Technical Papers
Jul 17, 2024

Investigation of Strut-and-Tie Model Performance Using Symmetrically Loaded GFRP–RC Double Corbels

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 28, Issue 5

Abstract

Corbels are characterized as low shear span-to-depth ratio (a/d) members that transfer vertical and horizontal loads to adjacent members such as columns or walls. Glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) reinforcement has linear-elastic behavior and a lower modulus of elasticity relative to steel leading to deeper and wider cracks, which is especially critical for low a/d members. Currently, Canadian bridge and building standards provide strut-and-tie modeling provisions to design steel– and GFRP–reinforced concrete (RC) corbels, but the United States (US) code for GFRP–RC structures prohibits the use of this method for GFRP–RC corbels because of lack of research. Eight full-scale GFRP–RC corbels were constructed and tested to failure. The test variables included main tie and secondary reinforcement ratios, a/d ratio, and concrete strength. The experimental results indicated that a/d and concrete strength have a considerable influence on concrete crack width development, deflection, and load-carrying capacity. The Canadian standard for FRP–RC buildings provided conservative shear capacity predictions for all eight corbels. The US code for steel–RC structures overestimated the shear capacity predictions for seven of the eight corbels, suggesting that revisions are required to better predict the capacity of GFRP–RC corbels.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the ACI Foundation, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the University of Manitoba Graduate Fellowship (UMGF) for financial support. The GFRP reinforcement was generously provided by Pultrall, Inc. The valuable assistance received from Chad Klowak, Samuel Abraha, and Daniel Szara, as a part of the W.R. McQuade Structures Laboratory technical staff, is greatly appreciated.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
A1
loaded area but not greater than the bearing plate or bearing cross-sectional area;
A2
area of the lower base of the largest frustum of a pyramid, cone, or tapered wedge contained wholly within the support and having its upper base equal to the loaded area;
Acs
cross-sectional area at one end of a strut in a strut-and-tie model, taken perpendicular to the axis of the strut (ACI 318-19) or effective cross-sectional area of strut (CSA S806-12);
AFT
area of longitudinal FRP reinforcement in the tension tie;
Anz
area of a face of a nodal zone or a section through a nodal zone;
Ast
total area of nonprestressed longitudinal reinforcement;
a
clear shear span;
d
effective depth of corbel section at column interface;
Fnn
nominal strength at the face of a nodal zone;
Fns
nominal strength of a strut;
Fnt
nominal strength of a tie;
fc
specified compressive strength of concrete;
fce
effective compressive strength of the concrete in a strut or a nodal zone;
fcu
limiting compressive stress in concrete strut;
fFu
ultimate strength of FRP reinforcement;
fy
specified yield strength for nonprestressed reinforcement;
h
height of corbel section at column interface;
Pexp
experimental capacity of corbel;
Ppredicted
predicted capacity of corbel;
Vu
ultimate capacity of corbel;
wcr-flex
experimental flexural crack width at ultimate load;
wcr-strut
experimental diagonal strut crack width at ultimate load;
βc
confinement modification factor for struts and nodes in a strut-and-tie model;
βn
factor used to account for the effect of the anchorage of ties on the effective compressive strength of a nodal zone;
βs
factor used to account for the effect of cracking and confining reinforcement on the effective compressive strength of the concrete in a strut;
Δu
experimental deflection at ultimate load;
ε1
tensile strain in the tie bar used to calculate the limiting compressive stress in concrete strut;
εF
tensile strain in the tie bar located closest to the tension face of the beam and inclined at θs to the strut;
εh
experimental tensile strain in the secondary reinforcement at ultimate load;
εt
experimental tensile strain in the main tie reinforcement at ultimate load;
θs
angle between axis of strut and the tension chord of the members (ACI 318-19) or the smallest angle between the strut and the adjoining ties (CSA S806-12);
ρs
secondary reinforcement ratio;
ρt
main tie reinforcement ratio;
ϕc
strength reduction factor for concrete (ACI 318-19)/resistance factor for concrete (CSA S806-12); and
ϕF
resistance factor for FRP reinforcement.

