Case Studies
Oct 21, 2021

Cumulative Impacts of Water Abstraction on a Recreational Salmon Fishery on the Rangitata River, New Zealand

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148, Issue 1

Abstract

This study investigates factors contributing to the unexpected loss of a recreational Chinook salmon fishery in a reach of the Rangitata River in Canterbury, New Zealand. The Rangitata is one of only 14 rivers nationwide in which flows are protected by water conservation orders to provide for instream values in the face of competition from extractive uses. However, the river has experienced significant water abstraction or takes for irrigation and hydroelectricity generation, even recently. In this study, local fishers determined flow requirements and conditions for successful fishing based on historical catch data and gauged flows. Relationships between preferred and historical flows were examined using scenario analyses to identify the cumulative impacts of water takes on the conditions required for fishing. An irrigation take of 19.6  m3/s beginning in 2013 was found to have severely reduced the duration of flows in a 30  m3/s flow range that previously supported fishing success. A recently proposed further take of 10  m3/s will completely remove any remaining flows from this preferred flow range. These results show that cumulative takes of water from river systems may have profound and unintended consequences when the flow regimes that support recreational uses are not well understood and retained or protected. Impact assessments that address both cumulative takes and flow-specific values are needed to reliably detect and manage adverse effects. In this case, additional controls are required to maintain the values specifically recognized by the water conservation order.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request (simulated flows).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the key contributions made by the expert local fishers that assisted with defining the salmon fishing flow window parameters in the study reach and their observations on physical and biotic changes in the study reach over time. The authors would like to thank the reviewers of earlier versions of this paper for their helpful comments and suggestions to strengthen the paper. The provision of angler data and annual salmon catch and return estimates by CSIFG are also gratefully acknowledged.

References

Canterbury Regional Council. 2020. “River flow for Rangitata River at Klondyke.” Accessed November 12, 2020. https://www.ecan.govt.nz/data/riverflow/sitedetails/69302.
Congress. 1968. Wild and scenic rivers act. Chicago: LexisNexisR Congressional.
CSIFG (Central South Island Fish and Game). 2020. Temuka, New Zealand: CSIFG.
Davis, S. F., M. J. Unwin, J. R. Zeldis, and J. W. Hayes. 1987. Angler use of the Rangitata River salmon and trout fisheries. Christchurch, New Zealand: MAFFish.
Day, T. J., and H. R. Hudson. 2001. “River management: The recent New Zealand experience.” In Gravel-bed rivers V, edited by M. P. Mosley, 555–579. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Hydrological Society.
Environment Canterbury. 2017. Canterbury land and water regional plan. Volume 1. Updated 24 August 2017, 470. Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury Regional Council.
Glova, G. J. 1988. “The effects of river flows on salmon fishing in a large braided river, New Zealand.” In Proc., of the Int. Association for Theoretical and Applied Limnology, 1790–1796. Stuttgart, Germany: E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Hall, M. C. 2018. Statement of evidence of Matthew Hall. Ashburton, New Zealand: Ashburton District Council.
Hauer, F. R., L. Harvey, V. J. Dreitz, L. Hebblewhite, W. H. Lowe, C. C. Muhlfeld, C. R. Nelson, M. F. Proctor, and S. B. Rood. 2016. “Gravel-bed river floodplains are the ecological nexus of glaciated mountain landscapes.” Sci. Adv. 2 (6): e1600026. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600026.
Hicks, D. M. 2018. Statement of evidence of Darryl Murray Hicks for Central South Island Fish and Game Council. Ashburton, New Zealand: Ashburton District Council.
Hughey, K. F. D., H. D. Rennie, and N. J. Williams. 2014. “New Zealand’s ‘wild and scenic rivers’: Geographical aspects of 30 years of water conservation orders.” N. Z. Geogr. 70 (1): 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/nzg.12037.
Jackson, J. R., C. E. Manning, and R. Grigg. 2005. Final report on a proposed Rangitata water conservation order. Christchurch, New Zealand: Environment Court.
Joy, M. 2019. “The environmental and human health impacts of dairy intensification: A case study—Canterbury.” VetScript 32 (8): 32–36.
Keane, A. 2018. Statement of evidence of Alasdair Keane for Central South Island Fish and Game Council. Ashburton, New Zealand: Ashburton District Council.
Kemble, G., B. Munro, D. Greaves, and C. Burmester. 2016. Lake Klondyke: A proposed water storage facility. Assessment of environmental effects report & resource consent application, 128. Tauranga, New Zealand: Ryder Consulting.
L’Abée-Lund, J. H., and H. Aspås. 1999. “Threshold values of river discharge and temperature for anglers’ catch of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.” Fish. Manage. Ecol. 6 (4): 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2400.1999.tb00083.x.
Ministry for the Environment. 2008. Proposed national environmental standard on ecological flows and water levels—Discussion document, 61. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry for the Environment.
New Zealand Government. 2006. “Water conservation (Rangitata River) order 2006.New Zealand Gazette 65 (4): 1545–1563.
Potts, W. T. W., and A. J. C. Malloch. 1991. “River flow, Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) movement and rod catch in the Aberdeenshire Dee.” J. Fish Biol. 39 (5): 755–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1991.tb04405.x.
Rankin, D. A., and S. Orchard. 2019. “Quantifying the impacts of water abstraction on kayaking and rafting values in the Rangitata River, Canterbury, New Zealand.” J. Hydrol. (NZ) 58 (1): 19–39.
Stafford, E., N. Fey, and J. J. Vaske. 2017. “Quantifying whitewater recreation opportunities in Cataract Canyon of the Colorado River, Utah: Aggregating acceptable flows and hydrologic data to identify boatable days.” River Res. Appl. 33 (1): 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3049.
Underwood, A. J. 1994. “On beyond BACI: Sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances.” Ecol. Appl. 4 (1): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942110.
Webb, M. 2018. Statement of evidence of Mark Webb for Central South Island Fish and Game Council. Ashburton, New Zealand: Ashburton District Council.
Webb, M. 2020. Temuka, New Zealand: Central South Island Fish and Game.
Yin, R. K. 2014. Case study research design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 148Issue 1January 2022

History

Received: Feb 26, 2021
Accepted: Aug 31, 2021
Published online: Oct 21, 2021
Published in print: Jan 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Mar 21, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Independent Researcher, Whitewater NZ, 28 Waipara St., Cracroft, Christchurch 8025, New Zealand (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-1285. Email: [email protected]
Research Associate, School of Earth and Environment, School of Biological Sciences, Univ. of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9040-6404. Email: [email protected]
Alan Brooks [email protected]
Member, New Zealand Salmon Anglers Association, 19b Cracroft Terrace, Cashmere, Christchurch 8022, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share