Technical Papers
Apr 30, 2024

Performance-Based Seismic Design for Retrofitting Deficient Bridge Bents: Developing Performance-Based Damage States

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 7

Abstract

The performance-based seismic design (PBSD) approach is implemented to achieve the desired structural performance over a wide range of seismic hazard levels. It requires a set of targeted performance levels and their corresponding limits to be defined. Because the current codes and guidelines do not prescribe these limits for different performance levels for old bridges with seismic deficiencies, such as inadequate ductility and low shear strength, this study aims to develop them. In this study, quantitative damage states that are expressed as drifts and damage indices (DIs) at various performance levels are developed using incremental dynamic analyses for retrofitted bents. Four retrofit options: (1) steel; (2) carbon–fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP); (3) concrete; and (4) engineered cementitious composite (ECC) jackets are considered in this study. The concrete and longitudinal reinforcement of all bents cracked and yielded at limiting drifts of 0.06% and 0.38%, respectively. In addition, the ECC-jacketed bent experienced core crushing of the concrete at the highest limiting drift of 4.16%. In addition, a detailed example complements this study, which presents how retrofitting could be designed by considering the target seismic performance that uses the proposed damage states. The first-mode spectral accelerations of the bents were the optimum intensity measures (IMs) to study their relative performance for noncumulative and cumulative damage measures (DMs) at various hazard levels. Drift is considered noncumulative, and the DI that includes the combined effect of maximum drift and absorbed hysteretic energy is considered cumulative. The steel jacket was the most effective when decreasing the median maximum drift of the retrofitted bent, and the ECC jacket reduced the median DI of this type of bent the most.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data and models generated or used during this study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The financial contributions from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through the Discovery Grant (secured by M. Shahria Alam) were crucial for this research and are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Alemdar, Z. F. 2010. “Plastic hinging behavior of reinforced concrete bridge columns.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas.
Atkinson, G. M., and K. Goda. 2011. “Effects of seismicity models and New ground-motion prediction equations on seismic hazard assessment for four Canadian cities.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 101 (1): 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100093.
Baker, J. W. 2005. Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Billah, A. H. M. M., and M. S. Alam. 2014. “Seismic performance evaluation of multi-column bridge bents retrofitted with different alternatives using incremental dynamic analysis.” Eng. Struct. 62–63: 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.005.
Billah, A. H. M. M., M. S. Alam, and M. A. R. Bhuiyan. 2013. “Fragility analysis of retrofitted multicolumn bridge bent subjected to near-fault and far-field ground motion.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (10): 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000452.
CESMD (Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data). n.d. “Strong-motion data.” Accessed September 1, 2020. http://www.strongmotioncenter.org/.
Chai, Y. H., M. J. N. Priestley, and F. Seible. 1994. “Analytical model for steel-jacketed RC circular bridge columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (8): 2358–2376. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:8(2358).
Ciampoli, M., and P. Giovenale. 2004. “Optimal intensity measures for the characterization of the ground motion in performance-based seismic design.” In Proc., Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, edited by C. Spitzer, U. Schmocker, and V. N. Dang, 2932–2937. London, UK: Springer.
Coffman, H. L., M. L. Marsh, and C. B. Brown. 1993. “Seismic durability of retrofitted reinforced-concrete columns.” J. Struct. Eng. 119 (5): 1643–1661. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:5(1643).
Conte, J. P., H. Pandit, J. P. Stewart, and J. W. Wallace. 2003. “Ground motion intensity measures for performance-based earthquake engineering.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Millpress.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6:19. Toronto, ON: CSA.
ElGawady, M., M. Endeshaw, D. McLean, and R. Sack. 2010. “Retrofitting of rectangular columns with deficient lap splices.” J. Compos. Constr. 14 (1): 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000047.
Fahmy, M. F. M., Z. Wu, and G. Wu. 2009. “Seismic performance assessment of damage-controlled FRP-retrofitted RC bridge columns using residual deformations.” J. Compos. Constr. 13 (6): 498–513. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000046.
fib (Federation Internationale du Beton). 2001. Externally bonded FRP reinforcement for RC structures. fib Bulletin No. 14, 138. Lausanne, Switzerland: FIB.
fib (Federation Internationale du Beton). 2006. Retrofitting of concrete structures by externally bonded FRPS, with emphasis on seismic applications. fib Bulletin No. 35, 220. Lausanne, Switzerland: FIB.
Fischer, G., and V. C. Li. 2003. “Deformation behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced engineered cementitious composite (ECC) flexural members under reversed cyclic loading conditions.” ACI Struct. J. 100 (1): 25–35.
Gencturk, B., and A. S. Elnashai. 2011. Multi-objective optimal seismic design of buildings using advanced engineering materials. Urbana, IL: Mid-America Earthquake Center.
Giovenale, P., C. A. Cornell, and L. Esteva. 2004. “Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 33 (8): 951–979. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.386.
Han, T. S., P. H. Feenstra, and S. L. Billington. 2003. “Simulation of highly ductile fiber-reinforced cement-based composite components under cyclic loading.” ACI Struct. J. 100 (6): 749–757.
Hose, Y., P. Silva, and F. Seible. 2000. “Development of a performance evaluation database for concrete bridge components and systems under simulated seismic loads.” Earthquake Spectra 16 (2): 413–442. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586119.
Iverson, J. K., C. Banchik, R. Brantley, and J. Sage. 1999. “Precast segmental seismic retrofit for the San Mateo Hayward Bridge.” PCI J. 44 (6): 28–40. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11011999.28.40.
