Technical Papers
Apr 7, 2023

Simulating Cost Risks for Prefabricated Construction in Developing Countries Using Bayesian Networks

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 149, Issue 6

Abstract

Prefabricated construction has been widely recognized as a primary method for sustainable construction, improving workflow continuity, increasing resource consumption efficiencies, and minimizing construction waste. While the benefits have been explored, its adoption constraints remain unexplored. Very few studies investigated the complex interrelationships between cost risk factors. The literature lacks a methodology that does not fall short of considering these interrelationships. Due to various interactive constraints, the development of prefabricated construction remains in its infancy. Therefore, the study aims to conduct cost risk identification and assessment methodology to investigate the interrelationships among barriers. In achieving this endeavor, a literature review was conducted first, followed by questionnaire surveys. Lastly, a risk assessment tool was developed by leveraging simulation models of Bayesian networks. The results showed that machinery and technology, direct costs, scheduling and planning, safety hazards, and site layout are the top five significant factors in implementing prefabricated construction with an assessment of 0.817, 0.777, 0.711, 0.687, and 0.666, respectively. The attention is increasing on the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainability. The Bayesian model shows that the three most influencing risk factors are a lack of machinery and technology, inadequate experience, and modifications to existing policies that directly influence at least three factors. The three most influenced risk factors are poor understanding, safety hazards, and scheduling and planning which are directly influenced by at least three factors. The study proposed the following mitigation strategies: (1) apply control measures for critical cost risks, (2) control influencing risks, and lastly (3) monitor highly influenced risks. The uniqueness of the study methodology is that it adopts a simulation model that not only simulates the interrelations of the factors but also updates the model when new evidence is revealed. Hence, when conducting a risk control and risk reassessment, the model will provide a prescriptive analysis to proactively control risks. The research builds upon existing knowledge and bridges a gap by investigating cost risks and their interrelationships. Study findings are informative to policymakers, providing a better grasp on prefabricated construction.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to give their gratitude to the industry professionals who have participated in face-to-face interviews to validate the reduced 25 risk factor list. The authors also express their thanks to the 149 industry experts who participated in the questionnaire survey and to those who distributed them. Finally, the authors declare no unreported conflict of interest associated with this publication. The authors report financial support and travel were provided by SELINA INSAAT VE GENEL TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI.

