Abstract

Reinforced concrete (RC) corbels are commonly utilized in bridges and industrial buildings to support primary beams and girders. Using glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforcement in corbels can be advantageous due to its corrosion-resistance properties. However, GFRP reinforcement, with a lower modulus of elasticity and shear strength than steel, could affect the capacity of direct shear. This paper presents the experimental results of nine full-scale, double-sided corbels reinforced with either GFRP or steel bent bars. Large-scale double-sided corbels were constructed and tested for failure under monotonic concentric loads. The test parameters included the reinforcement type (GFRP and steel), the main reinforcement ratio (0.5% and 0.7%), the shear span-to-depth ratio (a/d = 0.33 and 0.66), and the amount of crack-control horizontal reinforcement (0.7% and 1.3%). The predictions of corbel capacity using the Canadian standards for FRP-RC structures were conservative, especially for the corbels with crack-control reinforcement. In contrast, the predictions of the American and European codes overestimated the corbel strength, particularly for the higher a/d ratio of 0.66.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their special thanks and gratitude to the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), University of Manitoba Graduate Fellowship (UMGF), and MITACS-Globalink Graduate Fellowship for financial support. The authors also thank the technical staff of W.R. McQuade Heavy Structures Laboratory at the University of Manitoba for their assistance while conducting the experimental work.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
A1
loaded area;
A2
area of the lower base of the largest frustum of a pyramid, cone, or tapered wedge contained wholly within the support and having its upper base equal to the loaded area;
Acs
effective cross-sectional area of the strut;
AFT
area of tie reinforcement;
Af
area of FRP reinforcement;
Asi
area of steel distributed reinforcement;
Ast
area of steel reinforcement;
a
shear span;
b
corbel or strut width;
cc
clear concrete cover to main tie reinforcement;
d
effective depth of corbel section;
db
GFRP bar diameter;
dangle
depth of the corbel for the strut angle;
Ec
modulus of elasticity of concrete;
Ef
modulus of elasticity of FRP reinforcement;
Fnm
nominal compressive strength of a nodal zone;
Fns
strength of strut;
Fnt
nominal tensile strength of a tie;
fc
concrete compressive strength;
fcd
design value of concrete compressive strength;
fce
effective compressive strength of concrete in a strut;
fck
characteristic compressive cylinder strength of concrete at 28 days;
fcu
limiting compressive strength;
fFU
ultimate strength of the FRP bar;
fy
yield strength of steel reinforcement;
h
overall depth of corbel section;
hc
height of the corbel;
hnode
height of node back face near ties;
Itr
moment of inertia of the transformed RC section;
N1
node capacity;
PACI
predicted load capacity calculated based on ACI-318-19;
PCSA(1)
predicted load capacity calculated based on CSA S806 following Approach 1;
PCSA(2)
predicted load capacity calculated based on CSA S806 following Approach 2;
Pcr
first flexural-cracking load;
PEC2
predicted load capacity calculated based on Eurocode2;
Pexp
experimental load capacity of the tested specimen;
Ppre
predicted load capacity calculated based on code models;
Pu
ultimate load on one corbel;
r
radius of the GFRP bar bend;
si
distributed reinforcement spacing;
T
failure load of the tie;
Vu
ultimate shear force;
wbearing
width of the bearing plate;
α1
minimum angle between unidirectional distributed reinforcement and a strut;
αcc
coefficient taking account of long-term effects on the compressive strength;
βc
strut confinement factor;
βn
nodal zone coefficient;
βs
strut coefficient;
δmax
midspan deflection at failure;
δsl
deflection at service load;
ɛ1
transverse tensile strain;
ɛf
tensile strain in the FRP tie;
ɛpre
predicted tensile strain in the FRP tie;
θ
angle between the concrete strut and the longitudinal axis of the corbel;
θs
smallest angle between the strut and the adjoining ties;
λ
modification factor to reflect the reduced mechanical properties of lightweight concrete relative to normal-weight concrete of the same compressive strength;
λs
factor used to modify shear strength based on the effects of member depth, commonly referred to as the size effect factor;
ν
reduction factor for concrete strength;
γc
partial safety factor for concrete;
ρ
reinforcement ratio;
σRd
allowable compressive stress of struts;
φ
strength factor for shear;
φc
resistance factor for concrete; and
φF
resistance factor for FRP.

