Technical Papers
Feb 15, 2024

An Integrated Maneuverability–Based Ship Domain at Close Quarters

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 10, Issue 2

Abstract

An integrated ship domain at close quarters is proposed based on the mutual interaction and maneuvering capabilities of the meeting ships. Firstly, the significance and conditions of mutual interaction and maneuvering capabilities of the ships in the process of avoiding collision are clarified. Secondly, by combining the main particulars and maneuvering characteristics of the encounter ships, an identical ship domain is formed. To determine the radius of the ship domain, the universal advance and tactical diameters of the ships are derived from a great deal of collected turning circle maneuver data from around the world. Following this approach, the integrated ship domain defines a sufficient safe area when ships are meeting at close quarters. Finally, a simulation study is carried out and further illustrates that the integrated ship domain can address the inconsistent assessment problem of collision risk between the encounter ships with different principal specifics, and the proposed domain is simple and applicable to almost all ships.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51909022 and 61976033), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2022M710572), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 3132023623).

References

Cao, Y. H., X. J. Wang, Y. H. Wang, S. Q. Fan, H. X. Wang, Z. L. Yang, Z. J. Liu, J. Wang, and R. J. Shi. 2023a. “Analysis of factors affecting the severity of marine accidents using a data-driven Bayesian network.” J. Ocean Eng. 269 (Feb): 113563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113563.
Cao, Y. H., X. J. Wang, Z. L. Yang, J. Wang, H. X. Wang, and Z. J. Liu. 2023b. “Research in marine accidents: A bibliometric analysis, systematic review and future directions.” J. Ocean Eng. 284 (Sep): 115048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115048.
Chin, H. C., and A. K. Debnath. 2009. “Modeling perceived collision risk in port water navigation.” J. Saf. Sci. 47 (10): 1410–1416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.04.004.
Coldwell, T. G. 1983. “Marine traffic behaviour in restricted waters.” J. Navig. 36 (3): 430–444. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300039783.
Colley, B. A., R. G. Curtis, and C. T. Stockel. 1983. “Maneuvering times, domains and arenas.” J. Navig. 36 (2): 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300025030.
Davis, P. V., M. J. Dove, and C. T. Stockel. 1980. “A computer simulation of marine traffic using domains and arenas.” J. Navig. 33 (2): 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300035220.
Dinh, G. H., and N. K. Im. 2016. “The combination of analytical and statistical method to define polygonal ship domain and reflect human experiences in estimating dangerous area.” Int. J. e-Navig. Marit. Econ. 4 (Jun): 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enavi.2016.06.009.
Du, L., O. A. V. Banda, Y. Huang, F. Goerlandt, P. Kujala, and W. Zhang. 2021. “An empirical ship domain based on evasive maneuver and perceived collision risk.” J. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 213 (Jun): 107752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107752.
Fang, S. M., Z. J. Liu, X. H. Yang, X. J. Wang, J. Wang, and Z. L. Yang. 2023. “A quantitative study of the factors influencing human evacuation from ships.” J. Ocean Eng. 285 (Mar): 115156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115156.
Fiskin, R. 2023. “An advanced decision-making model for determining ship domain size with a combination of MCDM and fuzzy logic.” J. Ocean Eng. 283 (Sep): 114976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114976.
Fujii, Y., and K. Tanaka. 1971. “Traffic capacity.” J. Navig. 24 (4): 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300022384.
Gipps, P. G. 1981. “A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation.” J. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 15 (2): 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(81)90037-0.
Goodwin, E. M. 1975. “A statistical study of ship domain.” J. Navig. 28 (3): 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300041230.
Hansen, M. G., T. K. Jensen, T. Lehn-Schiøler, K. Melchild, F. M. Rasmussen, and F. Ennemark. 2013. “Empirical ship domain based on AIS data.” J. Navig. 66 (6): 931–940. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463313000489.
Hong, B. G. 2012. Ship handling. Dalian, China: Dalian Maritime University Press.
Hong, B. G., and C. Y. Jia. 2002. “Synthetic evaluation of large ship maneuverability.” J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2 (2): 55–58.
Huang, D. Z., T. T. Liang, S. P. Hu, S. Loughney, and J. Wang. 2023. “Characteristics analysis of intercontinental sea accidents using weighted association rule mining: Evidence from the Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea.” J. Ocean Eng. 287 (Nov): 115839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115839.
