Case Studies
Jul 13, 2016

Simulation Modeling to Secure Environmental Flows in a Diversion Modified Flow Regime

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 142, Issue 11

Abstract

This paper describes the development and application of a spreadsheet model to evaluate effects of water management on diversion modified flow regimes, enabling the exploration of novel ways to meet proposed environmental flow standards. Mill Creek, a northern California river with an altered flow regime that impacts aquatic species, was used as a case study. Test cases examined how water management alternatives, such as groundwater pumping, water rights transfers, and water exchange agreements, can improve environmental flow allocations given irrigation water demands. Four test cases include passage flows for Chinook salmon and steelhead trout, a minimum instream flow, 80% of natural flow, and a spring recession flow with functional flow components. The model identified late October as consistently water-scarce, even in wet years. These analyses suggest that fall shortages for fish migration could be eliminated through a water exchange agreement combined with use of wells. All cases except the minimum fish passage flow case required acquisition of the largest water rights to decrease environmental shortages by over 80%, with a substantial curtailment in irrigation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Maurice Hall, Tom Harmon, Erik Porse, David Rheinheimer, Gregg Werner, Ann Willis, Sarah Yarnell, and members of Jay Lund’s Water Systems Research group at UC Davis for insightful discussion and feedback on this work. This research was supported by the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences, The Nature Conservancy, and the UC Davis Hydrologic Sciences Graduate Group Fellowship.

