Abstract

Horizontal wood diaphragm systems, whether decked with conventional or mass timber panels, transfer wind and seismic loads to vertical elements of the lateral force-resisting system, in flexible, rigid, or semirigid ways. Characterizing and calculating the resulting diaphragm deflections will help determine the distribution of forces to critically loaded components and a significant portion of lateral building translations and rotations. Deflection equations for sheathed wood structural panel (WSP) diaphragms are well established in US design standards in a four-term expression that models flexural, shear, and fastener-slip deformations, but similar equations for cross-laminated timber (CLT) diaphragms have yet to unfold, despite growing industry consensus that CLT panels make efficient slabs and decks. Building code standards require CLT diaphragm deflections be computed using the principles of engineering mechanics. The current three-term and four-term deflection equations for WSP diaphragms are based on various assumptions that are often outpaced by current design practices. This is the second of two companion papers, in which the first paper provides the full generalized derivation of the current four-term WSP diaphragm deflection expression with a mechanics-based expansion to unify both potential WSP and CLT applications. This second paper builds on the first paper by expanding the generalized equation with implementation insights unique to WSP and CLT diaphragms. The various challenges of calculating diaphragm deflections associated with the current design practices are discussed with suggestions to assist in implementation.

Practical Applications

In general, the computation of diaphragm deflections has become increasingly important ever since equations were first developed for WSP systems around 70 years ago. Deflections are routinely computed to evaluate building separations, property line setbacks, P-delta instability, and evaluation of nonstructural damage from interstory drift. Additionally, appropriate engineering modeling requires accurate diaphragm stiffness values to characterize diaphragms as rigid, semirigid, or flexible. The mechanics-based equations in this paper are presented in a form that will be useful to today’s practitioners to produce more rational building designs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Funded by U.S. Endowment for Forestry and Communities with matching funds from the USDA Forest Service

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
A
area of a diaphragm chord (in.2);
a
exponential behavior variable of the nail slip term en in SDPWS Table C4.2.3D;
b
ratio of edge fastener spacings, S/S;
E
modulus of elasticity of diaphragm chords (lbf/in.2);
ef
fastener slip along a panel edge;
ef
fastener slip along a panel edge parallel to the diaphragm load direction based on shear along the diaphragm boundary;
ef
fastener slip along a panel edge perpendicular to the diaphragm load direction based on shear along the diaphragm boundary;
en
nail slip measured parallel to the nearest panel edge based on shear along the diaphragm boundary (in.);
Ga
apparent diaphragm shear stiffness (kips/in.);
Gvtv
panel in-plane, through-the-thickness, shear stiffness (lbf/in. of depth) of WSP panels;
L
length of a diaphragm span, perpendicular to the diaphragm load direction (ft);
n
number of slip planes at panel-to-panel connections parallel to the diaphragm load direction;
n
number of slip planes at panel-to-panel connections perpendicular to the diaphragm load direction;
P
panel dimension parallel to the diaphragm load direction;
P
panel dimension perpendicular to the diaphragm load direction;
S
fastener spacing on panel edges parallel to the diaphragm load direction;
S
fastener spacing on panel edges perpendicular to the diaphragm load direction;
Vf
shear force per fastener;
Vf
shear force per fastener on a panel edge parallel to the diaphragm load direction;
Vf
shear force per fastener on a panel edge perpendicular to the diaphragm load direction;
Vn
shear force per nail;
V
total shear on a panel edge parallel to the diaphragm load direction;
V
total shear on a panel edge perpendicular to the diaphragm load direction;
v
induced shear per unit length typically at the diaphragm boundary/support line (lbs/ft);
W
width of the diaphragm, parallel to the diaphragm load direction (ft);
x
distance from the nearest diaphragm support to the location of interest (ft);
Δc
diaphragm chord splice slip at the induced unit shear (in.);
δchord
diaphragm deformation component from the chord slip;
δdia
diaphragm deformation;
δflex
diaphragm deformation component from bending;
δshear
diaphragm deformation component from panel shear deformation;
δslip
diaphragm deformation component from the panel fastener slip; and
γ
fastener slip stiffness, or slip modulus.

