New Integrated Condition-Assessment Model for Combined Storm-Sewer Systems
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 139, Issue 1
Abstract
Optimal assessment of the overall state of the degradation affecting sewer systems requires consideration of both the hydraulic and the structural aspects. This work identifies a set of 15 factors—pertaining to both degradation aspects—as primary and constituting the framework for hierarchical structuring of the condition states. The relative importance of these factors was determined by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The proposed model was successfully applied to assess the current degradation state of the sewer network in Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec. The relative significance effect, assessing prevalence of either the hydraulic or the structural criteria in the degradation process, was established through sensitivity analysis. The outcome indicates that hydraulic factors have to be integrated in the pipe-deterioration model as well as the structural factors. With a reference case set at (i.e., structural and hydraulic criteria having the same significance level), results remained conservative most of the time. Even if the AHP technique was already applied in sewers and water mains as shown in the literature, this paper is unique in that the AHP technique is used to combine a large number (fifteen) of structural and hydraulic criteria and subcriteria. The proposed model will enable researchers and municipal engineers to weigh the structural criterion against the hydraulic criterion to achieve adequate intervention that is carefully planned through a flexible tool outlaying a hierarchy of scores reflecting the infrastructure under consideration.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
We are thankful to MDEIE (Ministère de Développement Économique, Industrie et Exportation—Quebec) for financing the study and to the cities of Verdun and St. Hyacinthe for providing the data.
References
Abraham, D., Wirahadikusumah, R., Short, T., and Shahbahrami, S. (1998). “Optimization modeling for sewer network management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(5), 402–410.
Al-Barqawi, H. (2006). “Condition rating models for underground infrastructure: Sustainable water mains.” M.S. thesis, Concordia Univ., Montreal, Canada.
Ariaratnam, S., El-Assaly, A., and Yang, Y. (2001). “Assessment of infrastructure inspection needs using logistic models.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 7(4), 160–165.
Baur, R., and Herz, R. (2002). “Selective inspection planning with aging forecast for sewer types.” Water Sci. Technol., 46(6–7), 389–396.
Bengassem, J. (2001). “Élaboration d’un système d’aide au diagnostique hydraulique et structural des réseaux d’assainissement urbains.” Thèse de doctorat, École de Technologie Supérieure, Université du Québec (in French).
Bennis, S., Bengassem, J., and Lamarre, P. (2001). “Méthodologie de partage des responsabilités de refoulement entre les tronçons d'un réseau de drainage urbain.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Innovative technologies in urban storm drainage, NOVATECH 2001, 87–91 (in French), GRAIE, Villeurbanne, FRANCE.
Centre de Recherche et d’Expertise en Infrastructures Urbaines (CERIU). (2009). Programme de certification visant l’évaluation de l’état des conduites, version 4.3.1 (in French) Montreal, Canada.
Chughtai, F., and Zayed, T. (2007). “Structural condition models for sewer pipeline.” Pipelines 2007: Advances and experiences with trenchless pipeline projects, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Chughtai, F., and Zayed, T. (2008). “Infrastructure condition prediction models for sustainable sewer pipeline.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 22(5), 333–341.
Davies, J. P., Clarke, B. A., Whiter, J. T., and Cunningham, R. J. (2001a). “Factors influencing the structural deterioration and collapse of rigid sewer pipes.” Urban Water, 3(1–2), 73–89.
Davies, J. P., Clarke, B. A., Whiter, J. T., Cunningham, R. J., and Leidi, A. (2001b). “The structural condition of rigid pipes: A statistical investigation.” Urban Water, 3(4), 277–286.
Federation of Canadian Municipalities and National Research Council. (2004). “Examen et évaluation d’un réseau de collecte d’eaux pluviales ou d’eaux usées.” National guide to sustainable municipal infrastructure, Issue No. 1.0, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Fuamba, M., Ibrango, S., and Mahdi, T. (2007). “Hydraulic performance degradation of a conduit section: Case study of an ageing drainage system in Montreal.” Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Sustainable Techniques and Strategies in Urban Water Management, NOVATECH 2007, GRAIE, Lyon, FRANCE.
Grigg, N. (1994). “Maintenance management systems for urban drainage.” Proc., Urban Rehabilitation Programs Techniques, ASCE, New York, 2–10.
Hasegawa, K., Wada, Y., and Miura, H. (1999). “New assessment system for premeditated management and maintenance of sewer pipe networks.” Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Urban Storm Drainage, Sydney, Australia, 586–593.
Kleiner, B., Rajani, B., and Sadiq, R. (2005). “Application of a fuzzy Markov model to plan the renewal of large-diameter buried pipes: A case study.” Proc., Computer and Control in the Water Industry (CCWI) 2005, Exeter, UK, 1–6.
Ministère des affaires municipales et des régions (MAMR). (2005). “Guide d’élaboration d’un plan d’intervention pour le renouvellement des conduites d’eau potable et d’égout.” Quebec, Canada, (in French).
McDonald, S., and Zhao, J. (2001). “Condition assessment and rehabilitation of large sewers.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Underground Infrastructure Research, Waterloo, Canada, 361–369.
Najafi, M., and Kulandaivel, G. (2005). “Pipeline condition predicting using neural network models.” Pipelines 2005: Optimizing pipeline design, operations, and maintenance in today’s economy, ASCE, New York, 767–781.
National Research Council Canada- Conseil national de recherches Canada (NRC-CNRC). (2003). “Deterioration and inspection of water distribution systems, a best practice by the national guide to sustainable municipal infrastructure.” Federation of Canadian Municipalities and National Research Council, Ottawa, Canada, 34.
Rajani, B., Kleiner, Y., and Sadiq, R. (2006). “Translation of pipe inspection results into condition ratings using the fuzzy synthetic evaluation technique.” J. Water Supply: Res. Technol.—AQUA, 55, 11–24.
Rostrum, J., Baur, R., Saegrov, S., Horold, S., and Schilling, W. (1999). “Predictive service-life models for urban water infrastructure management.” Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Urban Storm Drainage, Sydney, Australia, 594–601.
Ruwanpura, J., Ariaratnam, S., and El-Assaly, A. (2004). “Prediction models for sewer infrastructure utilizing rule-based simulation.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst., 21(3), 169–185.
Saaty, T. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Saaty, T. (1982). Decision-making for leaders: The analytic hierarchy process for decision in a complex world, Lifetime Learning, Belmont, CA.
Saegrov, S. (2006). CARE-S Computer Aided Rehabilitation of Sewer and Storm Water Networks, IWA Publishing, London, UK.
Tabesh, M., and Madani, S. (2006). “A performance indicator for wastewater collection systems.” Water Pract. Technol., 1(4), 318–324.
Yan, J. M., and Vairavamoorthy, K. (2003). “Fuzzy approach for pipe condition assessment.” 2003 Int. Conf. on Pipeline Engineering and Construction, ASCE, New York, 466–476.
Yang, M.-D., Su, T.-C., and Chen, Y.-P. (2005). “Priority evaluation of sewerage rehabilitation by AHP.” Pipeline 2005, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 12, 2010
Accepted: Nov 30, 2011
Published online: Dec 2, 2011
Published in print: Jan 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.