Technical Papers
Mar 7, 2024

Effect of Salinity on Crop Growth and Soil Moisture Dynamics: A Study with Root Water Uptake Model

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 28, Issue 3

Abstract

This study investigates the hazardous effect of salinity on plant growth and soil moisture dynamics in the root zone. Field irrigation experiments on paddy (Oryza sativa L.—basmati variety) with varying levels of salinity of irrigation water (0.5, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 dS/m) were performed for studying the effect of salt water stress on crop growth. Throughout the crop’s growth period, measurements of leaf area index (LAI), root depth (RD), and soil moisture status in the root zone were recorded. For the analysis, a numerical model was developed to simulate root water uptake (RWU) and soil moisture movement in the root zone, accounting for osmotic pressure developed as a result of the salinity. Nonlinear parameters for the RWU model were estimated based on these observations for each salinity level. By incorporating meteorological data and soil–crop parameters, the model simulated RWU and root zone soil moisture. The results of the irrigation experiments revealed that increased salinity levels in the irrigation water significantly hindered crop development, leading to a decrease in LAI and root depth. The maximum LAI in the growth period decreased markedly, from 5.19 m2m−2 at 0.5 dS/m to 2.01 m2m−2 at 25 dS/m, a decline of approximately 61%. Root depth also exhibited a substantial reduction, declining by up to 36%, from 69.5 cm at 0.5 dS/m to 44.5 cm at 25 dS/m. The simulation outcomes further demonstrated that higher salt concentrations in the irrigation water resulted in reduced root water uptake and decreased soil moisture content in the root zone, ultimately affecting crop yield. The reduction in root water uptake becomes notably pronounced, exhibiting an approximate decrease of 81% when salinity level increases from 0.5 to 25 dS/m. These findings shed light on the hazards posed by salinity in agricultural practices and emphasize the importance of effective management strategies to ensure sustainable crop production in the presence of salinity-induced hazards.

Practical Applications

The results of our research yield significant insights with practical applications for real-life conditions. We find that increasing salinity levels in irrigation water have a pronounced adverse effect on paddy crop growth and root water uptake. As salinity levels rise, there is a noticeable effect on crop growth i.e., decrease in leaf area index (LAI), root depth (RD), and root water uptake (RWU), which are crucial parameters for crop development. Furthermore, our findings reveal a clear correlation between increasing salinity and reduced soil moisture content, particularly at the critical depths of 20 and 40 cm below the surface. The practical implications of our research are twofold. First, it underscores the importance of carefully managing salinity levels in irrigation practices to mitigate the negative effects on crop growth and water uptake. Secondly, our study provides valuable insights for crop selection, suggesting that paddy crops may be less suitable under high salinity conditions. These results offer practical guidance for agricultural decision makers, highlighting the need for salinity control measures and informed crop selection to optimize agricultural productivity in regions with saline water environments.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
Acm
crop coverage adjustment factor;
C
specific soil moisture capacity;
ETc
crop evapotranspiration;
ETo
reference evapotranspiration;
Es
soil evaporation;
f(ψ)
matric stress response function;
f(π)
osmotic stress response function;
Kc
crop coefficient;
Kcadj
adjusted crop coefficient;
Ksat
saturated hydraulic conductivity;
K(ψ)
unsaturated hydraulic conductivity;
LAIdense
leaf area index of a healthy crop;
LAImax
maximum value of leaf area index during growth period;
RDmax
maximum root depth during growth period;
RWUmax
maximum root water uptake on any day during growth period;
Rjmax
maximum root depth;
S
sink term accounting for RWU;
Se
effective saturation;
Smax
maximum root water extraction;
Tj
potential crop transpiration;
Tjmax
maximum daily crop transpiration;
Ts
specific transpiration;
t
time coordinate;
tpeak
time in days to maximum daily transpiration;
z
vertical coordinate for depth;
zrj
root depth on jth day;
α, β
parameters of RWU model;
αv, nv, mv
van Genuchten water retention parameters;
ɛ
tolerance level;
θ
volumetric soil moisture content;
θr
residual moisture content;
θs
saturation moisture content;
π
osmotic potential head;
πmax
critical osmotic head;
πw
wilting point osmotic head;
ψ
soil pressure head;
ψa
soil pressure head at anaerobiosis;
ψamc
pressure head at available moisture content;
ψfc
soil pressure head at field capacity; and
ψw
soil pressure head at wilting point.

