Technical Papers
Sep 1, 2021

Service-Driven Modeling Approach to Managing Water Allocation in Priority Doctrine Regions

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 147, Issue 11

Abstract

This work focuses on developing methods to better manage significant imbalances between water supply and demand during droughts. A service-driven approach (Model as a Service, or MaaS) is used to couple river modeling services with optimization services for determining optimal water allocation strategies under daily drought scenarios. It demonstrates the promise of coupling simulation-optimization model services to improve real-time water management in a service driven framework, which should be beneficial to many other water resource applications. The approach is implemented using the DataWolf workflow tool and AzureML Cloud machine learning services and applied to an April 2015 drought event in the Upper Guadalupe River Basin, Texas. Weather and water demand uncertainty are considered through scenario-based optimization. The optimization objective is to minimize the daily total curtailment hours across all groups of permit holders. The scenario analysis shows that the current permit grouping system has a significant impact on the optimal water allocation strategy. The scenarios also demonstrate that noncompliance of junior water users is predicted to have a much greater effect on the river system than noncompliance of senior water users. The resulting framework can be deployed for water allocation in any area by updating water user information, water allocation policy constraints, and river data that can be obtained from publicly available sources.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code used during the study were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgements. The data used in this paper were provided by Kathy Alexander, Cindy Hooper, and others from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and are not publicly available. The code generated during this study can be accessed at https://github.com/tzhao2017/service-driven-modeling. The workflow tool that was used to implement the model services, DataWolf, is open-source and is available at https://datawolf.ncsa.illinois.edu/. The machine learning model development and deployment service applied in this work, Microsoft AzureML, can be accessed through https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/machine-learning/.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Kathy Alexander, Cindy Hooper, and others from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) for providing research data and assistance with formulating the problem. The authors also acknowledge Microsoft Research for funding support, and the Microsoft Azure data science team for technical support.

