Technical Papers
Aug 31, 2021

Markov Chain–Based Inspection and Maintenance Model for Stormwater Pipes

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 147, Issue 11

Abstract

Inspection and maintenance (M&R) of a buried network of stormwater drainage pipes is a challenging task for asset engineers due to a large number of pipes and restricted access. A Markov-based inspection model with a computational procedure was developed to estimate the lowest-cost inspection interval for various pipe conditions and an average total of M&R cost. The computational procedure is based on the innovative application of Markov deterioration model, the cost rate function, and Monte Carlo simulation. The results from a real case study show that the lowest-cost inspection intervals for stormwater pipe assets with a starting good condition of 1 are obtained between 9 and 11 years. The average number of undetected failure condition due to longer inspection interval is also presented and can be important in selecting the inspection interval when failure risk is concerned. The effect of penalty cost is shown to affect both the average cost rate and lowest-cost inspection interval. The annual interest rate is found to have a significant effect on total cost but has no impact on inspection interval.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

Support provided by Mr. Martin Wong of the city council in Australia is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to thank the editor, associate editor, and anonymous referees for their useful suggestions that helped to improve the quality of the paper.

References

Abeygunawardane, S. K., and P. Jirutitijaroen. 2014. “Application of probabilistic maintenance models for selecting optimal inspection rates considering reliability and cost tradeoff.” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery 29 (1): 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2013.2280021.
Ahmad, R., and S. Kamaruddin. 2012. “An overview of time-based and condition-based maintenance in industrial application.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 63 (1): 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.02.002.
Alaswad, S., and Y. Xiang. 2017. “A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 157 (Jan): 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.009.
Australian/New Zealand Standard. 2007. Design for installation of buried concrete pipes. AS/NZS 3725. Sydney, Australia: Australian/New Zealand Standard.
Baik, H., H. Jeong, and D. Abraham. 2006. “Estimating transition probabilities in Markov chain-based deterioration models for management of wastewater systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 132 (1): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:1(15).
Bettayeb, B., and S. J. Bassetto. 2016. “Impact of Type-II inspection errors on a risk exposure control approach based quality inspection plan.” J. Manuf. Syst. 40 (Part 1): 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.06.003.
Cao, C., M. M. S. Cheung, and B. Y. B. Chan. 2013. “Modelling of interaction between corrosion-induced concrete cover crack and steel corrosion rate.” Corros. Sci. 69 (Apr): 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.11.028.
Chen, X., H. Zhu, X. Li, X. Lin, and X. Wang. 2019. “Probabilistic performance prediction of shield tunnels in operation through data mining.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 44 (Jan): 819–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.013.
Christer, A. H., W. Wang, K. Choi, and F. A. Van Der Duyn Schouten. 2001. “The robustness of the semi-Markov and delay time single-component inspection models to the Markov assumption.” IMA J. Manage. Math. 12 (1): 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/12.1.75.
Dallman, S., A. M. Chaudhry, M. K. Muleta, and J. Lee. 2021. “Is rainwater harvesting worthwhile? A benefit–cost analysis.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 147 (4): 04021011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001361.
Davies, J. P., B. A. Clarke, and J. T. Whiter. 2001. “Factors influencing the structural deterioration and collapse of rigid sewer pipes.” Urban Water J. 3 (1–2): 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00017-6.
Fatima, T., and A. Muntean. 2014. “Sulfate attack in sewer pipes: Derivation of a concrete corrosion model via two-scale convergence.” Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 15 (Jan): 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2012.01.019.
Geara, C., R. Faddoul, A. Chateauneuf, and W. Raphaël. 2020. “Hybrid inspection-monitoring approach for optimal maintenance planning.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 16 (11): 1551–1561. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1713168.
Greenwood, C., and M. S. Nikulin. 1996. A guide to chi-squared testing. New York: Wiley.
Haladuick, S., and M. R. Dann. 2018. “Value of information-based decision analysis of the optimal next inspection type for deteriorating structural systems.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (9): 1283–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1433692.
Hassan, S. I., L. M. Dang, I. Mehmood, S. Im, C. Choi, J. Kang, Y. S. Park, and H. Moon. 2019. “Underground sewer pipe condition assessment based on convolutional neural networks.” Autom. Constr. 106 (Oct): 102849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102849.
Hong, H. P., W. Zhou, S. Zhang, and W. Ye. 2014. “Optimal condition-based maintenance decisions for systems with dependent stochastic degradation of components.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 121 (Jan): 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.09.004.
Hu, J., and P. Chen. 2020. “Predictive maintenance of systems subject to hard failure based on proportional hazards model.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 196 (Apr): 106707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106707.
Huynh, K. T., I. T. Castro, A. Barros, and C. Bérenguer. 2012. “Modeling age-based maintenance strategies with minimal repairs for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and shocks.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 218 (1): 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.025.
Iqbal, H., S. Tesfamariam, H. Haider, and R. Sadiq. 2017. “Inspection and maintenance of oil & gas pipelines: A review of policies.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 13 (6): 794–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1187632.
Jamali, A., U. Angst, B. Adey, and B. Elsener. 2013. “Modeling of corrosion-induced concrete cover cracking: A critical analysis.” Constr. Build. Mater. 42 (May): 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.019.