References

Albasha, R., J.-C. Mailhol, and B. Cheviron. 2015. “Compensatory uptake functions in empirical macroscopic root water uptake models—Experimental and numerical analysis.” Agric. Water Manage. 155: 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.010.
Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration—Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrig. Drain. Pap. No. 56. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
Bauder, J. W., and T. A. Brock. 1992. “Crop species, amendment, and water quality effects on selected soil physical properties.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56 (4): 1292–1298. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600040047x.
Belmans, C., J. G. Wesseling, and R. A. Feddes. 1983. “Simulation model of the water balance of a cropped soil: SWATRE.” J. Hydrol. 63 (3–4): 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(83)90045-8.
Bernstein, L. 1975. “Effects of salinity and sodicity on plant growth.” Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 13 (1): 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.13.090175.001455.
Brisson, N., et al. 2003. “An overview of the crop model stics.” Eur. J. Agron. 18 (3–4): 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00110-7.
Browning, L. S., K. R. Hershberger, and J. W. Bauder. 2007. “Soil water retention at varying matric potentials following repeated wetting with modestly saline-sodic water and subsequent air drying.” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 38 (19–20): 2619–2634. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620701662836.
Cai, G., J. Vanderborght, M. Langensiepen, A. Schnepf, H. Hüging, and H. Vereecken. 2018. “Root growth, water uptake, and sap flow of winter wheat in response to different soil water conditions.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22 (4): 2449–2470. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2449-2018.
Cardon, G. E., and J. Letey. 1992a. “Plant water uptake terms evaluated for soil water and solute movement models.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56 (6): 1876–1880. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600060038x.
Cardon, G. E., and J. Letey. 1992b. “Soil-based irrigation and salinity management model: II. Water and solute movement calculations.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56 (6): 1887–1892. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600060040x.
Celia, M. A., E. T. Bouloutas, and R. L. Zarba. 1990. “A general mass-conservative numerical solution for the unsaturated flow equation.” Water Resour. Res. 26 (7): 1483–1496. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i007p01483.
Chawla, K. L., B. K. Khosla, and D. R. Sharma. 1983. “Hydraulic properties of a sandy loam soil as influenced by salinisation and desalinisation.” Irrig. Sci. 4 (4): 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389647.
Chen, W., Z. Hou, L. Wu, Y. Liang, and C. Wei. 2010. “Evaluating salinity distribution in soil irrigated with saline water in arid regions of northwest China.” Agric. Water Manage. 97 (12): 2001–2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.03.008.
Childs, S. W., and R. J. Hanks. 1975. “Model of soil salinity effects on crop growth.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 39: 617–622. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1975.03615995003900040016x.
de Jong van Lier, Q., K. Metselaar, and J. C. van Dam. 2007. “Response to ‘comment on root water extraction and limiting soil hydraulic conditions estimated by numerical simulation.’” Vadose Zone J. 6 (3): 527–528. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0042l.
de Jong van Lier, Q., J. C. van Dam, and K. Metselaar. 2009. “Root water extraction under combined water and osmotic stress.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73 (3): 862–875. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2008.0157.
de Jong van Lier, Q., J. C. van Dam, and K. Metselaar. 2010. “Reply to ‘comment on macroscopic root water uptake distribution using a matric flux potential approach.’” Vadose Zone J. 9 (2): 503. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2009.0167.
de Willigen, P., J. C. van Dam, M. Javaux, and M. Heinen. 2012. “Root water uptake as simulated by three soil water flow models.” Vadose Zone J. 11 (3): vzj2012.0018. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2012.0018.
dos Santos, M. A., Q. De Jong Van Lier, J. C. Van Dam, and A. H. F. Bezerra. 2017. “Benchmarking test of empirical root water uptake models.” Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21 (1): 473–493. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-473-2017.
Dudley, L. M., and U. Shani. 2003. “Modeling plant response to drought and salt stress: Reformulation of the root-sink term.” Vadose Zone J. 2 (4): 751–758. https://doi.org/10.2113/2.4.751.
Erie, L. J., O. F. French, and K. Harris. 1965. Consumptive use of water by crops in Arizona (bulletin 169/Arizona agricultural experiment station). Tucson, AZ: Univ. of Arizona.
Feddes, R. A., E. Bresler, and S. P. Neuman. 1974. “Field test of a modified numerical model for water uptake by root systems.” Water Resour. Res. 10 (6): 1199–1206. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR010i006p01199.
