Professional Development—An Educator's Viewpoint
Publication: Engineering Issues: Journal of Professional Activities
Volume 101, Issue 4
Abstract
Proposals for continuing professional development as a requirement for renewal of registration are appearing in many places, notably in California where the Senate passed SR 218 in October, 1971, calling for all registration boards to submit plans in 1972 for possible mandated programs. While California engineers and engineering societies have strongly supported continuing education—or, more broadly, professional development—as desirable, they have generally resisted a mandatory program. The Los Angeles Section of ASCE, however, has endorsed a mandated program of professional development, involving developing proficiencies by the practice of engineering, formal schooling, attendance at meetings and seminars, and active membership in professional organizations. The Section agrees to monitor such a program on a trial basis. A simpler plan, proposed by the writer, would require each applicant for license renewal to demonstrate 30 contact hours of continuing education in each 2-yr period, and in any 4-yr period he would have 30 hr minimum in technical updating, the remainder in management or related fields.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Engineering Issues: Journal of Professional Activities
Volume 101 • Issue 4 • October 1975
Pages: 471 - 476
Copyright
© 1975 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published in print: Oct 1975
Published online: Feb 10, 2021
ASCE Technical Topics:
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.