Technical Papers
Jun 18, 2024

Physics-Informed Knowledge-Driven Decision-Making Framework for Holistic Bridge Maintenance

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 9

Abstract

Bridge maintenance is a highly intricate task that involves considering a wide range of factors in order to achieve optimal decisions that align with multiple objectives, criteria, and the entire lifecycle of the bridge. While physics-informed analysis, such as the finite element method (FEM), can simulate complex and closely coupled scenarios, such as bridge structural analysis, it cannot account for some loosely coupled discrete factors, which could be addressed by ontological reasoning. Therefore, this paper presents a knowledge-driven decision-making framework that combines static knowledge reasoning with dynamic FEM analysis results to support holistic bridge maintenance decisions. One significant contribution of this research is the development of a comprehensive bridge maintenance ontology that incorporates knowledge derived from bridge maintenance standards. Another key contribution is the ability to employ complex runtime rules-based reasoning to tackle intricate bridge maintenance scenarios. To enable automatic knowledge-driven reasoning, an integrated workflow is developed to orchestrate semantic modeling with numerical modeling through a Python-based Web Ontology Language application programming interface (OWL API). This integration facilitates the efficient orchestration of the framework. A case study is presented to demonstrate the potential for the developed framework in assisting with the complex holistic decisions required for bridge maintenance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this research are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant No. 3132019349), China Scholarship Council (CSC No. 202006570025), and BIM for Smart Engineering Centre in Cardiff University, UK. The author would like to thank them for their support.