References

Almoradie, A., A. Jonoski, F. Stoica, D. Solomatine, and I. Popescu. 2013. “Web-based flood information system: Case study of Somesul Mare, Romania.” Environ. Eng. Manage. J. (EEMJ) 12 (5): 1065–1070.
Ames, D. P., J. S. Horsburgh, Y. Cao, J. Kadlec, T. Whiteaker, and D. Valentine. 2012. “HydroDesktop: Web services-based software for hydrologic data discovery, download, visualization, and analysis.” Environ. Modell. Software 37 (Nov): 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.013.
Azure ML Team Microsoft. 2016. “AzureML: Anatomy of a machine learning service.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Predictive APIs and Apps, 1–13. Berlin: Leibniz Association.
Babel, M. S., A. D. Gupta, and D. K. Nayak. 2005. “A model for optimal allocation of water to competing demands.” Water Resour. Manage. 19 (6): 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-3282-4.
Bajcsy, P., R. Kooper, L. Marini, B. Minsker, and J. Myers. 2005. A meta-workflow cyber-infrastructure system designed for environmental observatories.. Urbana, IL: National Center for Supercomputing Applications.
Bonan, G. B. 1996. Land surface model (LSM version 1.0) for ecological, hydrological, and atmospheric studies: Technical description and users guide. Boulder, CO: National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Bumgarner, J. R., and F. E. Thompson. 2012. Simulation of streamflow and the effects of brush management on water yields in the Upper Guadalupe River Watershed, South-Central Texas, 1995–2010. USGS Scientific Invest. Rep. 2012-5051. Washington, DC: USGS.
Chen, S., D. Shao, X. Tan, W. Gu, and C. Lei. 2019. “Nonstationary stochastic simulation–based water allocation method for regional water management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 145 (3): 04018102. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001042.
Combs, S. 2012. “The impact of the 2011 drought and beyond.” Accessed February 6, 2012. https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth542095/m2/1/high_res_d/txcs-0790.pdf.
Cunge, J. A. 1969. “On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Musklngum method)” J. Hydraul. Res. 7 (2): 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686909500264.
David, C. H., F. Habets, D. R. Maidment, and Z. L. Yang. 2011. “RAPID applied to the SIM-France model.” Hydrol. Process. 25 (22): 3412–3425. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8070.
Deb, K. 2000. “An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 186 (2–4): 311–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00389-8.
Dong, C., G. Schoups, and N. van de Giesen. 2013. “Scenario development for water resource planning and management: A review.” Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change 80 (4): 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.015.
Draper, A. J., M. W. Jenkins, K. W. Kirby, J. R. Lund, and R. E. Howitt. 2003. “Economic-engineering optimization for California water management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 129 (3): 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:3(155).
Du, E., X. Cai, N. Brozović, and B. Minsker. 2017. “Evaluating the impacts of farmers’ behaviors on a hypothetical agricultural water market based on double auction.” Water Resour. Res. 53 (5): 4053–4072. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020287.
Fang, S., L. Xu, Y. Zhu, Y. Liu, Z. Liu, H. Pei, J. Yan, and H. Zhang. 2015. “An integrated information system for snowmelt flood early-warning based on internet of things.” Inf. Syst. Front. 17 (2): 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-013-9466-1.
Geller, G. N., and W. Turner. 2007. “The model web: A concept for ecological forecasting.” In Proc., Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp. 2007 IGARSS 2007, 2469–2472. New York: IEEE.
Georgakopoulos, D., M. Hornick, and A. Sheth. 1995. “An overview of workflow management: From process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure.” Distrib. Parallel Databases 3 (2): 119–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01277643.
GitHub. 2017. “Service-driven-modeling.” Accessed December 26, 2018. https://github.com/tzhao2017/service-driven-modeling.
Goldberg, D. E., and J. H. Holland. 1988. “Genetic algorithms and machine learning.” Mach. Learn. 3 (2): 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022602019183.
Gómez-Limón, J. A., C. Gutiérrez-Martín, and N. M. Montilla-López. 2020. “Agricultural water allocation under cyclical scarcity: The role of priority water rights.” Water 12 (6): 1835. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061835.
Goodall, J. L., J. S. Horsburgh, T. L. Whiteaker, D. R. Maidment, and I. Zaslavsky. 2008. “A first approach to web services for the national water information system.” Environ. Modell. Software 23 (4): 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.01.005.
Goodall, J. L., B. F. Robinson, and A. M. Castronova. 2011. “Modeling water resource systems using a service-oriented computing paradigm.” Environ. Modell. Software 26 (5): 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.11.013.
Hamarat, C., J. H. Kwakkel, E. Pruyt, and E. T. Loonen. 2014. “An exploratory approach for adaptive policymaking by using multi-objective robust optimization.” Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory 46 (Aug): 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2014.02.008.
Holland, J. H. 1992. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Huffaker, R., N. Whittlesey, and J. R. Hamilton. 2000. “The role of prior appropriation in allocating water resources into the 21st century.” Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 16 (2): 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900620050003161.
Jacobs, J. M., and R. M. Vogel. 1998. “Optimal allocation of water withdrawals in a river basin.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 124 (6): 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1998)124:6(357).
Jones, D., N. Jones, J. Greer, and J. Nelson. 2015. “A cloud-based MODFLOW service for aquifer management decision support.” Comput. Geosci. 78 (May): 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.02.014.
Kang, D., and K. Lansey. 2012. “Scenario-based robust optimization of regional water and wastewater infrastructure.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 139 (3): 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000236.
Laniak, G. F., et al. 2013. “Integrated environmental modeling: A vision and roadmap for the future.” Environ. Modell. Software 39 (Jan): 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.006.
Lee, G.-E., K. Rollins, and L. Singletary. 2017. An empirical analysis of water allocation efficiency through the prior appropriation doctrine: A case study in the Carson River Valley, Nevada. Milwaukee, WI: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
Lee, S., T. D. Wang, N. Hashmi, and M. P. Cummings. 2007. “Bio-STEER: A semantic web workflow tool for grid computing in the life sciences.” Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 23 (3): 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2006.07.011.
