Abstract

Long-span bridges, which are critical nodes of the nation’s infrastructure system, are frequently exposed to extreme hazards, such as flood, scour, hurricane, earthquake, blast, and impact. In spite of their importance, the structural robustness of long-span bridges is not well understood and has not been adequately quantified. Traditional design approaches are unable to provide explicit measures of residual safety of long-span bridges. Current evaluation approaches to ensure safety through redundancy in the event of any localized damage are mainly intended for short- to medium-span bridges. Therefore, a new robustness evaluation approach that is well suited for short-, medium- as well as long-span bridges is proposed. Applicability and versatility of this approach is demonstrated on a three-span I-girder bridge and three long-span cable-supported bridges and the results are compared with those from available approaches. A significant advantage of this approach is its ability to account for and estimate structural robustness corresponding to different user-specified initiating events and different user-specified limit states on a common and unified basis. Thus, unlike existing approaches, our approach can be used as a comprehensive tool to assess the safety of bridges in their intact and damaged conditions to facilitate critical decisions on design and retrofit needs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by Federal Highway Administration under contract number DTFH61-14-D-00010. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Highway Administration. The authors also acknowledge the support of CUNY High Performance Center for support with installation and management of LS-DYNA software used in this project.

References

AASHTO. 2018a. The manual for bridge evaluation. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2018b. Analysis and identification of fracture critical members and system redundant members. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2018c. Guide specifications for internal redundancy of mechanically-fastened built-up steel members. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2020. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 9th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Agarwal, J., J. England, and D. Blockley. 2006. “Vulnerability analysis of structures.” Struct. Eng. Int. 16 (2): 124–128. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686606777962611.
Agrawal, A. K., S. El-Tawil, Q. Chen, and H. Wang. 2022. Redundancy in long span bridges for risk mitigation in a multi-hazard environment. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
ASCE. 2023. Standard for mitigation of disproportionate collapse potential in buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 76-23. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Au, S.-K., and J. Beck. 2001. “Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 16: 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(01)00019-4.
Ayyub, B. M., and R. H. McCuen. 1995. “Simulation-based reliability methods.” In Probabilistic structural mechanics handbook: Theory and industrial applications, edited by C. Sundararajan, 53–69. New York: Chapman Hall.
Baker, J. W., M. Schubert, and M. H. Faber. 2008. “On the assessment of robustness.” Struct. Saf. 30 (3): 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.11.004.
Bartlett, F. M., R. J. Dexter, M. D. Graeser, J. J. Jelinek, B. J. Schmidt, and T. V. Galambos. 2003. “Updating standard shape material properties database for design and reliability.” Eng. J. Am. Inst. Steel Constr. 40 (1): 2–14.
Beeby, A. W. 1999. “Safety of structures, and a new approach to robustness.” Struct. Eng. 77 (4): 16–21.
Bhattacharya, B. 2021. “A reliability based measure of structural robustness for coherent systems.” Struct. Saf. 89: 102050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.102050.
Bhattacharya, B. 2022. “Risk and reliability in bridges.” In Chap. 7 of Innovative bridge design handbook, edited by A. Pipinato, 169–213. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Bjerager, P. 1988. “Probability integration by directional simulation.” J. Eng. Mech. 114: 1285. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1988)114:8(1285).
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2006. Actions on structures. Part 1–7: General actions–Accidental actions. Eurocode 1. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2023. Basis of structural and geotechnical design. EN 1990:2023. Eurocode. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chen, Q., H. Wang, S. El-Tawil, A. K. Agrawal, B. Bhattacharya, and W. Wong. 2023a. “Progressive collapse behavior of a long-span cable-stayed bridge induced by cable loss.” J. Bridge Eng. 28 (9): 05023005. https://doi.org/10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-5840.
