Technical Papers
Jun 7, 2024

Wildfire Ash Composition and Engineering Behavior

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 150, Issue 8

Abstract

After a wildfire event, ash is a newly formed surficial soil layer with microscale properties such as roughness, morphology, and chemical composition that may impact how ashes form fabrics in situ and so affect the overall hydrological conditions of a burned area (infiltration capacity, permeability, etc.). To examine the effects of ash microscale properties on macroscale behavior, eight wildfire ash samples from California were characterized physically (specific gravity, specific surface area, particle size, etc.), chemically (elemental composition, organic and inorganic carbon content, etc.), and geotechnically (strength, compaction, saturated hydraulic conductivity, etc.). The tested ashes were found to contain predominantly organic unburned carbons and carbonates derived from the combustion of calcium-oxalate rich fuels in temperatures likely ranging from 300°C to 500°C. Ashes had high specific surface areas because morphologically, particles had highly texturized and porous surfaces. Additional water was necessary to coat the particle surfaces, which led to high liquid limits and compaction optimum moisture contents. Hydraulic conductivity values were within range for silty sands (105103  cm/s), and specimens had friction angles near 30°. However, tested ashes consistently demonstrated high void ratios and low bulk densities during testing for strength, hydraulic conductivity, and compaction. These anomalies were attributed to unusual carbonate morphologies; the high interparticle friction of these phases allowed ashes to form looser fabrics than a typical silty sand and contributed to the measured high void ratios, low maximum dry unit weights, and high friction angles. Overall, we hypothesize that the relative amounts of inorganic versus organic constituents in our wildfire ash samples affected how the ashes formed fabrics and so affected their geotechnical properties.

Practical Applications

The role of wildfire ash in the postfire hydrological response of a catchment is not perfectly understood. Ash is a very heterogenous material whose properties are directly related to its formation environment (fuel type and accessibility, fire duration, and fire temperature, to name a few). This newly formed surface soil layer has unusual properties compared to natural soils, including low bulk densities and high porosities (sometimes up to 70% or more) in situ, but there is currently not enough information on ash properties in the literature to fully explain why. This study addresses this gap by providing physical, chemical, and geotechnical information about wildfire ashes. This is one of the first studies to specifically test wildfire ash maximum density, Atterberg limits, and shear strength. It provides geotechnical data to the community as well as information about ash chemical and physical properties. We hope that this study not only supplements the current literature on postwildfire landscapes but also informs researchers, engineers, and policy makers about how the formation environment of ash can influence its engineering behavior, such as strength, compressibility, and permeability.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in the NHERI DesignSafe repository in accordance with funder data retention policies [(2023) Characterization and Geotechnical Properties of Wildfire Ashes. DesignSafe-CI., DOIs: 10.17603/ds2-5g4s-0d41; 10.17603/ds2-z44q-yx40; 10.17603/ds2-02jz-3v08; 10.17603/ds2-kkzm-6056; 10.17603/ds2-t4qr-g268; 10.17603/ds2-d4n9-kk33; 10.17603/ds2-bs6z-4258; 10.17603/ds2-e0tv-4q57; 10.17603/ds2-5c1g-jq39; 10.17603/ds2-r93e-7d76; 10.17603/ds2-54es-sq16; 10.17603/ds2-jfjy-0122]. A portion of this work is a published part of the conference proceedings for the 9th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics (Wirth et al. 2023).

Acknowledgments

This work was funded in part by NSF Award #2138449. We graciously acknowledge the support provided by the National Science Foundation. We would like to acknowledge the efforts of former research students John Navarette and Brayden Padilla, whose contributions were instrumental in developing this work. Additionally, we would like to thank Dr. Matthew Kirby and Dr. Sean Loyd of the Geological Sciences department at CSU Fullerton, without whose guidance and equipment the particle size analysis and carbonate/carbon isotope testing would not have been possible. We would also like to thank Nick Everett Rollins and Dr. William Berelson of the University of Southern California for the use of the SEM. Finally, we would like to thank Boral Resources for the use of their helium pycnometer and X-ray fluorescence equipment. This work would not have been completed without the assistance of these individuals.

