Technical Papers
Feb 9, 2023

On the In Situ Cyclic Resistance of Natural Sand and Silt Deposits

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 4

Abstract

This study presents cyclic resistances of an instrumented medium dense sand (i.e., the Sand Array) and medium plastic silt (i.e., the Silt Array) deposit deduced from in situ dynamic testing using the controlled blasting test method. Particle velocity records were used to calculate the cyclic resistance ratios, CRRs, and convert the transient blast-induced ground motions into their equivalent number of shear stress cycles, Neq, through consideration of the cyclic resistance observed from stress-controlled, constant–volume, cyclic direct simple shear (DSS) tests. The CRR-Neq relationship developed for the medium dense sand deposit demonstrated that the in situ cyclic resistance is larger than that (1) expected from cyclic DSS test specimens reconstituted to the in situ vertical effective stress, relative density, and shear wave velocity, Vs; and (2) calculated using case history-based, penetration-, and Vs-based deterministic formulations of liquefaction triggering models. Differences between the in situ cyclic resistance and that computed using probabilistic liquefaction triggering models reduced somewhat when considering probabilities of liquefaction exceeding 50% and 85%, depending on the model. Partial drainage during dynamic loading of the Sand Array appears to have contributed to the cyclic resistance of the sand deposit, with an increase of 6% to 27% compared to that estimated for fully undrained conditions. Differences between the cyclic failure criteria used to interpret the cyclic resistance of intact laboratory specimens of silt result in significantly different interpretations of the in situ CRR; the use of maximum excess pore pressure-consistent criteria appears to provide the best representation of the in situ, stress-based cyclic resistance when high quality, intact silt specimens form the basis for conversion of transient seismic waveforms to uniform shear stress loading cycles. The investigation described herein suggests that the reduction of cyclic resistance for plastic soils to account for multidirectional shaking ranges from 0% to 7% over Neq of 1 to 100.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the sponsorship of this work by Cascadia Lifelines Program (CLiP) and its members, with special thanks to member agency Port of Portland. The authors were supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant CMMI 1663654) during the course of these experiments. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the above-mentioned sponsors.

