Technical Papers
Jun 3, 2024

Centrifuge Model Studies on the Mechanical Behavior of a Buried Pipe with Voids Surrounding the Bottom and the Effectiveness of EPS as a Countermeasure

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 150, Issue 8

Abstract

Due to insufficient backfilling and compaction, voids existing around the bottom of a buried pipe can have a negative effect on the mechanical behavior of the pipe. Expanded polystyrene (EPS) has been widely utilized in civil engineering as fill, backfill, moisture cutoff, and impact mitigation materials for falling rocks because of its light weight and workability. In this study, centrifuge model tests were conducted in order to investigate the possibility of pipe failure when voids existed around the bottom of the buried pipe, and the effect of installing EPS blocks as a countermeasure. In the test, a model polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe having a diameter of 140 mm was buried in the dry sand and loaded at the ground surface in a centrifugal field of 21G. Cases with voids around the bottom of the buried pipe and with EPS blocks were studied, and the differences in the pipe mechanical behavior under standard backfill conditions were discussed. The loading conditions and the shape of the EPS were varied. The test results showed that the loss of soil around the bottom of the pipe caused a stress concentration by a factor of more than 2.5 compared to the typical burial condition, and could directly cause pipe failure. In addition, it is clear that EPS installation was an effective countermeasure to avoid the risk of insufficient compaction, because it did not significantly affect pipe deformation and strain distribution, although the earth pressure tended to concentrate slightly at the bottom of the pipe.

Practical Applications

Pipelines that are buried in the ground usually need to be backfilled uniformly with soil around the pipe. However, due to difficulties in construction, the backfilling and compaction may be insufficient on the bottom sides of the pipe, resulting in voids or localized low-density areas. In this study, centrifuge model tests were conducted to investigate the behavior of pipes buried in such nonuniform ground and the effectiveness of a countermeasure to install expanded polystyrene foam (EPS) blocks as a foundation instead of backfilling with soil. In the tests, a 150-mm-diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe was buried in a container, and the strain of the pipe was measured in detail when a vertical load of up to 140 kPa was applied to the ground surface in a 20G centrifugal force field. As a result, when the soil in the lower part of the pipe is not uniform, a large strain is concentrated at the bottom of the pipe, which may lead to the pipe failure. Then, when EPS was installed, no large strains were measured, indicating that EPS installations are effective as a countermeasure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No. 20H00441).