References

Abu-Obaida, A., B. El-Ariss, and T. El-Maaddawy. 2018. “Behavior of short-span concrete members internally reinforced with glass fiber–reinforced polymer bars.” J. Compos. Constr. 22 (5): 04018038-2. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000877.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2002. Examples for the design of structural concrete with strut-and-tie models. ACI SP-208. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2015. Guide for the design and construction of structural concrete reinforced with FRP bars. ACI PRC-440.1R-15. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2022. Building code requirements for structural concrete reinforced with GFRP bars. ACI CODE-440.11-22. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Andermatt, M. F., and A. S. Lubell. 2013. “Strength modeling of concrete deep beams reinforced with internal fiber-reinforced polymer.” ACI Struct. J. 110 (4): 595–605. https://doi.org/10.14359/51685745.
ASTM (American Standard for Testing and Materials). 2021. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39-21. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Benmokrane, B., H. M. Mohamed, A. Manalo, and P. Cousin. 2017. “Evaluation of physical and durability characteristics of new headed glass fiber–reinforced polymer bars for concrete structures.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (2): 04016081. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000738.
Borgohain, A., A. G. Bediwy, and E. F. El-Salakawy. 2024a. “Performance of GFRP-reinforced concrete corbels under monotonic loading.” J. Compos. Constr. 28 (1): 04023067. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-4358.
Borgohain, A., A. G. Bediwy, and E. F. El-Salakawy. 2024b. “Practical evaluation of high-strength concrete corbels reinforced with GFRP bent bars.” Eng. Struct. 299: 117095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117095.
Campione, G. 2009. “Performance of steel fibrous reinforced concrete corbels subjected to vertical and horizontal loads.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (5): 519–529. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:5(519).
Cook, W. D., and D. Mitchell. 1988. “Studies of disturbed regions near discontinuities in reinforced concrete members.” ACI Struct. J. 85 (2): 206–216.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019a. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6-19. Toronto: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019b. Design of concrete structures. CSA A23.3-19. Toronto: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019c. Specification for fibre-reinforced polymers. CSA S807-19. Toronto: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2021. Design and construction of building structures with fibre-reinforced polymers. CSA S806-12. Toronto: CSA.
Farghaly, A. S., and B. Benmokrane. 2013. “Shear behavior of FRP-reinforced concrete deep beams without web reinforcement.” J. Compos. Constr. 17 (6): 04013015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000385.
Fattuhi, N. I. 1990. “Strength of SFRC corbels subjected to vertical load.” J. Struct. Eng. 116 (3): 701–718. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:3(701).
Khosravikia, F., H. Kim, Y. Yi, H. Wilson, H. Yousefpour, T. Hrynyk, and O. Bayrak. 2018. “Experimental and numerical assessment of corbels designed based on strut-and-tie provisions.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (9): 04018138. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002137.
Mattock, A. H., K. Chen, and K. C. Soongswang. 1976. “The behavior of reinforced concrete corbels.” PCI J. 21 (2): 52–77. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03011976.52.77.
Mohamed, A., K. Mahmoud, and E. El-Salakawy. 2021. “Shear capacity of glass fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete continuous deep beams without web reinforcement.” ACI Struct. J. 118 (3): 85–99.
Mohamed, K., A. S. Farghaly, and B. Benmokrane. 2017. “Effect of vertical and horizontal web reinforcement on the strength and deformation of concrete deep beams reinforced with GFRP bars.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (8): 04017079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001786.
Nehdi, M., Z. Omeman, and H. El-Chabib. 2008. “Optimal efficiency factor in strut-and-tie model for FRP-reinforced concrete short beams.” Mater. Struct. 41 (10): 1713–1727. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9359-9.
Ritter, W. 1899. “Die bauweise hennebique [Hennebiques construction method].” Schweizerische Bauzeitung. 33 (7): 59–61.
Schlaich, J., K. Schafer, and M. Jennewein. 1987. “Toward a consistent design of structural concrete.” PCI J. 32 (3): 74–150. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011987.74.150.
Wilson, H. R., H. Yousefpour, M. D. Brown, and O. Bayrak. 2018. “Investigation of corbels designed according to strut-and-tie and empirical methods.” ACI Struct. J. 115 (3): 813–824. https://doi.org/10.14359/51701917.
Yang, J.-M., J.-H. Lee, Y.-S. Yoon, W.-D. Cook, and D. Mitchell. 2012. “Influence of steel fibers and headed bars on the serviceability of high-strength concrete corbels.” J. Struct. Eng. 138 (1): 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000427.
Yong, Y.-K., and P. Balaguru. 1994. “Behavior of reinforced high-strength-concrete corbels.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (4): 1182–1201. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:4(1182).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 28Issue 5October 2024

History

Received: Jul 14, 2023
Accepted: Apr 26, 2024
Published online: Jul 17, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 17, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Matthew N. Allen, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
M.Sc. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, 15 Gillson St., Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 5V6. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, 15 Gillson St., Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 5V6 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4551-5839. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share