Li, M., W. Xu, and M. W. Rosegrant. 2017. “Irrigation, risk aversion, and water right priority under water supply uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res. 53 (9): 7885–7903. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019779.
L’Oreal Stepney, P. E. 2012. “Issues for the 83rd legislative session.” Accessed February 12, 2012. https://ftp.weat.org/govt/2012HorizonLOreal_presentation.pdf.
Maier, H. R., et al. 2014. “Evolutionary algorithms and other metaheuristics in water resources: Current status, research challenges and future directions.” Environ. Modell. Software 62 (Dec): 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.013.
Marini, L., R. Kooper, P. Bajcsy, and J. Myers. 2007. “Supporting exploration and collaboration in scientific workflow systems.” In Vol. 2007 of Proc., AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
Martin, D. M., D. Harrison-Atlas, N. A. Sutfin, and N. L. Poff. 2014. “A social-ecological framework to integrate multiple objectives for environmental flows management.” J. Contemp. Water Res. Educ. 153 (1): 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2014.03179.x.
McCarthy, G. T. 1938. “The unit hydrograph and flood routing.” In Proc., Conf. of North Atlantic Division, 608–609. Washington, DC: USACE.
McHenry, K., R. Kooper, M. Ondrejcek, L. Marini, and P. Bajcsy. 2011. “A mosaic of software.” In Proc., 2011 Seventh IEEE Int. Conf. on eScience, 279–286. New York: IEEE.
Minsker, B. S. 2005. “Genetic algorithms.” In Hydroinformatics: Data integrative approaches in computation, analysis, and modeling, edited by P. Kumar. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Nicklow, J., et al. 2009. “State of the art for genetic algorithms and beyond in water resources planning and management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 136 (4): 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000053.
Oinn, T., et al. 2004. “Taverna: A tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows.” Bioinformatics 20 (17): 3045–3054. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth361.
Pallottino, S., G. M. Sechi, and P. Zuddas. 2005. “A DSS for water resources management under uncertainty by scenario analysis.” Environ. Modell. Software 20 (8): 1031–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.09.012.
Rahman, A., and Z. Y. Wu. 2018. “Multistep simulation-optimization modeling approach for partitioning water distribution system into district meter areas.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 144 (5): 04018018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000927.
RAPID (Routing Application for Parallel computatIon of Discharge). 2021. “River network routing model.” Accessed June 13, 2021. http://rapid-hub.org/documents.html.
Reed, P., B. S. Minsker, and D. E. Goldberg. 2000. “Designing a competent simple genetic algorithm for search and optimization.” Water Resour. Res. 36 (12): 3757–3761. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900231.
Richter, B. D., R. Mathews, D. L. Harrison, and R. Wigington. 2003. “Ecologically sustainable water management: Managing river flows for ecological integrity.” Ecol. Appl. 13 (1): 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0206:ESWMMR]2.0.CO;2.
Roman, D., S. Schade, A. J. Berre, N. R. Bodsberg, and J. Langlois. 2009. “Model as a service (MaaS).” In Proc., AGILE Workshop: Grid Technologies for Geospatial Applications. Hannover, Germany: Grid Technologies for Geospatial Applications.
Shultz, M. J., and R. J. Corby. 2006. “Development, calibration, and implementation of a distributed hydrologic model for drainage basins located along the Texas Gulf Coast for use in real-time river flood forecast operations.” In Coastal Environment and Water Quality: Proceedings of the AIH 25th Anniversary Meeting & International Conference “Challenges in Coastal Hydrology and Water Quality.” Highland Ranch, CO: Water Resources Publications.
Singh, A. 2014. “Simulation–optimization modeling for conjunctive water use management.” Agric. Water Manage. 141 (Jul): 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.04.003.
Sun, A. 2013. “Enabling collaborative decision-making in watershed management using cloud-computing services.” Environ. Modell. Software 41 (Mar): 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.11.008.
Villa, F., I. N. Athanasiadis, and A. E. Rizzoli. 2009. “Modelling with knowledge: A review of emerging semantic approaches to environmental modeling.” Environ. Modell. Software 24 (5): 577–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.09.009.
Vose, M. D. 1999. Vol. 12 of The simple genetic algorithm: Foundations and theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wang, L., Jr., L. Fang, and K. W. Hipel. 2008. “Basin-wide cooperative water resources allocation.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 190 (3): 798–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.045.
Watkins, D. W., and D. C. McKinney. 1997. “Finding robust solutions to water resources problems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 123 (1): 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1997)123:1(49).
Wright, A. H. 1991. “Genetic algorithms for real parameter optimization.” In Foundations of genetic algorithms, 205–218. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Xevi, E., and S. Khan. 2005. “A multi-objective optimisation approach to water management.” J. Environ. Manage. 77 (4): 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.06.013.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 147Issue 11November 2021

History

Received: Sep 9, 2020
Accepted: Jun 18, 2021
Published online: Sep 1, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Feb 1, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Tingting Zhao [email protected]
Applied Scientist, Microsoft Corporate, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Barbara Minsker
Professor and Department Chair, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Southern Methodist Univ., Dallas, TX 75275.
Jacob Spoelstra
Director of Data Science, Microsoft Corporate, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052.
Christopher Navarro
Lead Research Programmer, National Center for Super Computing Applications, 1205 W. Clark St., Urbana, IL 61801.
Jong Lee
Deputy Associate Director, National Center for Super Computing Applications, 1205 W. Clark St., Urbana, IL 61801.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Relationship between Student Engagement and Academic Network Properties, Construction Research Congress 2022, 10.1061/9780784483985.022, (214-223), (2022).
  • Network Topologies and Team Performance: A Comparative Study of AEC Projects, Construction Research Congress 2022, 10.1061/9780784483978.108, (1062-1071), (2022).
  • Efficient Metamodel Approach to Handling Constraints in Nonlinear Optimization for Drought Management, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001476, 147, 12, (2021).
  • Integrative Collaboration in Fragmented Project Organizations: Network Perspective, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002149, 147, 10, (2021).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share