Technical Papers
Jul 16, 2024

Effects of Organizational Elements on Emerging Information and Construction Management Technology Implementation in Building Professionals: Moderating Role of Top Management Support

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150, Issue 10

Abstract

Emerging information and construction management technology (EICMT) has become prevailing in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry to achieve digital transformation by applying emerging information technologies (i.e., Internet of things, cloud computing, and mobile Internet) in construction management works (i.e., cost management, stakeholder management, on-site construction management, etc.). This study aims to test the relations between organizational elements and building professional EICMT implementation and explore its practical path by identifying the mediators and moderators. 507 valid responses were obtained using the questionnaire online. Mplus 8.0, a statistical analysis software that prevails in handling complex models, is used for path analysis and bootstrapping tests in this study. Path analyses are conducted to test the relations between organizational elements and EICMT implementation. Bootstrapping tests are used to identify the mediator and moderator. The finding reveals that corporate normative pressure and technology facilitating conditions can directly affect building professional EICMT implementation; the mediating role of perceived ease of use is verified between technology facilitating condition and building professional EICMT implementation, and the moderating effect of top management support is confirmed by remodeling the relations between organizational elements and EICMT implementation, which provides a boundary condition for the building professionals’ EICMT implementation. Our study extends the relations between organizational elements and building professional EICMT implementation by exploring the mediator role of perceived ease of use and moderator of top management support. The findings from this study can enrich the research on the antecedents of EICMT implementation in the AEC industry. Moreover, this study provides guidelines for practitioners to formulate corporate norms, foster corporate culture, and provide technology facilitating conditions to promote EICMT implementation. It also requires top management to engage in digital transformation in the AEC industry.

Practical Applications

Emerging information and construction management technology (EICMT) is applied to improve project management efficiency in the AEC industry. Construction enterprises make several efforts to encourage their building professionals to implement EICMT, such as formal norms and informal culture, but the implementation of EICMT is contentious in practice. This study recommends that corporate normative pressure, technology-facilitating conditions, and top management support are crucial for the EICMT implementation in building professionals. Besides, building professionals prefer to select technologies that are easy to use rather than practical. Therefore, construction enterprises should formulate formal norms related to EICMT implementation to evaluate building professionals’ job performance, which can urge employees to apply EICMT in their daily work and also provide rewards for these employees who use EICMT in their jobs and improve work outcomes. Moreover, construction enterprises can provide convenient conditions on EICMT to encourage building professionals to accept EICMT, such as training, operation manuals, and professional guidance. Construction enterprises’ top managers should actively participate in EICMT promotion by implementing EICMT in daily work, communicating EICMT with their employees, and recognizing its benefits.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

Our study thanks the hundreds of respondents who took the time to complete the survey. This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant No. ZR2021QG054) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 72301160 and 71972018).