References

Acreman, M., et al. (2008). “Developing environmental standards for abstractions from U.K. rivers to implement the EU water framework directive.” Hydrol. Sci. J., 53(6), 1105–1120.
Acreman, M., et al. (2014). “Environmental flows for natural, hybrid, and novel riverine ecosystems in a changing world.” Front. Ecol. Environ., 12(8), 466–473.
Arthington, A. H. (2012). Environmental flows: Saving rivers in the third millennium, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Baron, J. S., et al. (2002). “Meeting ecological and societal needs for freshwater.” Ecol. Appl., 12(5), 1247–1260.
Brisbane Declaration. (2007). “The Brisbane declaration: Environmental flows are essential for freshwater ecosystem health and human well-being.” 10th Int. River Symp. and Int. Environmental Flows Conf., Brisbane, Australia.
Bunn, S. E., and Arthington, A. H. (2002). “Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity.” Environ. Manage., 30(4), 492–507.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. (2015). “State and federally listed endangered and threatened animals of California.” Sacramento, CA.
California Department of Water Resources. (2013). “Chronological reconstructed Sacramento and San Joaquin valley water year hydrologic classification indices.” Sacramento, CA.
California State Water Resources Control Board. (2015). “Curtailment order in the matter of diversion of water from antelope creek tributary to the Sacramento River in Tehama County.”, Sacramento, CA.
Deitch, M. J., Merenlender, A. M., and Feirer, S. (2013). “Cumulative effects of small reservoirs on streamflow in northern coastal California catchments.” Water Resour. Manage., 27(15), 5101–5118.
Dudgeon, D., et al. (2006). “Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.” Biol. Rev., 81(2), 163–182.
Dudgeon, D. (2010). “Prospects for sustaining freshwater biodiversity in the 21st century: Linking ecosystem structure and function.” Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability, 2(5–6), 422–430.
Fereres, E., and Soriano, M. A. (2007). “Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use.” J. Exp. Bot., 58(2), 147–159.
Gorla, L., and Perona, P. (2013). “On quantifying ecologically sustainable flow releases in a diverted river reach.” J. Hydrol., 489, 98–107.
Heiman, D., and Knecht, M. L. (2010). “A roadmap to watershed management.” Sacramento River Watershed Program, Chico, CA.
Howard, T. (2014). “National marine fisheries service and California department of fish and game voluntary drought agreements on mill creek.” California State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, CA.
Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration version 7.1 [Computer software]. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
Jager, H. I. (2014). “Thinking outside the channel: Timing pulse flows to benefit salmon via indirect pathways.” Ecol. Modell., 273, 117–127.
Kiernan, J. D., Moyle, P., and Crain, P. K. (2012). “Restoring native fish assemblages to a regulated California stream using the natural flow regime concept.” Ecol. Appl., 22(5), 1472–1482.
Mason, A. J. (2012). “OpenSolver—An open source add-in to solve linear and integer programmes in excel.” Operations Research Proc., 2011, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 401–406.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L. (2007). “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
Moyle, P. (2002). Inland fishes of California, University of California Press, Oakland, CA.
Moyle, P. B., and Randall, P. J. (1996). “Sierra Nevada ecosystem project, final report to congress, vol. II, assessments and scientific basis for management options.” Univ. of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, Davis, CA.
Naiman, R. J., and Dudgeon, D. (2011). “Global alteration of freshwaters: Influences on human and environmental well-being.” Ecol. Res., 26(5), 865–873.
Nel, J. L., et al. (2009). “Progress and challenges in freshwater conservation planning.” Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst., 19(4), 474–485.
Null, S. E., and Viers, J. H. (2013). “In bad waters: Water year classification in nonstationary climates.” Water Resour. Res., 49(2), 1137–1148.
OpenSolver 2.6 [Computer software]. 〈http://opensolver.org/〉.
Palmer, T. (2012). Field guide to California rivers, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Perona, P., Durrenmatt, D. J., and Characklis, G. W. (2013). “Obtaining natural-like flow releases in diverted river reaches from simple riparian benefit economic models.” J. Environ. Manage., 118, 161–169.
Poff, N. L., et al. (1997). “The natural flow regime.” Bioscience, 47(11), 769–784.
Postel, S. L., and Richter, B. D. (2003). Rivers for life: Managing water for people and nature, Island Press, Washington, DC.
Razurel, P., Gorla, L., Crouzy, B., and Perona, P. (2016). “Non-proportional repartition rules optimize environmental flows and energy production.” Water Resour. Manage., 30(1), 207–223.
Richter, B. D., Baumgartner, J. V., Powell, J., and Braun, D. P. (1996). “A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems.” Conserv. Biol., 10(4), 1163–1174.
Richter, B. D., and Thomas, G. A. (2007). “Restoring environmental flows by modifying dam operations.” Ecol. Soc., 12(1), 12.
Rood, S. B., Samuelson, G. M., Braatne, J. H., Gourley, C. R., Hughes, F. M. R., and Mahoney, J. M. (2005). “Managing river flows to restore floodplain forests.” Front. Ecol. Environ., 3(4), 193–201.
Sala, O. E., et al. (2000). “Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100.” Science, 287(5459), 1770–1774.
Shiau, J.-T., and Wu, F.-C. (2013). “Optimizing environmental flows for multiple reaches affected by a multipurpose reservoir system in Taiwan: Restoring natural flow regimes at multiple temporal scales.” Water Resour. Res., 49(1), 565–584.
Shiklomanov, I. A. (1993). “World fresh water resources.” Water in crisis: A guide to the world’s fresh water resources, P. H. Gleick, ed., Oxford University Press, New York.
Superior Court of Tehama County. (1920). “Los Molinos land company & Coneland water company vs. Clarence V. Clough.” Red Bluff, CA.
Swain, D. L., et al. (2014). “The extraordinary California drought of 2013/2014: Character, context, and the role of climate change.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95(9), S3–S7.
Tharme, R. E. (2003). “A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: Emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers.” River Res. Appl., 19(5–6), 397–441.
van der Keur, P., et al. (2008). “Identification of major sources of uncertainty in current IWRM practice. Illustrated for the Rhine Basin.” Water Resour. Manage., 22(11), 1677–1708.
Viers, J. H. (2008). “Objective classification of Navarro river salmon habitat: A watershed-based critical habitat case study.” Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst., 18(2), 147–162.
Vorosmarty, C. J., et al. (2010). “Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity.” Nature, 467(7315), 555–561.
Willis, A., et al. (2015). “Instream flows: New tools to quantify water quality conditions for returning adult Chinook salmon.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04015056.
Yarnell, S. M., et al. (2015). “Functional flows in modified riverscapes: Hydrographs, habitats and opportunities.” BioScience, 65(10), 963–972.
Yarnell, S. M., Viers, J. H., and Mount, J. F. (2010). “Ecology and management of the spring snowmelt recession.” Bioscience, 60(2), 114–127.
Yin, X.-A., Yang, Z.-F., and Petts, G. E. (2011). “Reservoir operating rules to sustain environmental flows in regulated rivers.” Water Resour. Res., 47(8), W08509.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 142Issue 11November 2016

History

Received: Nov 24, 2015
Accepted: Apr 28, 2016
Published online: Jul 13, 2016
Published in print: Nov 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Dec 13, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Specialist, School of Engineering, Univ. of California, Merced, CA 95343 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
T. Rodd Kelsey
Forests and Agriculture Lead Scientist, The Nature Conservancy, 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1290, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Jeanette K. Howard
Freshwater Lead Scientist, The Nature Conservancy, 201 Mission St., 4th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105.
Jay R. Lund
Professor, Center for Watershed Sciences, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Samuel Sandoval-Solis
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Land Air and Water Resources, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616.
Joshua H. Viers
Associate Professor, School of Engineering, Univ. of California, Merced, CA 95343.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share