Technical Papers
Aug 26, 2024

Parametric Breach Model Evaluation from Laboratory Rockfill Dam Models under Overtopping Conditions

Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 150, Issue 6

Abstract

Rockfill dams are a common dam type, but breach development in these dams is not very well understood, particularly rockfill dams with placed or dumped riprap protections on the crest and downstream slope. In this paper, we look at several experimental setups investigating the overtopping of rockfill dam models with and without riprap protections and how these experimental results compare with existing empirical models for breach development in embankment dams. We describe the model setups, data acquisition, and data analysis as well as the comparison with existing empirical equations for breach development, focusing on the following parameters: breach width, breach formation time, and peak outflow. The discussion brings to light how the parametric breach models can predict breach development in rockfill dam models. It also highlights how the existing models are wholly unsuited to predict breach development in protected dam models. Breach initiation and development in protected dams differs so much from unprotected dams that new models are needed. Such models could integrate new parameters that describe the resistance against erosion the crest and slope protection provides, as well as the sudden breach development that ensues once the protection fails.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The writing of this article was made possible with the financial support offered by the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate, Hafslund E-CO Vannkraft, Hydro Energi, NEAS, SFE Produksjon, Sira-Kvina, Skagerak Kraft AS, Statkraft, Tafjord Kraftproduksjon, and Trønder Energi, all in Norway. This research is also financially supported by the Norwegian Research Council (Grant No. 257588), Norwegian Research Centre for Hydropower Technology (HydroCen), Work Package WP 1.2. We would like to thank the former M.Sc. students (in chronological order of involvement) Styrmir Sigurjónsson, Ghaith Essam Alkholossi, Nisal Senarathna, Saroj Sapkota, and Raj Kumar for their participation in these model tests.

