Optimum Finance-Based Scheduling
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 9
Abstract
Even though advanced heuristic and metaheuristic models have been developed for minimizing financing cost by using total float to adjust the start times of activities, these models overlook the fact that the attempt to minimize financing cost may result in more than one work schedule with minimum financing cost. It is therefore not surprising that no research has been conducted to select the best financing schedule out of the multiple optimal work schedules. It is well known that total float must be used sparingly to avoid the creation of too many critical and near-critical activities that may cause delays in the project duration. Indeed, the loss of schedule flexibility caused by the use of total float comes at a cost. It is argued in this paper that the cost of float consumption should be a vital part of models designed to minimize financing cost. The research presented in this paper attempts to fill this gap. A model is proposed in this study that not only minimizes financing cost but also demonstrates the negative impact of not considering the cost of float consumption in reaching the optimal solution, an area of research that is mostly overlooked in the finance-based scheduling literature. This research contributes to the body of knowledge by demonstrating that there may be more than one work schedule with minimum financing cost, and that the cost of float consumption must be considered to find the most optimal solution.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support for this research by the Fulbright US Scholar Program, which is sponsored by the US Department of State and the Turkish Fulbright Commission. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Fulbright Program, the Government of the US, or the Turkish Fulbright Commission.
References
Alavipour, S. R., and D. Arditi. 2018a. “Impact of contractor’s optimized finance cost on project bid price.” Int. J. Project Manage. 36 (5): 808–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.001.
Alavipour, S. R., and D. Arditi. 2018b. “Optimizing financing cost in construction projects with fixed project duration.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (4): 04018012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001451.
Alavipour, S. R., and D. Arditi. 2019. “Maximizing expected contractor profit using an integrated model.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26 (1): 118–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2018-0149.
Alghazi, A., A. Elazouni, and S. Selim. 2013. “Improved genetic algorithm for finance-based scheduling.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 27 (4): 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000227.
Ali, M. M., and A. Elazouni. 2009. “Finance-based CPM/LOB scheduling of projects with repetitive non-serial activities.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 27 (9): 839–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190903191764.
Arditi, D., and R. Chotibhongs. 2005. “Issues in subcontracting practice.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (8): 866–876. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:8(866).
Arditi, D., A. Koksal, and S. Kale. 2000. “Business failures in the construction industry.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 7 (2): 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021137.
Clough, R. H., G. A. Sears, S. K. Sears, R. O. Segner, and J. L. Rounds. 2015. Construction contracting: A practical guide to company management. 8th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Damci, A., G. Polat, F. D. Akin, and H. Turkoglu. 2020. “Use of float consumption rate in resource leveling of construction projects.” Front. Eng. Manage. 9 (Jun): 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-020-0118-0.
de la Garza, J. M., M. C. Vorster, and C. M. Parvin. 1991. “Total float traded as commodity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 117 (4): 716–727. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1991)117:4(716).
El-Abbasy, M. S., A. Elazouni, and T. Zayed. 2016. “MOSCOPEA: Multi-objective construction scheduling optimization using elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm.” Autom. Constr. 71 (Nov): 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.038.
El-Abbasy, M. S., A. Elazouni, and T. Zayed. 2017. “Generic scheduling optimization model for multiple construction projects.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 31 (4): 04017003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000659.
Elazouni, A. M., and A. M. Abido. 2014. “Enhanced trade-off of construction projects: Finance-resource-profit.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (9): 04014043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000880.
Elazouni, A. M., and M. Abido. 2011. “Multiobjective evolutionary finance-based scheduling: Individual projects within a portfolio.” Autom. Constr. 20 (7): 755–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.03.010.
Elazouni, A. M., and A. Gab-Allah. 2004. “Finance-based scheduling of construction projects using integer programming.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 130 (1): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(15).
Elazouni, A. M., and F. G. Metwally. 2005. “Finance-based scheduling: Tool to maximize project profit using improved genetic algorithms.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (4): 400–412. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:4(400).
Elazouni, A. M., and F. G. Metwally. 2007. “Expanding finance-based scheduling to devise overall-optimized project schedules.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 133 (1): 86–90. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:1(86).
Fathi, H., and A. Afshar. 2010. “GA-based multi-objective optimization of finance-based construction project scheduling.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 14 (5): 627–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-010-0849-2.
Hinze, J. W. 2012. Construction planning and scheduling. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Jiang, A., R. R. Issa, and M. Malek. 2011. “Construction project cash flow planning using the Pareto optimality efficiency network model.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 17 (4): 510–519. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2011.604537.
Liu, S. S., and C. J. Wang. 2008. “Resource-constrained construction project scheduling model for profit maximization considering cash flow.” Autom. Constr. 17 (8): 966–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.04.006.
Liu, S. S., and C. J. Wang. 2009. “Two-stage profit optimization model for linear scheduling problems considering cash flow.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 27 (11): 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190903233111.
Liu, S. S., and C. J. Wang. 2010. “Profit optimization for multiproject scheduling problems considering cash flow.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (12): 1268–1278. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000235.
Peterson, S. J. 2013. Vol. 2 of Construction accounting and financial management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Tabyang, W., and V. Benjaoran. 2016. “Modified finance-based scheduling model with variable contractor-to-subcontractor payment arrangement.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 20 (5): 1621–1630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0581-z.
Tavakolan, M., and S. Nikoukar. 2022. “Developing an optimization finance cost-scheduling trade-off model in construction project.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 22 (2): 262–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1619439.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150 • Issue 9 • September 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 31, 2024
Accepted: Mar 28, 2024
Published online: Jun 18, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 18, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.