Technical Papers
May 20, 2011

Option Games in Water Infrastructure Investment

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 138, Issue 3

Abstract

This paper proposes the use of option games as a tool to evaluate trade-offs between flexibility and strategic commitment in industrial water infrastructure projects. Option games meet the challenge of balancing competitive pressure to commit to big-budget projects against a more flexible approach that keeps investment options open. This hybrid approach, which combines real options and game theory, overcomes the shortcoming of traditional investment valuation methods, such as net present value or real option analysis, which do not resolve the challenge. The option games are enumerated by combining a real-options binomial tree and a payoff matrix under conditions of two investment competitors with four strategic scenarios. The calculated results are compared with traditional net present value and real option analysis to show the final value of investment. The application methodology is illustrated through the case of Government of Thailand (GoT) investments in tap and industrial water supplies and/or the private sector (PS) in recycled-water development. The investments are evaluated under four different strategic scenarios: (1) both invest, (2) GoT invests first, PS waits, (3) PS invests but GoT waits, and (4) both wait. The paper indicates that option games provide a tool that allows decision makers to accurately value all choices with consideration not only of future uncertainties, but also of competitors’ decisions. Policy makers or managers can make rational investment decisions by quantifying the values of commitment and flexibility.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Aguerrevere, F. L. (2003). “Equilibrium investment strategies and output price behavior: A real-options approach.” Rev. Financ. Stud., 16(4), 1239–1272.
Angelou, G. N., and Economides, A. A. (2009). “A multi-criteria game theory and real-options model for irreversible ICT investment decisions.” Telecommun. Policy, 33(10–11), 686–705.
Bernardo, A. E., and Chowdhry, B. (2002). “Resources, real options, and corporate strategy.” J. Financ. Econ.JFECDT, 63(2), 211–234.
Benaroch, M. (2002). “Managing information technology investment risk: A real options perspective.” J. Manage. Inf. Syst., 19(2), 43–84.JMISEB
Chan, S. H., Kensinger, J. W., Keown, A. J., and Martin, J. D. (1997). “Do strategic alliances create value?J. Financ. Econ.JFECDT, 46(2), 199–221.
Chiara, N., Garvin, M. J., and Vecer, J. (2007). “Valuing simple multiple-exercise real options in infrastructure projects.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.JITSE4, 13(2), 97–104.
Cortazar, G. (2001). “Simulation and numerical methods in real options valuation.” Real options and investment under uncertainty: Classical readings and recent contributions, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 601–620.
Cortelezzi, F., and Villani, G. (2009). “Valuation of R&D sequential exchange options using Monte Carlo approach.” Comput. Econ.CNOMEL, 33(3), 209–236.
Cox, J. C., Ross, S. A., and Rubinstein, M. (1979). “Option pricing: A simplified approach.” J. Financ. Econ.JFECDT, 7(3), 229–263.
Ferreira, N., Kar, J., and Trigeorgis, L. (2009). “Option games: The key to competing in capital-intensive industries.” Harv. Bus. Rev., 87(3), 101–108.HABRAX
Ford, D. N., Lander, D. M., and Voyer, J. J. (2002). “A real options approach to valuing strategic flexibility in uncertain construction projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 20(4), 343–351.
Gamba, A. (2003). “Real options valuation: A Monte Carlo approach.” Working Paper Series 2002/03, Faculty of Management, Univ. of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Grenadier, S. R. (2002). “Option exercise games: An application to the equilibrium investment strategies of firms.” Rev. Financ. Stud., 15(3), 691–721.
Ho, S. P., and Liu, L. Y. (2002). “An option pricing-based model for evaluating the financial viability of privatized infrastructure projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 20(2), 143–156.
Huo, Y., Wang, J., and Yang, D. (2009). “Investment in collaborative e-commerce platform based on option game.” ICIC Express Letters, 3(1), 85–91.
Japan Industrial Water Association (JIWA). (2010). “Industrial water use.” 〈http://www.jiwa-web.jp〉 (Aug. 19, 2010).
Kong, J. J., and Kwok, Y. K. (2007). “Real options in strategic investment games between two asymmetric firms.” Eur. J. Oper. Res.EJORDT, 181(2), 967–985.