References

Araújo Santos, L., S. Lopes, and J. Silva. 2019. “Difficulties of using the Harvard miniature compaction apparatus as a reference test in the study of soil compaction.” In Proc., 17th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal: Portuguese Geotechnical Society.
Araújo Santos, L. M., A. J. P. M. Correia, and P. A. L. F. Coelho. 2020. “Post-wildfire slope stability effects and mitigation: A case study from hilly terrains with unmanaged forest.” SN Appl. Sci. 2 (11): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.32075/17ECSMGE-2019-0620.
ASTM. 2000. Standard test method for permeability of granular soils (constant head). ASTM D2434. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2010. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM D4318. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Balfour, V. N., and S. W. Woods. 2013. “The hydrological properties and the effects of hydration on vegetative ash from the northern Rockies, USA.” Catena 111 (Dec): 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2013.06.014.
Bodí, M. B., D. A. Martin, V. N. Balfour, C. Santín, S. H. Doerr, P. Pereira, A. Cerdà, and J. Mataix-Solera. 2014. “Wildland fire ash: Production, composition and eco-hydro-geomorphic effects.” Earth Sci. Rev. 130 (Mar): 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.12.007.
Bodí, M. B., J. Mataix-Solera, S. H. Doerr, and A. Cerdà. 2011. “The wettability of ash from burned vegetation and its relationship to Mediterranean plant species type, burn severity and total organic carbon content.” Geoderma 160 (3–4): 599–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.11.009.
Budhu, M. 2011. Soil mechanics and foundations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Cannon, S. H., and J. Degraff. 2015. “Cascading consequences of climate change and expanding population on the threat of wildfire and post fire debris-flow hazards, Western U.S.” In Landslides: Disaster risk reduction, 177–190. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Cannon, S. H., J. E. Gartner, A. Holland-Sears, B. M. Thurston, and J. A. Gleason. 2003. “Debris flow response of basins burned by the 2002 Coal Seam and Missionary Ridge fires, Colorado.” In Engineering geology in Colorado: Contributions, tends, and case histories, 1–31. Golden, CO: Colorado Geological Survey.
Cerdà, A., and S. H. Doerr. 2008. “The effect of ash and needle cover on surface runoff and erosion in the immediate post-fire period.” Catena 74 (3): 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2008.03.010.
Certini, G. 2005. “Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: A review.” Oecologia 143 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1788-8.
Das, B. M. 2008. Advanced soil mechanics. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Debano, L. F. 1999. “Fire-induced water repellency in soils: Hydrologic implications.” Hydrol. Water Resour. Arizona Southwest 29: 1–7.
DeBano, L. F. 1981. Water repellent soils: A state-of-the-art. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
De Graff, J. V. 2018. “A rationale for effective post-fire debris flow mitigation within forested terrain.” Geoenviron. Disasters 5 (7): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-018-0099-z.
Doerr, S. H., R. A. Shakesby, and R. P. D. Walsh. 2000. “Soil water repellency: Its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance.” Earth Sci. Rev. 51 (1–4): 33–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00011-8.
Ebel, B. A., J. A. Moody, and D. A. Martin. 2012. “Hydrologic conditions controlling runoff generation immediately after wildfire.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (3): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011470.
Keeley, J. 2009. “Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: A brief review and suggested usage.” Int. J. Wildland Fire 18 (1): 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07049.
Kohn, M. J. 2010. “Carbon isotope compositions of terrestrial C3 plants as indicators of (paleo)ecology and (paleo)climate.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107 (46): 19691–19695. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004933107.
Lambe, T. W., and R. V. Whitman. 1969. Soil mechanics. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Larsen, I. J., L. H. MacDonald, E. Brown, D. Rough, M. J. Welsh, J. H. Pietraszek, Z. Libohova, J. Dios Benavides-Solorio, and K. Schaffrath. 2009. “Causes of post-fire runoff and erosion: Water repellency, cover, or soil sealing?” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73 (4): 1393–1407. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0432.
Meehan, C. L., T. L. Brandon, and J. M. Duncan. 2007. “Measuring drained residual strengths in the bromhead ring shear.” Geotech. Test. J. 30 (6): 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ101017.
Mitchell, J. K., and K. Soga. 2005. “Chapter 04.” Fundam. Soil Behhav. (3): 83–108.
Monje, P. V., and E. J. Baran. 2002. “Characterization of calcium oxalates generated as biominerals in cacti.” Plant Physiol. 128 (2): 707–713. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.010630.
Moody, J. A., B. A. Ebel, P. Nyman, D. A. Martin, C. Stoof, and R. Mckinley. 2016. “Relations between soil hydraulic properties and burn severity.” Int. J. Wildland Fire 25 (3): 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF14062.
Moody, J. A., D. A. Kinner, and X. Úbeda. 2009. “Linking hydraulic properties of fire-affected soils to infiltration and water repellency.” J. Hydrol. 379 (3–4): 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.015.