IMO (International Maritime Organization). 1972. “International regulations for preventing collisions at sea (COLREGs).” Accessed October 20, 1972. http://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/ListOfConventions/Pages/COLREG.
IMO (International Maritime Organization). 1999a. “Maneuverability of ships and maneuvering standards ship maneuvering data, submitted by Denmark, DE 43/INF.2.” Accessed September 10, 1999. https://docs.imo.org/Search.aspx?keywords=DE%2043%2FINF.2.
IMO (International Maritime Organization). 1999b. “The results of investigation and proposals for the amendments to Interim standards for ship maneuverability, submitted by Japan, MSC 71/20/9.” Accessed February 9, 1999. https://docs.imo.org/Search.aspx?keywords=MSC%2071%2F20%2F9.
IMO (International Maritime Organization). 2000a. “Compilation of maneuvering data, note by the Secretariat, DE 44/4/1.” Accessed December 12, 2000. https://docs.imo.org/Search.aspx?keywords=DE%2044%2F4%2F1.
IMO (International Maritime Organization). 2000b. “Ship maneuvering data, submitted by Denmark, DE 44/INF.4.” Accessed November 1, 2000. https://docs.imo.org/Search.aspx?keywords=DE%2044%2FINF.4.
IMO (International Maritime Organization). 2000c. “Ship maneuvering data, submitted by the Republic of Korea, DE 44/4/2.” Accessed December 29, 2000. https://docs.imo.org/Search.aspx?keywords=DE%2044%2F4%2F2.
IMO (International Maritime Organization). 2001. “Proposal for the revision of the interim standards for ship maneuverability, submitted by the Republic of Korea, DE 45/3.” Accessed December 14, 2001. https://docs.imo.org/Search.aspx?keywords=DE%2045%2F3.
IMO (International Maritime Organization). 2002a. “Explanatory notes to the standard for ship maneuverability (MSC/Circ.1053).” Accessed December 16, 2002. https://docs.imo.org/Search.aspx?keywords=MSC%2FCirc.
IMO (International Maritime Organization). 2002b. “Standards for Ship Maneuverability (Resolution MSC.137(76)/add.1).” Accessed December 4, 2002. https://docs.imo.org/Search.aspx?keywords=MSC.137%2876%29.
Kijima, K., and Y. Furukawa. 2003. “Automatic collision avoidance system using the concept of blocking area.” J. IFAC Proc. Volumes 36 (21): 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)37811-4.
Liu, K. Z., Z. T. Yuan, X. R. Xin, J. F. Zhang, and W. Q. Wang. 2021. “Conflict detection method based on dynamic ship domain model for visualization of collision risk hot-spots.” J. Ocean Eng. 242 (Dec): 110143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110143.
Liu, Z., B. Y. Zhang, M. Y. Zhang, H. L. Wang, and X. J. Fu. 2023. “A quantitative method for the analysis of ship collision risk using AIS data.” J. Ocean Eng. 272 (Jan): 113906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113906.
Ma, J. 1998. “A study on safe distance between the vehicles in freeway.” J. Xian Highway Univ. 18 (4): 90–94.
Montewka, J., F. Goerlandt, and P. Kujala. 2012. “Determination of collision criteria and causation factors appropriate to a model for estimating the probability of maritime accidents.” J. Ocean Eng. 40 (Feb): 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.12.006.
People’s Republic of China. 2004. “Regulations for the implementation of the law of the People’s Republic of China on road traffic safety.” Accessed April 30, 2004. http://en.pkulaw.cn/display.aspx?cgid=52565&lib=law.
Pietrzykowski, Z. 2008. “Ship’s fuzzy domain-a criterion for navigational safety in narrow fairways.” J. Navig. 61 (3): 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463308004682.
Pietrzykowski, Z., and J. Uriasz. 2004. “The ship domain in a deep-sea area.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Computer and IT Applications in the Maritime Industries, 204–211. Hamburg, Germany: Computer and IT Applications in the Maritime Industries Conference.
Pietrzykowski, Z., and J. Uriasz. 2009. “The ship domain-A criterion of navigational safety assessment in an open sea area.” J. Navig. 62 (1): 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463308005018.
Qu, X. B., Q. Meng, and S. Y. Li. 2011. “Ship collision risk assessment for the Singapore Strait.” J. Accid. Anal. Prev. 43 (6): 2030–2036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.022.
Shen, H. Q., H. Hashimoto, A. Matsuda, Y. Taniguchi, D. Terada, and C. Guo. 2019. “Automatic collision avoidance of multiple ships based on deep Q-learning.” J. Appl. Ocean Res. 86 (May): 268–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.02.020.
Shu, Y. Q., Y. J. Zhu, F. Xu, L. X. Gan, P. T.-W. Lee, J. C. Yin, and J. H. Chen. 2023. “Path planning for ships assisted by the icebreaker in ice-covered waters in the Northern Sea Route based on optimal control.” J. Ocean Eng. 267 (Jan): 113182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113182.
Szlapczynski, R. 2006. “A unified measure of collision risk derived from the concept of a ship domain.” J. Navig. 59 (3): 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463306003833.
Szlapczynski, R., P. Krata, and J. Szlapczynska. 2018. “Ship domain applied to determining distances for collision avoidance maneuvers in give-way situations.” J. Ocean Eng. 165 (Oct): 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.07.041.