Kulatilaka, N., and Perotti, E. C. (1998). “Strategic growth options.” Manage. Sci.MSCIAM, 44(8), 1021–1031.
Kumar, R. L. (1995). “An options view of investments in expansion-flexible manufacturing systems.” Int. J. Prod. Econ.IJPEE6, 38(2–3), 281–291.
Lambrecht, B., and Perraudin, W. (2003). “Real options and preemption under incomplete information.” J. Econ. Dyn. ControlJEDCDH, 27(4), 619–643.
Longstaff, F. A., and Schwartz, E. S. (2001). “Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach.” Rev. Financ. Stud., 14(1), 113–147.
Maklan, S., Knox, S., and Ryals, L. (2005). “Using real options to help build the business case for CRM investment.” Long Range Plann.LRPJA4, 38(4), 393–410.
McGrath, R. G. (1997). “A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 22(4), 974–996.
McGrath, R. G., and MacMillan, I. C. (2000). “Assessing technology projects using real options reasoning.” Res. Technol. Manage.RTMAEC, 43(4), 35–49.
Metropolitan Waterworks Authority (MWA). (2006). Annual report 2006, Bangkok, Thailand.
Metropolitan Waterworks Authority (MWA). (2009). Annual report 2009, Bangkok, Thailand.
Miller, K. D., and Waller, H. G. (2003). “Scenarios, real options and integrated risk management.” Long Range Plann.LRPJA4, 36(1), 93–107.
Mody, A. (1993). “Learning through alliances.” J. Econ. Behav. Organ.JEBOD9, 20(2), 151–170.
Pawlina, G., and Kort, P. M. (2006). “Real options in an asymmetric duopoly: Who benefits from your competitive disadvantage.” J. Econ. Manage. Strategy, 15(1), 1–35.
Peter, Boer, F. (2000). “Valuation of technology using real options.” Res. Technol. Manage.RTMAEC, 43(4), 26–30.
Pindyck, R. S. (1993). “Investments of uncertain cost.” J. Financ. Econ.JFECDT, 34(1), 53–76.
Shackleton, M. B., Tsekrekos, A. E., and Wojakowski, R. (2004). “Strategic entry and market leadership in a two-player real option game.” J. Bank Financ.JBFIDO, 28(1), 179–201.
Smit, H. T. J. (2003). “Infrastructure investment as a real option games: The case of European airport expansion.” Financ. Manage.FINMEE, 32(4), 27–57.
Smit, H. T. J., and Trigeorgis, L. (2007). “Strategic options and games in analysing dynamic technology investments.” Long Range Plann.LRPJA4, 40(1), 84–114.
Smit, H. T. J., and Trigeorgis, L. (2009). “Valuing infrastructure investment: An option games approach.” Calif. Manage. Rev., 51(2), 79–100.
Suttinon, P. (2008). “Water demand management model in the Lower Chao Phraya River Basin, Thailand.” Ph.D. dissertation, Kochi Univ. of Technology, Kochi, Japan.
Suttinon, P., and Nasu, S. (2010). “Real options for increasing value in industrial water infrastructure.” Water Resour. Manage.WRMAEJ, 24(12), 2881–2892.
Tokyo Metropolitan Government (TMG). (2009). “Water supply in Tokyo.” 〈http://www.waterworks.metro.tokyo.jp〉 (Aug. 20, 2010).
Villani, G. (2008). “An R&D investment game under uncertainty in real option analysis.” Comput. Econ.CNOMEL, 32(1–2), 199–219.
Wang, T. (2005). “Real options “in” projects and systems design - identification of options and solution for path dependency.” Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Wu, S. D., Erkoc, M., and Karabuk, S. (2005). “Managing capacity in the high-tech industry: A review of literature.” Eng. Econ.ENECAR, 50(2), 125–158.
Ye, S., Tiong, R. L. K. (2000). “NPV-at-risk method in infrastructure project investment evaluation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 126(3), 227–233.
Zhao, T., Sundararajan, S. K., and Tseng, C.-L. (2004). “Highway development decision-making under uncertainty: A real options approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.JITSE4, 10(1), 23–32.
Zhao, T., Tseng, C.-L. (2003). “Valuing flexibility in infrastructure expansion.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.JITSE4, 9(3), 89–97.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 138Issue 3May 2012
Pages: 268 - 276

History

Received: Aug 23, 2010
Accepted: May 18, 2011
Published online: May 20, 2011
Published in print: May 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Pongsak Suttinon [email protected]
Research Center for Social Management, Kochi Univ. of Technology, 185 Miyanokuchi, Tosayamada-cho, Kami-city, Kochi, 782-8502, Japan (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Asif Mumtaz Bhatti
Research Center for Social Management, Kochi Univ. of Technology, 185 Miyanokuchi, Tosayamada-cho, Kami-city, Kochi, 782-8502, Japan.
Seigo Nasu, M.ASCE
Dept. of Management, Kochi Univ. of Technology, 185 Miyanokuchi, Tosayamada-cho, Kami-city, Kochi, 782-8502, Japan.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share