Abstract

When the load rating of a bridge is less than 1.0 for AASHTO HL-93 live load and state-specific legal trucks, the bridge is posted. Posting a bridge causes an inconvenience to the public and may result in trucks taking longer routes. Thus, this paper investigated the effects of field-derived distribution factor (DF) and impact factor (IM) from static and dynamic load tests using computer vision and deflection measurements, instead of AASHTO factors, on the bridge load rating and component as well as system reliability for posting avoidance. The reliability approach used Monte Carlo simulations to account for uncertainties in calculating the flexural strength limit state (Strength I). Both Flexural strength I and serviceability (Service III) limit states were investigated. The bridge’s superstructure was studied in as-built, repaired, and damaged condition scenarios. For that, AASHTO HL-93, Florida legal trucks, and emergency vehicles were considered. In this regard, load rating distributions and component and system reliability indices were computed using both AASHTO and field-derived DF and IM. The increase in load rating and reliability was investigated. By using field-derived factors, a load rating increase of up to 17% was achieved. The component reliability also increased significantly. For example, the damaged case’s component reliability increased by 1.0 when replacing DF and IM, which indicates a major reduction in the probability of failure. The increase in system reliability was most significant because using the field-derived DF increased the capacity contribution from other girders. A 2.12 increase in system reliability was achieved in the damaged condition when only substituting DF, providing even higher system reliability as a result of a reduction in the system probability of failure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Bridge owner files such as bridge as-built and inspection reports are not available. All other data are available from the corresponding author of this paper upon request.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (Grant Number 1463493), Transportation Research Board of the National Academies-IDEA Project 222, and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Award No. 80NSSC20K0326 for the research activities and particularly for this paper. The research presented here was carried out at the Civil Infrastructure Technologies for Resilience and Safety (CITRS) Lab of the University of Central Florida. Several other scholars, graduate students, and undergraduate assistants contributed to the work, and the authors acknowledge these CITRS members for their support and contributions.