Szlapczynski, R., and J. Szlapczynska. 2017. “Review of ship safety domains: Models and applications.” J. Ocean Eng. 145 (Jan): 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.09.020.
Szlapczynski, R., and J. Szlapczynska. 2021. “A ship domain-based model of collision risk for near-miss detection and collision alert systems.” J. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 214 (Oct): 107766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107766.
Tam, C. K., R. Bucknall, and A. Greig. 2009. “Review of collision avoidance and path planning methods for ships in close range encounters.” J. Navig. 62 (3): 455–476. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463308005134.
Wang, N. 2010. “An intelligent spatial collision risk based on the quaternion ship domain.” J. Navig. 63 (4): 733–749. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463310000202.
Wang, N. 2013. “A novel analytical framework for dynamic quaternion ship domain.” J. Navig. 66 (2): 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463312000483.
Wang, N., X. Y. Meng, Q. Y. Xu, and Z. W. Wang. 2009. “A unified analytical framework for ship domains.” J. Navig. 62 (4): 643–655. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463309990178.
Wang, X. 2017. “The research on the safety of ship navigation on the open sea based on ship maneuverability.” Ph.D. thesis, College of Navigation, Dalian Maritime Univ.
Wang, X., Z. J. Liu, and Y. Cai. 2015. “A rating based fuzzy analytic network process (F-ANP) model for evaluation of ship maneuverability.” J. Ocean Eng. 106 (Sep): 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.061.
Wang, X., Z. J. Liu, and Y. Cai. 2017. “The ship maneuverability based collision avoidance dynamic support system in close-quarters situation.” J. Ocean Eng. 146 (Dec): 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.08.034.
Wang, Y. Y., and H. C. Chin. 2016. “An empirically-calibrated ship domain as a safety criterion for navigation in confined waters.” J. Navig. 69 (2): 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463315000533.
Xu, J., and H. Sun. 2002. “Safety distance about car-following.” J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2 (1): 101–104.
Yang, D., L. L. Zhu, D. Yu, F. Yang, and P. Yun. 2014. “An enhanced safe distance car-following model.” J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. 19 (1): 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-014-1479-5.
Zaccone, R., and M. Martelli. 2020. “A collision avoidance algorithm for ship guidance applications.” J. Mar. Eng. Technol. 19 (sup1): 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/20464177.2019.1685836.
Zaccone, R., M. Martelli, and M. Figari. 2019. “A COLREG-compliant ship collision avoidance algorithm.” In Proc., 18th European Control Conf. ECC 2019, 2530–2535. New York: IEEE.
Zhang, J. F., X. P. Yan, X. Q. Chen, L. Z. Sang, and D. Zhang. 2012. “A novel approach for assistance with anti-collision decision making based on the international regulations for preventing collisions at sea.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part M: J. Eng. Marit. Environ. 226 (3): 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090211434869.
Zhang, J. F., D. Zhang, X. P. Yan, S. Haugen, and C. Guedes Soares. 2015. “A distributed anti-collision decision support formulation in multi-ship encounter situations under COLREGs.” J. Ocean Eng. 105 (Sep): 336–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.054.
Zhao, J. S., F. C. Wang, and Z. L. Wu. 1992. “The development of ship collision avoidance automation.” J. Navig. 45 (1): 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300010511.
Zhao, J. S., Z. L. Wu, and F. C. Wang. 1993. “Comments on ship domains.” J. Navig. 46 (3): 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300011875.
Zhou, D., and Z. Y. Zheng. 2019. “Dynamic fuzzy ship domain considering the factors of own ship and other ships.” J. Navig. 72 (2): 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463318000802.
Zhou, W. 2001. “Theoretical study about road section capacity.” J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 1 (2): 92–98.
Zhu, X. L., H. Z. Xu, and J. Q. Lin. 2001. “Domain and Its Model Based on Neural Networks.” J. Navig. 54 (1): 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300001247.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 10Issue 2June 2024

History

Received: Jul 28, 2023
Accepted: Nov 27, 2023
Published online: Feb 15, 2024
Published in print: Jun 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jul 15, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tianhao Wu
Master’s Student, College of Navigation, Dalian Maritime Univ., Dalian 116026, China.
Associate Professor, College of Navigation, Dalian Maritime Univ., Dalian 116026, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Chunxiao Zhao
Master’s Student, College of Navigation, Dalian Maritime Univ., Dalian 116026, China.
Xue Chen
Master’s Student, College of Navigation, Dalian Maritime Univ., Dalian 116026, China.
Zihao Liu
Lecturer, College of Navigation, Dalian Maritime Univ., Dalian 116026, China.
Shengke Ni
Lecturer, College of Navigation, Dalian Maritime Univ., Dalian 116026, China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share