Chen, Q., H. Wang, S. El-Tawil, A. K. Agrawal, B. Bhattacharya, and W. Wong. 2023b. “Behavior of a network tied-arch bridge subjected to sudden hanger loss scenarios.” J. Bridge Eng. 29 (1): 05023010. https://doi.org/10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6328.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2014. Canadian highway bridge design code. CAN/CSA-S6-14. Toronto, ON, Canada: CSA.
Der Kiureghian, A. 2022. Structural and system reliability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ellingwood, B., T. Galambos, J. MacGregor, and C. Cornell. 1980. Development of a probability based load criterion for American national standard A58: Building code requirements for minimum design loads in buildings and other structures. NBS Special Rep. 577. Gaithersburg, MD: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards.
Ellingwood, B. R., and D. O. Dusenberry. 2005. “Building design for abnormal loads and progressive collapse.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 20 (3): 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00387.x.
El-Tawil, S., H. Li, and S. Kunnath. 2014. “Computational simulation of gravity-induced progressive collapse of steel-frame buildings: Current trends and future research needs.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (8): A2513001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000897.
Fascetti, A., S. K. Kunnath, and N. Nisticò. 2015. “Robustness evaluation of RC frame buildings to progressive collapse.” Eng. Struct. 86: 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.008.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2017. Closure of I-276 Delaware river bridge (PA Turnpike and NJ Turnpike). Event Rep. January 20, 2017, FHWA Office of Bridges and Structures. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Frangopol, D. M., and J. P. Curley. 1987. “Effects of damage and redundancy on structural reliability.” J. Struct. Eng. 113 (7): 1533–1549. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:7(1533).
Fu, G., and D. M. Frangopol. 1990. “Balancing weight, system reliability and redundancy in a multiobjective optimization framework.” Struct. Saf. 7 (2–4): 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(90)90066-X.
Ghosn, M., and F. Moses. 1998. Redundancy in highway bridge superstructures. NCHRP Rep. No. 406. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Academy Press.
Ghosn, M., J. Yang, D. Beal, and B. Sivakumar. 2014. Bridge system safety and redundancy. NCHRP Rep. No. 776. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Academy Press.
Imai, K., and D. M. Frangopol. 2001. “Reliability-based assessment of suspension bridges: Application to the Innoshima Bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (6): 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(398).
Izzuddin, B. A., A. G. Vlassis, A. Y. Elghazouli, and D. A. Nethercot. 2008. “Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss—Part I: Simplified assessment framework.” Eng. Struct. 30 (5): 1308–1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.011.
JSCE (Japan Society of Civil Engineers). 2007. Standard specifications for steel and composite structures. 1st ed. Tokyo: JSCE.
Kawai, Y., D. Siringoringo, and Y. Fujino. 2014. “Failure analysis of the hanger clamps of the Kutai-Kartanegara Bridge from the fracture mechanics viewpoint.” J. JSCE 2 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2208/journalofjsce.2.1_1.
Khandelwal, K., and S. El-Tawil. 2011. “Pushdown resistance as a measure of robustness in progressive collapse analysis.” Eng. Struct. 33 (9): 2653–2661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.05.013.
Kiakojouri, F., V. De Biagi, B. Chiaia, and M. R. Sheidaii. 2020. “Progressive collapse of framed building structures: Current knowledge and future prospects.” Eng. Struct. 206: 110061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110061.
KRTA (Korea Road & Transportation Association). 2010. Korean highway bridge design code. Seoul: KRTA.
Lind, N. C. 1995. “A measure of vulnerability and damage tolerance.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 48 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(95)00007-O.
Liu, W. D., A. Neuenhoffer, M. Ghosn, and F. Moses. 2001. Redundancy in highway bridge substructures. NCHRP Rep. No. 458. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Lu, N., Y. Liu, and M. Beer. 2021. “System reliability evaluation of in-service cable-stayed bridges subjected to cable degradation.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (11): 1486–1498. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1459743.
Maes, M. A., K. E. Fritzsons, and S. Glowienka. 2006. “Structural robustness in the light of risk and consequence analysis.” Struct. Eng. Int. 16 (2): 101–107. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686606777962468.
Melchers, R. E. 1990. “Radial importance sampling for structural reliability.” J. Eng. Mech. 116: 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:1(189).