References

AASHTO. 2018. The manual for bridge evaluation. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2021. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Akgül, F., and D. M. Frangopol. 2003. “Rating and reliability of existing bridges in a network.” J. Bridge Eng. 8 (6): 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:6(383).
Akgül, F., and D. M. Frangopol. 2004. “Bridge rating and reliability correlation: Comprehensive study for different bridge types.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (7): 1063–1074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:7(1063).
Alampalli, S., D. M. Frangopol, J. Grimson, D. Kosnik, M. Halling, E. O. L. Lantsoght, D. Y. Yang, and Y. Edward Zhou. 2019. Primer on bridge load testing. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Barker, R. M., and J. A. Puckett. 2013. Design of highway bridges: An LRFD approach. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Catbas, F. N., H. B. Gokce, and M. Gul. 2012. “Practical approach for estimating distribution factor for load rating: Demonstration on reinforced concrete T-beam bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (4): 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000284.
Catbas, F. N., F. Luleci, M. Zakaria, U. Bagci, J. J. LaViola, C. Cruz-Neira, and D. Reiners. 2022. “Extended reality (XR) for condition assessment of civil engineering structures: A literature review.” Sensors 22 (23): 9560. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239560.
Catbas, F. N., M. Susoy, and D. M. Frangopol. 2008. “Structural health monitoring and reliability estimation: Long span truss bridge application with environmental monitoring data.” Eng. Struct. 30 (9): 2347–2359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.013.
Catbas, N., H. B. Gokce, and D. M. Frangopol. 2013. “Predictive analysis by incorporating uncertainty through a family of models calibrated with structural health-monitoring data.” J. Eng. Mech. 139 (6): 712–723. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000342.
Chajes, M. J., D. R. Mertz, and B. Commander. 1997. “Experimental load rating of a posted bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 2 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(1997)2:1(1).
Colombani, I. A., and B. Andrawes. 2022. “Comparison of load rating of reinforced concrete slab bridge using analytical and field testing approaches.” Innovative Infrastruct. Solutions 7 (1): 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00677-9.
Debees, M., F. Luleci, and F. N. Catbas. 2023. “Effect of structural repairs on the load rating and reliability of a prestressed concrete bridge.” Adv. Bridge Eng. 4 (8): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-023-00087-0.
Dong, C., S. Bas, M. Debees, N. Alver, and F. N. Catbas. 2020a. “Bridge load testing for identifying live load distribution, load rating, serviceability and dynamic response.” Front. Built Environ. 6: 46. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00046.
Dong, C.-Z., S. Bas, and F. N. Catbas. 2020b. “A portable monitoring approach using cameras and computer vision for bridge load rating in smart cities.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 10 (5): 1001–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-020-00431-2.
Dong, C.-Z., and F. N. Catbas. 2019. “A non-target structural displacement measurement method using advanced feature matching strategy.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 22 (16): 3461–3472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219856171.
Dong, C.-Z., and F. N. Catbas. 2021. “A review of computer vision–based structural health monitoring at local and global levels.” Struct. Health Monit. 20 (2): 692–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720935585.
Dong, C.-Z., O. Celik, F. N. Catbas, E. J. O’Brien, and S. Taylor. 2020c. “Structural displacement monitoring using deep learning-based full field optical flow methods.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 16 (1): 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1650078.
Dumlupinar, T., H. B. Gokce, F. N. Catbas, and D. M. Frangopol. 2011. “Time-variant reliability and load rating of a movable bridge using structural health monitoring.” In Proc., Dynamics of Bridges, Volume 5: Proceedings of the 28th IMAC, A Conference on Structural Dynamics, 2010, 71–84. New York: Springer.
Ellobody, E. 2014. “Applied loads and stability of steel and steel–concrete composite bridges.” In Finite element analysis and design of steel and steel–concrete composite bridges, edited by E. Ehab, 113–220. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Estes, A. C., and D. M. Frangopol. 2005. “Load rating versus reliability analysis.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (5): 843–847. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:5(843).
FAST (Fixing America’s Surface Transportation). 2015. Act, Pub. L. No. 114-94. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/.
FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation). 2023. Bridge load rating manual. Tallahassee, FL: FDOT.
Feng, D., and M. Q. Feng. 2018. “Computer vision for SHM of civil infrastructure: From dynamic response measurement to damage detection—A review.” Eng. Struct. 156: 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.018.
Gangi, M., M. Jones, J. Liesen, and J. Zhou. 2017. Evaluation of repair techniques for impact-damaged prestressed beams. New York: CAIT/Virginia Tech.
Ghyabi, M., L. C. Timber, G. Jahangiri, D. Lattanzi, H. W. Shenton, M. J. Chajes, and M. H. Head. 2023. “Vision-based measurements to quantify bridge deformations.” J. Bridge Eng. 28 (1): 05022010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001960.
Gokce, H. B., F. N. Catbas, and D. M. Frangopol. 2011. “Evaluation of load rating and system reliability of movable bridge.” Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2251 (1): 114–122. https://doi.org/10.3141/2251-12.
