of climate change on hydrology and sediment load in a headwater basin in the Brazilian Cerrado biome.” Ecol. Eng. 133 (Aug): 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.04.021.
Di Prinzio, M., A. Castellarin, and E. Toth. 2011. “Data-driven catchment classification: Application to the PUB problem.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15 (6): 1921–1935. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1921-2011.
Farsadnia, F., and B. Ghahreman. 2016. “Using hierarchical clustering in order to increase efficiency of self-organizing feature map to identify hydrological homogeneous regions for flood estimation.” J. Water Soil 29 (5): 1207–1218. https://doi.org/10.22067/JSW.V29I5.34143.
Gassman, P. W., M. R. Reyes, C. H. Green, and J. G. Arnold. 2007. “The soil and water assessment tool: Historical development, applications, and future research directions.” Trans. ASABE 50 (4): 1211–1250. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23637.
Gitau, M. W., and I. Chaubey. 2010. “Regionalization of SWAT model parameters for use in ungauged watersheds.” Water 2 (4): 849–871. https://doi.org/10.3390/w2040849.
Golmohammadi, G., S. Prasher, A. Madani, and R. Rudra. 2014. “Evaluating three hydrological distributed watershed models: MIKE-SHE, APEX, SWAT.” Hydrology 1 (1): 20–39. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology1010020.
Gotzinger, J., and A. Bardossy. 2007. “Comparison of four regionalisation methods for a distributed hydrological model.” J. Hydrol. 333 (2–4): 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.008.
Government of India. 2020. “India-water resources information system (WRIS) portal.” Accessed April 28, 2021. https://indiawris.gov.in/wris/#/.
Gudmundsson, L., M. Leonard, H. X. Do, S. Westra, and S. I. Seneviratne. 2019. “Observed trends in global indicators of mean and extreme streamflow.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 46 (2): 756–766. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079725.
Guo, Y., Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, and Z. Wang. 2021. “Regionalization of hydrological modeling for predicting streamflow in ungauged catchments: A comprehensive review.” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Water 8 (1): 1487. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1487.
Hartigan, J. A. 1975. Clustering algorithms. New York: Wiley.
Hernandez, M., S. N. Miller, D. C. Goodrich, B. F. Goff, W. G. Kepner, C. M. Edmonds, and K. B. Jones. 2000. “Modeling runoff response to land cover and rainfall spatial variability in semi-arid watersheds.” Environ. Monit. Assess. 64: 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006445811859.
Hrachowitz, M., et al. 2013. “A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)-A review.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 58 (6): 1198–1255. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.803183.
Jolliffe, I. 2002. Principal Component Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
Kanishka, G., and T. I. Eldho. 2017. “Watershed classification using Isomap technique and hydrometeorological attributes.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 22 (10): 04017040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001562.
Kanishka, G., and T. I. Eldho. 2020. “Stream flow estimation in ungauged basins using watershed classification and regionalization techniques.” J. Earth Syst. Sci. 1: 129–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-020-01451-8.
Kaufman, L., and P. J. Rousseeuw. 1990. Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley.
Kavetski, D., G. Kuczera, and S. W. Franks. 2003. “Semi-distributed hydrological modeling: A saturation path perspective on TOPMODEL and VIC.” Water Resour. Res. 39 (9): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002122.
Kokkonen, T. S., A. J. Jakeman, P. C. Young, and H. J. Koivusalo. 2003. “Predicting daily flows in ungauged catchments: Model regionalization from catchment descriptors at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory.” Hydrol. Processes 17 (11): 2219–2238. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1329.
Koltsida, E., N. Mamassis, and A. Kallioras. 2023. “Hydrological modeling using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool in urban and peri-urban environments: The case of Kifisos experimental subbasin (Athens, Greece).” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 27 (4): 917–931. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-917-2023.
Mengistu, A. G., L. D. van Rensburg, and Y. E. Woyessa. 2019. “Techniques for calibration and validation of SWAT model in data scarce arid and semi-arid catchments in South Africa.” J. Hydrol. Reg. 25 (Oct): 100621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100621.