References

ANSI/APA (American National Standards Institute). 2020. Standard for performance-rated cross-laminated timber. ANSI/APA PRG 320-2019. Tacoma, WA: APA—The Engineered Wood Association.
ASCE. 2017. “Chapter 7: Analysis procedures and acceptance criteria.” In Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41-17. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2022. “Chapter 12: Seismic design requirements for building structures.” In Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-22. Reston, VA: ASCE.
AWC (American Wood Council). 2015. General dowel equations for calculating lateral connection values. Technical Rep. 12. Leesburg, VA: AWC.
AWC (American Wood Council). 2021. Special design provisions for wind and seismic. Leesburg, VA: AWC.
Bhardwaj, B., W. Pang, D. R. Rammer, M. O. Amini, and S. E. Pryor. 2021. “Experimental performance testing of cantilever cross-laminated timber (CLT) diaphragm under in-plane shear.” In Proc., World Conf. on Timber Engineering. Santiago, Chile: Centro UC de Innovación de Madera.
Brandner, R., P. Dietsch, J. Dröscher, M. Schulte-Wrede, H. Kreuzinger, and M. Sieder. 2017. “Cross laminated timber (CLT) diaphragms under shear: Test configuration, properties and design.” Constr. Build. Mater. 147: 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.153.
BSSC (Building Seismic Safety Council). 2021. Recommended future issues and research needs—Identified during the development of the 2020 NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures. Washington, DC: National Institute of Building Sciences’ Building Seismic Safety Council Provision Update Committee.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004. Design of timber structures. EN 1995-1:2004+A1. Eurocode 5. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Cobeen, K. E., J. D. Dolan, D. Thompson, and J. W. van de Lindt. 2014. Seismic design of wood light-frame structural diaphragm systems: A guide for practicing engineers. Applied Technology Council. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.
Countryman, D. 1952. Lateral tests on plywood sheathed diaphragms. Tacoma, WA: Douglas Fir Plywood Association.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2019. Engineering design in wood. CSA 086-14 (Reaffirmed 2019). Toronto: CSA.
Dolan, J. D., D. M. Carradine, J. W. Bott, and W. S. Easterling. 2003. Design methodology of diaphragms. Richmond, CA: Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering.
FEMA. 2021. Seismic design of rigid wall-flexible diaphragm buildings: An alternative procedure. 2nd ed. FEMA P-1026. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Flaig, M., and H. J. Blaβ. 2013. “Shear strength and shear stiffness of CLT-beams loaded in plane.” In Proc., CIB-W18 Meeting 46. Vancouver, BC: International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction.
Foster, R. M., T. Reynolds, and M. Ramage. 2016. “Proposal for defining a tall timber building.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (12): 02516001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001615.
Gagnon, S., T. Bilek, L. Podesto, and P. Crespell. 2013. “Introduction to cross-laminated timber.” In CLT handbook: Cross-laminated timber, U.S. edition, edited by E. Karacabeyli and B. Douglas. Point-Claire, Quebec: United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)/U.S. Forest Service/Forest Products Laboratory and Binational Softwood Lumber Council (BSLC).
ICC (International Code Council). 2021. International building code. Country Club Hills, IL: ICC.
Laguarda-Mallo, M. F., and O. Espinoza. 2018. “Awareness, perceptions and willingness to adopt CLT by US engineering firms.” BioProducts Bus. 3 (1): 1–14.
Lawson, J. W. 2012. Seismic design of timber panelized roof structures: 2012 International Building Code (IBC) edition. Washington, DC: Woodworks.
Lawson, J. W. 2018. “Improving the accuracy of wood diaphragm deflection estimates.” Wood Des. Focus 28 (2): 40–46.
Lawson, J. W. 2019. “Improving the accuracy of wood diaphragm deflection computations and its impact on ASCE 41 pseudo-lateral force estimates.” In Proc., Structural Engineers Association of California Convention. Squaw Valley, CA: Curran Associates.
Lawson, J., and M. Koliou. 2020. “Evaluating second order effects in rigid wall-flexible roof diaphragm buildings.” Earthquake Spectra 36 (4): 1864–1885. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020919420.
