Field Evaluation of the Installation and Pullout of Snakeskin-Inspired Anchorage Elements
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 150, Issue 8
Abstract
Soil nails and tieback anchors are used extensively for excavation support and slope stabilization; however, their performance can be complicated by limited pullout capacity or installation challenges. This paper presents the results of field load tests performed on anchorage elements with snakeskin-inspired surfaces that do not require grout and that can reduce the force required for installation. These tests evaluated the effects of the asperity geometry, soil type, and embedment depth on the anchor load transfer behavior and pullout capacity. The tests consisted of jacked installation and pullout loading in sites consisting of dense sand and structured silt. The test results in sand indicate that the installation force and pullout skin friction increase as the asperity height is increased and the asperity length is decreased. The pullout capacity of the snakeskin-inspired anchors in sand was between 1.2 and 4.2 times greater than the capacity of a reference rough anchor. In the structured silt site, disturbance during installation influenced the pullout behavior, resulting in a decrease in anchor capacity as the asperity height was increased. However, the anchor capacity with small asperity heights was greater than that of the reference rough anchor. The snakeskin-inspired anchors mobilized direction-dependent skin friction, resulting in pullout skin friction values that were as much as 3.0 and 4.5 times greater than those generated during installation in the sand and silt sites, respectively, due to mobilized passive resistances during pullout. The results indicate that the snakeskin-inspired anchors can outperform conventional driven anchors in sands. However, the possible effects of installation disturbance should be evaluated carefully in sensitive, structured soils.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Raw data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the Engineering Research Center Program of the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement no. EEC-1449501 and by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Award no. 1942369. The load tests were made possible due to support from the UC Davis CGM, which is supported under grant No. CMMI-1520581. The donation of in-kind services by Conetec, Inc. for the performance of CPT soundings is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NSF. The assistance of Chad Justice during the field tests is greatly appreciated.
References
Bhuiyan, M. Z. I., S. Wang, and J. P. Carter. 2021. “Experimental study of an innovative driven and grouted soil nail (x-Nail).” Can. Geotech. J. 58 (8): 1205–1215. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2020-0084.
Chen, Y., A. Martinez, and J. T. DeJong. 2022. “DEM simulations of a bio-inspired site characterization probe with two anchors.” Acta Geotech. 2022 (Sep): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01684-5.
Chu, L.-M., and J.-H. Yin. 2005. “Comparison of interface shear strength of soil nails measured by both direct shear box tests and pullout tests.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (9): 1097–1107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:9(1097).
Gayathri, V. L., P. Vangla, and A. Riya. 2022. “Effect of snakeskin-inspired patterns on the shear response of soil–continuum interfaces.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 16 (6): 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2022.2066049.
Gray, J., and H. W. Lissmann. 1950. “The kinetics of locomotion of the grass-snake.” J. Exp. Biol. 26 (4): 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.26.4.354.
Huang, L., and A. Martinez. 2021. “Load transfer anisotropy at snakeskin-inspired clay-structure interfaces.” In IFCEE 2021, 119–129. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Jamiolkowski, M., D. C. F. Lo Presti, and M. Manassero. 2003. “Evaluation of relative density and shear strength of sands from CPT and DMT.” In Soil behavior and soft ground construction, 201–238. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Junaideen, S. M., L. G. Tham, K. T. Law, C. F. Lee, and Z. Q. Yue. 2004. “Laboratory study of soil–nail interaction in loose, completely decomposed granite.” Can. Geotech. J. 41 (2): 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-094.
Lazarete, C. A., V. Elias, R. D. Esponiza, and P. L. Sabatini. 2003. Geotechnical engineering circular No. 7, soil nail walls. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Lee, S.-H., and S.-H. Chong. 2022. “A study on friction anisotropy between sand and surface asperities of plate using modified direct shear test.” J. Korean Geotech. Soc. 38 (2): 29–38. https://doi.org/10.7843/KGS.2022.38.2.29.
Li, J., L. G. Tham, S. M. Junaideen, Z. Q. Yue, and C. F. Lee. 2008. “Loose fill slope stabilization with soil nails: Full-scale test.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (3): 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:3(277).
Luo, S. Q., S. A. Tan, and K. Y. Yong. 2000. “Pull-out resistance mechanism of a soil nail reinforcement in dilative soils.” Soils Found. 40 (1): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.40.47.
Lutenegger, A. 2011. “Behavior of multi-helix screw anchors in sand.” In Proc., 2011 Pan American Geotechnical Conf. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Martinez, A., et al. 2022. “Bio-inspired geotechnical engineering: Principles, current work, opportunities and challenges.” Géotechnique 72 (8): 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.20.P.170.
Martinez, A., and J. D. Frost. 2017. “The influence of surface roughness form on the strength of sand–structure interfaces.” Géotechnique Lett. 7 (1): 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.16.00169.