References

Akinlolu, M., T. C. Haupt, D. J. Edwards, and F. Simpeh. 2020. “A bibliometric review of the status and emerging research trends in construction safety management technologies.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 22 (14): 2699–2711. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1819584.
Al-Gahtani, S. S., G. S. Hubona, and J. Wang. 2007. “Information technology (IT) in Saudi Arabia: Culture and the acceptance and use of IT.” Inf. Manage. 44 (8): 681–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.09.002.
Anderson, J. C., and D. W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.” Psychol. Bull. 103 (3): 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.
Arrotéia, A. V., R. C. Freitas, and S. B. Melhado. 2021. “Barriers to BIM adoption in Brazil.” Front. Built Environ. 7 (Mar): 520154. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.520154.
Bartlett, J. E., J. W. Kotrlik, and C. C. Higgins. 2001. “Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research.” Inf. Technol. Learn. Perform. J. 19 (1): 43–50.
Bentler, P. M., and C. P. Chou. 1987. “Practical issues in structural modeling.” Sociol. Methods Res. 16 (1): 78–117.
Bock, G.-W., R. W. Zmud, Y.-G. Kim, and J.-N. Lee. 2005. “Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate.” MIS Q. 29 (1): 87–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669.
Browne, M. W., and R. Cudeck. 1992. “Alternative ways of assessing model fit.” Sociol. Methods Res. 21 (2): 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005.
Cao, D., H. Li, and G. Wang. 2014. “Impacts of isomorphic pressures on BIM adoption in construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (12): 04014056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000903.
Cao, D., S. Shao, B. Huang, and G. Wang. 2021. “Multidimensional behavioral responses to the implementation of BIM in construction projects: An empirical study in China.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 29 (2): 819–841. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2020-0735.
Chan, D. W. M., T. O. Olawumi, and A. M. L. Ho. 2019. “Critical success factors for building information modelling (BIM) implementation in Hong Kong.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26 (9): 1838–1854. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2018-0204.
Colquitt, J. A., J. A. LePine, and R. A. Noe. 2000. “Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research.” J. Appl. Psychol. 85 (5): 678–707. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678.
Ding, Z., J. Zuo, J. Wu, and J. Y. Wang. 2015. “Key factors for the BIM adoption by architects: A China study.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 22 (6): 732–748. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2015-0053.
Durdyev, S., M. Ashour, S. Connelly, and A. Mahdiyar. 2022. “Barriers to the implementation of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for facility management.” J. Build. Eng. 46: 103736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103736.
Edwards, J. R., and L. S. Lambert. 2007. “Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis.” Psychol. Methods 12 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1.
Gerbov, A., V. Singh, and M. Herva. 2018. “Challenges in applying design research studies to assess benefits of BIM in infrastructure projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 25 (1): 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2016-0260.
Ghansah, F. A., D.-G. Owusu-Manu, J. Ayarkwa, D. J. Edwards, and M. R. Hosseini. 2021. “Exploration of latent barriers inhibiting project management processes in adopting smart building technologies (SBTs) in the developing countries.” Constr. Innov. 21 (4): 685–707. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-07-2020-0116.
Gurgun, A. P., K. Koc, and H. Kunkcu. 2022. “Exploring the adoption of technology against delays in construction projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-06-2022-0566.
Heidari, M., E. Allameh, B. de Vries, H. Timmermans, J. Jessurun, and F. Mozaffar. 2014. “Smart-BIM virtual prototype implementation.” Autom. Constr. 39 (Apr): 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.07.004.
Hillis, D. M., and J. J. Bull. 1993. “An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis.” Syst. Biol. 42 (2): 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/42.2.182.
Hong, Y., A. W. A. Hammad, and A. Akbarnezhad. 2019. “Impact of organization size and project type on BIM adoption in the Chinese construction market.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 37 (11): 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1575515.
Hosseini, M. R., E. A. Pärn, D. J. Edwards, E. Papadonikolaki, and M. Oraee. 2018. “Roadmap to mature BIM use in Australian SMEs: Competitive dynamics perspective.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (5): 05018008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000636.
Howard, R., L. Restrepo, and C.-Y. Chang. 2017. “Addressing individual perceptions: An application of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology to building information modelling.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (2): 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.012.
Huang, Y., M. T. Trinh, and T. Le. 2021. “Critical factors affecting intention of use of augmented hearing protection technology in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (8): 04021088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002116.
Hwang, B.-G., J. Ngo, and J. Z. K. Teo. 2022. “Challenges and strategies for the adoption of smart technologies in the construction industry: The case of Singapore.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (1): 05021014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000986.
Jia, R., B. Jin, M. Jin, Y. Zhou, and I. C. Konstantakopoulos. 2018. “Design automation for smart building systems.” Proc. IEEE 106 (9): 1680–1699.
Karahanna, E., D. W. Straub, and N. L. Chervany. 1999. “Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs.” MIS Q. 23 (2): 183–213. https://doi.org/10.2307/249751.
Kim, S., C. H. Park, and S. Chin. 2015. “Assessment of BIM acceptance degree of Korean AEC participants.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 20 (4): 1163–1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0647-y.
Kochovski, P., and V. Stankovski. 2018. “Supporting smart construction with dependable edge computing infrastructures and applications.” Autom. Constr. 85 (Jan): 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.008.
Koseoglu, O., and E. T. Nurtan-Gunes. 2018. “Mobile BIM implementation and lean interaction on construction site.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 25 (10): 1298–1321. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2017-0188.
Lee, S., and J. Yu. 2016. “Comparative study of BIM acceptance between Korea and the United States.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (3): 05015016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001076.
Liang, H., N. Saraf, Q. Hu, and Y. Xue. 2007. “Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management.” MIS Q. 31 (1): 59–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148781.
Lim, T.-K., S.-M. Park, H.-C. Lee, and D.-E. Lee. 2016. “Artificial neural network–based slip-trip classifier using smart sensor for construction workplace.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (2): 04015065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001049.
Liu, D., W. Lu, and Y. Niu. 2018. “Extended technology-acceptance model to make smart construction systems successful.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (6): 04018035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001487.
Loch, K. D., D. Straub, and S. Kamel. 2003. “Diffusing the internet in the ArabWorld: The role of social norms and technological culturation.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 50 (1): 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2002.808257.