Nafday, A. M. 2008. “System safety performance metrics for skeletal structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (3): 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:3(499).
Nowak, A. S. 1999. Calibration of LRFD bridge design code. NCHRP Rep. No. 368. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). 2008a. Safety recommendation (H08-1). Washington, DC: NTSB.
NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). 2008b. Structural investigation group chairman factual report. NTSB Rep. No. 08-015. Washington, DC: NTSB.
NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). 2008c. Data report: State-by-state bridge counts. Case No. HWY07MH024. Washington, DC: NTSB.
NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). 2008d. Collapse of I-35W highway bridge, Minneapolis, Minnesota, August 1, 2007. NTSB/HAR-08/03. Washington, DC: NTSB.
Paliou, C., M. Shinozuka, and Y.-N. Chen. 1990. “Reliability and redundancy of offshore structures.” J. Eng. Mech. 116 (2): 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:2(359).
Pang, Y., X. Wu, G. Shen, and W. Yuan. 2014. “Seismic fragility analysis of cable-stayed bridges considering different sources of uncertainties.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (4): 04013015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000565.
Pezeshk, S., C. V. Camp, A. Kashani, and M. Akhani. 2021. Data Analyses from Seismic Instrumentation Installed on the I-40 Bridge. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Dept. of Transportation
PTI (Post-Tensioning Institute). 2001. Recommendations for stay cable design, testing and installation. 4th ed. Phoenix, AZ: PTI.
Schmidt, B. J., and F. M. Bartlett. 2002. “Review of resistance factor for steel: Data collection.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 29 (1): 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1139/l01-081.
Sen, D., and B. Bhattacharya. 2015. “On the pareto optimality of variance reduction simulation techniques in structural reliability.” Struct. Saf. 53: 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.01.001.
SETRA (Centre des Techniques des Ouvrages d’Art). 2002. Cable stays: Recommendations of French interministerial commission on prestressing. Bagneux Cedex, France: SETRA.
Sørensen, J. D., E. Rizzuto, H. Narasimhan, and M. H. Faber. 2012. “Robustness: Theoretical framework.” Struct. Eng. Int. 22 (1): 66–72. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686612X13216060213554.
Starossek, U., and M. Haberland. 2011. “Approaches to measures of structural robustness.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 7 (7–8): 625–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.501562.
Truong, V.-H., and S.-E. Kim. 2017. “An efficient method of system reliability analysis of steel cable-stayed bridges.” Adv. Eng. Software 114: 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.07.011.
TTSB (Taiwan Transportation Safety Board). 2020. Final report on nanfangao sea-crossing bridge collapse. Rep. No. TTSB-HOR-20-11-001. Taiwan: TTSB.
Wang, H., Q. Chen, A. K. Agrawal, S. El-Tawil, B. Bhattacharya, and W. Wong. 2022. “Dynamic response and progressive collapse of a long-span suspension bridge induced by suspender loss.” J. Struct. Eng. 148 (6): 05022001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003367.
Wang, H., Q. Chen, A. K. Agrawal, S. El-Tawil, B. Bhattacharya, and W. Wong. 2023. “Performance of a long-span suspension bridge subjected to sudden single suspender loss.” J. Bridge Eng. 28 (11): 05023006. https://doi.org/10.1061/JBENF2.BEENG-6108.
Xu, G., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2011. “An energy-based partial pushdown analysis procedure for assessment of disproportionate collapse potential.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 67 (3): 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.09.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 29Issue 6June 2024

History

Received: Nov 24, 2022
Accepted: Jan 12, 2024
Published online: Apr 5, 2024
Published in print: Jun 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Sep 5, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY 10031 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8651-5210. Email: [email protected]
Postdoctoral Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY 10031. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6854-511X. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal 721302, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8758-7486. Email: [email protected]
Sherif El-Tawil, F.ASCE [email protected]
Antoine E. Naaman Collegiate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48105. Email: [email protected]
Anil K. Agrawal, Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
Herbert G. Kayser Professor of Structural Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY 10031. Email: [email protected]
Waider Wong [email protected]
Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, Baltimore, MD 21201. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share