Martinez, A., and K. O’Hara. 2021. “Skin friction directionality in monotonically- and cyclically-loaded bio-inspired piles in sand.” J. Deep Found. Inst. 15 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.37308/DFIJnl.20200831.222.
Martinez, A., S. Palumbo, and B. D. Todd. 2019. “Bioinspiration for anisotropic load transfer at soil–structure interfaces.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (10): 04019074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002138.
Marvi, H. 2013. “The role of functional surfaces in the locomotion of snakes.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Marvi, H., and D. L. Hu. 2012. “Friction enhancement in concertina locomotion of snakes.” J. R. Soc. Interface 9 (76): 3067–3080. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0132.
Mayne, P. W. 2001. Stress-strain-strength-flow parameters from enhanced in-situ tests. Bandung, Indonesia: Arahyangan Catholic Univ.
Mayne, P. W. 2006. “The second James K. Mitchell Lecture: Undisturbed sand strength from seismic cone tests.” Geomech. Geoeng. 1 (4): 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486020601035657.
Mayne, P. W. 2014. “Interpretation of geotechnical parameters from seismic piezocone tests.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Milligan, G. W. E., and K. Tei. 1998. “The pull-out resistance of model soil nails.” Soils Found. 38 (2): 179–190. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.38.2_179.
Nally, A., and J. P. Hambleton. 2019. “Assessment of analysis techniques for multi-plate anchors in sand.” In Proc., 44th Annual Conf. on Deep Foundations. Hawthorne, NJ: Deep Foundations Institute.
O’Hara, K. B. 2023. “A multiscale study of the interface behavior between sand and snakeskin-inspired surfaces and pile shafts.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California Davis.
O’Hara, K. B., and A. Martinez. 2020. “Monotonic and cyclic frictional resistance directionality in snakeskin-inspired surfaces and piles.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (11): 04020116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002368.
O’Hara, K. B., and A. Martinez. 2022a. “Load transfer directionality of snakeskin-inspired piles during installation and pullout in sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 148 (12): 04022110. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002929.
O’Hara, K. B., and A. Martinez. 2022b. “Shaft and base capacity of snakeskin-inspired piles from centrifuge pile tests.” In Proc., Geo-Congress 2022, 170–180. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Sabatini, P. J., and R. C. Bachus. 1999. Geotechnical engineering circular No. 4: Ground anchors and anchored systems. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Salgado, R. 2006. The engineering of foundations. New York: McGraw Hill.
Sharma, M., M. Samanta, and P. Punetha. 2019a. “Experimental investigation and modeling of pullout response of soil nails in cohesionless medium.” Int. J. Geomech. 19 (3): 04019002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001372.
Sharma, M., M. Samanta, and S. Sarkar. 2019b. “Novel laboratory pullout device for conventional and helical soil nails.” Geotech. Test. J. 42 (5): 1314. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20170319.
Steward, J. E., and J. M. Ribera. 1995. “Launched soil nails: New method for rapid low-impact slope repair.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. Low Volume Roads. Washington, DC: Transporation Research Board.
Stutz, H. H., and A. Martinez. 2021. “Directionally dependent strength and dilatancy behavior of soil–structure interfaces.” Acta Geotech. 16 (9): 2805–2820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01199-5.
Tei, K., R. N. Taylor, and G. W. E. Milligan. 1998. “Centrifuge model tests of nailed soil slopes.” Soils Found. 38 (2): 165–177. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.38.2_165.
Uesugi, M., and H. Kishida. 1986. “Frictional resistance at field between dry sand and mild steel.” Soils Found. 26 (4): 139–149. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.26.4_139.
Wang, Q., X. Ye, S. Wang, S. W. Sloan, and D. Sheng. 2017. “Experimental investigation of compaction-grouted soil nails.” Can. Geotech. J. 54 (12): 1728–1738. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0063.
White, D. J., and B. M. Lehane. 2004. “Friction fatigue on displacement piles in sand.” Géotechnique 54 (10): 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2004.54.10.645.
Zhang, L. L., L. M. Zhang, and W. H. Tang. 2009. “Uncertainties of field pullout resistance of soil nails.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (7): 966–972. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000014.
Zhong, W., H. Liu, Q. Wang, W. Zhang, Y. Li, X. Ding, and L. Chen. 2021. “Investigation of the penetration characteristics of snake skin-inspired pile using DEM.” Acta Geotech. 16 (6): 1849–1865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01132-2.
Zhu, H.-H., J.-H. Yin, A. T. Yeung, and W. Jin. 2011. “Field pullout testing and performance evaluation of GFRP soil nails.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137 (7): 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000457.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 150 • Issue 8 • August 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 19, 2023
Accepted: Mar 11, 2024
Published online: Jun 12, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 12, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.