References

ASCE/EWRI Task Committee on Dam/Levee Breaching. 2011. “Earthen embankment breaching.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 137 (12): 1549–1564. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000498.
Briaud, J. L. 2008. “Case histories in soil and rock erosion: Woodrow Wilson Bridge, Brazos River meander, Normandy cliffs, and New Orleans levees.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (10): 1425–1447. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:10(1425).
Chang, T. J., H. M. Kao, K. H. Chang, and M. H. Hsu. 2011. “Numerical simulation of shallow-water dam break flows in open channels using smoothed particle hydrodynamics.” J. Hydrol. 408 (1–2): 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.07.023.
Costa, J. E. 1985. Floods from dam failures. Washington, DC: USGS.
Dezert, T., G. H. Kiplesund, and F. G. Sigtryggsdóttir. 2022. “Riprap protection exposed to overtopping phenomena: A review of laboratory experimental models.” Water 14 (17): 2722. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14172722.
Dezert, T., and F. G. Sigtryggsdóttir. 2024. “Evaluation of parametric breach models from prototype and historical embankment dams under overtopping conditions.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 150 (4): 04024015. https://doi.org/10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-12128.
Evans, S. G. 1986. “The maximum discharge of outburst floods caused by the breaching of man-made and natural dams.” Can. Geotech. J. 23 (3): 385–387. https://doi.org/10.1139/t86-053.
Froehlich, D. C. 1995a. “Embankment dam breach parameters revisited.” In Proc., Int. Water Resources Engineering Conf., 887–891. New York: ASCE.
Froehlich, D. C. 1995b. “Peak outflow from breached embankment dam.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 121 (1): 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1995)121:1(90).
Froehlich, D. C. 2008. “Embankment dam breach parameters and their uncertainties.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 134 (12): 1708–1721. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:12(1708).
Froehlich, D. C. 2016a. “Empirical model of embankment dam breaching.” In Proc., River Flow 2016. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Froehlich, D. C. 2016b. “Predicting peak discharge from gradually breached embankment dam.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 21 (11): 04016041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001424.
ICOLD (International Commission on Large Dams). 2019. ICOLD Incident database Bulletin 99 update–Statistical analysis of dam failures (Issue December). Paris: ICOLD.
ICOLD (International Commission on Large Dams). 2021. Dam failures–Statistical analysis. Bulletin 188. Paris: ICOLD.
Kiplesund, G. H., F. G. Sigtryggsdottir, and L. Lia. 2023. “Breach progression observation in rockfill dam models using photogrammetry.” Remote Sens. 15 (6): 1715. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15061715.
Larese, A., R. Rossi, E. Oñate, M. Á. Toledo, R. Morán, and H. Campos. 2015. “Numerical and experimental study of overtopping and failure of rockfill dams.” Int. J. Geomech. 15 (4): 04014060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000345.
MacDonald, T. C., and J. Langridge-Monopolis. 1984. “Breaching characteristics of dam failures.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 110 (5): 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1984)110:5(567).
Morris, M., M. Hassan, A. Kortenhaus, and P. Visser. 2009. Breaching processes: A state of the art review. Oxfordshire, UK: HR Wallingford.
Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. 2010. “Forskrift om sikkerhet ved vassdragsanlegg (Norwegian dam safety code).” Accessed November 1, 2023. https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2009-12-18-1600.
NVE (Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate). 2012. “Veileder for fyllingsdammer. Report n. 4/2012.” Accessed November 1, 2023. https://publikasjoner.nve.no/veileder/2012/veileder2012_04.pdf.
Pierce, M. W., C. I. Thornton, and S. R. Abt. 2010. “Predicting peak outflow from breached embankment dams.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 15 (5): 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.000019.
Ravindra, G. H. R., O. Gronz, B. Dost, and F. G. Sigtryggsdóttir. 2020. “Description of failure mechanism in placed riprap on steep slope with unsupported toe using smartstone probes.” Eng. Struct. 221 (Apr): 111038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111038.
SCS (Soil Conservation Service). 1981. Simplified dam-breach routing procedure. Washington, DC: USDA.
Singh, K. P., and A. Snorrason. 1982. Sensitivity of outflow peaks and flood stages to the selection of dam breach parameters and simulation models. Chicago: Univ. of Illinois.
Singh, K. P., and A. Snorrason. 1984. “Sensitivity of outflow peaks and flood stages to the selection of dam breach parameters and simulation models.” J. Hydrol. 68 (1–4): 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(84)90217-8.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 1982. Guidelines for defining inundated areas downstream from Bureau of Reclamation dams. Denver: US Bureau of Reclamation.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 1988. Downstream hazards classification guidelines. Denver: US Bureau of Reclamation.
Vaskinn, K. A., A. Løvoll, K. Höeg, M. Morris, G. J. Hanson, and M. A. Hassan. 2004. “Physical modeling of breach formation: Large scale field tests.” Dam Saf. 2004: 1–16.
Walder, J. S., and J. E. O’Connor. 1997. “Methods for predicting peak discharge of floods caused by failure of natural and constructed earthen dams.” Water Resour. Res. 33 (10): 2337–2348. https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR01616.
Wu, W. 2013. “Simplified physically based model of earthen embankment breaching.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 139 (8): 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000741.
Wu, W., and S. S. Wang. 2007. “One-dimensional modeling of dam-break flow over movable beds.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 133 (1): 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2007)133:1(48).
Xu, Y., and L. M. Zhang. 2009. “Breaching parameters for earth and rockfill dams.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (12): 1957–1970. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000162.
Zheng, X., and W. Y. Duan. 2010. “Numerical simulation of dam breaking using smoothed particle hydrodynamics and viscosity behavior.” J. Mar. Sci. Appl. 9 (1): 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-010-8037-9.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 150Issue 6November 2024

History

Received: Nov 21, 2023
Accepted: Jun 14, 2024
Published online: Aug 26, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jan 26, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian Univ. of Science and Technology, S.P. Andersens veg 5, Trondheim 7491, Norway; R&D Researcher, FI-NDT, Gustave Eiffel Univ., Allée des Ponts et Chaussées, Bouguenais 44344, France (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2060-1538. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate and Consultant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian Univ. of Science and Technology, S.P. Andersens veg 5, Trondheim 7491, Norway. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8574-840X. Email: [email protected]
Fjóla Guðrún Sigtryggsdóttir [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian Univ. of Science and Technology, S.P. Andersens veg 5, Trondheim 7491, Norway. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share