Case Studies
Jul 5, 2016

Effectiveness of Best Management Practices for Stormwater Treatment as a Function of Runoff Volume

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 142, Issue 11

Abstract

Best management practices (BMPs) such as bioretentions, dry and wet ponds, porous pavement, and many other methods are widely used to reduce the runoff volume and the concentration of sediments and nutrients in the runoff. Numerical models are used to develop and assess water quality management plans that, among others, include BMPs. Those models need to take into account the BMP effectiveness to remove pollutants, being a function of the volume of daily runoff, in order to estimate their performance under a range of different climate scenarios. Circumventing the lack of monitoring data, this study used the Environmental Protection Agency’s system for urban stormwater treatment and analysis integration model (SUSTAIN) to run 22 years (1984–2005) of runoff data from the Patuxent River (Maryland) through seven types of BMPs. It was found that BMP effectiveness decreases sooner, steeper, and deeper with increasing sizes of storm events than assumed in the Chesapeake Bay Phase 5 watershed model. At a minimum, the resulting performance curves should differentiate among BMPs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This paper was written during a summer associateship at the RAND Corporation and is part of a project for the U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development. Jordan Fischbach and Edmundo Molina-Perez at the RAND Corporation advised the project. Gopal Bhatt, Gary Shenk, James Goodrich, Susan Julius, and Tom Johnson at EPA provided valuable help along the way. At the RAND Corporation, Rob Lempert, Abdul Tariq, and David Johnson contributed advice.

