Field Demonstration of an Innovative Box Beam Connection
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 1
Abstract
Previous research conducted multiple levels of laboratory tests and analytical studies and designed an innovative joint to resist joint cracking on the longitudinal joint between box girders. The joint design was165 mm (6.5 in.) wide and filled with shrinkage-compensating concrete and reinforced with transverse steel bars. Although the previous laboratory test and analytical simulation results indicated that the joint showed superior performance when resisting the joint early-age cracking and maintained the integrity of the bridge superstructure, its performance on a real onsite bridge was not evaluated. This paper documented the field evaluation of this new design on a single span box beam bridge. A bridge in Washington County, Iowa was selected to deploy the joint. To evaluate the performance of this first implementation, a 7-day field monitoring campaign was conducted during the early-age of the joint material. In addition, a live load field test and two bridge inspections at 6-month intervals were performed. During the field tests and monitoring work, temperature, strain, and displacement data were collected at critical locations and analyzed to evaluate the joint functionality on cracking resistance and load distribution. The visual inspections were conducted and focused on the condition and performance of the joint with a specific interest in the development of any cracking. The results indicated that this new joint was well suited to resist early-age joint longitudinal cracking, which is common in other joint designs. The joint was efficient in load distribution and the bridge superstructure behaved as an integral structure when the live load was placed. In addition, with an integral abutment, the construction of the abutment affected the strain distribution in the joint near the joint ends. This effect tended to provide compression in the transverse direction and reduced the potential of joint cracking.
Practical Applications
This paper documents the field evaluation of the new design of a longitudinal joint between concrete box beams on a bridge in Washington County, Iowa. The joint was 165 mm (6.5 in.) wide and filled with shrinkage-compensating concrete and reinforced by transverse steel bars. The results indicated that this new joint was well suited to resist early-age joint longitudinal cracking, which is common in other joint designs. The joint was efficient for load distribution. The bridge superstructure behaved as an integral structure when the live load was placed. In addition, with an integral abutment, the construction of the abutment affected the strain distribution in the joint near the joint ends. This effect tended to provide compression in the transverse direction and reduced the potential of joint cracking. This design is recommended to be used in concrete box beam bridges to prevent longitudinal joint cracking and reduce the potential of bridge superstructure deterioration, especially in rural regions. Further research is recommended to deploy the design on a bridge with a higher traffic volume to investigate the performance of the joint under larger traffic loads.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ASTM. 2017a. Standard test method for length change of hardened hydraulic-cement mortar and concrete. ASTM C157/C157M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017b. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C496/C496M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C 39. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Attanayake, U., and H. Aktan. 2008. “Issues with reflective deck cracks in side-by-side box beam bridges.” In Proc., Concrete Bridge Conf. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, National Concrete Bridge Council, Missouri Dept. of Transportation, American Concrete Institute.
Dong, H., Y. Li, and T. M. Ahlborn. 2007. “Performance of joint connections between decked prestressed concrete bridge girders.” In Proc., Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute National Bridge Conf. Chicago: Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute.
El-Remaily, A., M. K. Tadros, T. Yamane, and G. Krause. 1996. “Transverse design of adjacent precast prestressed concrete box girder bridges.” PCI J. 41: 96–113. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07011996.96.113.
Grace, N. F., E. A. Jensen, and M. R. Bebawy. 2012. “Transverse post-tensioning arrangement for side-by-side box-beam bridges.” PCI J. 57 (2): 48–63. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012012.48.63.
Hanna, K., G. Morcous, and M. K. Tadros. 2011. “Adjacent box girders without internal diaphragms or post-tensioned joints.” PCI J. 56 (4): 51–64. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09012011.51.64.
Hansen, J., K. Hanna, and M. K. Tadros. 2012. “Simplified transverse post-tensioning construction and maintenance of adjacent box girders.” PCI J. 57 (2): 64–79. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012012.64.79.
Huckelbridge, A. A., Jr., H. El-Esnawi, and F. Moses. 1995. “Shear key performance in multibeam box girder bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 9 (4): 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1995)9:4(271).
Lall, J., S. Alampalli, and E. F. DiCocco. 1998. “Performance of full-depth shear keys in adjacent prestressed box beam bridges.” PCI J. 43 (2): 72–79. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03011998.72.79.
Liu, Z. 2018. Evaluation of an innovative joint design for the adjacent box beam bridges. Ames, IA: Iowa State Univ.
Liu, Z., and B. M. Phares. 2019. “Small-scale investigation on wide longitudinal joints filled with shrinkage-compensated concrete for adjacent box beam bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (12): 04019114. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001465.
Liu, Z., and B. M. Phares. 2020. “Material selection for the joint between adjacent box beams.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 32 (4): 04020039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003085.
Liu, Z., B. M. Phares, W. Shi, and B. Shafei. 2020. “Full-scale evaluation of an innovative joint design between adjacent box beams.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (2): 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120902695.
Miller, R. A., G. M. Hlavacs, T. Long, and A. Greuel. 1999. “Full-scale testing of shear keys for adjacent box girder bridges.” PCI J. 44 (6): 80–90. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11011999.80.90.
Phares, B., L. Greimann, Z. Liu, and K. Freeseman. 2017. Context sensitive designs: Testing of multi-performance level box beam standards. No. IHRB Project TR-681. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Sharpe, G. P. 2007. “Reflective cracking of shear keys in multi-beam bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ.
Shi, W., B. Shafei, Z. Liu, and B. M. Phares. 2019. “Early-age performance of longitudinal bridge joints made with shrinkage-compensating cement concrete.” Eng. Struct. 197: 109391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109391.
Shi, W., B. Shafei, Z. Liu, and B. Phares. 2020. “Longitudinal box-beam bridge joints under monotonic and cyclic loads.” Eng. Struct. 220: 110976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110976.
Ulku, E., U. Attanayake, and H. M. Aktan. 2010. “Rationally designed staged post-tensioning to abate reflective cracking on side-by-side box-beam bridge decks.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2172 (1): 87–95. https://doi.org/10.3141/2172-10.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 30, 2022
Accepted: Sep 22, 2022
Published online: Nov 10, 2022
Published in print: Jan 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Apr 10, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Bridge tests
- Continuum mechanics
- Cracking
- Design (by type)
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering mechanics
- Field tests
- Fracture mechanics
- Joints
- Laboratory tests
- Live loads
- Load distribution
- Load tests
- Solid mechanics
- Static loads
- Statics (mechanics)
- Structural design
- Structural engineering
- Structural members
- Structural systems
- Tests (by type)
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.