References

Abdoun, T., M. A. Gonzalez, S. Thevanayagam, R. Dobry, A. Elgamal, M. Zeghal, and U. El Shamy. 2013. “Centrifuge and large-scale modeling of seismic pore pressures in sands: Cyclic strain interpretation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (8): 1215–1234. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000821.
Adamidis, O., U. Sinan, and I. Anastasopoulos. 2019. “Effects of partial drainage on the response of Hostun sand: An experimental investigation at element level.” In Vol. 4 of Earthquake geotechnical engineering for protection and development of environment and constructions, 993–1000. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Andrus, R. D., and K. H. Stokoe II. 2000. “Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 126 (11): 1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:11(1015).
Ashford, S. A., R. W. Boulanger, J. L. Donahue, and J. P. Stewart. 2011. Geotechnical quick report on the Kanto plain region during the March 11, 2011, Off Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake, Japan. Berkeley, CA: Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance.
Beyzaei, C. Z., J. D. Bray, M. Cubrinovski, M. Riemer, and M. E. Stringer. 2018. “Laboratory-based characterization of shallow silty soils in southwest Christchurch.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 110 (Jul): 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.046.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2004. Evaluating the potential for liquefaction or cyclic failure of silts and clays. Davis, CA: Univ. of California.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2007. “Evaluation of cyclic softening in silts and clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (6): 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:6(641).
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2012. “Probabilistic standard penetration test–based liquefaction–triggering procedure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (10): 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000700.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2014. CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures. Davis, CA: Center for Geotechnical Modelling.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2015. “Magnitude scaling factors in liquefaction triggering procedures.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 79 (Dec): 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.01.004.
Boulanger, R. W., and R. B. Seed. 1995. “Liquefaction of sand under bidirectional monotonic and cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (12): 870–878. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:12(870).
Cetin, K. O., R. B. Seed, R. E. Kayen, R. E. S. Moss, H. T. Bilge, M. Ilgac, and K. Chowdhury. 2018. “SPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction triggering hazard.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 115 (Dec): 698–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.012.
Chang, N. Y., S. T. Yeh, and L. P. Kaufman. 1982. “Liquefaction potential of clean and silty sands.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 3rd Int. Earthquake Microzonation Conf., 1017–1032. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Chang, W. J., E. M. Rathje, K. H. Stokoe, and K. Hazirbaba. 2007. “In situ pore pressure generation behavior of liquefiable sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (8): 921–931. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:8(921).
Cox, B. R., K. H. Stokoe, and E. M. Rathje. 2009. “An in-situ test method for evaluating the coupled pore pressure generation and nonlinear shear modulus behavior of liquefiable soils.” Geotech. Test. J. 32 (1): 11–21.
Cubrinovski, M., et al. 2010. “Geotechnical reconnaissance of the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 43 (4): 243–320. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.43.4.243-320.
Cubrinovski, M., A. Rhodes, N. Ntritsos, and S. Van Ballegooy. 2019. “System response of liquefiable deposits.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 124 (Sep): 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.013.
Dahl, K., R. W. Boulanger, and J. T. DeJong. 2018. “Trends in experimental data of intermediate soils for evaluating dynamic strength.” In Proc., 11th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Los Angeles: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Dahl, K. R., J. T. DeJong, R. W. Boulanger, R. Pyke, and D. Wahl. 2014. “Characterization of an alluvial silt and clay deposit for monotonic, cyclic, and post-cyclic behavior.” Can. Geotech. J. 51 (4): 432–440. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2013-0057.
Dobry, R., and T. Abdoun. 2015a. “3rd Ishihara Lecture: An investigation into why liquefaction charts work: A necessary step toward integrating the states of art and practice.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 68 (Jan): 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.09.011.
Dobry, R., and T. Abdoun. 2015b. “Cyclic shear strain needed for liquefaction triggering and assessment of overburden pressure factor kσ.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 141 (11): 04015047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001342.
Dobry, R., R. S. Ladd, F. Y. Yokel, R. M. Chung, and D. Powell. 1982. Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method. Gaithersburg, MD: National Bureau of Standards.
Donaldson, A. M. 2019. “Characterization of the small-strain stiffness of soils at an in-situ liquefaction test site.” M.S. thesis, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ.
El-Sekelly, W., T. Abdoun, and R. Dobry. 2016. “Liquefaction resistance of a silty sand deposit subjected to preshaking followed by extensive liquefaction.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (4): 04015101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001444.
El-Sekelly, W., R. Dobry, T. Abdoun, and J. H. Steidl. 2017. “Two case histories demonstrating the effect of past earthquakes on liquefaction resistance of silty sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (6): 04017009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001654.
Esposito, M. P., III, and R. D. Andrus. 2017. “Peak shear strength and dilatancy of a pleistocene age sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (1): 04016079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001582.
Evarts, R., J. O’Connor, and R. Wells. 2009. “The Portland Basin: A (big) river runs through it.” GSA Today 19 (9): 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG58A.1.
