Using Augmented Reality to Simulate Authentic Learning Building Assessment and Construction Experiences
Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 3
Abstract
As educators in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) domains seek to better prepare graduates for industry, providing authentic, hands-on design and construction experiences has been found to be one of the most effective ways of achieving the goal of educators. However, providing access to these experiences is costly, time-consuming, and resource-intensive, which limit access for most students. To explore a cost-effective alternative to hands-on AEC learning, augmented reality (AR) is considered as a simulation of authentic learning in these domains. In this study, a full-scale building redesign and construction experience is presented, in which students virtually perform design analysis, planning, and construction of renovations to an existing structure in an AR environment. As students participate in the simulation, they reflect on their process and the realism of the experience. Student behaviors and perceptions are analyzed to determine where the experience showed evidence of authentic learning characteristics and where the experience differs from traditional authentic learning. Ultimately, the results indicate strong evidence that this AR-enabled design and construction experience promotes higher-level thinking, with mixed results on which components of the experience felt realistic or unrealistic. These findings suggest that, with informed and intentional use, AR has a high potential to simulate authentic learning and achieve high-value, evidence-based learning outcomes. Educators may find these results useful in adopting AR as a tool for simulating authentic learning in AEC or other fields in which true authentic environments are not readily available.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. IIS-1735878 and IIS-1735804. A special thanks is given to the teams of undergraduate computer science capstone students who assisted in the development of the virtual environment.
References
Adams, N. E. 2015. “Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives.” J. Med. Lib. Assoc. 103 (3): 152–153. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010.
ASCE. 2016. “US infrastructure grade | ASCE’s 2021 infrastructure report card.” ASCE’s 2021 Infrastructure Report Card. Accessed July 26, 2022. https://infrastructurereportcard.org/infrastructure-categories/.
ASEE (American Society for Engineering Education). 2021. Engineering and engineering technology by the numbers. Washington, DC: ASEE.
Bjork, E. L., and R. Bjork. 2011. “Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning.” In Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society, edited by M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, and J. R. Pomerantz, 59–68. Belper, UK: Worth Publishers.
Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2012. “Thematic analysis.” In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, edited by H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, and K. J. Sher, 57–71. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. APA handbooks in psychology®.
Cowan, N. 2010. “The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why?” Accessed July 26, 2022. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0963721409359277?casa_token=g1W8zhG9ZwkAAAAA%3Aqs6pWZTCMHBtU6n1-Zt3iQTFZlUUJ4f2s310WOADeQT7bkMIWsN_q9Sfy6GpSKdKosMy-4AdTRJs.
Creswell, J. W., and C. N. Poth. 2016. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
DOE. 2009. “DOE solar decathlon: 2009 solar decathlon house construction costs.” Accessed July 26, 2022. https://www.solardecathlon.gov/past/2009/construction_costs.html.
DOE. 2020. “Solar decathlon: Build challenge teams.” Accessed July 26, 2022. https://www.solardecathlon.gov/2020/build/challenge-teams.html.
Fischer, M. A., K. M. Mazor, J. Baril, E. Alper, D. DeMarco, and M. Pugnaire. 2006. “Learning from mistakes.” J. Gener. Intern. Med. 21 (5): 419–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00420.x.
Forsyth, D. R. 2018. Group dynamics. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Gangone, M. V. 2022. “Creating a hands on civil engineering materials laboratory experience at home.” In Proc., 2022 American Society for Engineering Education Gulf Southwest Annual Conf. Washington, DC: The American Society for Engineering Education.
Hallgren, K. A. 2012. “Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial.” Tutorials Quant. Methods Psychol. 8 (1): 23–34. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023.
Hartless, J. F., S. K. Ayer, J. S. London, and W. Wu. 2020. “Comparison of building design assessment behaviors of novices in augmented- and virtual-reality environments.” J. Archit. Eng. 26 (2): 04020002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000396.
Herrington, A., and J. Herrington. 2005. Authentic learning environments in higher education. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: Idea Group Inc (IGI).
Herrington, J., and R. Oliver. 2000. “An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments.” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 48 (3): 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856.
Herrington, J., T. C. Reeves, R. Oliver, and Y. Woo. 2004. “Designing authentic activities in web-based courses.” J. Comput. Higher Educ. 16 (1): 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02960280.
Hogg, M. A., and K. D. Williams. 2000. “From I to We: Social identity and the collective self.” Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 4: 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.81.
Holt, E. A., B. Loss, and M. Shaurette. 2012. “Students involvement in the solar decathlon competition: Giving context to the classroom experience.” In Proc., 48th Associated Schools of Construction Annual Int. Conf. Fort Collins, CO: The Associated Schools of Construction's.