References

Abdoun, T. H., D. Ha, M. J. O’Rourke, M. D. Symans, T. D. O’Rourke, M. C. Palmer, and H. Stewart. 2009. “E: Factors influencing the behavior of buried pipelines subjected to earthquake faulting.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 29 (3): 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.04.006.
Ariyoshi, M., and Y. Tanaka. 2019. “Long-term performance evaluation of polyvinyl chloride pipe subjected to internal pressure.” [In Japanese.] Trans. Jpn. Soc. Irrig. Drain. Rural Eng. 309 (87): I_349–I_356. https://doi.org/10.11408/jsidre.87.I_349.
Arulmoli, K., K. K. Muraleetharan, M. M. Hossain, and L. S. Fruth. 1992. VELACS verification of liquefaction analyses by centrifuge studies, laboratory testing program. Irvine, CA: The Earth Technology Corporation.
Balkaya, M., I. D. Moore, and A. Sağlamer. 2012. “Study of non-uniform bedding due to voids under jointed PVC water distribution pipes.” Geotext. Geomembr. 34 (Oct): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.01.003.
Bartlett, S. F., B. N. Lingwall, and J. Vaslestad. 2015. “Methods of protecting buried pipelines and culverts in transportation infrastructure using EPS geofoam.” Geotext. Geomembr. 43 (5): 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.04.019.
Brant, L., and H. I. Ling. 2006. “Centrifuge modeling of piles subjected to lateral loads.” In Soil stress-strain behavior: Measurement, modeling and analysis, 895–907. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6146-2_68.
Choo, Y. W., T. H. Abdoun, M. J. O’Rourke, and D. Ha. 2007. “Remediation for buried pipeline systems under permanent ground deformation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (Dec): 1043–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.04.002.
Cubrinovski, M., D. Henderson, and B. Bradley. 2012. “Liquefaction impacts in residential areas in the 2010-2011 Christchurch earthquakes.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Engineering Lessons Learned from the Giant Earthquake, 811–824. Tokyo: Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Ecemis, N., H. Valizadeh, and M. Karaman. 2021. “Sand-granulated rubber mixture to prevent liquefaction-induced uplift of buried pipes: A shaking table study.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 19 (May): 2817–2838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01091-3.
Ha, D., T. H. Abdoun, M. J. O’Rourke, M. D. Symans, T. D. O’Rourke, M. C. Palmer, and H. E. Stewart. 2008. “Centrifuge modeling of earthquake effects on buried high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipelines crossing fault zones.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (10): 1501–1515. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:10(1501).
Horvath, J. S. 1994. “Expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam: An introduction to material behavior.” Geotext. Geomembr. 13 (4): 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(94)90048-5.
Itani, Y., T. Nishiyama, T. Ibata, and T. Kawabata. 2014. “Investigation of the actual situation of water leakage accidents to irrigation pipelines -A case study for the trunk lines around lake Biwa, Japan.” [In Japanese.] J. Rainwater Catchment Syst. 20 (2): 61–66. https://doi.org/10.7132/jrcsa.20_2_61.
Jeffrey, J. D., A. P. Moser, and S. L. Folkman. 2003. “New design guidelines for fatigue failure in PVC pipe.” In Proc., American Water Works Association Annual Conf., 1–16. Washington, DC: American Water Works Association.
Kang, J., H. Im, and J. S. Park. 2020. “The effect of load reduction on underground concrete arch structures in embedded trench installations.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 98 (Apr): 103240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103240.
Kawamura, M., T. Aoki, C. Ikawa, Y. Sonoda, J. Hinobayashi, Y. Sawada, and T. Kawabata. 2021. “Experiments on countermeasures against insufficient compaction at bottom-side of buried pipe.” In Proc., Presentation of the Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Rural Engineering, Conf., 308–309. Tokyo: Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Rural Engineering.
Kokkali, P., A. Tessari, T. Abdoun, R. Varuo, J. Johnson, G. Filz, and A. Reeb. 2018. “Settlement-induced bending moments on pile-founded floodwalls.” Int. J. Phys. Modell. Geotech. 18 (1): 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1680/jphmg.16.00019.
Kutter, B. L. 1992. “Dynamic centrifuge modeling of geotechnical structures.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1336: 24–30.
Lingwall, B. N., and S. F. Bartlett. 2014. “Full-scale testing of an EPS geofoam cover system to protect pipelines at locations of lateral soil displacement.” In Proc., Pipelines 2014 Conf., 605–615. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Marston, A. K. 1930. The theory of external loads on closed conduits in the light of the latest experiments. Ames, IA: Iowa State College.
Matsuo, M., and T. Horiuchi. 1979. “Earthquake damage and methodology of design of small diameter pipelines.” Soils Found. 19 (1): 23–38. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.19.23.
Melissianos, V. E., G. P. Korakitis, C. J. Gantes, and G. D. Bouckovalas. 2016. “Numerical evaluation of the effectiveness of flexible joints in buried pipelines subjected to strike-slip fault rupture.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 90 (Nov): 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.012.