Jean, M., C. St-Martin, N. Roy, P. Rivard, Z. Moradian, E. Carvalho Jr, and J. Proulx. 2012. “Limit states of reinforced concrete bridge piers confined with carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP).” In Proc., 15th World Conf. Earthquake Engineering. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates, Inc.
Khosravikia, F., and P. Clayton. 2020. “Updated evaluation metrics for optimal intensity measure selection in probabilistic seismic demand models.” Eng. Struct. 202: 109899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109899.
Kohrangi, M., P. Bazzurro, and D. Vamvatsikos. 2016. “Vector and scalar IMs in structural response estimation, part i: Hazard analysis.” Earthquake Spectra 32 (3): 1507–1524. https://doi.org/10.1193/053115EQS080M.
Kumar, P. R., T. Oshima, S. Mikami, and T. Yamazaki. 2005. “Seismic retrofit of square reinforced concrete piers by ferrocement jacketing.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 1 (4): 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470500031065.
Li, V. C., H. Horri, P. Kabele, T. Kanda, and Y. M. Lin. 2000. “Repair and retrofit using engineered cementitous composites.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 65 (2–3): 317–334.
Luco, N., and C. A. Cornell. 2007. “Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions.” Earthquake Spectra 23 (2): 357–392. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2723158.
Mander, J. B., M. J. N. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 114 (8): 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
Marsh, M. L., and S. J. Stringer. 2013. Performance-based seismic bridge design, a synthesis of highway practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Menegetto, M., and P. E. Pinto. 1973. “Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R.C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending.” In Proc., Symp. on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads, 15–22. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
Mohammed, M. S. 2016. Effect of earthquake duration on reinforced concrete columns. Reno, NV: Univ. of Nevada.
Mottier, P., R. Tremblay, and C. Rogers. 2021. “Shake table test of a two-story steel building seismically retrofitted using gravity-controlled rocking braced frame system.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 50 (6): 1576–1594. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3411.
NIED (National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience). 2019. “NIED K-NET, KiK-net.” Accessed September 1, 2020. https://www.doi.org/10.17598/NIED.0004.
Padgett, J. E., B. G. Nielson, and R. DesRoches. 2008. “Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (5): 711–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.782.
Pantelides, C. P., and J. Gergely. 2002. “Carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer seismic retrofit of RC bridge bent: Design and in situ validation.” J. Compos. Constr. 6 (1): 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:1(52).
Parghi, A., and M. S. Alam. 2017. “Seismic collapse assessment of non-seismically designed circular RC bridge piers retrofitted with FRP composites.” Compos. Struct. 160: 901–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.094.
Park, Y.-J., and A. H.-S. Ang. 1985. “Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 111 (4): 722–739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722).
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). 2013. “PEER ground motion database.” Accessed September 1, 2020. https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
Priestley, M. J. N., G. M. Calvi, and M. J. Kowalski. 2007. Displacement-based seismic design of structures. Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.
Priestley, M. J. N., F. Seible, and G. M. Calvi. 1996. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. New York: Wiley.
Pulido, C., M. S. Saiidi, D. Sanders, A. Itani, and S. El-Azazy. 2004. “Seismic performance of two-column bents—Part II: Retrofit with infill walls.” ACI Struct. J. 101 (5): 642–649.
Rodriguez, M., and R. Park. 1994. “Seismic load tests on reinforced concrete columns strengthened by jacketing.” ACI Struct. J. 91 (2): 150–159.
Seible, F., M. J. N. Priestley, G. A. Hegemier, and D. Innamorato. 1997. “Seismic retrofit of RC columns with continuous carbon fiber jackets.” J. Compos. Constr. 1 (2): 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:2(52).
SeismoMatch. 2020. SeismoMatch. Pavia, Italy: Seismosoft.
SeismoStruct. 2020. SeismoStruct. Pavia, Italy: Seismosoft.
Todorov, B., and A. H. M. M. Billah. 2021. “Seismic fragility and damage assessment of reinforced concrete bridge pier under long-duration, near-fault, and far-field ground motions.” Structures 31: 671–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.02.019.
Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.
Vandoros, K. G., and S. E. Dritsos. 2008. “Concrete jacket construction detail effectiveness when strengthening RC columns.” Constr. Build. Mater. 22 (3): 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.08.019.
Xiang, N., and M. S. Alam. 2019. “Displacement-based seismic design of bridge bents retrofitted with various bracing devices and their seismic fragility assessment under near-fault and far-field ground motions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 119: 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.12.023.
Xiao, Y., and H. Wu. 2003. “Retrofit of reinforced concrete columns using partially stiffened steel jackets.” J. Struct. Eng. 129 (6): 725–732. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:6(725).
Zarifian, A., R. A. I. Fard, and A. Khalighi. 2020. “Experimental study on the behavior of thermally insulated RC beams strengthened with CFRP after their exposure to high temperatures compared to non-insulated ones.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 47 (7): 875–883. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2019-0001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 29Issue 7July 2024

History

Received: Dec 20, 2022
Accepted: Dec 24, 2023
Published online: Apr 30, 2024
Published in print: Jul 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Sep 30, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Abu Obayed Chowdhury, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student, School of Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V 1V7. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9840-3438. Email: [email protected]
Professor of Civil Engineering, Tier-1 Principal’s Research Chair in Resilient & Green Infrastructure, School of Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V 1V7 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9092-1473. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share