Feddes, R. A., P. J. Kowalik, and H. Zaradny. 1978. Simulation of field water use and crop yield. Wageningen, Netherlands: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.
Gerwitz, A., and E. R. Page. 1974. “An empirical mathematical model to describe plant root systems.” J. Appl. Ecol. 11 (2): 773–781. https://doi.org/10.2307/2402227.
Gonçalves, M. C., J. Šimunek, T. B. Ramos, J. C. Martins, M. J. Neves, and F. P. Pires. 2006. “Multicomponent solute transport in soil lysimeters irrigated with waters of different quality.” Water Resour. Res. 42 (8): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004802.
Homaee, M. 1999. “Root water uptake under non-uniform transient salinity and water stress.” Ph.D. thesis. Dept. of Environmental Sciences, Wageningen Univ. and Research Centre.
Homaee, M., C. Dirksen, and R. A. Feddes. 2002a. “Simulation of root water uptake I. Non-uniform transient salinity using different macroscopic reduction functions.” Agric. Water Manage. 57 (2): 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00072-0.
Homaee, M., R. A. Feddes, and C. Dirksen. 2002b. “Simulation of root water uptake II. Non-uniform transient water stress using different reduction functions.” Agric. Water Manage. 57 (2): 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00071-9.
Homaee, M., and U. Schmidhalter. 2008. “Water integration by plants root under non-uniform soil salinity.” Irrig. Sci. 27 (1): 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-008-0123-2.
Hoogland, J. C., R. A. Feddes, and C. Belmans. 1981. “Root water uptake model depending on soil water pressure head and maximum extraction rate.” Acta Hortic. 1 (119): 123–136. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.1981.119.11.
Hu, Y., X. Li, M. Jin, R. Wang, J. Chen, and S. Guo. 2020. “Reduced co-occurrence and ion-specific preferences of soil microbial hub species after ten years of irrigation with brackish water.” Soil Tillage Res. 199: 104599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104599.
Huang, W.-L., C.-H. Lee, and Y.-R. Chen. 2012. “Levels of endogenous abscisic acid and indole-3-acetic acid influence shoot organogenesis in callus cultures of rice subjected to osmotic stress.” Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 108 (2): 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-011-0038-0.
IS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1980. Methods of test for soils, determination of water content dry density relation using light compaction. IS : 2720 (Part VII-1980), Reaffirmed (Second Revision). New Delhi, India: IS.
IS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1985. Methods of test for soils: Part 4 grain size analysis. IS 2720:Part 4:1985. New Delhi, India: IS.
IS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 1986. Indian standard guidelines for irrigation water. IS:11624-1986. New Delhi, India: IS.
Jansson, P.-E. 1998. Simulation model for soil water and heat conditions. Rep. No. 165. Uppsala, Sweden: Division of Agricultural Hydrotechnics, Dept. of Soil Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Javaux, M., T. Schröder, J. Vanderborght, and H. Vereecken. 2008. “Use of a three-dimensional detailed modeling approach for predicting root water uptake.” Vadose Zone J. 7 (3): 1079–1088. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0115.
Jorda, H., A. Perelman, N. Lazarovitch, and J. Vanderborght. 2018. “Exploring osmotic stress and differences between soil–root interface and bulk salinities.” Vadose Zone J. 17 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2017.01.0029.
Kumar, S., K. S. Hari Prasad, and D. S. Bundela. 2020. “Effect of sodicity on soil–water retention and hydraulic properties.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 146 (5): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0001461.
Kumar, S., I. Sonkar, V. Gupta, K. S. Hari Prasad, and C. S. P. Ojha. 2021. “Effect of salinity on moisture flow and root water uptake in sandy loam soil.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 25 (3): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)hz.2153-5515.0000618.
Maas, E. V., and G. J. Hoffman. 1977. “Crop salt tolerance—Current assessment.” J. Irrig. Drain. Div. 103: 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1061/JRCEA4.0001137.
Molz, F. J., and I. Remson. 1970. “Extraction term models of soil moisture use by transpiring plants.” Water Resour. Res. 6 (5): 1346–1356. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR006i005p01346.
Mualem, Y. 1976. “A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media.” Water Resour. Res. 12 (3): 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513.
Nimah, M. N., and R. J. Hanks. 1973. “Model for estimating soil water, plant, and atmospheric interrelations: I. Description and sensitivity.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 37 (4): 522–527. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1973.03615995003700040018x.
Ojha, C. S. P., and A. K. Rai. 1996. “Nonlinear root-water uptake model.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 122 (4): 198–202. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(1996)122:4(198).