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 2021. “Land improvement project planning and design standards and their application and explanation ‘Pipeline’.” [In Japanese.] Accessed November 10, 2022. https://www.maff.go.jp/j/nousin/pipeline/pipeline.html.
Mohri, Y., S. Masukawa, T. Hori, and M. Ariyoshi. 2014. “Damage to agricultural facilities.” Soils Found. 54 (4): 588–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2014.06.025.
Mohri, Y., and K. Nakajima. 1989. “Performance of buried large flexible pipe.” [In Japanese.] Trans. Jpn. Soc. Irrig. Drain. Reclam. Eng. 142: 9–18. https://doi.org/10.11408/jsidre1965.1989.142_9.
Moore, I. D. 2008. “Assessment of damage to rigid sewer pipes and erosion voids in the soil, and implications for design of liners.” In Proc., No-Dig Conf. and Exhibition. Dallas, TX: North American Society for Trenchless Technology.
Ni, P., I. D. Moore, and W. A. Take. 2018. “Distributed fibre optic sensing of strains on buried full-scale PVC pipelines crossing a normal fault.” Géotechnique 68 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.161.
Puppala, A. J., P. Ruttanaporamakul, and S. S. C. Congress. 2019. “Design and construction of lightweight EPS geofoam embedded geomaterial embankment system for control of settlements.” Geotext. Geomembr. 47 (3): 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.01.015.
Rasouli, H., and B. Fatahi. 2020. “Geofoam blocks to protect buried pipelines subjected to strike-slip fault rupture.” Geotext. Geomembr. 48 (3): 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.11.011.
Rezaeia, H., B. Ryanb, and I. Stoianovc. 2015. “Pipe failure analysis and impact of dynamic hydraulic conditions in water supply networks.” Procedia Eng. 119 (Jan): 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.883.
Sonoda, Y., M. Kawamura, Y. Sawada, H. Kudo, and T. Kawabata. 2022a. “Small-sized buried model tests on effectiveness of EPS pipe foundation.” In Proc., 7th Asian Regional Conf. on Geosynthetic on Hazard’s Risk Management, Innovation, and Sustainability. Austin, TX: International Geosynthetics Society.
Sonoda, Y., M. Kawamura, Y. Sawada, G. Takahara, and T. Kawabata. 2022b. “Model tests on effectiveness of EPS foundation as a countermeasure against insufficient compaction around buried pipe.” [In Japanese.] Geosynth. Eng. J. 37: 85–92. https://doi.org/10.5030/jcigsjournal.37.85.
Sonoda, Y., Y. Sawada, K. Ono, Y. Ohta, and T. Kawabata. 2023. “Three-dimensional deformation behavior for buried pipe joints subjected to local differential settlement using three-direction strain measurement.” Transp. Infrastruct. Geotechnol. 10 (6): 1089–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-022-00253-3.
Spangler, M. G. 1933. The supporting strength of rigid pipe culverts. Ames, IA: Iowa State College.
Spangler, M. G. 1941. The structural design of flexible pipe culverts. Ames, IA: Iowa State College.
Tohda, J., and H. Yoshimura. 1999. “Proposal of a rational design method for buried flexible pipes.” [In Japanese.] J. Jpn. Soc. Civ. Eng. 1999 (617): 49–63. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej.1999.617_49.
Vaslestad, J., and M. S. Sayd. 2018. “Load reduction on buried rigid culverts, instrumented case histories and numerical modeling.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Geofoam Blocks in Construction Applications, 115–128. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78981-1_10.
Vazouras, P., S. A. Karamanos, and P. Dakoulas. 2010. “Finite element analysis of buried steel pipelines under strike-slip fault displacements.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 30 (11): 1361–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.011.
Yamaguchi, A., T. Mori, M. Kazama, and N. Yoshida. 2012. “Liquefaction in Tohoku district during the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake.” Soils Found. 52 (5): 811–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.11.005.
Yan, S., Y. Wang, D. Wang, and S. He. 2022. “Application of EPS geofoam in rockfall galleries: Insights from large-scale experiments and FDEM simulations.” Geotext. Geomembr. 50 (4): 677–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.03.009.
Yoshimura, Y., J. Tohda, and L. Li. 1997. “Experimental study on earth pressure on and deformation of buried flexible pipes.” [In Japanese.] J. Jpn. Soc. Civ. Eng. 1997 (561): 245–255. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscej.1997.561_245.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 150Issue 8August 2024

History

Received: Jul 31, 2023
Accepted: Mar 1, 2024
Published online: Jun 3, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 3, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yusuke Sonoda [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe Univ., 1-1 Rokkodai-cho, Nada-ku, Kobe-shi, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe Univ., 1-1 Rokkodai-cho, Nada-ku, Kobe-shi, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5517-3345. Email: [email protected]
Hoe I. Ling [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia Univ., 500 West 120th St., New York, NY 10027. Email: [email protected]
Manager, Centrifuge Laboratory, Columbia Univ., 500 West 120th St., MC4709 151 Engineering Terrace, New York, NY 10027. Email: [email protected]
Toshinori Kawabata [email protected]
Executive Vice President, Kobe Univ., 1-1 Rokkodai-cho, Nada-ku, Kobe-shi, Hyogo 657-8501, Japan. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share