Merz, R., and G. Bloschl. 2004. “Regionalisation of catchment model parameters.” J. Hydrol. 287 (1–5): 95–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.028.
Moriasi, D. N., J. G. Arnold, M. W. Liew, R. L. Van Bingner, R. D. Harmel, and T. L. Veith. 2007. “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE 50 (3): 885–900. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153.
Murty, P. S., A. Pandey, and S. Suryavanshi. 2014. “Application of semi-distributed hydrological model for basin level water balance of the Ken basin of Central India.” Hydrol. Processes 28 (13): 4119–4129. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9950.
Naha, S., P. K. Thakur, and S. P. Aggarwal. 2016. “Hydrological modelling and data assimilation of satellite snow cover area using a land surface model, VIC.” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. XLI-B8: 353–360. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-353-2016.
Narbondo, S., A. Gorgoglione, M. Crisci, and C. Chreties. 2020. “Enhancing physical similarity approach to predict runoff in ungauged watersheds in sub-tropical regions.” Water 12 (2): 528. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020528.
Nash, J. E., and J. V. Sutcliffe. 1970. “River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I: A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol. 10 (3): 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.
Nathan, R. J., and T. A. McMahon. 1990. “Identification of homogeneous regions for the purposes of regionalization.” J. Hydrol. 121 (1–4): 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(90)90233-N.
Neitsch, S. L., J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry, and J. R. Williams. 2011. Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009. College Station, TX: Texas Water Resources Institute.
NRSC (National Remote Sensing Centre). 2021. “Bhuvan portal. National Remote Sensing Centre, ISRO, Government of India, Hyderabad, India.” Accessed January 28, 2021. https://bhuvan-app1.nrsc.gov.in/thematic/thematic/index.php.
Orth, R., M. Staudinger, S. I. Seneviratne, J. Seibert, and M. Zappa. 2015. “Does model performance improve with complexity? A case study with three hydrological models.” J. Hydrol. 523 (Apr): 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.044.
Pai, D. S., L. Sridhar, M. Rajeevan, O. P. Sreejith, N. S. Satbhai, and B. Mukhopadhyay. 2014. “Development of a new high spatial resolution (0.25° × 0.25°) long period (1901-2010) daily gridded rainfall data set over India and its comparison with existing data sets over the region.” Mausam 65 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v65i1.851.
Prabhanjan, A., E. P. Rao, and T. I. Eldho. 2015. “Application of SWAT model and geospatial techniques for sediment-yield modeling in ungauged watersheds.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 20 (6): C6014005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001123.
Qi, W. Y., J. Chen, L. Li, C. Y. Xu, J. Li, Y. Xiang, and S. Zhang. 2022. “Regionalization of catchment hydrological model parameters for global water resources simulations.” Hydrol. Res. 53 (3): 441–466. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2022.118.
Rao, A. R., and V. V. Srinivas. 2006. “Regionalization of watersheds by hybrid-cluster analysis.” J. Hydrol. 318 (1–4): 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.004.
Razavi, T., and P. Coulibaly. 2013. “Streamflow prediction in ungauged basins: Review of regionalization methods.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 18 (8): 958–975. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000690.
Rehana, S., and P. P. Mujumdar. 2011. “River water quality response under hypothetical climate change scenarios in Tunga-Bhadra River, India.” Hydrol. Processes 25 (22): 3373–3386. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8057.
Ribeiro, R. B., F. Falco Pruski, J. Silva de Oliveira, R. Filgueiras, D. Althoff, and E. J. D. A. Pinto. 2022. “Streamflow regionalization considering water balance with actual evapotranspiration estimated from remote sensing.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 27 (8): 04022012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002183.
Salinas, J. L., G. Laaha, M. Rogger, J. Parajka, A. Viglione, M. Sivapalan, and G. Blöschl. 2013. “Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins–Part 2: Flood and low flow studies.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17 (7): 2637–2652. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2637-2013.