Finn, W. D. L., P. L. Bransby, and D. J. Pickering. 1970. “Effect of strain history on liquefaction of sand.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 96 (6): 1917–1934. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001478.
Franke, K. W., R. D. Koehler, C. Z. Beyzaei, A. Cabas, I. Pierce, A. Stuedlein, and Z. Yang. 2019. Geotechnical engineering reconnaissance of the 30 November 2018 Mw 7.0 Anchorage, Alaska earthquake. Geotechnical Extreme Events Association. https://doi.org/10.18118/G6P07F.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2004. “Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes.” In Vol. 11 of Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, edited by D. Doolin, et al., 32–56. Davis, CA: Stallion Press.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2008. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Ishihara, K. 1968. “Propagation of compressional waves in a saturated soil.” In Proc., Int. Symp. Wave Propagation and Dynamic Properties of Earth Materials, 195–206. Albuquerque, NM: Univ. of New Mexico Press.
Ishihara, K., K. Harada, W. F. Lee, C. C. Chan, and A. M. M. Safiullah. 2016. “Post-liquefaction settlement analyses based on the volume change characteristics of undisturbed and reconstituted samples.” Soils Found. 56 (3): 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2016.04.019.
Ishihara, K., and M. Yoshimine. 1992. “Evaluation of settlements in sand deposits following liquefaction during earthquakes.” Soils Found. 32 (1): 173–188. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.32.173.
Jana, A. 2021. “Use of controlled blasting to quantify the dynamic, in-situ, nonlinear inelastic response of soils.” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ.
Jana, A., A. Dadashiserej, B. Zhang, A. W. Stuedlein, T. M. Evans, K. H. Stokoe II, and B. R. Cox. 2022. “Multi-directional vibroseis shaking and controlled blasting to determine the dynamic in-situ response of a low plasticity silt deposit.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 149 (3): 04023006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002924.
Jana, A., A. M. Donaldson, A. W. Stuedlein, and T. M. Evans. 2021. “Deep, in-situ nonlinear dynamic testing of soil with controlled blasting: Instrumentation, calibration, and example application to a plastic silt deposit.” Geotech. Test. J. 44 (5): 1301–1326. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20190426.
Jana, A., and A. W. Stuedlein. 2021a. “Dynamic in-situ response of a deep, medium dense sand deposit.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (6): 04021039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002523.
Jana, A., and A. W. Stuedlein. 2021b. “Monotonic, cyclic and post-cyclic response of an alluvial plastic silt deposit.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (3): 04020174. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002462.
Jana, A., and A. W. Stuedlein. 2022. “Dynamic, in situ, nonlinear-inelastic response and post-cyclic strength of a plastic silt deposit.” Can. Geotech. J. 59 (1): 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2020-0652.
Joyner, W. B., and A. T. Chen. 1975. “Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 65 (5): 1315–1336. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0650051315.
Kayen, R., R. Moss, E. Thompson, R. Seed, K. Cetin, A. Kiureghian, Y. Tanaka, and K. Tokimatsu. 2013. “Shear-wave velocity–based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (3): 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000743.
Koester, J. P. 1994. “The influence of fines type and content on cyclic strength.” In Ground failures under seismic conditions, 17–33. New York: ASCE.
Ladd, R. S. 1977. “Specimen preparation and cyclic stability of sands.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 103 (6): 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000435.
Ladd, R. S. 1978. “Preparing test specimens using under compaction.” Geotech. Test. J. 1 (1): 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10364J.
Lee, W. F., K. Ishihara, and C. C. Chen. 2012. “Liquefaction of silty sandpreliminary studies from recent Taiwan, New Zealand and Japan earthquakes.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, 747–758. Tokyo: Japan Association Earthquake Engineering.
Martin, G. R., W. D. L. Finn, and H. B. Seed. 1975. “Fundamentals of liquefaction under cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 101 (5): 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000164.
Moss, R. E. S., R. B. Seed, R. E. Kayen, J. P. Stewart, A. Der Kiureghian, and K. O. Cetin. 2006. “CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (8): 1032–1051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:8(1032).
Mulilis, J. P., C. K. Chan, and H. B. Seed. 1975. The effects of method of sample preparation on the cyclic stress-strain behavior of sands. EERC Rep. No. 75-18. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Ni, M., T. Abdoun, R. Dobry, and W. El-Sekelly. 2021. “Effect of field drainage on seismic pore pressure buildup and Kσ under high overburden pressure.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (9): 04021088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002536.
Ni, M., T. Abdoun, R. Dobry, K. Zehtab, A. Marr, and W. El-Sekelly. 2020. “Pore pressure and K σ evaluation at high overburden pressure under field drainage conditions. I: Centrifuge experiments.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (9): 04020088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002303.
Price, A., J. DeJong, and R. Boulanger. 2017. “Cyclic loading response of silt with multiple loading events.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (10): 04017080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001759.
Rathje, E., R. Phillips, W. J. Chang, and K. H. Stokoe. 2001. “Evaluating nonlinear response in situ.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. San Diego: Missouri S&T Library and Learning Resources.
Roberts, J. N., K. H. Stokoe, S. Hwang, B. R. Cox, Y. Wang, F. M. Menq, and S. van Ballegooy. 2016. “Field measurements of the variability in shear strain and pore pressure generation in Christchurch soils.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Australian Geomechanics Society.
Robertson, P. 2009. “Interpretation of cone penetration tests—A unified approach.” Can. Geotech. J. 46 (11): 1337–1355. https://doi.org/10 .1139/T09-065.