Ojha, C. S. P., K. S. Hari Prasad, D. N. Ratha, and R. Y. Surampalli. 2012. “Virus transport through unsaturated zone: Analysis and parameter identification.” J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 16 (2): 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)hz.2153-5515.0000102.
Paniconi, C., A. A. Aldama, and E. F. Wood. 1991. “Numerical evaluation of iterative and noniterative methods for the solution of the nonlinear Richards equation.” Water Resour. Res. 27 (6): 1147–1163. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR00334.
Peters, A., W. Durner, and S. C. Iden. 2017. “Modified Feddes type stress reduction function for modeling root water uptake: Accounting for limited aeration and low water potential.” Agric. Water Manage. 185: 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.02.010.
Prasad, R. 1988. “A linear root water uptake model.” J. Hydrol. 99 (3–4): 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(88)90055-8.
Pupisky, H., and I. Shainberg. 1979. “Soil science society of America.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43 (3): 429–433. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1979.03615995004300030001x.
Raes, D., P. Steduto, T. C. Hsiao, and E. Fereres. 2009. “Aquacrop—The FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: II. Main algorithms and software description.” Agron. J. 101 (3): 438–447. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0140s.
Ragab, R. 2002. “A holistic generic integrated approach for irrigation, crop and field management: The SALTMED model.” Environ. Modell. Software 17 (4): 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00079-2.
Rhoades, J., A. Kandiah, and A. Mashali. 1992. The use of saline waters for crop production. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
Shalhevet, J., and T. C. Hsiao. 1986. “Salinity and drought—A comparison of their effects on osmotic adjustment, assimilation, transpiration and growth.” Irrig. Sci. 7 (4): 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00270435.
Shankar, V., K. S. H. Prasad, C. S. P. Ojha, and R. S. Govindaraju. 2012. “Model for nonlinear root water uptake parameter.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 138 (10): 905–917. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000469.
Šimůnek, J., M. T. van Genuchten, and M. Šejna. 2016. “Recent developments and applications of the HYDRUS computer software packages.” Vadose Zone J. 15 (7): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.04.0033.
Šimůnek, J., M. T. van Genuchten, and O. Wendroth. 1998. “Parameter estimation analysis of the evaporation method for determining soil hydraulic properties.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62 (4): 894–905. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200040007x.
Skaggs, T. H., M. T. van Genuchten, P. J. Shouse, and J. A. Poss. 2006. “Macroscopic approaches to root water uptake as a function of water and salinity stress.” Agric. Water Manage. 86 (1–2): 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.06.005.
Sonkar, I., G. S. Kaushika, and K. S. H. Prasad. 2018. “Modeling moisture flow in root zone: Identification of soil hydraulic and root water uptake parameters.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 144 (10): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001342.
Stöckle, C. O., M. Donatelli, and R. Nelson. 2003. “Cropsyst, a cropping systems simulation model.” Eur. J. Agron. 18 (3–4): 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00109-0.
van Genuchten, M. T. 1980. “A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44 (5): 892–898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x.
Wind, G. P. 1969. “Capillary conductivity data estimated by a simple method.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., Wageningen Symp., edited by P. E. Rijtema and H. Wassink, 181–191. Paris: International Association of Scientific Hydrology.
Zhang, Y., X. Li, J. Šimůnek, H. Shi, N. Chen, Q. Hu, and T. Tian. 2021. “Evaluating soil salt dynamics in a field drip-irrigated with brackish water and leached with freshwater during different crop growth stages.” Agric. Water Manage. 244: 106601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106601.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 28Issue 3July 2024

History

Received: Jul 17, 2023
Accepted: Dec 14, 2023
Published online: Mar 7, 2024
Published in print: Jul 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Aug 7, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4349-3939. Email: [email protected]
Ickkshaanshu Sonkar [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Rupnagar, Punjab 140001, India. Email: [email protected]
Satendra Kumar [email protected]
Scientist B, Ground Water Hydrology Division, National Institute of Hydrology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India. Email: [email protected]
K. S. Hari Prasad [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
C. S. P. Ojha, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 247667, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share