References

Abanda, F. H., J. H. M. Tah, and F. K. T. Cheung. 2017. “BIM in off-site manufacturing for buildings.” J. Build. Eng. 14 (Nov): 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.10.002.
Aliferis, C. F., A. Statnikov, I. Tsamardinos, S. Mani, and X. D. Koutsoukos. 2010. “Local causal and Markov blanket induction for causal discovery and feature selection for classification part I: Algorithms and empirical evaluation.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11 (1): 171–234.
Arif, M., and C. O. Egbu. 2010. “Making a case for offsite construction in China.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 17 (6): 536–548. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981011090170.
Badir, Y. F., M. A. Kadir, and A. H. Hashim. 2002. “Industrialized building systems construction in Malaysia.” J. Archit. Eng. 8 (1): 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2002)8:1(19).
Baltar, F., and I. Brunet. 2012. “Social research 2.0: Virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook.” Internet Res. 22 (1): 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211199960.
Blismas, N., C. Pasquire, and A. Gibb. 2006. “Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 24 (2): 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500184444.
Botsch, R. 2011. “Chapter 12. Significance and measures of association.” Accessed November 10, 2022. http://polisci.usca.edu/apls301/Text/Chapter12.SignificanceandMeasuresofAssociation.htm.
CIDB (Construction Industry Development Board). 2003. “Industrialised building systems (IBS): Roadmap 2003-2010.” In Construction industry development board Malaysia (Issue 72). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: CIDB.
Colombo, D., and M. H. Maathuis. 2015. “Order-independent constraint-based causal structure learning.” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15 (1): 3741–3782.
Friedman, N., I. Nachman, and D. Pe’er. 1999. “Learning Bayesian network structure from massive datasets: The ‘sparse candidate’ algorithm.” Preprint, submitted January 23, 2013. http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6696.
Gan, X., R. Chang, and T. Wen. 2018. “Overcoming barriers to off-site construction through engaging stakeholders: A two-mode social network analysis.” J. Cleaner Prod. 201 (Nov): 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.299.
Gan, X., R. Chang, J. Zuo, T. Wen, and G. Zillante. 2018. “Barriers to the transition towards off-site construction in China: An Interpretive structural modeling approach.” J. Cleaner Prod. 197 (Part 1): 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.184.
Gibb, A., and F. Isack. 2003. “Re-engineering through pre-assembly: Client expectations and drivers.” Build. Res. Inf. 31 (2): 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210302000.
Gibb, A. G. 1999. Off-site fabrication: Prefabrication, pre-assembly and modularisation. New York: Wiley.
Goodier, C. I., and A. G. F. Gibb. 2005. “Barriers and opportunities for offsite in the UK.” In Proc., Systematic Innovation in the Management of Project and Processes, Cib Helsinki Int. Joint Symp., edited by A. S. Kazi, 148–150. Helsinki, Finland: Technical Research Centre of Finland/Association of Finnish Civil Engineers.
Goodman, L. A. 1961. “Snowball sampling.” Ann. Math. Stat. 32 (1): 148–170. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177705148.
Hong, J., G. Q. Shen, Z. Li, B. Zhang, and W. Zhang. 2018. “Barriers to promoting prefabricated construction in China: A cost–benefit analysis.” J. Cleaner Prod. 172 (Jan): 649–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.171.
Hu, X., H. Y. Chong, and X. Wang. 2019. “Sustainability perceptions of off-site manufacturing stakeholders in Australia.” J. Cleaner Prod. 227 (Aug): 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.258.
Hwang, B. G., M. Shan, and K. Y. Looi. 2018. “Key constraints and mitigation strategies for prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction.” J. Cleaner Prod. 183 (May): 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.136.
Jaillon, L., and C. S. Poon. 2008. “Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: A Hong Kong case study.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 26 (9): 953–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802259043.
Jiang, R., C. Mao, L. Hou, C. Wu, and J. Tan. 2018. “A SWOT analysis for promoting off-site construction under the backdrop of China’s new urbanization.” J. Cleaner Prod. 173 (Feb): 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.147.
Kamali, M., and K. Hewage. 2017. “Development of performance criteria for sustainability evaluation of modular versus conventional construction methods.” J. Cleaner Prod. 142 (Part 4): 3592–3606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.108.
Kawecki, L. R. 2010. Environmental performance of modular fabrication: Calculating the carbon footprint of energy used in the construction of a modular home. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State Univ.
Kendall, M. G. 1938. “A new measure of rank correlation.” Biometrika 30 (1–2): 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81.
Krebbs, D. E. 1987. “Measurement theory.” Phys. Theory 67 (12): 1834–1839. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/67.12.1834.
Lazzerini, B., and L. Mkrtchyan. 2011. “Analyzing risk impact factors using extended fuzzy cognitive maps.” IEEE Syst. J. 5 (2): 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2011.2134730.
Li, C. Z., J. Hong, F. Xue, G. Q. Shen, X. Xu, and M. K. Mok. 2016. “Schedule risks in prefabrication housing production in Hong Kong: A social network analysis.” J. Cleaner Prod. 134 (Part B): 482–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.123.
Li, H. X., M. Al-Hussein, Z. Lei, and Z. Ajweh. 2013. “Risk identification and assessment of modular construction utilizing fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and simulation.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 40 (12): 1184–1195. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2013-0013.
Li, Z., G. Q. Shen, and M. Alshawi. 2014. “Measuring the impact of prefabrication on construction waste reduction: An empirical study in China.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 91 (Sep): 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.013.