Harries, K. A., J. Kasan, R. Miller, and R. Brinkman. 2012. “Updated Research for Collision Damage and Repair of Prestressed Concrete Beams.” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Jamali, S., T. H. Chan, A. Nguyen, and D. P. Thambiratnam. 2019. “Reliability-based load-carrying capacity assessment of bridges using structural health monitoring and nonlinear analysis.” Struct. Health Monit. 18 (1): 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718808462.
Kameshwar, S., and J. E. Padgett. 2014. “Multi-hazard risk assessment of highway bridges subjected to earthquake and hurricane hazards.” Eng. Struct. 78: 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.016.
Lu, R., Y. Luo, and J. P. Conte. 1994. “Reliability evaluation of reinforced concrete beams.” Struct. Saf. 14 (4): 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(94)90016-7.
Luleci, F., and F. N. Catbas. 2023. “Condition transfer between prestressed bridges using structural state translation for structural health monitoring.” AI Civ. Eng. 2: 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43503-023-00016-0.
Luleci, F., F. N. Catbas, and O. Avci. 2022. “A literature review: Generative adversarial networks for civil structural health monitoring.” Front. Built Environ. 8: 1027379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.1027379.
Mankar, A., I. Bayane, J. D. Sørensen, and E. Brühwiler. 2019. “Probabilistic reliability framework for assessment of concrete fatigue of existing RC bridge deck slabs using data from monitoring.” Eng. Struct. 201: 109788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109788.
Mertz, D. R. 2005. Load rating by load and resistance factor evaluation method. NCHRP Project 20-07, Task 122. Washington DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board.
Nowak, A. S. 2004. “System reliability models for bridge structures.” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. 52 (4): 321–328.
Nowak, A. S., A. S. Nowak, and S. W. Tabsh. 1994. “Probabilistic models for resistance of concrete bridge girders.” ACI Struct. J. 91 (3): 269–276.
Nowak, A. S., and A. M. Rakoczy. 2013. “Uncertainties in the building process.” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 61 (1): 129–135. https://doi.org/10.2478/bpasts-2013-0011.
Peiris, A., and I. E. Harik. 2019. Bridge load testing versus bridge load rating. Rep. No. KTC-19-16/SPR06-423-1F. Lexington, KY: Kentucky Transportation Center, University of Kentucky.
Rafizadeh, A., and A. Gharighoran. 2019. “Evaluation of load distribution factors on AASHTO LRFD design parameters of the bridges deck by harmonic analysis.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 23 (6): 2550–2560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1917-x.
Ren, J., J. Song, and B. R. Ellingwood. 2021. “Reliability assessment framework of deteriorating reinforced concrete bridges subjected to earthquake and pier scour.” Eng. Struct. 239: 112363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112363.
Sherman, R. J., M. H. Hebdon, and J. B. Lloyd. 2020. “Diagnostic load testing for improved accuracy of bridge load rating.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 34 (5): 04020082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001483.
Stieglitz, M., T. Terzioglu, M. B. D. Hueste, S. Hurlebaus, J. B. Mander, and S. G. Paal. 2022. “Field testing and refined load rating of a load-posted continuous steel girder bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 27 (10): 05022008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001927.
Sudret, B., and A. D. Kiureghian. 2000. Stochastic finite element methods and reliability: A state of the art report. Oakland CA: Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of California.
Wang, N., B. R. Ellingwood, and A.-H. Zureick. 2011a. “Bridge rating using system reliability assessment. II: Improvements to bridge rating practices.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (6): 863–871. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000171.
Wang, N., C. O’Malley, B. R. Ellingwood, and A.-H. Zureick. 2011b. “Bridge rating using system reliability assessment. I: Assessment and verification by load testing.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (6): 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000172.
Wang, Y., J. Brownjohn, K. Dai, and M. Patel. 2019. “An estimation of pedestrian action on footbridges using computer vision approaches.” Front. Built Environ. 5: 133. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00133.
Yuan, X., A. Smith, F. Moreu, R. Sarlo, C. D. Lippitt, M. Hojati, S. Alampalli, and S. Zhang. 2023. “Automatic evaluation of rebar spacing and quality using LiDAR data: Field application for bridge structural assessment.” Autom. Constr. 146: 104708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104708.
Zobel, R. S., and J. O. Jirsa. 1998. “Performance of strand splice repairs in prestressed concrete bridges.” PCI J. 43 (6): 72–84. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11011998.72.84.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 29Issue 3March 2024

History

Received: Jun 1, 2023
Accepted: Oct 5, 2023
Published online: Dec 21, 2023
Published in print: Mar 1, 2024
Discussion open until: May 21, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Marwan Debees, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Associate, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816. Email: [email protected]
Doctoral Student, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5265-6771. Email: [email protected]
Research Associate, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6010-2859. Email: [email protected]
F. Necati Catbas, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-9976 [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Construction Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-9976. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share