Kandasamy, V. P. V., and S. K. Sinha. 2018. “Stormwater pipe performance index using fuzzy inference method.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 144 (10): 04018062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000967.
Levitin, G., L. Xing, and H. Z. Huang. 2019. “Cost effective scheduling of imperfect inspections in systems with hidden failures and rescue possibility.” Appl. Math. Modell. 68 (Apr): 662–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.12.001.
Lokuge, W., M. Wilson, H. Tran, and S. Setunge. 2019. “Predicting the probability of failure of timber bridges using fault tree analysis.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (6): 783–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1569069.
Lovejoy, S. C. 2003. “Determining appropriate fatigue inspection intervals for steel bridge members.” J. Bridge Eng. 8 (2): 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:2(66).
Marlow, D. R., F. Boulaire, D. J. Beale, C. Grundy, and M. Moglia. 2011. “Sewer performance reporting: Factors that influence blockages.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 17 (1): 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000041.
Melchers, R. E. 1999. Structural reliability analysis and prediction. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Mercier, S., and I. T. Castro. 2019. “Stochastic comparisons of imperfect maintenance models for a gamma deteriorating system.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 273 (1): 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.06.020.
Micevski, T., G. Kuczera, and P. Coombes. 2002. “Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8 (2): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:2(49).
Pham, H., and H. Wang. 1996. “Imperfect maintenance.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 94 (3): 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00099-9.
Ranjith, S., S. Setunge, R. Gravina, and S. Venkatesan. 2013. “Deterioration prediction of timber bridge elements using the Markov chain.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27 (3): 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000311.
Ross, S. M. 2000. Introduction to probability models. London: Academic Press.
Seyedhosseini, S. M., H. Moakedi, and K. Shahanaghi. 2018. “Imperfect inspection optimization for a two-component system subject to hidden and two-stage revealed failures over a finite time horizon.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 174 (Jun): 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.02.024.
Song, J. S., V. Lok, K. B. Yoon, Y. W. Ma, and B. O. Kong. 2021. “Quantitative risk-based inspection approach for high-energy piping using a probability distribution function and modification factor.” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Pip. 189 (Feb): 104281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104281.
Tran, D. H., A. W. M. Ng, K. J. McManus, and S. Burn. 2008. “Prediction models for serviceability deterioration of stormwater pipes.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 4 (4): 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470600792236.
Van Oosterom, C. D., A. H. Elwany, D. Çelebi, and G. J. Van Houtum. 2014. “Optimal policies for a delay time model with postponed replacement.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 232 (1): 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.06.038.
Verbert, K., B. De Schutter, and R. Babuška. 2017. “Timely condition-based maintenance planning for multi-component systems.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 159 (Mar): 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.032.
Vladeanu, G., and J. Matthews. 2019. “Wastewater pipe condition rating model using multicriteria decision analysis.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 145 (12): 04019058. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001134.
Wang, H. 2002. “A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 139 (3): 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00197-7.
Wang, W. 2011. “An inspection model based on a three-stage failure process.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 (7): 838–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.03.003.
Wang, W. 2012. “An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modeling.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 106 (Oct): 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.004.
Wirahadikusumah, R., D. Abraham, and T. Iseley. 2001. “Challenging issues in modeling deterioration of combined sewers.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 7 (2): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:2(77).
WSAA (Water Service Association of Australia). 2006. Conduit inspection reporting code of Australia. Melbourne, Australia: WSAA.
Xie, M., and Z. Tian. 2018. “A review on pipeline integrity management utilizing in-line inspection data.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 92 (Oct): 222–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.05.010.
Yang, L., Y. Zhao, R. Peng, and X. Ma. 2018. “Hybrid preventive maintenance of competing failures under random environment.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 174 (Jun): 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.02.017.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 147Issue 11November 2021

History

Received: Jan 25, 2021
Accepted: Jul 13, 2021
Published online: Aug 31, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 31, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Fellow, School of Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Univ., Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Sujeeva Setunge
Professor, School of Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Univ., Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Long Shi
Lecturer, School of Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Univ., Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Progress in Drainage Pipeline Condition Assessment and Deterioration Prediction Models, Sustainability, 10.3390/su15043849, 15, 4, (3849), (2023).
  • Optimisation of Maintenance Policies Based on Right-Censored Failure Data Using a Semi-Markovian Approach, Sensors, 10.3390/s22041432, 22, 4, (1432), (2022).
  • Markov-based deterioration prediction and asset management of floodway structures, Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 10.1080/23789689.2022.2067950, 7, 6, (789-802), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share