Hyde, P. 2020. “New outdoor lab enhances hands-on learning in construction science and management.” Clemson News. Accessed October 4, 2022. https://news.clemson.edu/new-outdoor-lab-enhances-hands-on-learning-in-construction-science-and-management/.
Kim, J., and J. Irizarry. 2021. “Evaluating the use of augmented reality technology to improve construction management student’s spatial skills.” Int. J. Construct. Educ. Res. 17 (2): 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2020.1717680.
Kim, S., S. Chang, and D. Castro-Lacouture. 2020. “Dynamic modeling for analyzing impacts of skilled labor shortage on construction project management.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (1): 04019035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000720.
Landis, J. R., and G. G. Koch. 1977. “The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.” Biometrics 33 (1): 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.
Lebow, D. G., and W. W. Wager. 1994. “Authentic activity as a model for appropriate learning activity: Implications for emerging instructional technologies.” Can. J. Educ. Commun. 23: 231.
Lombardi, M. M., and D. G. Oblinger. 2007. Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative.
Lyles College of Engineering. 2022. “Construction management: laboratories.” Construction Management: Laboratories. Accessed October 4, 2022. https://engineering.fresnostate.edu/cm/laboratories.html.
McCord, K. H., S. K. Ayer, A. J. Lamanna, M. Eicher, J. S. London, and W. Wu. 2023. “Construction education needs derived from industry evaluations of students and academic research publications.” Int. J. Construct. Educ. Res. 19: 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2021.1974985.
McCord, K. H., S. K. Ayer, L. A. Perry, K. R. Patil, J. S. London, V. Khoury, and W. Wu. 2022. “Student approaches and performance in element sequencing tasks using 2D and augmented reality formats.” Educ. Sci. 12 (4): 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040247.
Michigan State University. 2022. “Construction management education and research lab.” School of Planning, Design and Construction. Accessed October 4, 2022. https://www.canr.msu.edu/spdc/programs/construction_management/construction-management-education-and-research-lab.
Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2018. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Milgram, P., and F. Kishino. 1994. “A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays.” Accessed July 26, 2022. https://search.ieice.org/bin/summary.php?id=e77-d_12_1321.
Moon, J. 2007. Critical thinking: An exploration of theory and practice. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
Navarro, I., et al. 2014. “Experiences and methodology in a multidisciplinary energy and architecture competition: Solar Decathlon Europe 2012.” Energy Build. 83: 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.03.073.
Noghabaei, M., A. Heydarian, V. Balali, and K. Han. 2020. “Trend analysis on adoption of virtual and augmented reality in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry.” Data 5 (1): 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5010026.
Parameswaran, U. D., J. L. Ozawa-Kirk, and G. Latendresse. 2020. “To live (code) or to not: A new method for coding in qualitative research.” Qual. Social Work 19 (4): 630–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325019840394.
Rule, A. C. 2006. The components of authentic learning. Oswego, NY: State Univ. of New York.
Shirazi, A., and A. H. Behzadan. 2015. “Design and assessment of a mobile augmented reality-based information delivery tool for construction and civil engineering curriculum.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 141 (3): 04014012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000229.
Strobel, J., J. Wang, N. R. Weber, and M. Dyehouse. 2013. “The role of authenticity in design-based learning environments: The case of engineering education.” Comput. Educ. 64: 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.026.
The Center for Literacy and Learning. 2021. “Higher level thinking | resources | center for development and learning.” The Center for Literacy & Learning. Accessed July 26, 2022. https://mycll.org/for-parents-and-teachers/higher-level-thinking/.
The Glossary of Education Reform. 2013. “Authentic learning definition.” Accessed July 26, 2022. https://www.edglossary.org/authentic-learning/.
Turkan, Y., R. Radkowski, A. Karabulut-Ilgu, A. H. Behzadan, and A. Chen. 2017. “Mobile augmented reality for teaching structural analysis.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 34: 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2017.09.005.
Turner, A., V. Tieto, and “v-chmccl.” 2022. “Shared experiences in mixed reality.” Microsoft Documentation. Accessed October 4, 2022. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/mixed-reality/design/shared-experiences-in-mixed-reality.
Wen, J., M. Gheisari, S. Jain, Y. Zhang, and R. E. Minchin. 2021. “Using cloud-based augmented reality to 3D-enable the 2D drawings of AISC steel sculpture: A plan-Reading educational experiment.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 147 (3): 04021006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000046.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 29 • Issue 3 • September 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 29, 2022
Accepted: Dec 5, 2022
Published online: Jun 2, 2023
Published in print: Sep 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Nov 2, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.