Technical Papers
Feb 24, 2022

Consistent Classification System for Sewer Pipe Deterioration and Asset Management

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148, Issue 5

Abstract

Sewer pipe deterioration is driven by a finite number of root causes and processes. Thus, it should be both feasible and advantageous to have a uniform classification system that can be universally applied in sewer deterioration modeling and asset management. However, a literature review of existing classification systems revealed several problems and inconsistencies, and no widely adopted system. This work proposes a uniform classification system that can be used for different purposes in the fields of gravity pipe deterioration and asset management. This paper focuses on separated sewer systems, but the proposed system can be easily adapted for combined sewer and stormwater systems. The proposed system is based on three top-level categories of failures, defects, and factors with subcategories based on functional considerations. Each category is unambiguously defined and a classification flow diagram is proposed. This work demonstrates how existing parameters can be consistently classified, discusses the interactions between different defects and failures, and illustrates the application of the proposed system to the processes causing overflow failures due to sedimentation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data, models, or code were generated or used during the study.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded in part by a grant from Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) of New Zealand. Their support is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the MBIE Innovation Partnership.

References

Ana, E. V., and W. Bauwens. 2010. “Modeling the structural deterioration of urban drainage pipes: The state-of-the-art in statistical methods.” Urban Water J. 7 (1): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620903447597.
Angkasuwansiri, T., and S. K. Sinha. 2013. “Comprehensive list of parameters affecting wastewater pipe performance.” Technol. Interface Int. J. 13 (2): 68–79.
Baik, H.-S., H. S. Jeong, and D. M. Abraham. 2006. “Estimating transition probabilities in Markov chain-based deterioration models for management of wastewater systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 132 (1): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:1(15).
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2011. Investigation and assessment of drain and sewer systems outside buildings—Part 2: Visual inspection coding system. DIN EN-13508-2. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chughtai, F., and T. Zayed. 2007a. “Sewer pipeline operational condition prediction using multiple regression.” In Proc., Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects—Proc. of the ASCE Int. Conf. on Pipeline Engineering and Construction, 18. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chughtai, F., and T. Zayed. 2007b. “Structural condition models for sewer pipeline.” In Proc., Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects—Proc. of the ASCE Int. Conf. on Pipeline Engineering and Construction, 25. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chughtai, F., and T. Zayed. 2008. “Infrastructure condition prediction models for sustainable sewer pipelines.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 22 (5): 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:5(333).
Davies, J. P., B. A. Clarke, J. T. Whiter, and R. J. Cunningham. 2001. “Factors influencing the structural deterioration and collapse of rigid sewer pipes.” Urban Water 3 (1–2): 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00017-6.
Finisdore, J., C. Rhodes, R. Haines-Young, S. Maynard, J. Wielgus, A. Dvarskas, J. Houdet, F. Quétier, K. A. Lamothe, and H. Ding. 2020. “The 18 benefits of using ecosystem services classification systems.” Ecosyst. Serv. 45 (Oct): 101160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101160.
Grigg, N. S. 2012. Water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Hawari, A., F. Alkadour, M. Elmasry, and T. Zayed. 2017. “Simulation-based condition assessment model for sewer pipelines.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 31 (1): 04016066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000914.
Hawari, A., F. Alkadour, M. Elmasry, and T. Zayed. 2020. “A state of the art review on condition assessment models developed for sewer pipelines.” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 93 (Aug): 103721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103721.
Laakso, T., T. Kokkonen, I. Mellin, and R. Vahala. 2018. “Sewer condition prediction and analysis of explanatory factors.” Water (Switzerland) 10 (9): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091239.
Marne, P. E. V. De. 2013. In Vol. 13 of Performance indicators and multicriteria decision support for sewer asset management, 75012. Reston, VA: ASCE.
McFarlane, P. 2018. Wastewater renewals framework—Gravity pipelines. Wellington, New Zealand: Water New Zealand.
Mohammadi, M. M., M. Najafi, V. Kaushal, R. Serajiantehrani, N. Salehabadi, and T. Ashoori. 2019. “Sewer pipes condition prediction models: A state-of-the-art review.” Infrastructures 4 (4): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures4040064.
Moradi, S., T. Zayed, and F. Golkhoo. 2019. “Review on computer aided sewer pipeline defect detection and condition assessment.” Infrastructures 4 (1): 10–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures4010010.
NASSCO (National Association of Sewer Service Companies). 2001. Pipeline assessment & certification program (PACP) reference manual. Marriottsville, MD: NASSCO.
NRC (National Research Council). 2006. Drinking water distribution systems: Assessing and reducing risks. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NZGP (New Zealand Gravity Pipe). 2019. New Zealand gravity pipe inspection. Wellington, New Zealand: Water New Zealand.
Opila, M. C. 2011. Structural condition scoring of buried sewer pipes for risk-based decision making. Newark, DE: Univ. of Delaware.
Roghani, B., F. Cherqui, M. Ahmadi, P. Le, M. Tabesh, P. Le Gauffre, M. Tabesh, P. Le, and M. Tabesh. 2019. “Dealing with uncertainty in sewer condition assessment: Impact on inspection programs.” Autom. Constr. 103 (Jul): 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.012.
Salman, B., and O. Salem. 2012. “Modeling failure of wastewater collection lines using various section-level regression models.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 18 (2): 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000075.
Stanić, N., J. Langeveld, and F. Clemens. 2012. “Identification of the information needs for sewer asset management by assessing failure mechanisms.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Urban Drainage Modelling, 11. London: International Water Association.
Stanić, N., J. G. Langeveld, and F. H. L. R. Clemens. 2014. “HAZard and OPerability (HAZOP) analysis for identification of information requirements for sewer asset management.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (11): 1345–1356.
WNZ (Water New Zealand). 2019. Gravity pipe inspection manual standard of New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: WNZ.
WSA (Water Services Association of Australia). 2020. Conduit inspection reporting code of Australia suite 8.02, level 8. Docklands, Australia: Water Services Association of Australia.
Yin, X., Y. Chen, A. Bouferguene, and M. Al-Hussein. 2020a. “Data-driven bi-level sewer pipe deterioration model: Design and analysis.” Autom. Constr. 116 (Aug): 103181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103181.
Yin, X., Y. Chen, A. Bouferguene, H. Zaman, M. Al-hussein, and L. Kurach. 2020b. “A deep learning-based framework for an automated defect detection system for sewer pipes.” Autom. Constr. 109 (Jan): 102967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102967.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148Issue 5May 2022

History

Received: Jul 20, 2021
Accepted: Dec 29, 2021
Published online: Feb 24, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jul 24, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Z. Tizmaghz [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Auckland, 20 Symonds St., Auckland 1010, New Zealand (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
J. E. van Zyl [email protected]
Watercare Chair in Infrastructure, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Auckland, 20 Symonds St., Auckland 1010, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]
T. F. P. Henning [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Investigation on the Water Depth of Choked Flow due to Bottom Blockages in Circular Open Channels, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 10.1061/JHEND8.HYENG-13905, 150, 5, (2024).
  • Biggest Challenges Facing the Construction Industry, Construction Research Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485286.065, (652-660), (2024).
  • Evaluation of the critical factors causing sewer overflows through modeling of structural equations and system dynamics, Journal of Cleaner Production, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134035, 375, (134035), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share