Samuel, J., P. Coulibaly, and R. A. Metcalfe. 2011. “Estimation of continuous streamflow in Ontario ungauged basins: Comparison of regionalization methods.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 16 (5): 447–459. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000338.
Sawicz, K., T. Wagener, M. Sivapalan, P. A. Troch, and G. Carrillo. 2011. “Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Catchment classification: Empirical analysis of hydrologic similarity based on catchment function in the eastern USA.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15 (9): 2895–2911. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2895-2011.
Seibert, J. 1999. “Regionalisation of parameters for a conceptual rainfall-runoff model.” Agric. For. Meteorol. 98–99 (Dec): 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00105-7.
Shepard, D. 1968. “Two- dimensional interpolation function for irregularly spaced data.” In Proc., 23rd National Conf., 517–524. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Sivapalan, M., et al. 2003. “IAHS decade on predictions in ungauged basins (PUB), 2003-2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 48 (6): 857–880. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.48.6.857.51421.
Smakhtin, V. U. 2001. “Low flow hydrology: A review.” J. Hydrol. 240 (3–4): 147–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00340-1.
Srinivasan, R., J. G. Arnold, and C. A. Jones. 1998. “Hydrologic modelling of the united states with the soil and water assessment tool.” Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 14 (3): 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900629849231.
Srivastava, A. K., M. Rajeevan, and S. R. Kshirsagar. 2009. “Development of a high resolution daily gridded temperature data set (1969–2005) for the Indian region.” Atmos. Sci. Lett. 10 (4): 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.232.
State of the Tropics. 2020. State of the tropics 2020 report. Townsville, Australia: James Cook Univ.
Swain, J. B., and K. C. Patra. 2017. “Streamflow estimation in ungauged catchments using regionalization techniques.” J. Hydrol. 554 (Nov): 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.054.
Taia, S., L. Erraioui, Y. Arjdal, J. Chao, B. El Mansouri, and A. Scozzari. 2023. “The application of SWAT model and remotely sensed products to characterize the dynamic of streamflow and snow in a mountainous watershed in the High Atlas.” Sensors 23 (3): 1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031246.
Tananaev, N. I., O. M. Makarieva, and L. S. Lebedeva. 2016. “Trends in annual and extreme flows in the Lena River basin, northern Eurasia.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 43 (20): 10764–10772. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070796.
Tenenbaum, J. B., V. D. Silva, and J. C. Langford. 2000. “A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction.” Science 290 (5500): 2319–2323. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5500.2319.
Thorndike, R. L. 1953. “Who belongs in the family?” Psychometrika 18 (4): 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289263.
Yang, X., J. Magnusson, S. Huang, S. Beldring, and C. Y. Xu. 2020. “Dependence of regionalization methods on the complexity of hydrological models in multiple climatic regions.” J. Hydrol. 582 (Mar): 124357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124357.
Yang, X., J. Magnusson, J. Rizzi, and C. Y. Xu. 2018. “Runoff prediction in ungauged catchments in Norway: Comparison of regionalization approaches.” Hydrol. Res. 49 (2): 487–505. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2017.071.
Zhang, J., and Y. Wang. 2022. “Runoff prediction under different precipitation scenarios based on SWAT model and stochastic simulation of precipitation.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 27 (5): 05022003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002173.
Zhang, Y., J. Vaze, F. H. S. Chiew, J. Teng, and M. Li. 2014. “Predicting hydrological signatures in ungauged catchments using spatial interpolation, index model, and rainfall: Runoff modeling.” J. Hydrol. 517 (Sep): 936–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.032.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 29Issue 4August 2024

History

Received: Nov 28, 2022
Accepted: Mar 4, 2024
Published online: May 31, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 31, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, School of Infrastructure, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Khordha, Odisha 752050, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9381-3980. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Infrastructure, Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar, Khordha, Odisha 752050, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5622-7269. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share