Lawson, J., S. Breneman, and M. Lo Ricco. 2023. “Wood diaphragm deflections. Part I: Generalizing standard equations using mechanics-based derivations for panel construction.” J. Archit. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061.JAEIED/AEENG-1573.
Line, P., S. Nyseth, and N. Waltz. 2022a. “Full-scale cross-laminated timber diaphragm evaluation. I: Design and full-scale diaphragm testing.” J. Struct. Eng. 148 (5): 04022037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003308.
Line, P., S. Nyseth, and N. Waltz. 2022b. “Full-scale cross-laminated timber diaphragm evaluation. II: CLT diaphragm connection tests.” J. Struct. Eng. 148 (5): 04022038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003309.
Nairn, J. A. 2017. “Cross laminated timber properties including effects of non-glued edges and additional cracks.” Eur. J. Wood Prod. 75 (6): 973–983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-017-1202-y.
NZS (New Zealand Standards). 1993. Timber structures standard. NZS 3603:1993. Wellington, New Zealand: NZS.
Pang, W., S. Pant, C. Ni, and J. Lawson. 2014. “Examining the applicability of design methods for large panelized all-wood roof diaphragms under seismic loading.” In Proc., 10th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
SEAOC (Structural Engineers Association of California). 2019. 2018 IBC SEAOC structural/seismic design manual, volume 2, example 2. Sacramento, CA: SEAOC.
Skaggs, T. D., and Z. A. Martin. 2004. “Estimating wood structural panel diaphragm and shear wall deflection.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 9 (3): 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2004)9:3(136).
Spickler, K., M. Closen, P. Line, and M. Pohil. 2015. “Cross laminated timber: horizontal diaphragm design example.” Penticton, BC: Structurlam. Revision 10. Accessed January 23, 2023. www.structurlam.com/resources/manufacturing-standards/.
Sullivan, K., T. H. Miller, and R. Gupta. 2018. “Behavior of cross-laminated timber diaphragm connections with self-tapping screws.” Eng. Struct. 168: 505–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.094.
Taylor, B., A. R. Barbosa, and A. Sinha. 2020. “Cyclic performance of in-plane shear cross-laminated timber panel-to-panel surface spline connections.” Eng. Struct. 218: 110726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110726.
Taylor, B., A. R. Barbosa, and A. Sinha. 2021. “In-plane shear cyclic performance of spline cross-laminated timber-concrete composite diaphragms.” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (10): 04021148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003127.
Tissell, J. R., and J. R. Elliott. 2004. Plywood diaphragms. Tacoma, WA: APA—The Engineered Wood Association.
Turesson, J., S. Berg, and M. Ekevad. 2019. “Impact of board width on in-plane shear stiffness of cross-laminated timber.” Eng. Struct. 196: 109249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.090.
Zapata-Kraft, C., J. Lawson, and P. Laursen. 2022. “Estimating periods of wood structural panel diaphragms.” In Proc., 12th U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Zimmerman, R. B., and E. McDonnell. 2017. “Framework—A tall re-centering mass timber building in the United States.” In Proc., Joint 2017 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Annual Conf. and the Anti-Seismic Systems International Society’s 15th World Conf. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 29Issue 3September 2023

History

Received: Oct 12, 2022
Accepted: Mar 27, 2023
Published online: May 29, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Oct 29, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, California Polytechnic State Univ., San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3237-5929. Email: [email protected]
Senior Technical Director—Mass Timber Program Manager, WoodWorks—Wood Products Council, PO Box D, Deer Park, WA 99006. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1189-1374. Email: [email protected]
Research General Engineer, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, WI 53726. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9940-1602. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Two-Way Bending Behavior of Cross-Laminated Timber–Concrete Composite Floors with Alternative Shear Connectors, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-13290, 150, 8, (2024).
  • Analytical and Numerical Models for Wind and Seismic Design and Assessment of Mass Timber Diaphragms, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12265, 150, 2, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share