References

Abdul-Razzaq, K. S., and A. A. Dawood. 2021. “Reinforcing struts and ties in concrete corbels.” ACI Struct. J. 118 (4): 153–162.
Abu-Obaida, A., B. El-Ariss, and T. El-Maaddawy. 2018. “Behavior of short-span concrete members internally reinforced with glass fiber–reinforced polymer bars.” J. Compos. Constr. 22 (5): 04018038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000877.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI Committee 318. ACI 318-19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2022. Building code requirements for structural concrete reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars—Code and commentary. ACI Committee 440. ACI 440.11-22. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 1973. “The shear strength of reinforced concrete members.” J. Struct. Div. 99 (6): 1091–1187. ASCE-ACI Committee 426. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0003532.
Andermatt, M. F., and A. S. Lubell. 2013. “Behavior of concrete deep beams reinforced with internal fiber-reinforced polymer-experimental study.” ACI Struct. J. 110 (4): 585–594.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for tensile properties of fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite bars. ASTM D7205/D7205M-06. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products. ASTM A370-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bediwy, A., and E. El-Salakawy. 2021. “Ductility and performance assessment of glass fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete deep beams incorporating cementitious composites reinforced with basalt fiber pellets.” ACI Struct. J. 118 (4): 83–95.
Birrcher, D. B., R. G. Tuchscherer, M. Huizinga, and O. Bayrak. 2013. “Minimum web reinforcement in deep beams.” ACI Struct. J. 110 (2): 297–306.
Brown, M. D., and O. Bayrak. 2006. “Minimum transverse reinforcement for bottle-shaped struts.” ACI Struct. J. 103 (6): 813–821.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2004. Design of concrete structures part 1-1: General rules 170 and rules for buildings. Eurocode 2. EN 1992-1-1:2004. London: BSI.
Campione, G. 2012. “Flexural behavior of steel fibrous reinforced concrete deep beams.” J. Struct. Eng. 138 (2): 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000442.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2019a. Design of concrete structures. CSA A23.3-19. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2019b. Concrete materials and methods of concrete construction/test methods and standard practices for concrete. CSA A23.1-19/A23.2-19. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2019c. Specification for fibre-reinforced polymers. CSA S807-10 (R2019). Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2019d. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6-19. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2021. Design and construction of building structures with fiber-reinforced polymer. CSA S806-12 (R2021). Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
Farghaly, A. S., and B. Benmokrane. 2013. “Shear behavior of FRP-reinforced concrete deep beams without web reinforcement.” J. Compos. Constr. 17 (6): 04013015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000385.
Fattuhi, N. 1994. “Reinforced corbels made with high-strength concrete and various secondary reinforcements.” ACI Struct. J. 91 (4): 376–383.
Hwang, S., W. Lu, and H. Lee. 2000. “Shear strength prediction for reinforced concrete corbels.” ACI Struct. J. 97: 543–552.
Mattock, A. H., K. C. Chen, and K. Soongswang. 1976. “The behavior of reinforced concrete corbels.” PCI J. 21 (2): 52–77. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03011976.52.77.
Mohamed, K., A. S. Farghaly, and B. Benmokrane. 2017. “Effect of vertical and horizontal web reinforcement on the strength and deformation of concrete deep beams reinforced with GFRP bars.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (8): 04017079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001786.
Nehdi, M., Z. Omeman, and H. El-Chabib. 2008. “Optimal efficiency factor in strut-and-tie model for FRP-reinforced concrete short beams with (1.5 < a/d < 2.5).” Mater. Struct. 41 (10): 1713–1727. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9359-9.
Schlaich, J., K. Schaefer, and M. Jennewein. 1987. “Toward a consistent design of structural concrete.” PCI J. 32: 74–150. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011987.74.150.
Tan, K. H., F. K. Kong, S. Teng, and L. W. Weng. 1997. “Effect of web reinforcement on high-strength concrete deep beams.” ACI Struct. J. 94 (5): 572–582.
Vecchio, F., and M. Collins. 1986. “The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear.” ACI J. Proc. 83 (2): 219–231.
Wight, J., and J. MacGregor. 2009. Reinforced concrete: Mechanics and design. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Yong, Y.-K., and P. Balaguru. 1994. “Behavior of reinforced high-strength-concrete corbels.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (4): 1182–1201. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:4(1182).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 28Issue 1February 2024

History

Received: Apr 17, 2023
Accepted: Oct 4, 2023
Published online: Nov 10, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Apr 10, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

M.Sc. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, 15 Gillson St., Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 5V6. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2663-6712. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Lakehead Univ., 955 Oliver Rd., Thunder Bay, ON, Canada P7B 5E1. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0294-5304. Email: [email protected]
Professor of Structural Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, 15 Gillson St., Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 5V6 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4551-5839. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Investigation of Strut-and-Tie Model Performance Using Symmetrically Loaded GFRP–RC Double Corbels, Journal of Composites for Construction, 10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-4460, 28, 5, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share