References

Chai, Y. T., and T. K. Wang. 2022. “Evaluation and decision-making framework for concrete surface quality based on computer vision and ontology.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 30 (10): 9969–9988. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2022-0064.
Chakraborty, S., and A. Sen. 2014. “Adaptive response surface based efficient finite element model updating.” Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 80 (Mar): 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2013.11.002.
El-Diraby, T. E., and K. F. Kashif. 2005. “Distributed ontology architecture for knowledge management in highway construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (5): 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:5(591).
El-Diraby, T. E., and H. Osman. 2011. “A domain ontology for construction concepts in urban infrastructure products.” Autom. Constr. 20 (8): 1120–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.04.014.
Fan, W., B. Liu, X. Huang, and Y. Sun. 2019. “Efficient modeling of flexural and shear behaviors in reinforced concrete beams and columns subjected to low-velocity impact loading.” Eng. Struct. 195 (Sep): 22–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.082.
Farghaly, K., R. K. Soman, and S. A. Zhou. 2023. “The evolution of ontology in AEC: A two-decade synthesis, application domains, and future directions.” J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 36 (Sep): 100519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2023.100519.
Federal Highway Administration. 2022. “National bridge inspection standards.” Accessed March 16, 2024. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/09/22/2022-20422/national-bridge-inspection-standards-technical-correction.
Garijo, D. 2017. “WIDOCO: A wizard for documenting ontologies.” In Vol. 10588 of Proc., Semantic Web–ISWC 2017: 16th International Semantic Web Conf., 94–102. Vienna, Austria: Springer International Publishing.
Garijo, D., and M. Poveda-Villalón. 2020. “Best Practices for Implementing FAIR Vocabularies and Ontologies on the Web.” Appl. Pract. Ontol. Des. Extr. Reasoning 49 (Dec): 39–54. https://doi.org/10.3233/SSW200034.
Gruber, T. R. 1993. “A translation approach to portable ontology specifications.” Knowl. Acquis. 5 (2): 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008.
Gruber, T. R. 1995. “Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing?” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 43 (5–6): 907–928. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081.
Hamdan, A.-H., M. Bonduel, and R. J. Scherer. 2019. “An ontological model for the representation of damage to constructions.” In Proc., 7th Linked Data in Architecture and Construction Workshop—LDAC2019. Leuven, Belgium: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Hamdan, A.-H., and R. J. Scherer. 2020. “Integration of BIM-related bridge information in an ontological knowledgebase.” In Proc., 8th Linked Data in Architecture and Construction Workshop—LDAC2020. Dresden, Germany: Technische Universität Dresden.
Hamdan, A.-H., J. Taraben, M. Helmrich, T. Mansperger, G. Morgenthal, and R. J. Scherer. 2021. “A semantic modeling approach for the automated detection and interpretation of structural damage.” Autom. Constr. 128 (Aug): 103739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103739.
Hou, S., H. Li, and Y. Rezgui. 2015. “Ontology-based approach for structural design considering low embodied energy and carbon.” Energy Build. 102 (Sep): 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.051.
Hu, X., and K. Liu. 2022. “Structural deterioration knowledge ontology towards physics-informed machine learning for enhanced bridge deterioration prediction.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 37 (1): 04022051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0001066.
Jiang, Y., H. Li, and G. Yang. 2023c. “Bridge maintenance ontology (BMO).” Accessed March 16, 2024. https://w3id.org/BMO.
Jiang, Y., H. Li, G. Yang, C. Zhang, and K. Zhao. 2023a. “Machine learning-driven ontological knowledge base for bridge corrosion evaluation.” IEEE Access 11 (Dec): 144735–144746. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3344320.
Jiang, Y., G. Yang, H. Li, and T. Zhang. 2023b. “Knowledge driven approach for smart bridge maintenance using big data mining.” Autom. Constr. 146 (Feb): 104673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104673.
Jiang, Y. L., G. Yang, and H. H. Song. 2020. “Dynamic optimization design of extradosed cable-stayed bridge under earthquake excitation.” [In Chinese.] Eng. Mech. 37 (Jun): 313–319. https://doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2019.04.S060.
Jung, S.-Y., S. Lee, and J. Yu. 2020. “Ontological approach for automatic inference of concrete crack cause.” Appl. Sci. 11 (1): 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010252.
Kartal, M. E., H. B. Başaⓖa, and A. Bayraktar. 2011. “Probabilistic nonlinear analysis of CFR dams by MCS using response surface method.” Appl. Math. Model. 35 (6): 2752–2770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.12.003.
Khudhair, A., H. Li, G. Ren, and S. Liu. 2021. “Towards future BIM technology innovations: A bibliometric analysis of the literature.” Appl. Sci. 11 (3): 1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031232.
Kim, S. J., E. J. Park, S. Y. Jung, and Y. J. Kim. 2017. “Optimization of the pole piece in coaxial magnetic gears for transfer torque ripple improvement.” Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech. 55 (2): 223–234. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-170079.
Li, R., T. Mo, J. Yang, S. Jiang, T. Li, and Y. Liu. 2021. “Ontologies-based domain knowledge modeling and heterogeneous sensor data integration for bridge health monitoring systems.” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 17 (1): 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.2967561.
Liu, K., and N. El-Gohary. 2016. “Semantic modeling of bridge deterioration knowledge for supporting big bridge data analytics.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2016. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479827.094.
Liu, K., and N. El-Gohary. 2017. “Ontology-based semi-supervised conditional random fields for automated information extraction from bridge inspection reports.” Autom. Constr. 81 (Sep): 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.02.003.
Liu, K., and N. El-Gohary. 2022. “Bridge deterioration knowledge ontology for supporting bridge document analytics.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (6): 04022030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002210.
Mancini, F., H. Remes, J. Romanoff, and P. Gallo. 2021. “Influence of weld rigidity on the non-linear structural response of beams with a curved distortion.” Eng. Struct. 246 (Nov): 113044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113044.
Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. 2021. “Important traffic news from the Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China.” Accessed March 16, 2024. https://www.mot.gov.cn/jiaotongyaowen/202111/t20211111_3625593.html.
Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. 2023. “The current industry standards (quota) and daily management group information for highway engineering.” Accessed March 16, 2024. https://xxgk.mot.gov.cn/2020/jigou/glj/202304/t20230407_3790364.html.
Noy, N. F., and D. L. McGuinness. 2001. “Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology.” Accessed March 16, 2024. https://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/Ontology101.
Ontology Engineering Group—UPM. 2023. “Linked open vocabularies (lov).” Accessed March 16, 2024. https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/.
Osman, H., and T. El-Diraby. 2006. “Ontological modeling of infrastructure products and related concepts.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1984 (1): 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106198400115.
Pauwels, P., S. Zhang, and Y. C. Lee. 2017. “Semantic web technologies in AEC industry: A literature overview.” Autom. Constr. 73 (Jan): 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.10.003.
Ren, G., R. Ding, and H. Li. 2019. “Building an ontological knowledgebase for bridge maintenance.” Adv. Eng. Software 130 (Apr): 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2019.02.001.
Saba, F., and Y. Mohamed. 2013. “An ontology-driven framework for enhancing reusability of distributed simulation modeling of industrial construction processes.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 40 (9): 917–926. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2011-0489.
Smiroldo, F., I. Giongo, and M. Piazza. 2021. “Use of timber panels to reduce the seismic vulnerability of concrete frame structures.” Eng. Struct. 244 (Oct): 112797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112797.
Studer, R., V. R. Benjamins, and D. Fensel. 1998. “Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods.” Data Knowl. Eng. 25 (1–2): 161–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-023X(97)00056-6.
The World Wide Web Consortium. 2024. “About W3C web standards.” Accessed March 16, 2024. https://www.w3.org/standards/about/.
Uschold, M., and M. Gruninger. 1996. “Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications.” Knowl. Eng. Rev. 11 (2): 93–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888900007797.
W3C Permanent Identifier Community Group. 2023. “Permanent identifiers for the web.” Accessed March 16, 2024. https://w3id.org/.
W3C Working Group. 2006. “Defining N-ary Relations on the Semantic Web.” Accessed March 16, 2024. https://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/.
Wu, C., P. Wu, J. Wang, R. Jiang, M. Chen, and X. Wang. 2021a. “Critical review of data-driven decision-making in bridge operation and maintenance.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 18 (1): 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1833946.
Wu, C., P. Wu, J. Wang, R. Jiang, M. Chen, and X. Wang. 2021b. “Ontological knowledge base for concrete bridge rehabilitation project management.” Autom. Constr. 121 (Jan): 103428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103428.
Xu, X., and H. Cai. 2020. “Semantic approach to compliance checking of underground utilities.” Autom. Constr. 109 (Jan): 103006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.103006.
Zhang, J., H. Li, Y. Zhao, and G. Ren. 2018. “An ontology-based approach supporting holistic structural design with the consideration of safety, environmental impact and cost.” Adv. Eng. Software 115 (Jan): 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.08.010.
Zhang, Y., J. Liu, and K. Hou. 2023. “Building a knowledge base of bridge maintenance using knowledge graph.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2023 (Apr): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6047489.
Zhou, X., and X. Zhang. 2019. “Thoughts on the development of bridge technology in China.” Engineering 5 (6): 1120–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.10.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150Issue 9September 2024

History

Received: Feb 1, 2023
Accepted: Mar 21, 2024
Published online: Jun 18, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Nov 18, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, College of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Maritime Univ., Dalian 116026, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, College of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Maritime Univ., Dalian 116026, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor and Chair in BIM for Smart Engineering, School of Engineering, Cardiff Univ., Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6326-8133. Email: [email protected]
Professor, College of Transportation Engineering, Dalian Maritime Univ., Dalian 116026, China. Email: [email protected]
Ali Khudhair, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Associate, BIM for Smart Engineering, School of Engineering, Cardiff Univ., Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share