Sahadewa, A., D. Zekkos, R. D. Woods, and K. H. Stokoe. 2015. “Field testing method for evaluating the small-strain shear modulus and shear modulus nonlinearity of solid waste.” Geotech. Test. J. 38 (4): 20140016. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20140016.
Sanin, M. V., and D. Wijewickreme. 2006. “Cyclic shear response of channel-fill Fraser River Delta silt.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 26 (9): 854–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.12.006.
Seed, H. B. 1979. “Soil liquefaction and cyclic mobility evaluation for level ground during earthquakes.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 105 (2): 201–255. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000768.
Seed, H. B., and K. L. Lee. 1965. Studies of liquefaction of sands under cyclic loading conditions. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Seed, H. B., K. Tokimatsu, L. F. Harder, and R. M. Chung. 1985. “Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (12): 1425–1445. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425).
Singh, S. 1994. “Liquefaction characteristics of silts.” In Ground Failures under Seismic Conditions. Geotechnical Special Publication 44, 105–116. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Stokoe, K. H., II, and J. C. Santamarina. 2000. “Seismic-wave based testing in geotechnical engineering.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., Int. Conf. on Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 1490–1536. Brunswick, OH: Association of Environmental and Engineering Geologists.
Tasiopoulou, P., K. Ziotopoulou, F. Humire, A. Giannakou, J. Chacko, and T. Travasarou. 2020. “Development and implementation of semiempirical framework for modeling postliquefaction shear deformation accumulation in sands.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (1): 04019120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002179.
Troncoso, J. H., and R. Verdugo. 1985. “Silt content and dynamic behavior of tailings sands.” In Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1311–1314. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Upadhyaya, S., R. A. Green, B. W. Maurer, A. Rodriguez-Marek, and S. van Ballegooy. 2022. “Limitations of surface liquefaction manifestation severity index models used in conjunction with simplified stress-based triggering models.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 148 (3): 04021194. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002725.
Verma, P., A. Seidalinova, and D. Wijewickreme. 2019. “Equivalent number of uniform cycles versus earthquake magnitude relationships for fine-grained soils.” Can. Geotech. J. 56 (11): 1596–1608. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0331.
Wang, B., C. Yao, Z. Liu, H. Fan, and H. Xiao. 2019. “Development of an energy-based EPWP generation model under different drainage conditions.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 304 (2): 022053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/304/2/022053.
Wijewickreme, D., A. Soysa, and P. Verma. 2019. “Response of natural fine-grained soils for seismic design practice: A collection of research findings from British Columbia, Canada.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 124 (Sep): 280–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.053.
Xiao, P., H. Liu, Y. Xiao, A. W. Stuedlein, and T. M. Evans. 2018. “Liquefaction resistance of bio-cemented calcareous sand.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 107 (Apr): 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.01.008.
Yoshimi, Y., K. Tokimatsu, and Y. Hosaka. 1989. “Evaluation of liquefaction resistance of clean sands based on high-quality undisturbed samples.” Soils Found. 29 (1): 93–104. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.29.93.
Yoshimi, Y., K. Tokimatsu, and O. Kaneko. 1984. “Undrained cyclic shear strength of a dense Niigata sand.” Soils Found. 24 (4): 131–145. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.24.4_131.
Youd, T. L., and I. M. Idriss. 2001. “Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and the 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on the evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (4): 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:4(297).
Zamani, A., and B. M. Montoya. 2019. “Undrained cyclic response of silty sands improved by microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 120 (May): 436–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.010.
Zeghal, M., and A. W. Elgamal. 1994. “Analysis of site liquefaction using earthquake records.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (6): 996–1017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:6(996).
Zeghal, M., A. W. Elgamal, H. T. Tang, and J. C. Stepp. 1995. “Lotung downhole array. II: Evaluation of soil nonlinear properties.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (4): 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:4(363).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 149Issue 4April 2023

History

Received: Feb 7, 2022
Accepted: Oct 25, 2022
Published online: Feb 9, 2023
Published in print: Apr 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jul 9, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Armin W. Stuedlein, M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6265-9906
Professor, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6265-9906
Postdoctoral Researcher, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1130-4037. Email: [email protected]
Ali Dadashiserej
Graduate Research Assistant, School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State Univ., 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331.
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400045, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9411-4660

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Flowability of Saturated Sands under Cyclic Loading and the Viscous Fluid Flow Failure Criterion for Liquefaction Triggering, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11872, 150, 1, (2024).
  • Postliquefaction Reconsolidation Settlement of a Soil Deposit Considering Spatially Variable Properties and Ground Motion Variability, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11768, 150, 3, (2024).
  • Cyclic Resistance Models for Transitional Silts with Application to Subduction Zone Earthquakes, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11671, 150, 2, (2024).
  • Discussion of “A New -Based Liquefaction-Triggering Procedure for Gravelly Soils”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11311, 149, 7, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share