Ma, P., S. Zhang, Y. Hua, and J. Zhang. 2020. “Behavioral perspective on BIM postadoption in construction organizations.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (1): 04019036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000729.
Marangunić, N., and A. Granić. 2014. “Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013.” Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 14 (1): 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1.
Murguia, D., P. Demian, and R. Soetanto. 2021. “Systemic BIM adoption: A multilevel perspective.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (4): 04021014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002017.
Ogunrinde, O., C. Nnaji, and A. Amirkhanian. 2021. “Quality management technologies in highway construction: Stakeholders’ perception of utility, benefits, and barriers.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 26 (1): 04020043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000531.
Okpala, I., C. Nnaji, and A. A. Karakhan. 2020. “Utilizing emerging technologies for construction safety risk mitigation.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 25 (2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000468.
O’Leary-Kelly, S. W., and R. J. Vokurka. 1998. “The empirical assessment of construct validity.” J. Oper. Manage. 16 (4): 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00020-5.
Park, Y., H. Son, and C. Kim. 2012. “Investigating the determinants of construction professionals’ acceptance of web-based training: An extension of the technology acceptance model.” Autom. Constr. 22 (Mar): 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.016.
Phuyal, S., D. Bista, and R. Bista. 2020. “Challenges, opportunities and future directions of smart manufacturing: A state of art review.” Sustainable Futures 2 (Jan): 100023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100023.
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P. 2017. “Future smart facilities: State-of-the-art BIM-enabled facility management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (9): 02517006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001376.
Qin, X., Y. Shi, K. Lyu, and Y. Mo. 2020. “Using a TAM-TOE model to explore factors of building information modelling (BIM) adoption in the construction industry.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 26 (3): 259–277. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.12176.
Ragu-Nathan, B. S., C. H. Apigian, T. S. Ragu-Nathan, and Q. Tu. 2004. “A path analytic study of the effect of top management support for information systems performance.” Omega 32 (6): 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.03.001.
Schepers, J., and M. Wetzels. 2007. “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects.” Inf. Manage. 44 (1): 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007.
Shrestha, N. 2020. “Detecting multicollinearity in regression analysis.” Am. J. Appl. Math. Statis. 8 (2): 39–42. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-8-2-1.
Singh, V., and J. Holmström. 2015. “Needs and technology adoption: Observation from BIM experience.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 22 (2): 128–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2014-0124.
Sinoh, S. S., F. Othman, and Z. Ibrahim. 2020. “Critical success factors for BIM implementation: A Malaysian case study.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 27 (9): 2737–2765. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2019-0475.
Son, H., S. Lee, and C. Kim. 2015. “What drives the adoption of building information modeling in design organizations? An empirical investigation of the antecedents affecting architects’ behavioral intentions.” Autom. Constr. 49 (Jan): 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.10.012.
Son, H., Y. Park, C. Kim, and J.-S. Chou. 2012. “Toward an understanding of construction professionals’ acceptance of mobile computing devices in South Korea: An extension of the technology acceptance model.” Autom. Constr. 28 (Dec): 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.07.002.
Song, J., G. C. Migliaccio, G. Wang, and H. Lu. 2017. “Exploring the influence of system quality, information quality, and external service on BIM user satisfaction.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (6): 04017036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000549.
Teo, H. H., K. K. Wei, and I. Benbasat. 2003. “Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective.” MIS Q. 27 (1): 19–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036518.
Thong, J. Y. L., C.-S. Yap, and K. S. Raman. 1996. “Top management support, external expertise and information systems implementation in small businesses.” Inf. Syst. Res. 7 (2): 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.2.248.
Umar, T. 2021. “Challenges of BIM implementation in GCC construction industry.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 29 (3): 1139–1168. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-11-2019-0608.
Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 2000. “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies.” Manage. Sci. 46 (2): 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view.” MIS Q. 27 (3): 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.
Wang, G., H. Lu, W. Hu, X. Gao, and P. Pishdad-Bozorgi. 2020. “Understanding behavioral logic of information and communication technology adoption in small- and medium-sized construction enterprises: Empirical study from China.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (6): 05020013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000843.
Winfred Arthur, J., D. J. Woehr, and R. Maldegen. 2000. “Convergent and discriminant validity of assessment center dimensions a conceptual and empirical reexamination of the assessment center construct-related validity paradox.” J. Manage. 26 (4): 813–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600410.
Won, D., B.-G. Hwang, S. Chi, and J. L. Kor. 2022. “Adoption of three-dimensional printing technology in public housing in Singapore: Drivers, challenges, and strategies.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001065.
Yuan, H., and Y. Yang. 2020. “BIM adoption under government subsidy: Technology diffusion perspective.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (1): 04019089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001733.
Zhang, L., J. Yuan, Y. Ning, N. Xia, and G. Zhang. 2022. “Enhancing the impacts of absorptive capacity on interorganizational collaboration in BIM-enabled construction projects—An SLT perspective.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 29 (10): 4215–4240. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2020-0931.
Zhou, H., H. Wang, and W. Zeng. 2018. “Smart construction site in mega construction projects: A case study on island tunneling project of Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao bridge.” Front. Eng. Manage. 5 (1): 78–87. https://doi.org/10.15302/j-fem-2018075.
Zhu, H., B.-G. Hwang, J. Ngo, and J. P. S. Tan. 2022. “Applications of smart technologies in construction project management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 148 (4): 04022010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002260.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 150Issue 10October 2024

History

Received: Dec 17, 2023
Accepted: Apr 19, 2024
Published online: Jul 16, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 16, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, School of Management, Shandong Univ., Jinan 250100, China. Email: [email protected]
Sujie Zhang [email protected]
Master’s Student, School of Management, Shandong Univ., Jinan 250100, China. Email: [email protected]
Master’s Student, School of Management, Shandong Univ., Jinan 250100, China. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School Public Policy and Administration, Chongqing Univ., Chongqing 400044, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2600-0493. Email: [email protected]
Xianbo Zhao [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Engineering and Technology |Tertiary Education Division, Central Queensland Univ. Australia, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share