Mao, C., Q. Shen, W. Pan, and K. Ye. 2015. “Major barriers to off-site construction: The developer’s perspective in China.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (3): 04014043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000246.
Mao, C., F. Xie, L. Hou, P. Wu, J. Wang, and X. Wang. 2016. “Cost analysis for sustainable off-site construction based on a multiple-case study in China.” Habitat Int. 57 (Oct): 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.08.002.
Mohamad Kamar, K. A., M. Alshawi, and Z. Abd Hamid. 2009. “Barriers to industrialized building system (IBS): The case of Malaysia.” In Proc., Built and Human Environment 9th Int. Postgraduate Research Conf. Salford, UK: Univ. of Salford.
Nawi, M. N. M., A. Lee, and K. M. Nor. 2011. “Barriers to implementation of the industrialised building system (IBS) in Malaysia.” Built Hum. Environ. Rev. 4 (2): 34–37.
O’Connor, J. T., W. J. O’Brien, and J. O. Choi. 2014. “Critical success factors and enablers for optimum and maximum industrial modularization.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (6): 04014012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000842.
Pan, W., A. G. Gibb, and A. R. Dainty. 2007. “Perspectives of UK housebuilders on the use of offsite modern methods of construction.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 25 (2): 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600827058.
Pan, W., A. G. Gibb, and A. R. Dainty. 2012. “Strategies for integrating the use of off-site production technologies in house building.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (11): 1331–1340. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000544.
Pearl, J. 1985. “Bayesian networks a model of self-activated memory for evidential reasoning.” In Proc., 7th Conf. of the Cognitive Science Society. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Computer Science Dept.
Quale, J., M. J. Eckelman, K. W. Williams, G. Sloditskie, and J. B. Zimmerman. 2012. “Construction matters: Comparing environmental impacts of building modular and conventional homes in the United States.” J. Ind. Ecol. 16 (2): 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00424.x.
Rahman, M. M. 2014. “Barriers of implementing modern methods of construction.” J. Manage. Eng. 30 (1): 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000173.
Russel, S., and P. Norvig. 2012. “Artificial intelligence—A modern approach.” In The knowledge engineering review. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Schwarz, G. 1978. “Estimating the dimension of a model.” Ann. Stat. 6 (2): 461–464.
Scutari, M., and D. Jean-Baptiste. 2014. “Bayesian networks: With examples in R.” In The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. London: CRC Press.
Shachter, R. D. 1986. “Evaluating influence diagrams.” Oper. Res. 34 (6): 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.34.6.871.
Song, J., W. R. Fagerlund, C. T. Haas, C. B. Tatum, and J. A. Vanegas. 2005. “Considering prework on industrial projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (6): 723–733. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:6(723).
Tam, V. W., I. W. Fung, M. C. Sing, and S. O. Ogunlana. 2015. “Best practice of prefabrication implementation in the Hong Kong public and private sectors.” J. Cleaner Prod. 109 (Dec): 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.045.
Tam, V. W., C. M. Tam, S. X. Zeng, and W. C. Ng. 2007. “Towards adoption of prefabrication in construction.” Build. Environ. 42 (10): 3642–3654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.003.
Tsamardinos, I., C. Aliferis, A. Statnikov, and E. Statnikov. 2003. “Algorithms for large scale Markov blanket discovery.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., FLAIRS Conf., 376–380. Palo Alto, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
Tsamardinos, I., L. E. Brown, and C. F. Aliferis. 2006. “The max-min hill-climbing Bayesian network structure learning algorithm.” Mach. Learn. 65 (1): 31–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-006-6889-7.
Uttam, K., and C. L. L. Roos. 2015. “Competitive dialogue procedure for sustainable public procurement.” J. Cleaner Prod. 86 (Jan): 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.031.
Wey, W. M., and K. Y. Wu. 2008. “Interdependent urban renewal project selection under the consideration of resource constraints.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 35 (1): 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33045.
Xiahou, X., J. Yuan, Y. Liu, Y. Tang, and Q. Li. 2018. “Exploring the driving factors of construction industrialization development in China.” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15 (3): 442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030442.
Xu, L., M. Skoularidou, A. Cuesta-Infante, and K. Veeramachaneni. 2019. “Modeling tabular data using conditional GAN.” In Advances in neural information processing systems. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
Yaramakala, S., and D. Margaritis. 2005. “Speculative Markov blanket discovery for optimal feature selection.” In Proc., IEEE Int. Conf. on Data Mining, ICDM. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2005.134.
Zhai, X., R. Reed, and A. Mills. 2014. “Factors impeding the offsite production of housing construction in China: An investigation of current practice.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 32 (1–2): 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2013.787491.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 149Issue 6June 2023

History

Received: Oct 18, 2022
Accepted: Feb 8, 2023
Published online: Apr 7, 2023
Published in print: Jun 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Sep 7, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil Engineering, Boğaziçi Univ., Bebek, Istanbul 34342, Turkey. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Sustainability in Prefabricated Construction: Enhancing Multicriteria Analysis and Prediction Using Machine Learning, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-14227, 150, 8, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share