Moody, J. A., R. A. Shakesby, P. R. Robichaud, S. H. Cannon, and D. A. Martin. 2013. “Current research issues related to post-wildfire runoff and erosion processes.” Earth Sci. Rev. 122 (Jul): 10–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.03.004.
Neary, D. G., G. J. Gottfried, and P. F. Ffolliott. 2003. “Post-wildfire watershed flood responses.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Fire Ecology and Fire Management Congress, 1–8. Boston: American Meteorological Society.
Onda, Y., W. E. Dietrich, and F. Booker. 2008. “Evolution of overland flow after a severe forest fire, Point Reyes, California.” Catena 72 (1): 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2007.02.003.
Parker, V., R. Pratt, and J. E. Keeley. 2018. “Chaparral.” Encycl. Ecol. 420–425.
Pereira, P., A. Cerdà, X. Úbeda, J. Mataix-Solera, D. Martin, A. Jordán, and M. Burguet. 2013. “Spatial models for monitoring the spatio-temporal evolution of ashes after fire—A case study of a burnt grassland in Lithuania.” Solid Earth 4 (1): 153–165. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-4-153-2013.
Pereira, P., X. Úbeda, and D. A. Martin. 2012. “Fire severity effects on ash chemical composition and water-extractable elements.” Geoderma 191 (Dec): 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.02.005.
Rodela, M. H., I. Chowdhury, and A. K. Hohner. 2022. “Emerging investigator series: Physicochemical properties of wildfire ash and implications for particle stability in surface waters.” Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 24 (11): 2129–2139. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EM00216G.
Sánchez-García, C., et al. 2023. “Chemical characteristics of wildfire ash across the globe and their environmental and socio-economic implications.” Environ. Int. 178 (Aug): 108065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.108065.
Santamarina, J. C., K. A. Klein, and M. A. Fam. 2001. Soils and waves. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Santamarina, J. C., K. A. Klein, Y. H. Wang, and E. Prencke. 2002. “Specific surface: Determination and relevance.” Can. Geotech. J. 39 (1): 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1139/t01-077.
Shahack-Gross, R., and A. Ayalon. 2013. “Stable carbon and oxygen isotopic compositions of wood ash: An experimental study with archaeological implications.” J. Archaeolog. Sci. 40 (1): 570–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.036.
Stark, T. D., and J. Vettel. 1992. “Bromhead ring shear test procedure.” Geotech. Test. J. 15 (1): 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10221J.
Tiwari, B., B. Ajmera, A. Gonzalez, and H. Sonbol. 2020. “Impact of wildfire on triggering mudslides: A case study of 2018 Montecitro debris flows.” In Proc., Geo-Congress 2020 Conf., 289–298. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Úbeda, X., P. Pereira, L. Outeiro, and D. A. Martin. 2009. “Effects of fire temperature on the physical and chemical characteristics of the ash from two plots of cork oak (Quercus suber).” Land Degrad. Dev. 20 (6): 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.930.
Vassilev, S. V., D. Baxter, and C. G. Vassileva. 2013. “An overview of the behaviour of biomass during combustion: Part I. Phase-mineral transformations of organic and inorganic matter.” Fuel 112 (Oct): 391–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.043.
Wirth, X., V. Antunez, D. Enriquez, and Z. Arevalo. 2023. “Engineering properties of wildfire ashes.” In Proc., 9th Int. Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 1–10. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Wirth, X., D. A. Glatstein, and S. E. Burns. 2019. “Mineral phases and carbon content in weathered fly ashes.” Fuel 236 (Jan): 1567–1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.106.
Woods, S. W., and V. N. Balfour. 2010. “The effects of soil texture and ash thickness on the post-fire hydrological response from ash-covered soils.” J. Hydrol. 393 (3–4): 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.08.025.
Yeboah, N. N. N., C. R. Shearer, S. E. Burns, and K. E. Kurtis. 2014. “Characterization of biomass and high carbon content coal ash for productive reuse applications.” Fuel 116 (Jan): 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.08.030.
Zhang, R. 1997. “Infiltration models for the disk infiltrometer.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61 (6): 1597–1603. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100060008x.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 150Issue 8August 2024

History

Received: Feb 14, 2023
Accepted: Jan 31, 2024
Published online: Jun 7, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 7, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xenia Wirth, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, CSU Fullerton, 800 N State College Blvd., Fullerton, CA 92831 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Vanessa Antunez, M.ASCE
Civil Engineering Associate 1, LADWP, 111 N Hope St., Los Angeles, CA 90012.
Dezire Enriquez
Undergraduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, CSU Fullerton, 800 N State College Blvd., Fullerton, CA 92831; presently, Staff Engineer, Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., Yorba Linda, CA 92887.
Zuleyma Arevalo
Undergraduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, CSU Fullerton, 800 N State College Blvd., Fullerton, CA 92831; presently, Field Soils Technician, GeoTek Consultants Office, 1548 N Maple St., Corona, CA 92880.
Ramzieh Kanaan
Staff Engineer, Group Delta, 32 Mauchly STE B, Irvine, CA 92618; presently, Field Soils Technician, GeoTek Consultants Office, 1548 N Maple St., Corona, CA 92880.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share