References

Ackerman, D., and Stein, E. (2008). “Evaluating the effectiveness of best management practices using dynamic modeling.” J. Environ. Eng., 628–639.
Bahr, R., et al. (2012). “Recommendations of the expert panel to define removal rates for urban stormwater retrofit projects.” 〈〉 (May 17, 2016).
Barber, M., King, S., Yonge, D., and Hathhorn, W. (2003). “Ecology ditch: A best management practice for storm water runoff mitigation.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 111–122.
Barrett, M., Walsh, P., Jr., and Charbeneau, R. (1998). “Performance of vegetative controls for treating highway runoff.” J. Environ. Eng., 1121–1128.
Bobée, B. (1975). “The log Pearson type 3 distribution and its application in hydrology.” Water Resour. Res., 11(5), 681–689.
Carpenter, D., and Kaluvakolanu, P. (2011). “Effect of roof surface type on storm-water runoff from full-scale roofs in a temperate climate.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 161–169.
Chesapeake Bay Program. (2012). “Phase 5.3 watershed model.” 〈http://www.chesapeakebay.net/about/programs/modeling/53〉 (May 17, 2016).
Damodaram, C. (2010). “Simulating and optimizing storm water management strategies in an urban watershed.” M.S. thesis, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX.
Dietz, M. E. (2007). “Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommendations for future directions.” Water Air Soil Pollut., 186(1), 351–363.
Groves, D. G., and Lempert, R. J. (2007). “A new analytic method for finding policy-relevant scenarios.” Glob. Environ. Change, 17(1), 73–85.
Heitz, L. F., Khosrowpanah, S., and Nelson, J. (2000). “Sizing of surface water runoff detention ponds for water quality improvement.” JAWRA, 36(3), 541–548.
Hunt, W. F., and Winston, M. R. J. (2010). “Investigating level spreader vegetated filter strip systems for stormwater management.” 〈〉 (May 17, 2016).
Jones, J., Clary, J., Strecker, E., and Quigley, M. (2008). “Reasons you should think twice before using percent removal to assess BMP performance.” Stormwater Magazine, Santa Barbara, CA.
Jones, J., Langan, T., Fassman, E., Urbonas, B., Strecker, E., and Quigley, M. (2004). “Why is it so difficult to acquire reliable BMP performance data?” Critical transitions in water and environmental resources management, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–8.
Koch, B. J., Febria, C. M., Gevrey, M., Wainger, L. A., and Palmer, M. A. (2014). “Nitrogen removal by stormwater management structures: A data synthesis.” JAWRA, 50(6), 1594–1607.
Lai, D., Dai, T., Zhen, J., Riverson, J., Alvi, K., and Shoemaker, L. (2007). “SUSTAIN—An EPA BMP process and placement tool for urban watersheds.” Proc., WEF 2007 TMDL Specialty Conf., Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, VA, 946–968.
Lempert, R. J., Groves, D. G., Popper, S. W., and Bankes, S. C. (2006). “A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios.” Manag. Sci., 52(4), 514–528.
Li, H., Sharkey, L., Hunt, W., and Davis, A. (2009). “Mitigation of impervious surface hydrology using bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 407–415.
Maryland Department of Natural Resources. (2007). “Maryland tributary strategy Patuxent river basin summary.”, Annapolis, MD.
Maryland Department of Planning, Agriculture and Natural Resources. (2010). “Maryland’s phase I watershed implementation plan for the Chesapeake Bay total maximum daily load.” Baltimore.
Meng, Y., Wang, H., Chen, J., and Zhang, S. (2014). “Modelling hydrology of a single bioretention system with HYDRUS-1D.” Sci. World J., 1–10.
Oregon State University. (2006). “Evaluation of best management practices and low impact development for highway runoff control.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Schueler, T. R. (2011). “Nutrient accounting methods to document local stormwater load reductions in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.”, Chesapeake Stormwater Network, Ellicott City, MD.
Schueler, T. R., and Claytor, R. A. (2000). “Maryland stormwater design manual.” Dept. of the Environment, Baltimore.
Shoemaker, L. (2009). “Framework for placement of best management practices in urban watersheds to protect water quality.”, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC.
Singelis, N., and Kosco, J. (2008). “How to choose better stormwater BMPs.” Civil Structural Engineer, Fayetteville, AR, 〈〉.
Solomon, S., Plattner, G.-K., Knutti, R., and Friedlingstein, P. (2009). “Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 106(6), 1704–1709.
SUSTAIN [Computer software]. Sustain, LLC, Scarborough, ME.
U.S. EPA. (2008). “Three keys to BMP performance: Concentration, volume and total load.” National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. (2010a). “A method to assess climate-relevant decisions: Application in the Chesapeake Bay (2010 external review draft).”, Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. (2010b). “Chesapeake Bay Phase 5.3 community watershed model.”, Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, MD.
U.S. EPA. (2010c). “Chesapeake Bay total maximum daily load for nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment.”, Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. (2010d). “Estimates for county-level nitrogen and phosphorus data for use in modeling pollutant reduction: Documentation for scenario builder version 2.2.” Washington, DC.
U.S. EPA. (2014). “How does it work? Ensuring results in the bay.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/reg3wapd/tmdl/ChesapeakeBay/EnsuringResults.html?tab2=1〉 (Dec. 2, 2014).
U.S. EPA. (2015a). “Water quality models.” 〈http://water.epa.gov/scitech/datait/models/〉 (Jan. 23, 2015).
U.S. EPA. (2015b). “Watershed models ecosystems research.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/athens/wwqtsc/html/watershed_models.html〉 (Jan. 23, 2015).
Walsh, P. M., Barrett, M. E., Malina, J. F., and Charbeneau, R. J. (1997). “Use of vegetative controls for treatment of highway runoff.” Center of Research in Water Resources, Bureau of Engineering Research, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
WERF, EWRI, EPA. (2016). “U.S. Department of transportation.” 〈http://www.bmpdatabase.org/〉 (Feb. 12, 2014).
Wright Water Engineers and Geosyntec Consultants. (2012). “BMP performance summary: Chesapeake Bay and related areas.” 〈〉 (May 17, 2016).
Wright Water Engineers and Geosyntec Consultants. (2012). “International stormwater best management practices (BMP) database: Narrative overview of BMP database study characteristics.” ASCE, Reston, VA.
Wurbs, R. A. (1997). Computer models for water-resources planning and management: National study of water management during drought, A&M Texas Univ., College Station, TX.
Zahmatkesh, Z., Burian, S. J., Karamouz, M., Tavakol-Davani, H., and Goharian, E. (2015). “Low-impact development practices to mitigate climate change effects on urban stormwater runoff: Case study of New York City.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 04014043.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 142Issue 11November 2016

History

Received: Jun 19, 2015
Accepted: Mar 23, 2016
Published online: Jul 5, 2016
Published in print: Nov 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Dec 5, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Frauke Hoss, Ph.D. [email protected]
Dept. of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon Univ., 5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jordan Fischbach, Ph.D. [email protected]
RAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Ave., Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. E-mail: [email protected]
Edmundo Molina-Perez [email protected]
Pardee RAND Graduate School, 1776 Main St., P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share